HBV reactivation in HBsAg-/HBcAb+ rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs

Updated recommendations for the management of hepatitis B, C, and E virus infections in patients with haematological malignancies and those undergoing haematopoietic cell transplantation: recommendations from the 9th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-9)

Viral hepatitis remains a global health challenge and immune status affects outcomes. In patients with haematological malignancies, including haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients, viral hepatitis can be life-threatening due to the direct effects of the virus or the need to modify or delay chemotherapy. Additionally, haematopoietic stem-cell donors with past or current viral hepatitis infections might transmit the virus to recipients. The growing recognition of hepatitis E virus (HEV), advances in haematological therapies, and the availability of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV), led the 2022 9th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-9) to update the 2013 ECIL-5 guidelines on viral hepatitis. The ECIL organising committee convened a panel of 13 impartial international experts (all authors of this Review) in viral hepatitis, both within and outside the fields of haematological malignancies and immunosuppression. The ECIL-9 panel conducted a review of the literature on hepatitis B virus (HBV), HCV, and HEV, grading the evidence based on the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases system. The panel identified key clinical questions and outcomes and built on the recommendations established during ECIL-5. A consensus conference was held in Sofia Antipolis, France, from Sept 15-17, 2022, bringing together 49 experts from 19 countries. The ECIL-9 panel presented the proposed recommendations, which were revised following expert discussions. A final consensus on updated guidelines was reached in a second plenary session. The updated ECIL-9 guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations on the prevention, screening, treatment, and long-term surveillance of viral hepatitis in patients with haematological malignancies and haematopoietic cell transplantation recipients.

Similar Hepatitis B virus reactivation risk for patients with inflammatory arthritis or connective tissue diseases: a multicenter retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B reactivation and administration of prophylactic antiviral treatment are considered in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) undergoing immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory treatment. Data are more robust for rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving bDMARDs but are limited for other AIIRD and drug categories.

METHODS

Adult patients with AIIRD (inflammatory arthritis [IA] or connective tissue diseases [CTD]) and documented chronic or resolved HBV infection (defined as serum HBsAg positivity or anti-HBcAb positivity in the case of HBsAg non-detection respectively), followed-up in six rheumatology centers in Greece and Italy, were included. Data collected included demographic characteristics, AIIRD medications prior and after HBV screening [cs-DMARDs, (b-ts)- DMARDs, other immunosuppressants initiated and mean glucocorticoid dose], HBV prophylactic treatment, and possible HBV-reactivation (defined as increase in HBV-DNA or HBsAg seroconversion) within one year of HBV screening. Frequency of HBV reactivation and possible association with recorded parameters were examined.

RESULTS

During one year of follow-up, HBV reactivation occurred in 5.6% and 7.9% of IA and CTD patients, respectively. In patients with chronic hepatitis B, reactivation rates were 14.8% for IA and 22.2% for CTD, while in patients with resolved hepatitis B were 3.7% and 6%, respectively. In patients with resolved hepatitis B no association was found between HBV reactivation and antiviral prophylactic treatment, or the use of csDMARDs, bDMARDS, or other immunosuppressants.

CONCLUSION

The risk of HBV reactivation was similar between IA and CTD patients and was significantly higher in chronic compared to resolved hepatitis B infection. For the latter, prophylactic treatment was not associated with lower reactivation risk.

Incidence of HBV Reactivation in Psoriasis Patients Undergoing Cytokine Inhibitor Therapy: A Single-Center Study and Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis patients who are seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) face an elevated risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) when treated with cytokine inhibitors. This study aims to elucidate the risk in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess the risk of HBVr in 73 psoriasis patients treated with cytokine inhibitors from 2013 to 2023. Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed, pooling data from 10 studies (including our cohort) and adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and pooled proportions were calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

No HBVr cases were observed among the 11 HBsAg+ patients in the cohort. However, two of the sixty-two (3.2%) HBsAg-/HBcAb+ patients experienced reactivation during therapy, with outcomes ranging from spontaneous recovery in one case to death from hepatic failure despite antiviral treatment in the other. The meta-analysis, pooling data from 10 studies, revealed a reactivation rate of 21.2% (95% CI: 9.4-41.0%) in HBsAg+ patients without prophylaxis and 4.4% (95% CI: 2.2-8.7%) in HBsAg-/HBcAb+ patients.

CONCLUSION

Antiviral prophylaxis is essential for HBsAg+ patients receiving cytokine inhibitors, given the high risk of reactivation. Despite the lower risk for HBsAg-/HBcAb+ patients, the potential severity of outcomes demands careful monitoring and timely action.

Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part II: Risk of Infections. A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

The risk of infections associated with biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) has been extensively explored in the literature. However, there is a dearth of studies that evaluate both pharmacological groups together and, furthermore, compare them. Here, we review the risk of infections associated with BD and JAKi used in dermatology.

METHODS

A narrative review was performed. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of infection and opportunistic infections with BD and JAKi between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected.

RESULTS

Overall, the incidence of infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections associated with BD and JAKi is low, but higher than in the general population. JAKi approved for dermatological disorders (abrocitinib, baricitinib, deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, ritlecitinib, and topical ruxolitinib) have been shown to be safe, and present a low rate of infections. We found an elevated risk, especially with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib at high doses). Specific associations with infections include tuberculosis and tuberculosis reactivation with anti-TNF agents and tocilizumab; candidiasis with anti-interleukin (IL) 17 agents; hepatitis B virus reactivation with rituximab, anti-TNF, and JAKi; and herpes simplex and herpes zoster infections with JAKi (especially tofacitinib and upadacitinib at high doses). The incidence of infections with ustekinumab and anti-IL-23 was very low. Anti-IL-1, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, and omalizumab were not associated with an increased risk of infections. Dupilumab could decrease the incidence of cutaneous infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNF agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib) can increase the risk of infections. Close monitoring of patients undergoing these therapies is recommended. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to comparatively evaluate the risks of infection deriving from treatment with BD and JAKi.

The Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tocilizumab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Tocilizumab has demonstrated optimal efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from clinical trials. However, the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in these patients remains uncertain because patients with underlying HBV have been excluded in phase III studies.

METHODS

Systematical reviews were conducted on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 21 February 2023. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled incidence of HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

We included 0 clinical trials and 11 observational studies with a total of 25 HBsAg+ and 322 HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ RA patients. Among the HBsAg+ patients without antiviral prophylaxis, the pooled rate was 69.4% (95% CI, 32.9-91.3), with a median time of 4 months (range, 1-8 months) from tocilizumab initiated. Half of these patients with HBVr experienced hepatitis flare-up but no deaths. HBVr was eliminated with prophylaxis in this population. Among HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ patients, the pooled incidence of reactivation was 3.3% (95% CI, 1.6-6.7), with a median time of 10 months (range, 2-43 months) from tocilizumab initiated. HBVr was not associated with hepatitis flare-up and death. HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ patients without anti-HBs antibodies had a significantly higher risk of HBVr (Odds ratio, 12.20; 95% CI, 1.16-128.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review indicated that the risk of HBVr in RA patients with anti-HBs-, HBsAg+, or HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ cannot be ignored but may be avoided. Clinicians should consider implementing appropriate antiviral prophylaxis and monitoring policies for RA patients to avoid unnecessary hepatic side effects from tocilizumab treatment.