A computer-based model to assess costs associated with the use of factor VIII and factor IX one-stage and chromogenic activity assays

Acute treatment of intracranial hemorrhage complicated by hemophilia a and emicizumab therapy

Among patients with hemophilia A with or without FVIII inhibitors, emicizumab prophylaxis has demonstrated significantly reduced bleeding events. However, emicizumab interferes with clotting-based assays used for monitoring FVIII activity, resulting in falsely elevated FVIII activity. This lack of accurate monitoring can complicate the dosing of intravenous therapeutic FVIII clotting factor concentrates in the treatment of critical bleeding events. This case report aims to inform providers who frequently treat hemophilia-associated hemorrhages about emicizumab's effect on clotting-based assays essential for monitoring factor replacement.

Optimization and evaluation of a two-stage chromogenic assay procedure for measurement of emicizumab plasma levels

Emicizumab mimics the hemostatic activity of activated factor VIII (FVIIIa) within the tenase complex. Despite functional similarities between FVIIIa and emicizumab, conventional laboratory methods designed for monitoring of FVIII activity are inappropriate for the measurement of emicizumab. At present, a modified one stage (FVIII) assay (mOSA) is mainly used for emicizumab monitoring. Two-stage chromogenic FVIII assays based on human factors can be used, although limited performance due to lack of corresponding optimization might be observed. Furthermore, the presence of FVIII or anticoagulants in the patient sample may falsify assay results. To address these issues, we optimized and evaluated a two-stage chromogenic assay (emi-tenase) for measurement of emicizumab in plasma samples. Heat inactivation of samples was established to abolish the influence of endogenous or substituted FVIII. The lower limit of quantification (LLoQ) was found to be 2 μg/ml in a manual assay format and 9.5 μg/ml on an automated coagulation analyzer. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) did not exceed 20%. Analysis of 17 patient plasma samples with severe haemophilia A under emicizumab treatment showed good correlation of results between the emi-tenase assay and the mOSA (Cohens Kappa coefficient = 0.9). Taken together, the emi-tenase assay allows specific measurement of emicizumab plasma levels over a broad concentration range (10 μg/ml to 100 μg/ml). The assay can be applied on an automated coagulation analyzer, demonstrating its applicability within a routine laboratory setting.

International consensus recommendations on the management of people with haemophilia B

Haemophilia B is a rare X-linked genetic deficiency of coagulation factor IX (FIX) that, if untreated, can cause recurrent and disabling bleeding, potentially leading to severe arthropathy and/or life-threatening haemorrhage. Recent decades have brought significant improvements in haemophilia B management, including the advent of recombinant FIX and extended half-life FIX. This therapeutic landscape continues to evolve with several non-factor replacement therapies and gene therapies under investigation. Given the rarity of haemophilia B, the evidence base and clinical experience on which to establish clinical guidelines are relatively sparse and are further challenged by features that are distinct from haemophilia A, precluding extrapolation of existing haemophilia A guidelines. Due to the paucity of formal haemophilia B-specific clinical guidance, an international Author Group was convened to develop a clinical practice framework. The group comprised 15 haematology specialists from Europe, Australia, Japan, Latin America and North America, covering adult and paediatric haematology, laboratory medicine and biomedical science. A hybrid approach combining a systematic review of haemophilia B literature with discussion of clinical experience utilized a modified Delphi format to develop a comprehensive set of clinical recommendations. This approach resulted in 29 recommendations for the clinical management of haemophilia B across five topics, including product treatment choice, therapeutic agent laboratory monitoring, pharmacokinetics considerations, inhibitor management and preparing for gene therapy. It is anticipated that this clinical practice framework will complement existing guidelines in the management of people with haemophilia B in routine clinical practice and could be adapted and applied across different regions and countries.

Guidance for establishing a factor VIII testing protocol for the myriad of factor VIII products

INTRODUCTION

Management of hemophilia A has changed significantly in the past few years with the expansion of new and/or modified products as treatment options. Unfortunately, many of the standard factor VIII assays do not always accurately measure all available treatment products; therefore, the laboratory must investigate various assay algorithms to ensure the reporting of the correct results.

METHODS

Requirements for factor testing, diagnosis and severity levels, product testing, factor VIII inhibitor detection and titers, are evaluated, and potential algorithms are created for optimal assessment of patients with hemophilia A.

