High occurrence of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from healthy rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus): first report of blaIMI and blaVIM type genes from livestock in Tunisia

Prevalence of blaCTX-M and blaTEM Genes in Cefotaxime-Resistant Escherichia coli Recovered from Tertiary Care at Central Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are highly prevalent globally, and various antibiotics are employed for their treatment. However, the emergence of drug-resistant uropathogens towards these antibiotics causes a high rate of morbidity and mortality. This study was conducted at the Microbiology Laboratory of Grande International Hospital from November 2021 to May 2022 and aimed to assess the prevalence of UTI caused by Escherichia coli and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern with a focus on extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and the prevalence of two genes (blaCTX-M and blaTEM) in cephalosporin-resistant E. coli. Altogether, 1050 urine samples were processed to obtain 165 isolates of E. coli. The isolates were identified by colony morphology and biochemical characteristics. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests (ASTs) were determined by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, and their ESBL enzymes were estimated by the combined disk method (CDM). Two ESBL genes (blaCTX-M and blaTEM) were investigated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in cefotaxime-resistant E. coli. Among the 1050 urine samples that were processed, 335 (31.9%) were culture-positive with 165 (49.2%) identified as E. coli. The age group ≥60 years (30.3%) had greater susceptibility to bacterial infections. AST revealed that meropenem was highly effective (95.7% susceptibility), while ampicillin showed the least sensitivity (42.4%). Among the E. coli isolates, 86 were multidrug resistant (MDR) and 10 were extensively drug resistant (XDR). Of these, 46 MDR (96%) and 2 XDR (4%) were ESBL producers. The prevalence of ESBL genes (blaCTX-M and blaTEM) was 49.3% and 54.8%, respectively. The overall accuracy of CDM as compared to PCR for the detection of the blaCTX-M gene was 55.26%. The prevalence of MDR E. coli harboring the blaCTX-M and blaTEM genes underscores the imperative role of ESBL testing in accurately identifying both beta-lactamase producers and nonproducers.

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial‐resistant Escherichia coli in dogs and cats, horses, swine, poultry, cattle, sheep and goats

Escherichia coli (E. coli) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial‐resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for dogs and cats, horses, swine, poultry, cattle, sheep and goats in previous scientific opinions. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR E. coli can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33–66% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 (Categories A, B, C and D; 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–33% and 10–33% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel was uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Section 5 (Category E, 33–66% probability of meeting the criteria). The animal species to be listed for AMR E. coli according to Article 8 criteria include mammals, birds, reptiles and fish.