Sleep apnea severity based on estimated tidal volume and snoring features from tracheal signals

Night shift work, poor sleep quality and unhealthy sleep behaviors are positively associated with the risk of epilepsy disease

BACKGROUND

Night shift work and poor sleep quality are gradually becoming more prevalent in modern society. Nevertheless, there have been limited studies assessing the association between night shift work, sleep behaviors, and risk of epilepsy. The aim of our study was to ascertain whether a positive association exists between night shift work, sleep quality, sleep behaviors, and risk of epilepsy.

METHODS

Our study included a total of over 270,000 individuals with or without epilepsy from the UK Biobank, followed up over a period of 13.5 years. Information on current night shift work and major sleep behaviors was also obtained. We used Cox proportional hazard models to assess the association between night shift work, sleep quality, sleep behaviors, and the risk of epilepsy after adjusting for multiple variables.

RESULTS

Night shift work was positively associated with a higher risk of epilepsy (P for trend = 0.059). There was a gradual increase in epilepsy risk from 'never/rarely' to 'usual/permanent' night shifts, with 'usual/permanent' night shifts work presenting the highest risk [hazard ratio (HR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.65). Additionally, there was a significant association between sleep quality and risk of epilepsy (P < 0.001). Among the five major sleep behaviors, sleep duration (< 7 or > 8 h/day), frequent insomnia, and daytime sleepiness were significantly associated with a higher risk of epilepsy (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11-1.28; HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.30; HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.24-1.72, respectively). Furthermore, sleep duration exhibited a 'U-shaped' association with epilepsy risk. Nevertheless, no significant association was found between sleep chronotype and snoring and the risk of incident epilepsy (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.12; HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-1.04).

CONCLUSIONS

'Usual/permanent' night shifts and poor sleep quality were positively associated with a greater risk of incident epilepsy. Major sleep behaviors, including unhealthy sleep duration (< 7 or > 8 h/day), frequent insomnia, and daytime sleepiness, also tended to increase the risk of epilepsy.

OSA diagnosis goes wearable: are the latest devices ready to shine?

STUDY OBJECTIVES

From 2019-2023, the United States Food and Drug Administration has cleared 9 novel obstructive sleep apnea-detecting wearables for home sleep apnea testing, with many now commercially available for sleep clinicians to integrate into their clinical practices. To help clinicians comprehend these devices and their functionalities, we meticulously reviewed their operating mechanisms, sensors, algorithms, data output, and related performance evaluation literature.

METHODS

We collected information from PubMed, United States Food and Drug Administration clearance documents, ClinicalTrials.gov, and web sources, with direct industry input whenever feasible.

RESULTS

In this "device-centered" review, we broadly categorized these wearables into 2 main groups: those that primarily harness photoplethysmography data and those that do not. The former include the peripheral arterial tonometry-based devices. The latter was further broken down into 2 key subgroups: acoustic-based and respiratory effort-based devices. We provided a performance evaluation literature review and objectively compared device-derived metrics and specifications pertinent to sleep clinicians. Detailed demographics of study populations, exclusion criteria, and pivotal statistical analyses of the key validation studies are summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

In the foreseeable future, these novel obstructive sleep apnea-detecting wearables may emerge as primary diagnostic tools for patients at risk for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea without significant comorbidities. While more devices are anticipated to join this category, there remains a critical need for cross-device comparison studies as well as independent performance evaluation and outcome research in diverse populations. Now is the moment for sleep clinicians to immerse themselves in understanding these emerging tools to ensure our patient-centered care is improved through the appropriate implementation and utilization of these novel sleep technologies.

CITATION

Chiang AA, Jerkins E, Holfinger S, et al. OSA diagnosis goes wearable: are the latest devices ready to shine? J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(11):1823-1838.

Obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis and beyond using portable monitors

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic sleep and breathing disorder with significant health complications, including cardiovascular disease and neurocognitive impairments. To ensure timely treatment, there is a need for a portable, accurate and rapid method of diagnosing OSA. This review examines the use of various physiological signals used in the detection of respiratory events and evaluates their effectiveness in portable monitors (PM) relative to gold standard polysomnography. The primary objective is to explore the relationship between these physiological parameters and OSA, their application in calculating the apnea hypopnea index (AHI), the standard metric for OSA diagnosis, and the derivation of non-AHI metrics that offer additional diagnostic value. It is found that increasing the number of parameters in PMs does not necessarily improve OSA detection. Several factors can cause performance variations among different PMs, even if they extract similar signals. The review also highlights the potential of PMs to be used beyond OSA diagnosis. These devices possess parameters that can be utilized to obtain endotypic and other non-AHI metrics, enabling improved characterization of the disorder and personalized treatment strategies. Advancements in PM technology, coupled with thorough evaluation and validation of these devices, have the potential to revolutionize OSA diagnosis, personalized treatment, and ultimately improve health outcomes for patients with OSA. By identifying the key factors influencing performance and exploring the application of PMs beyond OSA diagnosis, this review aims to contribute to the ongoing development and utilization of portable, efficient, and effective diagnostic tools for OSA.

Physiological Determinants of Snore Loudness

Rationale: The physiological factors modulating the severity of snoring have not been adequately described. Airway collapse or obstruction is generally the leading determinant of snore sound generation; however, we suspect that ventilatory drive is of equal importance. Objective: To determine the relationship between airway obstruction and ventilatory drive on snore loudness. Methods: In 40 patients with suspected or diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (1-98 events/hr), airflow was recorded via a pneumotachometer attached to an oronasal mask, ventilatory drive was recorded using calibrated intraesophageal diaphragm electromyography, and snore loudness was recorded using a calibrated microphone attached over the trachea. "Obstruction" was taken as the ratio of ventilation to ventilatory drive and termed flow:drive, i.e., actual ventilation as a percentage of intended ventilation. Lower values reflect increased flow resistance. Using 165,063 breaths, mixed model analysis (quadratic regression) quantified snore loudness as a function of obstruction, ventilatory drive, and the presence of extreme obstruction (i.e., apneic occlusion). Results: In the presence of obstruction (flow:drive = 50%, i.e., doubled resistance), snore loudness increased markedly with increased drive (+3.4 [95% confidence interval, 3.3-3.5] dB per standard deviation [SD] change in ventilatory drive). However, the effect of drive was profoundly attenuated without obstruction (at flow:drive = 100%: +0.23 [0.08-0.39] dB per SD change in drive). Similarly, snore loudness increased with increasing obstruction exclusively in the presence of increased drive (at drive = 200% of eupnea: +2.1 [2.0-2.2] dB per SD change in obstruction; at eupneic drive: +0.14 [-0.08 to 0.28] dB per SD change). Further, snore loudness decreased substantially with extreme obstruction, defined as flow:drive <20% (-9.9 [-3.3 to -6.6] dB vs. unobstructed eupneic breathing). Conclusions: This study highlights that ventilatory drive, and not simply pharyngeal obstruction, modulates snore loudness. This new framework for characterizing the severity of snoring helps better understand the physiology of snoring and is important for the development of technologies that use snore sounds to characterize sleep-disordered breathing.

A Real-Time Medical Ventilation on Heart Failure Analysis Based on Sleep Apnea Snore and Meta-Analysis

An issue with cardiac ventilation can result in death at any moment throughout a person's life. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) has historically been influenced by medical ventilation on heart failure; nevertheless, the sleep snore analysis is the best model to diagnose. The problems with ventilation are caused by problems with air pressure and blood circulation in the heart valves, where the pathological measures are continually detecting ventilation issues. Understanding the pathophysiology of OSA will have a direct impact on clinical treatment choices as well as the design of clinical studies. Treatments could be tailored to each patient's unique needs based on the fundamental reason to their OSA. Through the OSA treatment, patients could feel better, and understanding OSA symptoms and also outcomes will improve patient's health; as a result, the study reveals that most of the population are likely to benefit from specific OSA treatment approaches. For achieving the benefits of OSA treatment the classification accuracy is needed to be improved. So, in this research work, an LeNet-100 CNN-based deep learning technology is used to get information and apply the classification approaches. We obtained the heart failure dataset from the Kaggle website for conducting a meta-analysis. An accuracy of 93.25%, sensitivity of 97.29%, recall of 96.34%, and F measure of 95.34% had been attained. This approach outperforms the technology and is comparable to the present heart failure meta-analysis..