An Evaluation of the Effect of Periodontal Biotype on Inter-Dental Papilla Proportions, Distances Between Facial and Palatal Papillae in the Maxillary Anterior Dentition

Importance of periodontal phenotype in periodontics and restorative dentistry: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Periodontal phenotype is regarded to be one of the key factors influencing the efficacy of restorative therapies in dental practice. The objective of the systematic review was to explore the importance of thin and thick periodontal phenotypes and how they affect the outcome of periodontal and restorative therapies by looking at a number of academic publications from various online databases.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review standards), relevant data will be searched and retrieved from three significant scientific databases, including PubMed, EBSCO, and Scopus. The articles with full texts that matched the keywords and published in English between 2018 and 2023 were taken into consideration.

RESULTS

The majorities of these articles were based on the type of periodontal phenotype and their impact on periodontal and restorative treatment outcomes were selected. The initial search yielded a total of 530 articles. Only 273 were relevant to the review's objectives, and these were considered for determining eligibility. Only 20 publications were eligible for analysis.

CONCLUSION

Understanding these anatomical aspects of periodontal phenotype is crucial to both periodontology and restorative dentistry. The clinical outcome of restorative, prosthetic, orthodontic, surgical, and periodontal therapies is determined in large part by the periodontal phenotype, which also plays a significant role in clinical failure or success in dental treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study protocol registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) dated 16th June 2023 with the registration ID CRD42023432568.

Soft tissue phenotype modification impacts on peri-implant stability: a comparative cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Soft tissue phenotype modification (STPM) could be performed to maintain peri-implant health. Therefore, the aim of the study was to analyze tissue alteration around implants following soft tissue phenotype modification during implant uncovering surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had STPM (either pouch roll or modified roll technique) during implant second-stage surgery with at least 12-month follow-up were included. Clinical and radiographic parameters including mucosal tissue thickness (MTT), recession (REC), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), probing pocket depth (PPD), marginal bone loss (MBL), emergence profile, and emergence angle were extracted from 2-week, 2-month, and 12-month visits after second-stage surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with 33 implants that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. After soft tissue phenotype modification, at 2 weeks, REC was negatively correlated to mean MTT at mid-buccal site (r =  - 0.41, p = 0.018) and borderline correlated at mid-lingual site (r =  - 0.343, p = 0.051). Stable KMW was maintained from 2 weeks to 12 months with minimal shrinkage rate (3 ~ 14%). MBL change was limited (0.24 ~ 0.47 mm) after STPM. All implants had shallow PPD (≤ 3 mm) with the absence of bleeding on probing. Emergence angle at the mesial side, however, was significantly correlated to surgical techniques, which indicated pouch roll technique would have 6.96 degrees more than modified roll technique (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Soft tissue phenotype modification, either pouch roll or modified roll technique, during uncovering surgery resulted in favorable clinical outcomes. Thin mucosal tissue thickness and pouch roll technique are the factors related to more recession at 2 weeks. Pouch roll technique could influence the restorative design by having a wide emergence angle at the mesial side.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Modified and pouch roll techniques during uncovering surgery were viable methods to yield favorable peri-implant health, while the preciseness of pouch roll technique was required to avoid mucosal recession and inadequate restorative design.

Depth of mucosal tunnel in peri-implant health during 12-month follow-up in patients with controlled periodontitis

BACKGROUND

The association between thickness of peri-implant mucosa, known as mucosal tunnel (MT) and related clinical parameters in bone-level implants has not been investigated.

METHODS

Posterior implants, in patients with controlled periodontitis, were evaluated at different time intervals: during uncovering surgery (T₀ ), 2-month after uncovering surgery (T_2M ) and 12-month after placement (T_12M ). Clinical parameters including vertical soft tissue height (VSTH), MT, tooth-implant discrepancy of bone level (DBL), pocket depth (PD), peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL), emergence profile and emergence angle (EA) were collected, and the correlation were assessed at different time points.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with 60 implants were recruited, and 81.7% of the patients were Stage III-IV, Grade B-C generalized periodontitis. MT presented no significant difference in PD, VSTH, and MBL. Periodontitis Grade C and absence of bone regeneration were significant predictors for deep MT (>3 mm), and 5.85⁰ less EA at mesial side of implants (p = 0.02).The regression of analysis implied the increase of DBL 1 mm would cause 0.26 mm deeper MT, 1.7 times higher risk of having deep MT (p = 0.041; OR = 1.731; 95% CI:1.02-2.93) and 2.1 times higher risk of having circumferential PD > 4 mm (p = 0.019; OR = 2.1; 95% CI:1.13-3.92).

