Quality of life in adolescents with hepatitis C treated with sofosbuvir and ribavirin

Efficacy and safety of DAA in children and adolescents with chronic HCV infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of pan-genotypic regimens, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), and sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (SOF/DCV) and other direct-acting antivirals (DAA) regimens for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected adolescents (12-18 years), older children (6-11 years), and young children (3-5 years). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to inform the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines.

METHODS

We included clinical trials and observational studies published up to August 11, 2021, that evaluated DAA regimens in HCV-infected adolescents, older children, and young children. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases and key conference abstracts. Sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12), adverse events (AEs), and treatment discontinuation were the outcomes evaluated. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the ROBINS-I tool. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

A total of 49 studies including 1882 adolescents, 436 older children, and 166 young children were considered. The SVR12 was 100% (95% Confidence Interval: 96-100), 96% (90-100), and 96% (83-100) for GLE/PIB in adolescents, older, and young children, respectively; 95% (90-99), 93% (86-98), and 83% (70-93), for SOF/VEL, respectively; and 100% (97-100) and 100% (94-100) for SOF/DCV in adolescent and older children, respectively. There was a clear trend towards a higher rate of any reported AE from adolescents (50%), older children (53%), to young children (72%). Serious AEs and treatment discontinuations were uncommon in adolescents and older children (<1%) but slightly higher in young children (3%).

CONCLUSIONS

All three pan-genotypic DAA regimens were highly effective and well-tolerated and are now recommended by the WHO for use in adults, adolescents, and children down to 3 years, which will simplify procurement and supply chain management. The evidence was based largely on single-arm non-randomized controlled studies. Moreover, there were also missing data regarding key variables such as route of HCV acquisition, presence or absence of cirrhosis, or HIV co-infection that precluded evaluation of the impact of these factors on outcomes.

PROSPERO RECORD

CRD42020146752.

Health-related quality of life in patients aged 6-18 years with chronic hepatitis C treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) on the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of children with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

In the non-commercial, non-randomized, open-label PANDAA-PED study, 50 children aged 6-18 years with chronic hepatitis C were treated with a fixed dose of SOF/VEL. All patients achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Evaluation of HRQL was performed twice: at baseline (before the treatment) and during the SVR12 analysis using the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaires, which included 5 dimensions of HRQL, for child self-reporting and parent proxy reporting. The normal range for the population was set to T values of 50 ± 10 points. Child-parent agreement was analysed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman test.

RESULTS

Mean T values were within the normal range for all dimensions, both before and after treatment. There was a significant improvement in physical well-being based on the children's self-assessment (from 48.53 to 51.21, p = .03). In addition, a trend towards better scores in the 'social support & peers' part of the parent proxy evaluation (from 45.98 to 48.66, p = .06) was noticed. After the treatment, the proportion of children self-assessing their physical well-being as below normal significantly decreased from 17% to 5% (p = .007). HRQL scores were not associated with patients' sex, but in most cases, younger age correlated with better HRQL. Evaluation of the ICC for child self-reports versus parent proxy reports revealed poor to moderate agreement for most single measures. Bland-Altman analysis showed that in all dimensions, both before and after treatment, the limits of agreement (LoAs) exceeded ±5 points (half of the SD and considered a maximum allowed difference).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of children with chronic hepatitis C have decreased HRQL in all dimensions, but effective treatment with SOF/VEL leads to an improvement in some areas of well-being. As the effect of HCV on HRQL is more pronounced in older patients, treatment of younger children should be indicated to prevent them from experiencing decreased HRQL due to ongoing HCV infection in the future.

HBV and HCV Infection in Children and Adolescents

Hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) infections are the major causes of chronic liver disease and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality [...].

Adolescents with chronic hepatitis C might be good candidates for direct‐acting antiviral therapy

Three Japanese adolescents with chronic hepatitis C were treated by direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs). No adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were observed during and after DAA therapy, and a sustained virological response was achieved in all cases. The emotional functioning of the patients and their mothers were improved after DAA therapy.

