1
|
The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder. J Addict Med 2024; 18:1-56. [PMID: 38669101 PMCID: PMC11105801 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
The American Society of Addiction Medicine/American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (ASAM/AAAP) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder provides guidance on evidence-based strategies for the treatment of stimulant use disorders (StUDs), stimulant intoxication, and stimulant withdrawal, as well as secondary and tertiary prevention of harms associated with stimulant use. The Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) comprised experts from ASAM and AAAP representing a range of clinical settings and patient populations. The guideline was developed following modified GRADE methodology. The process included a systematic literature review as well as several targeted supplemental searches. The CGC utilized Evidence to Decision tables to review available evidence and rate the strength of each recommendation. The clinical practice guideline was revised based on external stakeholder review. Key takeaways included: Contingency management represents the current standard of care for treatment of StUDs; Pharmacotherapies may be utilized off-label to treat StUDs; Acute stimulant intoxication can result in life-threatening complications that should be addressed in an appropriate level of care; Secondary and tertiary prevention strategies should be used to reduce harms related to risky stimulant use.
Collapse
|
2
|
Young AM, Havens JR, Cooper HLF, Fallin-Bennett A, Fanucchi L, Freeman PR, Knudsen H, Livingston MD, McCollister KE, Stone J, Vickerman P, Freeman E, Jahangir T, Larimore E, White CR, Cheatom C, Community Staff K, Design Team K. Kentucky Outreach Service Kiosk (KyOSK) Study protocol: a community-level, controlled quasi-experimental, type 1 hybrid effectiveness study to assess implementation, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a community-tailored harm reduction kiosk on HIV, HCV and overdose risk in rural Appalachia. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e083983. [PMID: 38431295 PMCID: PMC10910671 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many rural communities bear a disproportionate share of drug-related harms. Innovative harm reduction service models, such as vending machines or kiosks, can expand access to services that reduce drug-related harms. However, few kiosks operate in the USA, and their implementation, impact and cost-effectiveness have not been adequately evaluated in rural settings. This paper describes the Kentucky Outreach Service Kiosk (KyOSK) Study protocol to test the effectiveness, implementation outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a community-tailored, harm reduction kiosk in reducing HIV, hepatitis C and overdose risk in rural Appalachia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS KyOSK is a community-level, controlled quasi-experimental, non-randomised trial. KyOSK involves two cohorts of people who use drugs, one in an intervention county (n=425) and one in a control county (n=325). People who are 18 years or older, are community-dwelling residents in the target counties and have used drugs to get high in the past 6 months are eligible. The trial compares the effectiveness of a fixed-site, staffed syringe service programme (standard of care) with the standard of care supplemented with a kiosk. The kiosk will contain various harm reduction supplies accessible to participants upon valid code entry, allowing dispensing data to be linked to participant survey data. The kiosk will include a call-back feature that allows participants to select needed services and receive linkage-to-care services from a peer recovery coach. The cohorts complete follow-up surveys every 6 months for 36 months (three preceding kiosk implementation and four post-implementation). The study will test the effectiveness of the kiosk on reducing risk behaviours associated with overdose, HIV and hepatitis C, as well as implementation outcomes and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The University of Kentucky Institutional Review Board approved the protocol. Results will be disseminated in academic conferences and peer-reviewed journals, online and print media, and community meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05657106.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April M Young
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jennifer R Havens
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Hannah L F Cooper
- Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Laura Fanucchi
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Patricia R Freeman
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Hannah Knudsen
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Melvin D Livingston
- Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kathryn E McCollister
- Division of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA
| | - Jack Stone
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Vickerman
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Edward Freeman
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Tasfia Jahangir
- Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Elizabeth Larimore
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Carol R White
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | | | - KyOSK Community Staff
