Disrupting ripples: Methods, results, and caveats in closed-loop approaches in rodents

Hippocampal memory reactivation during sleep is correlated with specific cortical states of the retrosplenial and prefrontal cortices

Episodic memories are thought to be stabilized through the coordination of cortico-hippocampal activity during sleep. However, the timing and mechanism of this coordination remain unknown. To investigate this, we studied the relationship between hippocampal reactivation and slow-wave sleep up and down states of the retrosplenial cortex (RTC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC). We found that hippocampal reactivations are strongly correlated with specific cortical states. Reactivation occurred during sustained cortical Up states or during the transition from up to down state. Interestingly, the most prevalent interaction with memory reactivation in the hippocampus occurred during sustained up states of the PFC and RTC, while hippocampal reactivation and cortical up-to-down state transition in the RTC showed the strongest coordination. Reactivation usually occurred within 150-200 msec of a cortical Up state onset, indicating that a buildup of excitation during cortical Up state activity influences the probability of memory reactivation in CA1. Conversely, CA1 reactivation occurred 30-50 msec before the onset of a cortical down state, suggesting that memory reactivation affects down state initiation in the RTC and PFC, but the effect in the RTC was more robust. Our findings provide evidence that supports and highlights the complexity of bidirectional communication between cortical regions and the hippocampus during sleep.

How our understanding of memory replay evolves

Memory reactivations and replay, widely reported in the hippocampus and cortex across species, have been implicated in memory consolidation, planning, and spatial and skill learning. Technological advances in electrophysiology, calcium imaging, and human neuroimaging techniques have enabled neuroscientists to measure large-scale neural activity with increasing spatiotemporal resolution and have provided opportunities for developing robust analytic methods to identify memory replay. In this article, we first review a large body of historically important and representative memory replay studies from the animal and human literature. We then discuss our current understanding of memory replay functions in learning, planning, and memory consolidation and further discuss the progress in computational modeling that has contributed to these improvements. Next, we review past and present analytic methods for replay analyses and discuss their limitations and challenges. Finally, looking ahead, we discuss some promising analytic methods for detecting nonstereotypical, behaviorally nondecodable structures from large-scale neural recordings. We argue that seamless integration of multisite recordings, real-time replay decoding, and closed-loop manipulation experiments will be essential for delineating the role of memory replay in a wide range of cognitive and motor functions.

Role of cerebellum in sleep-dependent memory processes

The activities and role of the cerebellum in sleep have, until recently, been largely ignored by both the sleep and cerebellum fields. Human sleep studies often neglect the cerebellum because it is at a position in the skull that is inaccessible to EEG electrodes. Animal neurophysiology sleep studies have focussed mainly on the neocortex, thalamus and the hippocampus. However, recent neurophysiological studies have shown that not only does the cerebellum participate in the sleep cycle, but it may also be implicated in off-line memory consolidation. Here we review the literature on cerebellar activity during sleep and the role it plays in off-line motor learning, and introduce a hypothesis whereby the cerebellum continues to compute internal models during sleep that train the neocortex.

An open-source, ready-to-use and validated ripple detector plugin for the Open Ephys GUI

OBJECTIVE

Sharp wave-ripples (SWRs, 100-250 Hz) are oscillatory events extracellularly recorded in the CA1 subfield of the hippocampus during sleep and quiet wakefulness. Many studies employed closed-loop strategies to either detect and abolish SWRs within the hippocampus or manipulate other relevant areas upon ripple detection. However, the code and schematics necessary to replicate the detection system are not always available, which hinders the reproducibility of experiments among different research groups. Furthermore, information about performance is not usually reported. Here, we sought to provide an open-source, validated ripple detector for the scientific community.

APPROACH

We developed and validated a ripple detection plugin integrated into the Open Ephys GUI. It contains a built-in movement detector based on accelerometer or electromyogram data that prevents false ripple events (due to chewing, grooming, or moving, for instance) from triggering the stimulation/manipulation device.

MAIN RESULTS

To determine the accuracy of the detection algorithm, we first carried out simulations in Matlab with real ripple recordings. Using a specific combination of detection parameters (amplitude threshold of 5 standard deviations above the mean, time threshold of 10 ms, and RMS block size of 7 samples), we obtained a 97% true positive rate and 2.48 false positives per minute. Next, an Open Ephys plugin based on the same detection algorithm was developed, and a closed-loop system was set up to evaluate the round trip (ripple onset-to-stimulation) latency over synthetic data. The lowest latency obtained was 34.5 ± 0.5 ms. The embedded movement monitoring was effective in reducing false positives and the plugin's flexibility to detect pathological events was also verified.

SIGNIFICANCE

Besides contributing to increased reproducibility, we anticipate that the developed ripple detector plugin will be helpful for many closed-loop applications in the field of systems neuroscience.