Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C virus treatments: The bold and the beautiful

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

Racial Disparities in Liver Transplant for Hepatitis C-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In the United States, hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and mortality are highest among minorities. Socioeconomic constraints play a major role in inequitable treatment. We evaluated the association between race/ethnicity and outcomes in a population that overcame treatment barriers.

METHODS

We report a retrospective cohort study of 666 patients across 20 institutions in the United States Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Transplantation Consortium from 2015 to 2019 with hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma who completed direct-acting antiviral therapy and underwent liver transplantation. Patients were excluded if they had a prior liver transplantation, hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, no prior liver-directed therapy, or if race/ethnicity data were unavailable. Patients were stratified by race/ethnicity. Primary outcomes were recurrence-free survival and overall survival, and secondary outcome was major postoperative complication.

RESULTS

Race/ethnicity was not associated with differences in 5-year recurrence-free survival (White 90%, Black 88%, Hispanic 92%, Other 87%; p = 0.85), overall survival (White 85%, Black 84%, Hispanic 84%, Other 93%; p = 0.70), or major postoperative complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Race/ethnicity was not associated with worse oncologic or postoperative outcomes among those who completed direct-acting antiviral therapy and underwent liver transplantation, suggesting that overcoming socioeconomic constraints equalizes outcomes across racial/ethnic groups. Eliminating barriers that prohibit care access among minorities must be a priority.

Monocyte and Macrophage Functions in Oncogenic Viral Infections

Monocytes and macrophages are part of innate immunity and constitute the first line of defense against pathogens. Bone marrow-derived monocytes circulate in the bloodstream for one to three days and then typically migrate into tissues, where they differentiate into macrophages. Circulatory monocytes represent 5% of the nucleated cells in normal adult blood. Following differentiation, macrophages are distributed into various tissues and organs to take residence and maintain body homeostasis. Emerging evidence has highlighted the critical role of monocytes/macrophages in oncogenic viral infections, mainly their crucial functions in viral persistence and disease progression. These findings open opportunities to target innate immunity in the context of oncogenic viruses and to explore their potential as immunotherapies.

Etiological changes of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma-complicated liver cirrhosis in Japan: Updated nationwide survey from 2018 to 2021

AIM

A nationwide survey in 2018 showed decreasing involvement of viral hepatitis and increasing involvement of nonviral liver diseases in the etiology of liver cirrhosis (LC) in Japan. An updated nationwide survey was undertaken in 2023.

METHODS

Cases of LC diagnosed between 2018 and 2021 were collected from 75 institutions, and the etiologies of LC were investigated. In addition, the data obtained were compared with the results of previous studies.

RESULTS

Among the 15 517 cases, alcohol-related liver disease (ALD)-associated LC was the most frequent cause (n = 5,487, 35.4%). Hepatitis C virus-associated LC, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-associated LC, and hepatitis B virus-associated LC were ranked as second, third, and fourth, respectively. In comparison to the previous survey, the ratios of viral hepatitis-associated LC decreased (HBV: from 11.5% to 8.1%; HCV: from 48.2% to 23.4%), while the ratios of ALD-associated LC and NASH-associated LC increased (from 19.9% to 35.4% and from 6.3% to 14.6%, respectively). Regarding cases of LC with hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 5906), HCV-associated LC (1986 cases, 33.6%) was the most frequent cause. Alcohol-related liver disease-associated LC, NASH-associated LC, and HBV-associated LC were the second-, third-, and fourth-ranked causes, respectively. In comparison to the previous survey, as the cause of hepatocellular carcinoma-complicated LC, HCV-associated LC decreased from 60.3% to 33.6%, while the ratios of ALD-associated LC and NASH-associated LC increased from 14.2% to 28.6% and from 4.2% to 14.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The major causes of LC in Japan are suggested to have been shifting from viral hepatitis to nonviral chronic liver diseases.

Hepatitis B virus as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: There is still much work to do

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a significant health problem that can result in progression to liver cirrhosis, decompensation, and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). On a country level, the prevalence of chronic HBV infection varies between 0.1% and 35.0%, depending on the locality and the population being investigated. One-third of all liver cancer fatalities worldwide are attributable to HBV. The adoption of standard birth-dose immunization exerted the most significant impact on the decline of HBV prevalence. HCC incidence ranges from 0.01% to 1.40% in noncirrhotic patients and from 0.9% to 5.4% annually, in the settings of liver cirrhosis. Although antiviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of developing HBV-related HCC, studies have demonstrated that the risk persists, and that HCC screening is still essential. This review discusses the complex relationship between HBV infection and HCC, recent epidemiological data, different aspects of clinical disease characteristics, and the impact of antiviral therapy in this context.

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: Predictors and management

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the sixth most common cancer globally, is associated with high mortality rates and more than 830,000 annual deaths. Despite advances in the available management options including surgical resection and local ablative therapies, recurrence rates after the initial treatment exceed 50%, even among patients who have undergone curative-intent therapy. Moreover, postsurgical HCC recurrence occurs in about 70% of cases five years postoperatively. The management of recurrent HCC remains undefined. This review discusses different predictors for HCC recurrence after each treatment modality and different approaches available to stratify these patients. More specific guidelines for managing HCC recurrence and strict surveillance protocols for such recurrence after initial HCC management are needed.

Recent Insights into the Biomarkers, Molecular Targets and Mechanisms of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis-Driven Hepatocarcinogenesis

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and steatohepatitis (NASH) are chronic hepatic conditions leading to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development. According to the recent "multiple-parallel-hits hypothesis", NASH could be caused by abnormal metabolism, accumulation of lipids, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stresses and is found in obese and non-obese patients. Recent translational research studies have discovered new proteins and signaling pathways that are involved not only in the development of NAFLD but also in its progression to NASH, cirrhosis, and HCC. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of HCC developing from precancerous lesions have not yet been fully elucidated. Now, it is of particular importance to start research focusing on the discovery of novel molecular pathways that mediate alterations in glucose and lipid metabolism, which leads to the development of liver steatosis. The role of mTOR signaling in NASH progression to HCC has recently attracted attention. The goals of this review are (1) to highlight recent research on novel genetic and protein contributions to NAFLD/NASH; (2) to investigate how recent scientific findings might outline the process that causes NASH-associated HCC; and (3) to explore the reliable biomarkers/targets of NAFLD/NASH-associated hepatocarcinogenesis.