Flipped classroom on humanities: medicine, narrative and art

Profiling students via clustering in a flipped clinical skills course using learning analytics

Flipped classrooms have become popular as a student-centered approach in medical education because they allow students to improve higher-order thinking skills and problem-solving applications during in-class activities. However, students are expected to study videos and other class materials before class begins. Learning analytics and unsupervised machine learning algorithms (clustering) can be used to examine the pre-class activities of these students to identify inadequate student preparation before the in-class stage and make appropriate interventions. Furthermore, the students' profiles, which provide their interaction strategies towards online materials, can be used to design appropriate interventions. This study investigates student profiles in a flipped classroom. The learning management system interactions of 375 medical students are collected and preprocessed. The k-means clustering algorithms examined in this study show a two-cluster structure: 'high interaction' and 'low-interaction.' These results can be used to help identify low-engaged students and give appropriate feedback.

Impact of narrative medicine program on improving reflective capacity and empathy of medical students in Iran

PURPOSE

Narrative medicine is expressing medical experiences and reflecting on narratives to create empathic communication with patients. Moreover, reflection on narratives causes self-awareness and recognition of the narrator's feelings or the main character of the story, and affect the audience. This study conducted to examine the impact of the narrative medicine program on improving the reflective capacity and empathy of medical students.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study was performed in 2018-2019 at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran for 135 medical interns with two groups (control (n=66) and experiment (n=69)). We held seven two-hour reflective practice sessions for medical interns in the experiment group, and no educational intervention for the control group. Pre-test and post-test were held for both of the groups using two valid and reliable tools to assess reflective capacity and empathy. A comparison of mean scores of reflection and empathy was done in pre-test and post-test in one group and between groups using t-paired and t-test (p≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean score of reflection and empathy in the experiment group had a significant increase before and after the educational intervention, but in the control group had not. Moreover, the comparison of the mean scores between the two groups in the post-test was significant. (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Narrative medicine is an effective teaching method that can improve reflective capacity and empathy, and ultimately promote professionalism as a core competency in medicine. Consideration of learning conditions and interdisciplinary teaching is necessary for implementing the narrative medicine program.

Narrative medicine as a medical education tool: A systematic review

Aim: Narrative medicine has been promoted as an innovative and effective means of stimulating medical students' professional development by teaching them to approach their patients' experiences of illness with more understanding and compassion. This systematic literature review aims to answer the following question: what evidence of effect is available in the literature about models for teaching narrative medicine? Methods: We conducted a narrative review of 36 articles and used the Best Evidence in Medical Education (BEME) Global Scale and Kirkpatrick Scale for strength and importance of evidence to categorize reported assessment strategies and to evaluate the effectiveness of their narrative medicine programs. Results: We found evidence that narrative medicine is an effective pedagogic tool with a clear and replicable structure and methodology. We also determined that a positive impact could be measured when pertaining to participation and modification of attitudes, knowledge, and skills. However, unequivocal evidence of the effect of narrative medicine on students' behavior or ongoing interaction with colleagues and patients is still lacking. Conclusion: While many recent publications describe the goals and virtues of a narrative-based approach, more research is needed to determine whether or not there is an ideological consensus undergirding this approach. In addition, it is still unclear whether the long-term impact of narrative medicine classroom interventions are felt by patients, or whether such interventions positively impact patient care.

Progress integrating medical humanities into medical education: a global overview

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The article reviews the most recent developments in integrating humanities into medical education. Global implications and future trends are illustrated.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main concern of medical humanities education is teaching professionalism; one important aspect that has emerged is the goal of nurturing emotion through reflexivity. Relating effectively to all stakeholders and being sensitive to inequitable power dynamics are essential for professional social accountability in modern medical contexts. Mediating doctors' understanding of the clinical encounter through creative arts and narrative is part of most recent pedagogic innovations aimed at motivating learners to become empowered, engaged and caring clinicians. Scenario-based and discursive-oriented evaluations of such activities should be aligned with the medical humanities' problem-based learning curriculum. Medical humanities education fosters professional reflexivity that is important for achieving patient-centered care.

SUMMARY

Countering insufficient empathy with reflective professionalism is an urgent challenge in medical education; to answer this need, creative arts and narrative understanding have emerged as crucial tools of medical humanities education. To ensure competent professional identity formation in the era of translational medicine, medical humanities programs have adopted scenario-based assessments through inclusion of different voices and emphasizing personal reflection and social critique.