High efficacy of Sofosbuvir plus Simeprevir in a large cohort of Spanish cirrhotic patients infected with genotypes 1 and 4

Singlet oxygen and radical-mediated mechanisms in the oxidative cellular damage photosensitized by the protease inhibitor simeprevir

Hepatitis C, a liver inflammation caused by the hepatitis C virus (HCV), is treated with antiviral drugs. In this context, simeprevir (SIM) is an NS3/4A protease inhibitor used in HCV genotypes 1 and 4. It is orally administered and achieves high virological cure rates. Among adverse reactions associated with SIM treatment, photosensitivity reactions have been reported. In the present work, it is clearly shown that SIM is markedly phototoxic, according to the in vitro NRU assay using BALB/c 3T3 mouse fibroblast. This result sheds light on the nature of the photosensitivity reactions induced by SIM in HCV patients, suggesting that porphyrin elevation in patients treated with SIM may not be the only mechanism responsible for SIM-associated photosensitivity. Moreover, lipid photoperoxidation and protein photooxidation assays, using human skin fibroblasts (FSK) and human serum albumin (HSA), respectively, reveal the capability of this drug to promote photodamage to cellular membranes. Also, DNA photo lesions induced by SIM are noticed through comet assay in FSK cells. Photochemical and photobiological studies on the mechanism of SIM-mediated photodamage to biomolecules indicate that the key transient species generated upon SIM irradiation is the triplet excited state. This species is efficiently quenched by oxygen giving rise to singlet oxygen, which is responsible for the oxidation of lipids and DNA (Type II mechanism). In the presence of HSA, the photobehavior is dominated by binding to site 3 of the protein, to give a stable SIM@HSA complex. Inside the complex, quenching of the triplet excited state is less efficient, which results in a longer triplet lifetime and in a decreased singlet oxygen formation. Hence, SIM-mediated photooxidation of the protein is better explained through a radical (Type I) mechanism.

Safety and efficacy of the combination simeprevir-sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1- and 4-mono-infected patients from the French ANRS CO22 hepather cohort

BACKGROUND

Although real-life results of sofosbuvir/simeprevir have been extensively reported from the United States, data from other geographical areas are limited. In the French observational cohort, ANRS CO22 HEPATHER, 9432 patients were given the new oral antivirals from December 2013 to June 30, 2018. We report the results of sofosbuvir/simeprevir in genotypes 1- and 4-infected patients.

METHODS

Demographics and history of liver disease were collected at entry in the cohort. Clinical, adverse events, and virological data were collected throughout treatment and post-treatment follow-up. The choice of treatment duration or addition of ribavirin was left up to the physician.

RESULTS

Five hundred ninety-nine HCV (467 genotype 1 and 132 genotype 4) mono-infected, naïve for all oral-DAAs regimen patients were given sofosbuvir/simeprevir with (n = 63) or without ribavirin (n = 536) for 12 or 24 weeks; 56% had cirrhosis (4% decompensated) and 71% had prior treatment failure to interferon-based regimen. 7 patients (1.16%) were lost to follow-up. The overall SVR12 rate was 92.6%. The SVR12 was 90% in GT1a, 94.2% in GT1b and 91.6% in GT4 with no significant difference for genotype, treatment duration or ribavirin addition. Severity of liver disease was not associated with a lower SVR12 rate on multivariate analysis but was associated with a higher rate of severe side effects. Early treatment discontinuations were rare; no new safety signals were reported.

CONCLUSION

In this real life, observational, prospective cohort study, the 12-week sofosbuvir/simeprevir+/-ribavirin combination appears to be efficient and safe.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01953458 .

Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir: a new triple combination for hepatitis C virus treatment. One pill fits all? Is it the end of the road?