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jakubowski A, Fowler S, Fox AD. Three decades of research in substance use disorder treatment for syringe services program participants: a scoping review of the literature. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2023; 18:40. [PMID: 37301953 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-023-00394-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Syringe services programs (SSPs) provide a spectrum of health services to people who use drugs, with many providing referral and linkage to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and some offering co-located treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). The objective of this study was to review the evidence for SSPs as an entry point for SUD treatment with particular attention to co-located (onsite) MOUD. METHODS We performed a scoping review of the literature on SUD treatment for SSP participants. Our initial query in PubMed led to title and abstract screening of 3587 articles, followed by full text review of 173, leading to a final total of 51 relevant articles. Most articles fell into four categories: (1) description of SSP participants' SUD treatment utilization; (2) interventions to link SSP participants to SUD treatment; (3) post-linkage SUD treatment outcomes; (4) onsite MOUD at SSPs. RESULTS SSP participation is associated with entering SUD treatment. Barriers to treatment entry for SSP participants include: use of stimulants, lack of health insurance, residing far from treatment programs, lack of available appointments, and work or childcare responsibilities. A small number of clinical trials demonstrate that two interventions (motivational enhancement therapy with financial incentives and strength-based case management) are effective for linking SSP participants to MOUD or any SUD treatment. SSP participants who initiate MOUD reduce their substance use, risk behaviors, and have moderate retention in treatment. An increasing number of SSPs across the United States offer onsite buprenorphine treatment, and a number of single-site studies demonstrate that patients who initiate buprenorphine treatment at SSPs reduce opioid use, risk behaviors, and have similar retention in treatment to patients in office-based treatment programs. CONCLUSIONS SSPs can successfully refer participants to SUD treatment and deliver onsite buprenorphine treatment. Future studies should explore strategies to optimize the implementation of onsite buprenorphine. Because linkage rates were suboptimal for methadone, offering onsite methadone treatment at SSPs may be an appealing solution, but would require changes in federal regulations. In tandem with continuing to develop onsite treatment capacity, funding should support evidence-based linkage interventions and increasing accessibility, availability, affordability and acceptability of SUD treatment programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Jakubowski
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, 3300 Kossuth Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
| | - Sabrina Fowler
- Ascension St. John Hospital, 22101 Moross Road, Detroit, MI, 48236, USA
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Aaron D Fox
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, 3300 Kossuth Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Batty EJ, Ibragimov U, Fadanelli M, Gross S, Cooper K, Klein E, Ballard AM, Young AM, Lockard AS, Oser CB, Cooper HLF. A qualitative analysis of rural syringe service program fidelity in Appalachian Kentucky: Staff and participant perspectives. J Rural Health 2023; 39:328-337. [PMID: 36117151 PMCID: PMC10484119 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As drug-related epidemics have expanded from cities to rural areas, syringe service programs (SSPs) and other harm reduction programs have been slow to follow. The recent implementation of SSPs in rural areas demands attention to program fidelity based on core components of SSP success. METHODS Semistructured interviews conducted with clients and staff at 5 SSPs in 5 counties within 2 Central Appalachian health districts. Interviews covered fidelity of SSP implementation to 6 core components: (1) meet needs for harm reduction supplies; (2) education and counseling for sexual, injection, and overdose risks; (3) cooperation between SSPs and local law enforcement; (4) provide other health and social services; (5) ensure low threshold access to services; and (6) promote dignity, the impact of poor fidelity on vulnerability to drug-related harms, and the risk environment's influence on program fidelity. We applied thematic methods to analyze the data. FINDINGS Rural SSPs were mostly faithful to the 6 core components. Deviations from core components can be attributed to certain characteristics of the local rural risk environment outlined in the risk environment model, including geographic remoteness, lack of resources and underdeveloped infrastructure, and stigma against people who inject drugs (PWID) CONCLUSIONS: As drug-related epidemics continue to expand outside cities, scaling up SSPs to serve rural PWID is essential. Future research should explore whether the risk environment features identified also influence SSP fidelity in other rural areas and develop and test strategies to strengthen core components in these vulnerable areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Batty
- Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - U Ibragimov
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - M Fadanelli
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - S Gross
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - K Cooper
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - E Klein
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - A M Ballard
- Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - A M Young
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - A S Lockard
- Kentucky River District Health Department, Hazard, Kentucky, USA
| | - C B Oser
- Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - H L F Cooper
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Surratt HL, Yeager HJ, Adu A, González EA, Nelson EO, Walker T. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Barriers, Facilitators and Unmet Need Among Rural People Who Inject Drugs: A Qualitative Examination of Syringe Service Program Client Perspectives. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:905314. [PMID: 35706473 PMCID: PMC9189386 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.905314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for HIV infection, yet in rural areas PWID are understudied with respect to prevention strategies. Kentucky is notable for heavy rural HIV burden and increasing rates of new HIV diagnoses attributable to injection drug use. Despite high need and the strong evidence for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) as a gold-standard biomedical HIV prevention tool, scale up has been limited among PWID in Kentucky and elsewhere. This paper explores individual, environmental, and structural barriers and facilitators of PrEP care from the perspective of PWID in rural Kentucky. METHODS Data are drawn from an ongoing NIH-funded study designed to adapt and integrate a PrEP initiation intervention for high-risk PWID at point of care in two rural syringe service programs (SSPs) in southeastern Kentucky. As part of this initiative, a qualitative study guided by PRISM (Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model) was undertaken to gather SSP client perspectives on intervention needs related to PrEP, competing needs related to substance use disorder, as well as tangible supports for and barriers to PrEP uptake. Recruitment and interviews were conducted during September-November 2021 with 26 SSP clients, 13 from each of the two SSP sites. A semi-structured guide explored injection behaviors, SSP use, knowledge of PrEP, perceived barriers to PrEP, as well as aspects of the risk environment (e.g., housing instability, community stigma) that may impact PrEP uptake. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and verified by project staff. A detailed coding scheme was developed and applied by independent coders using NVivo. Coded transcripts were synthesized to identify salient themes in the data using the principles of thematic analysis All study procedures were approved by the University IRB. RESULTS Participants were 96% white, 42% female, with a median age of 41 years (range 21-62); all reported injection use within the past month. Overall, we found low PrEP awareness among this sample, yet interest in PrEP was high, with several indicating PrEP is urgently needed. Clients reported overwhelmingly positive experiences at the SSPs, considering them trusted and safe locations to receive health services, and were enthusiastic about the integration of co-located PrEP services. Lack of basic HIV and PrEP knowledge and health literacy were in evidence, which contributed to common misperceptions about personal risk for HIV. Situational risks related to substance use disorder, particularly in the context of withdrawal symptoms and craving, often lead to heightened HIV injection and sexual risk behaviors. Stigma related to substance use and HIV arose as a concern for PrEP uptake, with several participants reflecting that privacy issues would impact their preferences for education, prescribing and monitoring of PrEP. Noted tangible barriers included inconsistent access to phone service and transportation. Primary supports included high levels of insurance coverage, consistent pharmacy access, and histories with successful medication management for other health conditions. CONCLUSIONS Drawing on the critical perspectives of people with substance use disorder, our findings provide important and actionable information on individual and environmental barriers and facilitators of PrEP uptake among rural PWID at high risk for HIV infection. These data will drive the adaptation and implementation of a client-centered approach to integrated PrEP care within rurally located SSP settings to address unmet needs for PrEP care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary L Surratt
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.,Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Hannah J Yeager
- Department of Anthropology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Akosua Adu
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Evelyn A González
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Elizabeth O Nelson
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Tamara Walker