The efficacy/safety of therapy with direct‐acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C in Japanese adolescents were favorable and the improvement of emotional functioning of them and their mothers by viral eradication was observed in all cases.

Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM version 4.0 short form generic core scale across pediatric populations review data

The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory^TM Version 4.0 Short Form Generic Core Scale (PedsQL^TM) is a validated and widely used tool assessing the quality of life (QoL) of children and youth. It has been used extensively across healthy populations as well as those with chronic and acute illnesses, allowing for comparison of the psychosocial impact of chronic illness between pediatric disease cohorts. As part of the QoL initiative undertaken at the British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH) Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) program and published in the Journal of Pediatrics titled “Cross-Sectional Analysis of Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients with IBD in British Columbia, Canada,” a limited literature review was conducted using Embasse and Ovid. Studies using the English version of the PedsQL^TM short form generic scale (not a disease specific scale) were identified. Studies with populations greater than 50 patients with robust subgroup sample size were included, with an emphasis on studies with well-defined patients with chronic disease. These data were compared to the BCCH population, as discussed in the aforementioned journal article.

Analysis within the BCCH cohort is described separately. Comparison between different populations from the existing literature was qualitative only, with no statistical analysis done given the heterogeneity of populations and studies.

In a study of patients from the emergency department at BCCH (n=178), the mean (SD) QoL scores of the healthy patients was 89.2 (10.3). In a group of self-identified healthy patients in California (n=5079), their mean QoL score was 83.9 (12.5). Separating the BCCH IBD population by disease activity, those in remission (n=220, 84.4 (12.8)) have similar QoL scores to these healthy cohorts, though their scores remain slightly below the previously published BCCH cohort. For children with any degree of active IBD (n=98, 75.6 (15.8)), their QoL scores are below the healthy means and are lower than other groups with self-identified “chronic illnesses” (n=367, 77.2 (15.5)), diabetes (n=418, 82.3 (13.5)), mild asthma (n=281, 85.5 (13.3)), or Canadian patients 4 weeks post-concussion (n=1157, 80.3). BCCH IBD patients with moderately to severely active disease have QoL scores well below the other disease groups (n=33, 63.1 (18.8)); lower than oncology patients on induction chemotherapy regimens (n=105, 68.9 (16.0)), acute inpatients (n=359, 63.9 (20.3)), and asthmatics with moderate-severe, persistent asthma (n=86, 67.1 (18.6)).

This data is useful for clinicians treating pediatric patients looking at how QoL is influenced by chronic illness and by factors such as disease type and severity.

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in British Columbia, Canada

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate quality of life (QoL) in a large cohort of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to identify the clinical factors that influence QoL.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional study analyzes a quality improvement initiative in 351 pediatric patients with IBD in British Columbia, Canada using the self-reported Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic scale. The questionnaire was completed at outpatient clinic and biologic infusion appointments. Statistical analysis included the t test, ANOVA, and multilinear regressions to evaluate the relationships between clinical factors and QoL.

RESULTS

Mean (SE) QoL scores (79.95 [0.84]) fell between previously described healthy and chronically ill populations. Disease activity was the most significant predictor of QoL, with patients in remission scoring similar (84.42 [0.87]) to well established healthy norms, and those with moderately or severely active disease having some of the lowest published PedsQL scores (63.13 [3.27]), lower than most other chronic pediatric conditions. Twenty-five patients with moderately or severely active disease at the time of survey completion had follow-up surveys identified 1 year later and had a significant improvement of both their disease activity (P < .005) and their PedsQL scores (follow-up survey mean 76.13 [3.11]). Additional clinical factors independently associated with poor QoL were school nonattendance (15.5% decrease in QoL, P < .001), immune-modulator selection (methotrexate conferring a 9.5% lower mean QoL score than azathioprine, P = .005), and female gender (P = .031).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients with IBD experience a QoL significantly impacted by multiple clinical factors including current severity of IBD symptoms.