The advent of oral direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has dramatically improved the hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment landscape in the last 4 years, providing cure rates over 95% with a shorter duration of treatment and a very good safety profile. This has enabled access to treatment in nearly all HCV infected patients. The launch of two pangenotypic fixed dose combinations (FDCs) in 2017 made a new step forward in HCV treatment by slightly increasing efficacy and more importantly allowing the treatment of patients without HCV genotyping, and in some cases without fibrosis assessment. However, retreatment of the few DAA failure patients was still an issue for some HCV genotypes. The launch of the triple regimen FDC, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, solves this issue by providing a cure rate over 96% regardless of HCV genotype. In this review, we describe the current HCV treatment landscape and focus on the development of this triple FDC either in treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced patients with previous failure on a DAA regimen.

Effectiveness and safety of simeprevir-based regimens for hepatitis C in Italy: The STIly observational study

The combination of the direct-acting antivirals, simeprevir (SMV) and sofosbuvir (SOF), was the first highly efficacious interferon-free combination for treating patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), and was widely used in Italy as a result.The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of SMV in Italian patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 and 4 overall, by treatment regimen [SMV/SOF and SMV/SOF+ribavirin (RBV)], cirrhosis status, and GT (GT1a, GT1b, and GT4).An observational multicenter cohort study was conducted in 46 centers across Italy. Adult HCV + GT1 or GT4 patients, naive or treatment-experienced, with or without cirrhosis, who underwent treatment with a SMV-containing regimen from May to September 2015 were included. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable serum HCV RNA levels 12 weeks after treatment end (SVR12). The secondary endpoints included duration of treatment, safety and tolerability of each treatment regimen, and SVR by treatment and according to response to previous treatment and fibrosis stage. The association between SVR and a subset of the most clinically relevant variables was investigated by a multivariate logistic regression analysis.A total of 349 HCV-positive patients treated with an SMV-based regimen were enrolled, of whom 342 received SMV/SOF ± RBV and were included in this analysis. Most patients (59.4%) were treatment-experienced and had cirrhosis (78.1%). In the group receiving SMV/SOF + RBV, most (63.1%) were treatment-experienced and 82.9% had cirrhosis. Three patients were lost to follow-up; 330 patients receiving SMV/SOF ± RBV (96.5%) were treated for 12 weeks. Overall, SVR12 was achieved by 324 patients [94.2%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 92-97]. When stratified by treatment and clinical and virologic characteristics, SVR12 was achieved by 77 of 79 [97.5% (95% CI 94.0-100.0)] and 247 of 263 [93.9% (95% CI 91.0-96.8)] patients receiving SMV/SOF and SMV/SOF + RBV, respectively; 132 of 139 (95.0%) naive versus 192/203 (94.6%) treatment-experienced patients; 250 of 267 (93.6%) cirrhotic and 56 of 62 (90.3%) HIV coinfected patients. SMV-based regimens were generally well tolerated. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were not observed.A high proportion of patients treated with SMV/SOF-based regimens achieved SVR12 in this study. A high SVR12 rate was also achieved in patients with cirrhosis, treatment experience, and HUV coinfected patients.

Adverse Effects of Direct Acting Antivirals in HIV/HCV Coinfected Patients: A 4-Year Experience in Miami, Florida

Introduction: The new direct acting antivirals (DAA) have demonstrated low rates of adverse effects in controlled studies. However, real world-studies have disclosed emerging toxicities and drug-drug interactions in special populations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of HIV/HCV coinfected patients who were treated with DAA at Jackson Memorial Hospital from 2014 to 2017. Our aim was to determine the adverse effects (AE) and factors that are associated with AE in HIV/HCV individuals who are treated with DAA. Results: There were 78 coinfected patients treated with DAA. AE that were secondary to DAA were reported by 21 (26.9%) patients. The most common AE were fatigue (47.6%), gastrointestinal symptoms (38.1%), anemia (14.3%), and headache (14.3%). In comparison with the rest of the study cohort, the patients who developed AE were more often Caucasian (33.3% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.017) and were more frequently treated with PrOD/Ribavirin (9.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.018). In terms of antiretroviral therapy (ART), there was a trend towards a more frequent use of TDF/FTC + NNRTI (33.3% vs. 14%, p = 0.055). Conclusions: These findings demonstrated good tolerability of DAAs in HIV/HCV coinfected patients. More real-world studies are needed to explore the variables that are associated with AE.