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kimmel SD, Phillips KT, Anderson BJ, Stein MD. Characteristics associated with motivation to stop substance use and improve skin and needle hygiene among hospitalized patients who inject drugs. Subst Abus 2022; 43:878-883. [PMID: 35179454 PMCID: PMC9907781 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2007520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Background: Hospitalizations for people who inject drugs (PWID) are opportunities to address substance use. However, little is known about hospitalized PWIDs' motivation to stop substance use or improve skin and needle hygiene, common means for reducing injection sequelae. Methods: We used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention to improve skin and needle hygiene among 252 hospitalized PWID between January 2014 and June 2018. We examined motivation (scale 1-10) to stop substance use, use new needles, and clean skin and used multiple linear regression models to evaluate characteristics associated with these outcomes. Results: PWID were recruited during injection-related (154, 61.1%) and non-injection-related hospitalizations (98, 38.9%). Motivation to stop substance use was 7.11 (SD = 2.67), use new needles was 7.8 (SD = 1.9), and clean skin was 6.7 (SD = 2.3). In adjusted models, experiencing an injection-related hospitalization was not significantly associated (p > 0.05) with motivation to stop substance use (β = -0.76, SE = 0.299), use new needles (β = 0.301, SE = 0.255), or clean skin (β = 0.476, SE = 0.323). Number of past-year skin and soft tissue infections was negatively associated with motivation to use new needles (β = -0.109, SE = 0.049, p < 0.05) and clean skin (β = -0.131, SE = 0.062, p < 0.05). Greater opioid withdrawal was associated with lower motivation to use new needles (β = -0.275, SE = 0.92, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Among hospitalized PWID, motivation to stop substance use and improve skin and needle hygiene was moderately high, but injection-related hospitalizations were not associated with greater motivation. Efforts to reduce injection sequelae for all hospitalized PWID are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simeon D. Kimmel
- Clinical Addiction Education and Research Unit, Sections of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Kristina T. Phillips
- Center for Integrated Health Care Research, Kaiser Permanent Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
| | | | - Michael D. Stein
- Behavioral Medicine and Addiction Research, Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bushling C, Walton MT, Conner KL, Liu G, Hoven A, Joseph J, Taylor A. Syringe services programs in the Bluegrass: Evidence of population health benefits using Kentucky Medicaid data. J Rural Health 2021; 38:620-629. [PMID: 34541715 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate whether Kentucky counties that established a new syringe services program realized a significant decline in the incidence rate of a set of infectious disease diagnoses commonly transmitted via injection drug use. METHODS Longitudinal count models of within-county rates of newly diagnosed infections among populations at risk were estimated using Medicaid claims/encounters data. Generalized estimating equation models were used to report incident rate ratios of 6 diagnoses: (1) HIV; (2) hepatitis C; (3) hepatitis B; (4) osteomyelitis; (5) endocarditis; and (6) skin/soft tissue infection. To investigate whether a delay in effect was present, separate models were fit to estimate the effects of establishing a syringe services program: at its opening date, and again at 1, 3, and 6 months postopening date. FINDINGS Taken together, the aggregated within-county incidence rate of these 6 diagnoses was significantly lower following the implementation of a syringe services program (P < .05). Our models estimated that counties which opted to open a syringe services program realized an approximate month-over-month decline in new diagnoses of 0.5% among the population at risk. CONCLUSIONS These results lend further support to previous conclusions made in the public health literature regarding the efficacy of syringe services programs. Specifically, declines in incidence rates were observable beginning at 1 month post syringe services program opening. These results are particularly notable due to the typical setting in which these syringe services programs operated-rural communities of fewer than 40,000 residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Bushling
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Office of Health Data and Analytics, Division of Analytics, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA.,University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Matthew T Walton
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Office of Health Data and Analytics, Division of Analytics, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA.,University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Kailyn L Conner
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Office of Health Data and Analytics, Division of Analytics, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA.,University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.,Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Medicaid Services, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA
| | - Gilbert Liu
- Partners for Kids, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ardis Hoven
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Public Health, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jessin Joseph