RESULTS

The potential for inaccurate result reporting for patients with hemophilia A or those being treated with the myriad of products has left many laboratories uncertain as to which assay algorithm to implement to ensure reporting the correct results for all products used in their hemophilia program. Algorithms for using either One-stage Clotting assays or Chromogenic assays or a combination of both types of assays are presented for each laboratory to implement based on their clinical situation.

CONCLUSIONS

Several algorithms are considered based on the needs of the clinical providers and their patients. Each laboratory must select a testing algorithm that is cost-effective and within available resources, yet that encompasses the needs of their providers and patients. Laboratory personnel must consider all assay uses (factor VIII levels, different products, interfering products, and inhibitor titers) in determining the best algorithm for their laboratory. This paper is a starting guide for developing the best factor VIII testing assays and protocols for your laboratory.

Haemophilia

Haemophilia A and B are rare congenital, recessive X-linked disorders caused by lack or deficiency of clotting factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX), respectively. The severity of the disease depends on the reduction of levels of FVIII or FIX, which are determined by the type of the causative mutation in the genes encoding the factors (F8 and F9, respectively). The hallmark clinical characteristic, especially in untreated severe forms, is bleeding (spontaneous or after trauma) into major joints such as ankles, knees and elbows, which can result in the development of arthropathy. Intracranial bleeds and bleeds into internal organs may be life-threatening. The median life expectancy was ~30 years until the 1960s, but improved understanding of the disorder and development of efficacious therapy based on prophylactic replacement of the missing factor has caused a paradigm shift, and today individuals with haemophilia can look forward to a virtually normal life expectancy and quality of life. Nevertheless, the potential development of inhibitory antibodies to infused factor is still a major hurdle to overcome in a substantial proportion of patients. Finally, gene therapy for both types of haemophilia has progressed remarkably and could soon become a reality.

The Evaluation of APTT Reagents in Reference Plasma, Recombinant FVIII Products; Kovaltry® and Jivi® Using CWA, Including sTF/7FIX Assay

The FVIII activity in patients treated with several extended half-life FVIII (EHL-FVIII) agents different when various activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents were used. The present study examined the difference in clot waveform analysis (CWA) findings and FVIII activity when various APTT reagents and CWA were used. The CWA including FVIII activity was measured using 12 APTT reagents, and the FIX activation based on a small amount of tissue factor assay (sTF/FIX) were examined in reference plasma (RP), EHL-FVIII (Jivi^®) and Kovaltry^®. The 3 APTT reagents were associated with high variation in the peak time and height in the CWA when analyzing low concentrations of FVIII. The peak time and height could not be measured with one APTT reagent, and there were marked differences in the CWA findings between Jivi^® and Kovaltry^® among APTT reagents. Several APTT reagents showed a markedly lower FVIII activity with Jivi^® than with Kovaltry^®. In the FVIII assay, the peak time measured with sTF/FIX did not differ markedly between Jivi^® and Kovaltry^®; however, the FVIII activity in Jivi^® (as measured by the peak height) tended to be higher than in Kovaltry^®. The CWA findings for monitoring Jivi^® varied for monitoring Jivi^® depending on the APTT reagents used, and sTF/FIX assay may be able to measure the EHL-FVIII.

Comparison between coagulation factor VIII quantified with one-stage activity assay and with mass spectrometry in haemophilia A patients: Proof of principle

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia A is a hereditary bleeding disorder caused by a factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. As biomarker, FVIII activity is used to classify disease severity and to monitor treatment. The one-stage clotting assay (OSA) is performed to measure FVIII activity, but OSA's limitations may result in misclassification of disease severity or suboptimal monitoring of treatment. Measurement of FVIII plasma concentration with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) might overcome these challenges. The objective is to investigate the correlation between FVIII activity and concentration, and determinants for differences between the two methods.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, all haemophilia A patients receiving standard-of-care were eligible for inclusion. Within the activity categories of <1 IU/dL, 1-5 IU/dL, >5-40 IU/dL, >40-150 IU/dL and >150-600 IU/dL, we randomly selected 15-20 plasma samples and compared FVIII concentration (LC-MS/MS) to FVIII activity (OSA) with linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Potential determinants for differences were analysed with linear regression.