Real-Life Experience with Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection with Genotypes 1 and 4 in Children Aged 12 to 17 Years-Results of the POLAC Project

BACKGROUND

Available real-world data on the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in pediatric patients are limited. In this prospective, open-label, single-center study, we aimed to present our real-life experience with a fixed dose of LDV/SOF (90/400 mg) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotypes 1 and 4 in children aged 12 to 17 years.

METHODS

We analyzed intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) rates of sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV viral load at posttreatment week 12, in 37 participants treated with LDV/SOF according to the HCV genotype, baseline liver fibrosis, duration of treatment, and experience of the previous ineffective antiviral treatment. There were 32 patients infected with genotype 1 and 5 with genotype 4. Fourteen (38%) participants were treatment-experienced, two were coinfected with HIV, and three were cirrhotic. Two patients qualified for 24 weeks of therapy, and the remaining 35 received 12 weeks of LDV/SOF treatment.

RESULTS

The overall ITT SVR12 rate was 36/37 (97%). One patient was lost to follow-up after week 4 of therapy when his HCV RNA was undetectable. All 36 patients who completed the full protocol achieved SVR (36/36, 100%). PP analyses of SVR12 rates according to the HCV genotype, baseline liver fibrosis, duration of the treatment, and previous ineffective treatment were all 100%. A significant decrease in aminotransferase serum levels was observed in the subsequent weeks of the treatment and at SVR assessment compared to baseline. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm previous observations of a suitable efficacy and safety profile of LDV/SOF for the treatment of CHC genotypes 1 and 4 in adolescents.

Cascade of care for children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol 2021;27:1117-1131. [PMID: 33828389 PMCID: PMC8006101 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i12.1117]

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection presents a significant global public health burden. In 2015, over 400000 deaths worldwide were attributed to HCV infection. This led the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2016 to set the ambitious goal of eliminating HCV by 2030. Adult-centered guidelines have been established in order to provide direction for healthcare professionals, allowing integration of the newest screening policies and therapeutic strategies into their practices. However, for children and adolescents, HCV is a significant, unrecognized public health problem. HCV infection rates in the United States in women of childbearing age and those who are pregnant have increased in parallel with the rising opioid epidemic. An estimated 29000 women with HCV infection gave birth each year from 2011 to 2014 in the United States, with approximately 1700 of their infants being infected with HCV. Newer HCV-specific therapeutics, namely direct acting antivirals (DAA), has brought a new and highly successful approach to treatment of hepatitis C. Recent studies have confirmed similar levels of effectiveness and safety of DAA therapies in the pediatric population. Thus, an enhanced cascade of care, which should include the population under 18 years of age, can help achieve the WHO goal by focusing on elimination in the youngest populations. This review will present an overview of the natural history, clinical features, and management of HCV in children and adolescents.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals in children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

The effect of direct-acting anti-virals (DAAs) in children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is difficult to determine, since few, aged between 3 and 18 years, have been enrolled in clinical trials, and some data come from observational studies.

AIM

To summarise the evidence on efficacy and safety of DAAs in children and adolescents with chronic HCV infection.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of DAAs in subjects <18 years of age. We considered the sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 as efficacy outcome and adverse events as safety outcome. We considered intervention effect for each study arm by calculating the proportion of sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 in subjects receiving all doses of treatment and proportion of adverse events in subjects receiving at least one dose of treatment. Pooled proportions were calculated using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Random effects model was used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Among 39 included studies (1796 subjects), the pooled proportion among those receiving all doses of treatment and reaching sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 was 100% (95% confidence interval: 100-100). Considering subjects receiving at least one dose of treatment, lowest estimates were reported among children with cirrhosis (83%). Headache and fatigue were the most common adverse events. Serious adverse events were uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

Children and adolescents with chronic HCV infection can be safely treated with DAAs with similar efficacy as reported in adults.

