Are feeding disorders and feeding tube dependency the same?: A discrimination study between feeding disorders, feeding tube dependency and healthy eaters

Physical health complications in children and young people with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID): a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a feeding and eating disorder with known acute and longstanding physical health complications in children and young people (CYP) and commonly presents to paediatricians.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the published literature on physical health complications in CYP with ARFID using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library was performed on 14 February 2024. Studies reporting physical health complications in CYP ≤25 years with ARFID were included. We pooled studies for meta-analysis comparing ARFID with healthy controls or anorexia nervosa (AN).

RESULTS

Of 9058 studies found in searches, we included 132 studies. We found evidence for low weight, nutritional deficiencies and low bone mineral density. CYP with ARFID can present across the weight spectrum; however, the majority of CYP with ARFID were within the healthy weight to underweight range. Most studies reported normal range heart rates and blood pressures in ARFID, but some CYP with ARFID do experience bradycardia and hypotension. CYP with ARFID had higher heart rates than AN (weighted mean difference: 12.93 bpm; 95% CI: 8.65 to 17.21; n=685); heterogeneity was high (I2: 81.33%).

CONCLUSION

There is a broad range of physical health complications associated with ARFID requiring clinical consideration. Many CYP with ARFID are not underweight yet still have complications. Less cardiovascular complications found in ARFID compared with AN may be related to chronicity.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022376866.

Pediatric Tube Weaning: A Meta-Analysis of Factors Contributing to Success

Approximately 3-10% of children have severe feeding issues, and some require enteral/tube nutrition to grow and thrive. For many children, tube feeding is temporary, making efficacious interventions for tube weaning essential. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of tube weaning treatments. Outcomes included percentage of participants completely weaned from the tube, and mean percentage of kilocalories consumed orally following treatment. Data were extracted from 42 studies, including cohort studies and single-subject research design studies. We evaluated moderators of treatment success, including treatment setting, use of behavioral approaches, use of hunger provocation, and use of a multidisciplinary approach. Results indicated that, after treatment, children received significantly more calories orally, and 67-69% of children were fully weaned. These analyses suggest that current interventions are generally effective; however, variability within treatments exist. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to understand effective components of weaning interventions.

[The Need of Evidence-Based Treatment of Early-Onset Feeding Tube Dependency: A Pico- Framework Based Analytic Review of Clinical Features and Treatment of Feeding Tube Dependency]

Feeding Tube Dependency is a constant increasing perinatal mental health condition, with estimated 350 new cases per year in Germany.The early onset feeding tube dependency is the consequence of a generalized food aversion. To establish an evidence-based nationwide treatment plan, relevant research from the past twenty years were narratively reviewed. Feeding tube dependency is an international increasingmental health condition, with a high symptom persistence and a low spontaneous remission. The generalized food aversion would prevent the transition to oral feeding.The treatment protocols, supported by the German Health System, based on low-frequency individual treatment and intensive inpatient treatments are not supported by the most recent evidence. In treatment outcome research more promising and effective programs can be distinguished from ineffective programs. As a result, treatment which are designed as intensive treatment, home-based or inpatient and are psychodynamicbased are most effective. Day-clinic and behavioral modification programs are not or low in treatment effectiveness.The German Health System approach to assist families with feeding tube dependency is not evidence-based. A new structure of treatment is imperatively required.