RESULTS

Inclusion was 87 samples. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated an overall mean difference of -1% with an SD of 64% between the two methods. Large differences were correlated with the presence of anti-FVIII antibodies (133% [95% CI: 81, 185] n = 5) and use of exogenous FVIII products (-37% [95% CI: -65,-9] n = 58), for example plasma-derived and B-domain-modified FVIII products.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite good overall correlation between the two methods, relative differences were large, especially for samples with anti-FVIII antibodies or exogenous FVIII products. These differences may have clinical impact. More research is needed to determine the value of FVIII plasma concentration in comparison with FVIII activity.

Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one-stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B

Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one‐stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)‐based clotting or two‐stage chromogenic factor activity assays. We discuss strengths and limitations of these assays, providing examples of clinical scenarios to highlight some of the challenges associated with their current use for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. Substantial inter‐laboratory variability has been reported for one‐stage assays when measuring the activity of factor replacement products due to the wide range of currently available aPTT reagents, calibration standards, factor‐deficient plasmas, assay conditions and instruments. Chromogenic activity assays may avoid some limitations associated with one‐stage assays, but their regulatory status, perceived higher cost, and lack of laboratory expertise may influence their use. Haemophilia management guidelines recommend the differential application of one or both assays for initial diagnosis and disease severity characterisation, post‐infusion monitoring and replacement factor potency labelling. Efficient communication between clinical and laboratory staff is crucial to ensure application of the most appropriate assay to each clinical situation, correct interpretation of assay results and, ultimately, accurate diagnosis and optimal and safe treatment of haemophilia A or B patients.

Advances in the Treatment of Hemophilia: Implications for Laboratory Testing

BACKGROUND

Until recently, clinical laboratories have monitored hemophilia treatment by measuring coagulation factors before/after infusion of human-derived or recombinant factors. Substantial changes are expected in the near future based on new therapeutic approaches that have been or are being developed.

CONTENT

Hemophilia treatment includes replacement therapy with human-derived/recombinant factors or treatment with bypassing agents for patients without or with inhibitors, respectively. Accordingly, laboratory methods for monitoring include one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays meant to measure either factor VIII/IX or global coagulation tests to measure the effect of bypassing agents. Recently, modified long-acting coagulation factors have been introduced for which discrepant results may be expected when measurement is performed with one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays. Currently, novel drugs not based on coagulation factors are under development and are being tested in clinical studies. These drugs do require new methods and therefore laboratory evaluation of hemophilia will undergo dramatic changes in the near future.

SUMMARY

From the analysis of the current practice and literature, we draw the following conclusions: (a) Thrombin generation or thromboelastometry are the logical candidate assays to monitor bypassing agents. (b) Considerable differences are expected when measuring modified long-acting coagulation factors, depending on whether one-stage or chromogenic assays are used. Although no definitive conclusions can presently be drawn, chromogenic assays are probably more suitable than one-stage clotting. (c) Novel drugs not based on coagulation factors such as emicizumab, fitusiran, or concizumab that are entering the market do require alternative methods that are not yet well established.

Quiescence status of glioblastoma stem-like cells involves remodelling of Ca2+ signalling and mitochondrial shape

Quiescence is a reversible cell-cycle arrest which allows cancer stem-like cells to evade killing following therapies. Here, we show that proliferating glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSLCs) can be induced and maintained in a quiescent state by lowering the extracellular pH. Through RNAseq analysis we identified Ca²⁺ signalling genes differentially expressed between proliferating and quiescent GSLCs. Using the bioluminescent Ca²⁺ reporter EGFP-aequorin we observed that the changes in Ca²⁺ homeostasis occurring during the switch from proliferation to quiescence are controlled through store-operated channels (SOC) since inhibition of SOC drives proliferating GSLCs to quiescence. We showed that this switch is characterized by an increased capacity of GSLCs’ mitochondria to capture Ca²⁺ and by a dramatic and reversible change of mitochondrial morphology from a tubular to a donut shape. Our data suggest that the remodelling of the Ca²⁺ homeostasis and the reshaping of mitochondria might favours quiescent GSLCs’ survival and their aggressiveness in glioblastoma.

Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review

Inhibitors are antibodies directed against haemophilia treatment products which interfere with their function. Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors in haemophilia B are significant clinically when they require a change in a patient's treatment regimen. Their persistence may increase morbidity and mortality. Multiple laboratory tests are now available for detecting and understanding inhibitors in haemophilia. Inhibitors are traditionally measured by their interference in clotting or chromogenic factor assays. They may also be detected using immunologic assays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or fluorescence immunoassay. Anti-FVIII or anti-FIX antibodies of IgG4 subclass best correlate with the presence of functional inhibitors. Improvements in inhibitor measurement have been recently introduced. Preanalytical heat treatment of patient specimens allows testing of patients without delaying treatment. Use of chromogenic and immunologic assays may aid in identification of false-positive results, which are frequent among low-titre inhibitors. Validated reagent substitutions can be used to reduce assay cost. New methods for defining assay positivity and reporting low-titre inhibitors have been suggested. Challenges remain in the areas of quality control, assay standardization, monitoring of patients undergoing immune tolerance induction therapy and testing in the presence of modified and novel treatment products.

Evaluation of chromogenic factor IX assays by automated protocols

INTRODUCTION

Chromogenic substrate assays (CSA) to measure Factor IX (FIX) have recently become commercially available. However, information on their performance characteristics and use in diagnostic haemostasis laboratories remains limited.

AIM

To evaluate the Hyphen Biomed (Hyphen) and Rossix FIX CSAs on fully automated coagulation analysers and compare them to the FIX one-stage assay (OSA). This study was conducted in a tertiary referral haemostasis laboratory associated with a haemophilia treatment centre.

METHODS

Automated CSA protocols were adapted to the Sysmex CS2500 (CS2500) and Diagnostica Stago STA-R (STA-R) analysers. Samples assayed were from healthy volunteers, haemophilia B patients and FIX deficient plasma spiked with either plasma derived, recombinant or extended half-life FIX products.

RESULTS

Reference intervals for Hyphen and Rossix assays were 73 IU/dL to 164 IU/dL and 73 IU/dL to 168 IU/dL, respectively, on the CS2500 analyser; and 84 IU/dL to 165 IU/dL for the Rossix assay on the STA-R. Repeatability across all method/analyser combinations resulted in CVs ranging from 0.8% to 5.4%. Between run reproducibility gave CVs <6.7% for all method/analyser combinations. In spiked samples, FIX recoveries were mostly within an acceptable limit of 100 ± 25% for BeneFIX^® , Rixubis^® and Alprolix^® with some differences between CSAs.

CONCLUSION

Both commercial factor FIX CSA kits can be adapted for Stago and Sysmex automated coagulation analysers. Reagent cost and workflow practices will need to be considered. These assays are potentially more consistent than OSA in measurement of replacement FIX products in haemophilia B patients.

Impact of a product-specific reference standard for the measurement of a PEGylated rFVIII activity: the Swiss Multicentre Field Study

INTRODUCTION

Measuring factor VIII (FVIII) activity can be challenging when it has been modified, such as when FVIII is pegylated to increase its circulating half-life. Use of a product-specific reference standard may help avoid this issue.

AIM

Evaluate the impact of using a product-specific reference standard for measuring the FVIII activity of BAX 855 - a pegylated FVIII - in eight of Switzerland's main laboratories.

METHODS

Factor VIII-deficient plasma, spiked with five different concentrations of BAX 855, plus a control FVIII sample, was sent to the participating laboratories. They measured FVIII activity by using either with a one-stage (OSA) or the chromogenic assay (CA) against their local or a product-specific reference standard.

RESULTS

When using a local reference standard, there was an overestimation of BAX 855 activity compared to the target concentrations, both with the OSA and CA. The use of a product-specific reference standard reduced this effect: mean recovery ranged from 127.7% to 213.5% using the OSA with local reference standards, compared to 110% to 183.8% with a product-specific reference standard, and from 146.3% to 182.4% using the CA with local reference standards compared to 72.7% to 103.7% with a product-specific reference standard.

CONCLUSION

In this in vitro study, the type of reference standard had a major impact on the measurement of BAX 855 activity. Evaluation was more accurate and precise when using a product-specific reference standard.