Meeting the WHO hepatitis C virus elimination goal: Review of treatment in paediatrics

Over 3 million paediatric patients globally and ~50 000 in the United States are estimated to be infected with HCV. Eradicating HCV in children helps prevent liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma; reduces extra-hepatic manifestations of HCV; improves quality of life; and increases survival. The 2019 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA) guidelines now recommend direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment with an approved regimen for all children and adolescents with HCV infection aged ≥3 years. We conducted a descriptive review of the new DAA treatments for HCV infection in the paediatric population. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and sofosbuvir with ribavirin (SOF/RBV) are now approved for those ≥3 years old under specific clinical scenarios; sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is the only pangenotypic agent approved for those ≥6 years or ≥17 kg, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) is approved for adolescents ≥12 years old or ≥45 kg. These DAA regimens are well-tolerated and have comparable sustained virologic response rates at 12 weeks post-treatment compared to those reported in adults (close to 100%). The introduction of DAAs has significantly changed the landscape of HCV treatment in adults and children with HCV infection and has increased confidence that the 2030 World Health Organization elimination goal may be attainable. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal treatment for children with HCV infection, including timing, regimen and duration. Additionally, with the recent paediatric approvals, long-term safety data are needed.

Cost-effectiveness of Oral Regimens for Adolescents With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

BACKGROUND

Novel oral regimes have been approved for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in adolescents due to their superior effectiveness and safety. However, its economic outcome is still unclear in this population. The current analysis investigates the cost-effectiveness of novel oral regimens compared with that of pegylated interferon α with ribavirin (PR) therapies in adolescents in the context of the United States and China.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to measure the economic and health outcomes of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LS) for genotypes 1 and 4, sofosbuvir/ribavirin (SR) for genotype 2, and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir/ribavirin (LSR) for genotype 3 HCV infection compared with the outcomes of PR treatment. Clinical costs and utility inputs were gathered from published sources. Lifetime discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured. The uncertainty was facilitated by 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

In the United States, the ICERs of LS strategy were $14,699 and $14,946/QALY for genotypes 1 and 4 HCV infection, respectively; the ICER of SR strategy for genotype 2 was $42,472/QALY; and the ICER of LSR for genotype 3 was $49,409/QALY in comparison with the PR strategy. In Chinese adolescents, LS for genotypes 1 and 4, SR for genotype 2, and LSR for genotype 3 were the dominant alternatives to the PR strategy. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel oral regimes for adolescents with HCV infection are likely to be cost-effective in the context of the United States and China.

Cytokine balance is restored as patient-reported outcomes improve in patients recovering from chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) has a negative impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Although most CHC patients who achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) show an improvement in PRO scores, some continue to experience impairment in PROs. The aim was to investigate if serum biomarkers (selected neurotransmitters and cytokines) are associated with changes in PROs in CHC patients who achieve SVR.

METHODS

Data were utilized from a prospective clinical trial of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir fixed-dose combination. Chronic genotype 1 HCV subjects without cirrhosis (N = 40, age: 45.3 ± 11.5, 48% male, 90% white) were treated for 12 weeks open label with 97% achieving SVR24. PRO questionnaires included Short Form-36 (SF-36), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-HCV (CLDQ-HCV) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F). Sera were used for measurement of selected neurotransmitters and cytokines. Data were collected at baseline and follow-up week 24.

RESULTS

Changes in physical health correlated with changes in several biomarkers. BDNF negatively correlated with SF-36 physical health summary score (rho = -0.34, P < 0.05), SF-36 physical functioning (rho = -0.34, P < 0.05), SF-36 bodily pain (rho = -0.39, P < 0.05) and FACIT-F physical well-being (rho = -0.54, P < 0.001). Changes in emotional well-being (FACIT-F) were positively associated with changes in serotonin (rho = 0.34, P < 0.05), but negatively associated with changes in GABA and BDNF (rho = -0.4, P = 0.01, and rho = -0.35, P < 0.05 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate relationships between PROs and serum biomarkers pre- and post-SVR in CHC. These concomitant changes may have important clinical relevance.