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Medicaid Services, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA
| | - Angela Taylor
- Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Office of Health Data and Analytics, Division of Analytics, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA.,University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meadowcroft D, Whitacre B. Community Meetings on the Rural Opioid Crisis: Setting a Path Forward by Learning from Others. SUBSTANCE ABUSE-RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2020; 14:1178221820920651. [PMID: 32922018 PMCID: PMC7446270 DOI: 10.1177/1178221820920651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: This study implemented a series of meetings in one rural community struggling
with the opioid crisis. Set in the town of Ardmore, Oklahoma, these meetings
presented local residents who dealt with the crisis as part of their jobs
with four categories of programs aimed at preventing and treating
opioid-related issues. The ultimate goal was for the participants to develop
a consensus about where resources should be appropriated in the future,
based off the needs of the area. Methods: Three community meetings were held over a six-week period, with an average of
40 attendees. Data was collected through surveys, study circles, and a
participant voting exercise. Surveys were distributed at the beginning and
end of the meetings to determine if participant views changed over the
course of the study. Study circles broke participants into small groups and
prompted them with questions regarding the crisis to encourage group
discussion. The participant voting exercise allowed participants to note
where they would like future resources to be directed. Findings: Listening to experts and holding group discussions led to changes in opinions
for some participants. Most felt that the most pressing need was to provide
accessible opioid treatment options in their community. Youth-based
prevention efforts were also noted as being a program that the community
should focus on. Conclusions: Local perceptions of the most appropriate strategies for combatting the rural
opioid crisis can change with group discussions alongside others who are
actively involved with this issue. Future research should actively involve
affected communities in order to develop relevant and accepted action
plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon Meadowcroft
- Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Brian Whitacre
- Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith KE, Tillson MD, Staton M, Winston EM. Characterization of diverted buprenorphine use among adults entering corrections-based drug treatment in Kentucky. Drug Alcohol Depend 2020; 208:107837. [PMID: 31951906 PMCID: PMC7418075 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Illicit, medically unsupervised use of buprenorphine (i.e., "diverted use") among vulnerable and underserved populations, such as corrections-involved adults, remains underexplored. METHODS Survey data (2016-2017) collected as part of a clinical assessment of incarcerated adults entering corrections-based substance use treatment in Kentucky were analyzed. For years examined, 12,915 completed the survey. Removing cases for participants who did not reside in Kentucky for >6 months during the one-year pre-incarceration period (n = 908) resulted in a final sample size of 12,007. RESULTS Over a quarter of the sample reported past-year diverted buprenorphine use prior to incarceration and 21.8 % reported use during the 30-days prior to incarceration, using 6.5 months and 14.3 days on average, respectively. A greater proportion of participants who reported diverted buprenorphine use had previously been engaged with some substance use treatment (77.0 %) and reported greater perceived need for treatment (79.4 %) compared to those who did not report use. Use was more likely among participants who were younger, white, male, and who reported rural or Appalachian residence. Diverted buprenorphine users also evidenced extensive polydrug use and presented with greater substance use disorder severity. Non-medical prescription opioid, heroin, and diverted methadone use were associated with increased odds of diverted buprenorphine use while kratom was not. Diverted methadone use was associated with a 252.9 % increased likelihood of diverted buprenorphine use. CONCLUSIONS Diverted buprenorphine use among participants in this sample was associated with concerning high-risk behaviors and may indicate barriers to accessing opioid agonist therapies for corrections-involved Kentucky residents, particularly those in rural Appalachia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten E Smith
- Center on Drug and Alcohol and Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40508, United States; Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, 40292, United States.
| | - Martha D Tillson
- Center on Drug and Alcohol and Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40508, United States; Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 40508, United States
| | - Michele Staton
- Center on Drug and Alcohol and Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40508, United States; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 40508, United States
| | - Erin M Winston
- Center on Drug and Alcohol and Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40508, United States
| |
Collapse
|