Blood derived products in pediatrics: New laboratory tools for optimizing potency assignment and reducing side effects

Neonates and children can develop rare bleeding disorders due to congenital/acquired coagulation Factor deficiencies, or allo-immune/autoimmune complications, or can undergo surgeries at high haemorrhagic risk. They then need specialized transfusion of blood components/products, or purified blood extracted products or recombinant proteins. Blood-derived therapies conventionally used for management of affected infants with genetic/acquired deficiencies, bleeding problems (coagulation Factor reduced or missing) or thrombotic disorders (reduced or missing anticoagulant proteins) pose some additional risks. These remedial therapies can cause tolerance when used very early in life and, sometimes needed, repeatedly. The introduction of recombinant proteins has allowed manufacturers to produce large amounts of the proteins usually present at very low concentration in blood. This has also changed the risk pattern of plasma-extracted products, especially in terms of continual reduction of viral transmission. Many efforts have been made over these past decades to reduce the risks associated with the use of all these products in terms of viral and bacterial safety, as well as immune disorders but they are not the objective of this article. Other associated side effects are the presence of undesired activities in blood products, which can produce thrombotic events or adverse reactions. The progressive introduction of blood derived products has greatly improved the prognosis and quality of life of affected patients. This concerns whole blood, but also blood cell concentrates, mainly platelets and red blood cells, plasma, while the blood extracted products are increasingly replaced by recombinant proteins. All these therapeutic products, i.e. blood extracted drugs, improve health and quality of life for hemophiliac's A or B, or patients with auto/allo-immune thrombocytopenias or with rare bleeding disorders, and those with thrombotic events occurring in childhood, which are mainly due to Protein C or Protein S deficiencies (congenital or acquired). Progress in analytical methods and biotechnology allow better control of the manufacturing processes for all blood derived or plasma extracted products and recombinant proteins, and contribute to improved manufacturing processes to minimize the occurrence of side effects. These adverse events can be due to the aging of the blood cell concentrate with release of their granule content, and generation of EVs, which can produce anaphylactic reactions and risk of thrombosis, but also to the presence of activated coagulation Factors in purified products, such as Factor Xia as recently identified in immunoglobulin concentrates. Characterization and measurement of contaminant products is of special usefulness during product preparation and for optimization of manufacturing processes for purified extracted products, but also for recombinant proteins. The pharmaceutical industry introduces these new methods for validating manufacturing processes, or for quality control assessments. The objective is first to warrant the full quality and safety of the lots produced, and assure the highest efficacy with the lowest risks when used in patients. For cell concentrates and fresh blood, storage conditions are critical and measurement of analytes such as EVs or Annexin V allows evaluation of quality of each individual transfused pouch. In addition to all the rules around viral and bacterial transmission risk, and immune tolerance, our available laboratory methods contribute to reducing the side effects of blood cell concentrates and derived plasma products, as well as those of the therapeutic recombinant proteins.

Factor VIII chromogenic assays can be used for potency labeling and postadministration monitoring of N8-GP

Essentials Chromogenic assays may be less variable than one-stage clot assays for measuring modified factor VIII. Chromogenic assays were evaluated for N8-GP potency labeling and postadministration monitoring. There was no significant difference between chromogenic assay kits for measuring N8-GP potency. Postadministration monitoring of N8-GP was comparable to turoctocog alfa for all kits tested.

SUMMARY

Background Factor VIII activity (

FVIII

C) is commonly measured using one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based clot assays. Chromogenic assays are, however, an alternative, and potency assessment in Europe is performed using chromogenic assays. One-stage clot assays are in general associated with high variability, and modified FVIII products may add to this variability. FVIII chromogenic assays may be less affected. Objectives To evaluate available chromogenic assay kits for potency labeling of polyethylene glycol-glycoconjugated turoctocog alfa (turoctocog alfa pegol [N8-GP]) and to evaluate selected chromogenic kits for postadministration monitoring of N8-GP using turoctocog alfa (Novoeight(®) ) as comparator. Methods Six FVIII chromogenic assay kits were adapted to the European Pharmacopeia guidelines for potency labeling, including assessment of time to 50% FX activation. Four kits were adapted for postadministration monitoring using an ACL(®) TOP 500 analyzer. Severe hemophilia A plasma was spiked with N8-GP or turoctocog alfa to simulate postadministration samples. The World Health Organization (WHO) 8th International Standard (IS) FVIII concentrate was used as calibrator throughout. In addition, a plasma calibrator was used for postadministration samples. Results When measuring N8-GP potency, no significant difference using a 1% significance level was observed between kits. In simulated postadministration samples, all test kits were highly accurate and precise, except at low concentrations, with no significant difference between

FVIII

C (P > 0.05) measured using the different calibrators. However, values obtained using the WHO 8th IS were closer to labeled values. Conclusions Chromogenic assay kits tested measured consistent

FVIII

C for N8-GP potency and showed comparable results for N8-GP and turoctocog alfa in simulated postadministration samples.