Lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate cancer under and after intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Can men 75 and older safely receive a minimally invasive radical prostatectomy?

Men 75 and older presenting with localized prostate cancer have traditionally not been managed with surgery. Therefore, we compared the morbidity and operative outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in men 75 and older to their younger counterparts. We utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to gather subjects who received a minimally invasive RP (CPT: 55866) from 2016 to 2020. This cohort was then stratified by age to compare men 18-74 years old and men 75 and older. The preclinical profile, complications, and outcomes were analyzed. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Of the 48,485 men identified, 2,009 (4.1%) were ≥ 75 years old. Within the 75 and older cohort, the median age was 76 (IQR: 75-78), the median BMI was 27.3 (IQR: 24.9-29.9), and 1,601 (79.7%) were Caucasian. Men 75 and older had higher rates of Clavien 3 (1.3% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.02) and Clavien 4 (7.8% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001) complications. Reoperative rates (1.7% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.01), readmission rates (6.5% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001), and mortality (0.4% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001) were all higher in men 75 and older. Multivariate analysis shows older age to be a risk factor for readmission (OR 1.58, 95%CI 1.31-1.90). Complications and 30-day outcomes remain within an acceptable range to offer surgery in men 75 and older. Age alone should not disqualify men from receiving a RP, but appropriate patient selection and counseling are necessary.

Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate in Patients with Pre-Existing Localized Prostate Cancer, Dual Center Study

Background: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has been used as an effective minimally invasive technique for management of enlarged prostates. We aimed to report the role of HoLEP in prostate cancer (PCa) patients either on active surveillance with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or for prostate debulking before radiation therapy and the impact on PCa management plans. Methods: Prospectively maintained database in two institutions was reviewed for patients with localized PCa managed by HoLEP with at least a follow-up of 1 year. We assessed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) trends, effect on international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and further management of PCa. Results: Out of >2000 HoLEP patients, 117 patients with a median follow-up of 30 months were included. Mean (standard deviation) age was 72.3 (±8.3) years with median (interquartile range, IQR) IPPS of 22 (16-28) and median (IQR) PSA at 7.6 (5.3-14.9) ng/mL. Gleason grade group was 1, 2, 3, and 4 in 47 (73.2%), 32 (27.35%), 7 (5.9%), and 4 (3.4%) patients, respectively. Median (IQR) PSA has significantly dropped to 1.3 (0.6-3.1), 1.4 (0.75-2.9), and 1.7 (0.86-2.75) ng/mL at 6-week, 3-month, and 1-year follow-up, respectively (p < 0.001). IPSS scores post-HoLEP obviously improved with mean (IQR) IPSS of 10 (5-13), 7 (3-12), and 3 (2-5) at 6-week, 3-month, and 1-year, respectively (p < 0.001). Eighty-eight (72%) patients stayed on active surveillance, whereas 27 (23%) patients had radiotherapy ± androgen deprivation therapy for persistently high or relapsing PSA. Within 36 intermediate-risk patients, 15 (41.6%) and patients had radiotherapy, whereas 21 (58.3%) patients continued active surveillance. Conclusions: HoLEP is beneficial in debulking large prostate in PCa patients with bothersome LUTS on active surveillance or before radiotherapy. HoLEP reduces the contribution of large adenoma to PSA level, thus reflecting PSA level better and helping reduce overtreatment.

Application Effect of Bladder Function Training Combined with Kangaiping Pills on Permanent Bladder Stoma after Radical Prostatectomy

Objective

To investigate the application effect of bladder function training combined with Kangaiping pills on permanent bladder stoma after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods

The clinical data of 80 patients with a permanent bladder stoma after RP in our hospital from December 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were equally split into the experimental group (EG) and control group (CG) according to the odd and even hospitalization numbers. EG received bladder function training combined with Kangaiping pills while CG received routine nursing for permanent bladder stomas to compare the urodynamic indexes and quality of life (QOL) scores after intervention between the two groups.

Results

Compared with CG, EG after intervention achieved an obviously higher number of patients with bladder function grade I (∗), higher urodynamic indexes (P < 0.001), a higher SF-36 score (P < 0.001), a lower LUTS score (P < 0.001), and a lower total incidence of postoperative adverse reactions (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Bladder function training combined with Kangaiping pills is a reliable method to improve the bladder function of patients with a permanent bladder stoma after RP. This intervention method greatly enhances the QOL of patients and reduces the risk of postoperative adverse reactions, which is recommended for clinical application.

A Pilot retrospective analysis of alpha-blockers on recurrence in men with localised prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy

While alpha-blockers are commonly used to reduce lower urinary tract symptoms in prostate cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, their impact on response to radiotherapy remains unknown. Therefore, this pilot study aimed to retrospectively determine if alpha-blockers use, influenced response to radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. In total, 303 prostate cancer patients were included, consisting of 84 control (alpha-blocker naïve), 72 tamsulosin and 147 prazosin patients. The main outcomes measured were relapse rates (%), time to biochemical relapse (months) and PSA velocity (ng/mL/year). Recurrence free survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Prazosin significantly reduced biochemical relapse at both two and five-years (2.72%, 8.84%) compared to control (22.61%, 34.52%). Recurrence free survival was also significantly higher in the prazosin group. This remained after multivariable analysis (HR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.04-0.26, p < 0.001). Patients receiving prazosin had a 3.9 times lower relative risk of biochemical relapse compared to control. Although not statistically significant, tamsulosin and prazosin extended recurrence free survival by 13.15 and 9.21 months respectively. We show for the first time that prazosin may reduce risk of prostate cancer recurrence and delay time to biochemical relapse and provides justification for prospective studies to examine its potential as an adjunct treatment option for localised prostate cancer.

A Contribution into Developing a Model for Prostate Cancer Self-Care Mobile Application

INTRODUCTION

New Healthcare models are developed with the focus on the community members and towards their self-accomplishment of the healthy activities. Mobile Health, as a newbie technology, seems to be appropriate to help prostate cancer self-care.

AIM

this study aimed to provide a comparative model of mobile application for prostate cancer care self-care for Iranians.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is an applied mixed method study, which was conducted in three phases from 2017 to 2018 as follows: 1) searching and thematic content analyzing of prostate cancer mobile applications and their related articles to extract technical features and clinical functions; 2) selecting the common extracted features and functions to design an initial model of the application; and 3) confirming validity of the features and functions through 2 rounds of Delphi technique.

RESULTS

This applied model was developed for the appropriate prostate cancer self-care, with such functionalities as user training, care, diagnosis, interaction, and alerting the user. Also, some technical features of the model include settings and data sharing.

CONCLUSION

The applied model of mobile application for prostate cancer has been done in compliance with requirements of Iranian health information technologists, urologists and oncologists. It seems it would be of help in self-care of patients with needed to prostate cancer care.