Use of the consolidated framework for implementation research to assess determinants of silver diamine fluoride implementation in safety net dental clinics

Silver diamine fluoride for the management of dental caries in children in primary dental care: protocol for a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Dental caries remains a significant problem in England, affecting 11% of 3-year-olds and 23% of 5-year-olds. While current approaches have been extensively investigated, their ability to (1) control pain and infection; (2) prevent hospital admissions, and (3) be implemented within the National Health Service (NHS) contractual arrangements, remains unsatisfactory. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is an alternative, non-invasive approach that has proven efficacy in arresting caries progression in primary teeth, principally from studies conducted outside of Europe. Its use in primary dental care in the UK is limited, despite the acknowledged need. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of SDF has not been compared to usual care in the UK. Before a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) can be conducted to compare SDF to usual care for caries management in young children, there are several uncertainties that require investigation. This study aims to establish whether such an RCT is feasible.

METHODS

This mixed-method parallel design study is a feasibility study with an embedded process evaluation, to compare SDF with usual treatment in primary dental care in the UK. It will be individually randomised, with 13 dentists and therapists, in 8 different dental primary care sites with a sample size of 80 child participants aged 1-8 years old. The aim will be to recruit ten participants per site with equal arm allocation. Follow-up will be for 1 year. The study will inform whether an RCT is feasible by resolving several key uncertainties. The acceptability and implementation of SDF and the research processes will be explored. Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement representatives will be involved throughout recruitment and retention strategies, participant documentation, analysis, engagement and dissemination.

DISCUSSION

The ability to conduct an RCT will be evaluated. If feasible, this RCT has the potential to evaluate the effectiveness of a non-invasive approach for the management of untreated caries in young children. A feasibility study also offers the opportunity to consider factors associated with the implementation of SDF at an early stage through a process evaluation that will inform the definitive trial and an implementation strategy for SDF by identifying relevant barriers and facilitators.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06092151. Date: 19/10/2023.

Survival of silver diamine fluoride among patients treated in community dental clinics: a naturalistic study

Background

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is a minimally-invasive preventive service used in the U.S. to avert and arrest caries since 2014. No studies document survival outcomes based in real world delivery. We analyzed 12-month survival outcomes of SDF applied independently or concurrently with other restorative procedures among a population receiving community dental care.

Methods

We analyzed data on SDF applications from de-identified dental claims on Oregon Health Plan patients served by Advantage Dental in 2016, who had been seen in 2015 (patient n = 2269; teeth n = 7787). We compared survival rates of SDF alone, SDF applied with a sedative filling, and SDF with a same-day restoration. Failure was defined as a restoration or extraction of the tooth 7 to 365 days after initial application. Survival was defined as a patient returning 180 or more days after application whose tooth did not have a restoration or extraction. Differences were assessed through Wilcoxon equality of survivor function tests and log-rank equality of survivor tests to compare failure rates, Cox Proportional Hazards models to assess factors associated with survival of SDF, and Kaplan–Meier survival estimate to calculate the probability of survival over time.

Results

SDF alone had an overall survival rate of 76%. SDF placed with sedative filling and with a same-day restoration had survival rates of 50% and 84% respectively, likely reflecting treatment intent. SDF alone survived exceptionally well on primary cuspids, permanent molars, and permanent bicuspids and among patients aged 10 to 20 years, with modest variation across caries risk assessment categories. A single annual application of SDF was successful in 75% of cases. Among SDF failures on permanent dentition, more than two-thirds of teeth received a minor restoration.

Conclusion

SDF is a minimally invasive non-aerosolizing option that prevented non-cavitated lesions and arrested early decay among community dentistry patients when applied independently or concurrently with restorative procedures. Professional organizations, policy makers, providers, and payors should broaden optional SDF use by informing clinical guidelines, reimbursement policies, and treatment decisions. Future research should address clinical, social, service delivery, workforce, and economic outcomes using diverse population-based samples, and the mechanisms underlying single application success and caries prevention potential.

Dentists' Adoption of Silver Diamine Fluoride among 1- to 5-Year-Old Children in North Carolina

BACKGROUND

A natural experiment was conducted to observe the adoption of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) by Medicaid-enrolled dentists in North Carolina (NC). The purpose of this study was to describe the sociocontextual and community health characteristics where dentists adopted SDF, determine the association between SDF use and general anesthesia (GA) use, and examine the changes in GA utilization following implementing SDF reimbursement.

METHODS

NC Medicaid initiated SDF reimbursement in 2016 for children ages 1 to 5 y. This cross-sectional time series study used aggregate NC Medicaid claims, including geographic data, from 2014 to 2018. All dentists who provided GA and/or SDF to children ages 1 to 5 y were included. County health ranking data described social and community health indicators. Descriptive statistics, spatial data techniques, and multivariable methods were used.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2018, the number of dentists using SDF increased from 35 to 258, or 637%, whereas the number of dentists using GA increased from 179 to 211, or 17%. SDF utilization spread outward from areas of good social and health indicators to areas of poorer indicators. SDF utilization increased from 0.35 to 0.65 per 1,000 children, whereas GA utilization decreased from 2.57 to 2.47 per 1,000 children. GA utilization was positively associated with SDF utilization and poorer county health ranking but did not change before and after SDF implementation.

CONCLUSION

Early adopters of SDF in NC practiced in areas with positive social and community health indicators. Over time, SDF was adopted in resource-poor communities. It remains too early to determine the public health impacts of SDF treatment on GA utilization.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

Policy makers and clinicians can use the results of this study to develop geographically targeted interventions that could lead to clinically and cost-effective public health programs.