A Comprehensive Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Liver Diseases

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a global health problem with chronic viral hepatitis, alcohol-related liver disease, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease being important causes of mortality. Besides its clinical burden, patients with CLD also suffer from impairment of their health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PRO). In this context, a combination of both clinical and PROs will allow assessment of the comprehensive burden of liver disease on patients. PROs cannot be observed directly and must be assessed by validated questionnaires or tools. Various tools have been developed to accurately measure PROs in patients with CLD, including generic and disease-specific questionnaires such as Short Form-36, Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire and its subtypes. It is important to note that PRO instruments can be used to appreciate the impact of the natural history of CLD or of treatment on patients' experiences. This review summarizes PRO assessment in different types of liver disease and different tools useful to investigators and clinicians who are interested in this aspect of patients' experience.

Hepatitis C virus infection in children and adolescents

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease and associated morbidity and mortality worldwide. Short-course, oral, curative, direct-acting antiviral regimens have transformed treatment for HCV infection. Since the 2016 launch of the first global strategy towards elimination of viral hepatitis as a public health threat by 2030, the predominant focus of the global response has been on the treatment of adults, who bear the greatest burden of morbidity and mortality of HCV-related chronic liver disease. Compared with adults, there has been little attention paid to addressing the response to HCV in children and adolescents, in part because of the scarcity of data to inform specific paediatric management practices and policy. In this Series paper, we summarise knowledge on the epidemiology, natural history, and treatment of chronic HCV infection in adolescents and children, and we highlight key differences from infection acquired in adulthood. The estimated global prevalence and burden of HCV infection in children aged 1-19 years is 0·15%, corresponding to 3·5 million people (95% CI 3·1-3·9 million). HCV infection is usually asymptomatic during childhood, and cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma are rare. Sofosbuvir with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir with ribavirin have received regulatory approval and guidelines recommend their use in adolescents aged 12 years and older with HCV infection. In April, 2019, glecaprevir with pibrentasvir also received regulatory approval for adolescents aged 12-17 years. Key actions to address the current policy gaps and achieve treatment scale-up that is comparable to that in adults include: establishment of a campaign on access to testing and treatment that is targeted at children and adolescents; fast-track evaluation of pan-genotypic regimens; and accelerated approval of paediatric formulations. Research gaps that need to be addressed include: age-specific prevalence studies of HCV viraemia in priority countries; further validation of non-invasive tests for staging of liver disease in children; and establishment of paediatric treatment registries and international consortia to promote collaborative research agendas.

The management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in children

In the present paper, we review the increased disease burden of hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) infection that is recognized worldwide; especially in children when the most common mode of transmission is vertically from infected mothers. In children with HBV and HCV infection, spontaneous clearance of the virus in the first years of life is not common, in contrast with adults, but these patients often stay asymptomatic until early adulthood, when disease has progressed to chronic hepatitis with increased risk of cirrhosis and its complication, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Due to limited treatment options of HBV infection in the pediatric population, clinicians focus on primary prevention, by vaccinating all infants during their first days of life. Infants born to infected mothers, receive intravenous immunoglobulin on top of the vaccine, and thus preventing transmission in 95% of the infants. While for HCV infection, since there is no vaccine to prevent HCV disease, providers focus primarily on treatment. The treatment landscape of HCV infection in children rapidly evolves, away from interferon regimens, and towards direct-acting antiviral agents that have a safer and more efficacious drug profile. Currently, there are ongoing clinical trials investigating the efficacy and tolerance of direct-acting agents in children below 12 years of age.

Hepatitis C virus infection in children in the era of direct-acting antiviral

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains an important global health problem with chronic infection affecting approximately 11 million children worldwide. The emergence of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies and the development of non-invasive methods for the determination of liver fibrosis will significantly improve the management of paediatric patients with chronic HCV infection in subsequent years. For paediatric patients, a new era of highly effective DAA agents is beginning, and the first results of available clinical trials are very promising. In this era, the identification and monitoring of patients continues to be an important issue. The availability of non-invasive serological and imaging methods to measure hepatic fibrosis enables the identification of patients with significant or advanced liver fibrosis stages. This article summarizes the current data on the epidemiology and progress of research aimed to evaluate the new therapies and non-invasive methods for liver injury in paediatric patients with chronic hepatitis C.