CONCLUSIONS

In bone-level implants, a correlation between MT and clinical parameters at 12-month follow-up was not found. However, history of periodontitis Grade C, absence of bone regeneration and tooth-implant discrepancy of bone level might define the depth of MT. Additionally, the depth of MT played a critical role in determining restorative design.

Collagen Versus Xenograft Bovine Bone Inserted Into Extraction Sockets: Healing and Pain Management

Background

Different materials can be used in filling the extraction socket to achieve an alveolar ridge preservation. The present study compared the wound healing potential and pain management efficacy of the collagen and the xenograft bovine bone, covered by a cellulose mesh, inserted into the socket of extracted teeth.

Materials and Methods

Thirteen patients were willingly chosen to enter our split-mouth study. It was a clinical trial of crossover design with a minimum of two teeth to be extracted for each patient. Randomly, one of the alveolar sockets was filled with collagen material as Collaplug®, and the second alveolar socket was filled with xenograft bovine bone substitute Bio-Oss® and covered with a cellulose mesh Surgicel®. Post-extraction follow-up was observed at day 3, 7 and 14, and each participant was told to document his/her pain experience in our prepared Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) document for 7 consecutive days.

Results

Clinically, the differential wound closure potential between the two groups was significant in the buccolingual (P = 0.045) but not significant in the mesiodistal (P = 0.204) mouth areas. The pain expressed as rated in the NRS was higher in the case of the Bio-Oss®, but there was no significant difference upon comparing the two procedures for 7 consecutive days (P = 0.397) except on day 5 (P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Collagen appears to support faster wound healing rate, higher potential influence on socket healing and decreased pain perception than xenograft bovine bone.

Periodontal phenotype: A review of historical and current classifications evaluating different methods and characteristics

OBJECTIVE

To review the historical and current periodontal phenotype classifications evaluating methods and characteristics. Moreover, to identify and classify the methods based on periodontal phenotype components.

OVERVIEW

Several gingival morphology studies have been frequently associated with different terms used causing confusion among the readers. In 2017, the World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions recommended to adopt the term "periodontal phenotype". This term comprises two terms, gingival phenotype (gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width) and bone morphotype (buccal bone plate thickness). Furthermore, gingival morphology has been categorized on "thin-scalloped", "thick-scalloped" and "thick-flat" considering the periodontal biotype. However, by definition, the term phenotype is preferred over biotype. Periodontal phenotype can be evaluated through clinical or radiographic assessments and may be divided into invasive/non-invasive (for gingival thickness), static/functional (for keratinized tissue width), and bi/tridimensional (for buccal bone plate thickness) methods.

CONCLUSIONS

"Thin-scalloped," "thick-scalloped," and "thick-flat" periodontal biotypes were identified. These three periodontal biotypes have been considered in the World Workshop but the term periodontal phenotype is recommended. Periodontal phenotype is the combination of the gingival phenotype and the bone morphotype. There are specific methods for periodontal phenotype evaluation.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The term periodontal phenotype is currently recommended for future investigations about gingival phenotype and bone morphotype. "Thin-scalloped," "thick-scalloped," and "thick-flat" periodontal phenotypes can be evaluated through specific methods for gingival thickness, keratinized tissue width, and buccal bone plate thickness evaluation.

Minimally invasive procedures for deficient interdental papillae: A review

OBJECTIVE

Deficient interdental papillae cause a series of problems, including food impaction, phonetic difficulties, and esthetic concerns. The purpose of this article is to provide valid clinical recommendations for clinicians to address these problems in a predictable and less invasive way.

OVERVIEW

Numerous treatments are available for interdental papillae reconstruction, but most of them involve surgery and yield unpredictable outcomes. Minimally invasive treatments have the advantages of being effective, predictable, and involving only slight injury as compared to surgical treatments. We included 66 studies obtained after searching for relevant papers in PubMed and Web of Science. The etiology and classification of deficient interdental papillae are explained and minimally invasive procedures for deficient interdental papillae reconstruction are summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive procedures are promising ways to reconstruct deficient interdental papillae, and have the advantages of slight pain and rapid recovery. It should be noticed that some of the minimally invasive treatments still require further long-term observation to confirm their efficacy.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Familiarity with etiology and classification of deficient interdental papillae can help clinicians to choose the appropriate minimally invasive approach as well as help with case collection to enhance esthetics status in patients with deficient interdental papillae.