Impact of new DAA therapy on real clinical practice: a multicenter region-wide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Management of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) has significantly accelerated in the last few years. Currently, second generation direct acting antivirals (DAAs) promise clearance of infection in most of patients. Here we present the results of the first analysis carried out on data of Lazio clinical network for DAAs.

METHODS

The study was designed as a multicenter cohort: a) to assess the evolution of treatment during the first 24 months of the activity of the Clinical Network; b) to report overall efficacy of treatments; c) to analyze potential factors associated with lack of virological response at 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12); d) to evaluate the variation of ALT at baseline and 12 weeks after therapy in those who achieved SVR12 in comparison to those who did not. Analyses of efficacy were carried out with multilevel mixed effect logistic regression model. ALT temporal variation was assessed by mixed effect model mixed models with random intercept at patient's level and random slope at the level of the time; i.e. either before or after therapy.

RESULTS

Between 30 December 2014 and 31 December 2016 5279 patients started a DAA treatment; of those, 5127 (in 14 clinical centers) had completed the 12-week follow-up. Overall proportion of SVR12 was 93.41% (N = 4780) with no heterogeneity between the 14 clinical centers. Interruption as the consequence of severe side effect was very low (only 23 patients). Unadjusted analysis indicates that proportion of SVR12 significantly changes according to patient's baseline characteristics, however after adjusting for potential confounders only adherence to current guidelines, stage of liver diseases, gender, transplant and HIV status were independently associated with the response to therapy. Analysis of ALT temporal variation showed that ALT level normalized in most, but not, all patients who achieved SVR12.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the extraordinary efficacy of DAAs outside clinical trials. The advantage of DAAs was particularly significant for those patients who were previously considered as difficult-to-treat and did not have treatment options before DAAs era. Intervention based on network of select centers and prioritization of patients according to diseases severity was successful. Further studies are needed to establish whether clearance of HCV after DAAs therapy can arrest or even revert liver fibrosis in non-cirrhotic patients and/or improve life quality and expectancy in those who achieve SVR12 with cirrhosis.

Micro-costing analysis of guideline-based treatment by direct-acting agents: the real-life case of hepatitis C management in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) using direct-acting agents (DAA) has been associated with a financial burden to health authorities worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the guideline-based treatment costs by DAAs from the perspective of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (BMoH).

METHODS

The activity based costing method was used to estimate the cost for monitoring/treatment of genotype-1 (GT1) HCV patients by the following strategies: peg-interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks, PEG-IFN/RBV plus boceprevir (BOC) or telaprevir (TEL) for 48 weeks, and sofosbuvir (SOF) plus daclastavir (DCV) or simeprevir (SIM) for 12 weeks. Costs were reported in United States Dollars without (US$) and with adjustment for purchasing power parity (PPP$). Drug costs were collected at the National Database of Health Prices and an overview of the literature was performed to assess effectiveness of SOF/DCV and SOF/SIM regimens in real-world cohorts.

RESULTS

Treatment costs of GT1-HCV patients were PPP$ 43,176.28 (US$ 24,020.16) for PEG-IFN/RBV, PPP$ 71,196.03 (US$ 39,578.23) for PEG-IFN/RBV/BOC and PPP$ 86,250.33 (US$ 47,946.92) for PEG-IFN/RBV/TEL. Treatment by all-oral interferon-free regimens were the less expensive approach: PPP$ 19,761.72 (US$ 10,985.90) for SOF/DCV and PPP$ 21,590.91 (US$ 12,002.75) for SOF/SIM. The overview reported HCV eradication in up to 98% for SOF/DCV and 96% for SOF/SIM.

CONCLUSION

Strategies with all oral interferon-free might lead to lower costs for management of GT1-HCV patients compared to IFN-based regimens in Brazil. This occurred mainly because of high discounts over international DAA prices due to negotiation between BMoH and pharmaceutical industries.