'Yourself in all your forms': A grounded theory exploration of identity safety in medical students

Abrasion: a phenomenological study of inequity in workplace-based assessment in pediatrics

Despite the centrality of workplace-based assessments in medical education and practice, there is troubling evidence that workplace-based assessments are inequitable. This study investigated the experience of inequity in workplace-based assessment via a phenomenological study with learners (resident physicians) and assessors (physician supervisors) in one specialty in the United States, general pediatrics, from August 2023-June 2024. The authors used critical phenomenology to prompt and iteratively analyze participants' experiences with inequity in workplace-based assessment and their lifeworlds. To understand participants' lifeworlds, the authors applied Collins' domains of power framework to examine participants' varied and unique locations within intersecting power relations. Participants described the phenomenon of inequity in workplace-based assessment as a type of abrasion, that is, an injury caused by friction that occurred when a workplace-based assessment excoriated their sense of self. Abrasion had three dimensions: physical, affective, and temporal. These findings suggest that inequity in workplace-based assessment cannot be tracked solely by measuring disparities in numbers, grades, differences in narrative language used in comments, and other common measures of inequity, rather, it can be characterized as an experienced, felt, phenomenon that has essential dimensions. These findings have major implications for how inequity is conceptualized and intervened upon in medical education.

Legitimacy, Belonging and Engagement: A Qualitative Exploration of Safe Learning Spaces in a South African University

INTRODUCTION

The term 'safe learning space' is commonly used in health professions education, but its use can be ambiguous and is often misconstrued. Considering historical and societal disparities, safety cannot be a universal experience. This study explored students' personal experiences of 'safe spaces' in a South African university to contribute to a contextually grounded understanding that supports meaningful learning.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative research design was used, utilising focus groups to generate data. The population studied was undergraduate Occupational Therapy (OT) students. Purposive sampling was used and a total of eight participants, all third- and fourth-year OT students with one or more marginalised identities, were included in two focus groups conducted in 2023. Reflective thematic analysis was used to develop themes.

RESULTS

Three themes were developed: (1) 'What is the purpose of this space?', (2) 'Who are we?' (with sub-themes 'How identity shapes safety' and 'How upbringing shapes safety') and (3) 'How can we feel safer?' (with sub-themes 'Legitimacy and belonging' and 'Non-judgmental spaces').

CONCLUSION

The study identified sequential elements to set up, enter and maintain a 'safe learning space'. This involves using clear, intentional language for naming the space and co-creating boundaries and intent with students. After entering the space, 'safety' should focus on protecting personhood to create freedom for learning. This can be facilitated through valuing diverse identities, acknowledging situated knowledge, supporting legitimacy and fostering belonging. Creating a non-judgmental space through collective vulnerability supports protecting student identities while promoting critical dialogue and idea challenges.

In Their Own Voices: A Critical Narrative Review of Black Women Faculty Members' First-Person Accounts of Racial Trauma Across Higher Education

Phenomenon: Black women often face more challenges in academic medicine than others and are leaving the profession due to unsupportive work environments, systematic neglect, and experiences of invisibility. Research offers insight into Black women faculty experiences, but studies have largely been conducted on their experiences rather than written by them. We analyzed first-person narratives exploring Black women faculty members' experiences with racial trauma across the academy considering the intersectionality of racism and sexism to lay the foundation for understanding Black women physicians' faculty experiences in similar spaces. Approach: We gathered first-person narratives of Black women faculty members in the U.S. from ERIC, Web of Science, and Ovid Medline. We used a variety of terms to draw out potential experiences with trauma (e.g., microaggressions, stigma, prejudice). Articles were screened by two researchers, with a third resolving conflicts. Drawing on constructs from Black feminist theory, two researchers extracted from each article authors' claims about: (a) their institutions, (b) their experiences in those spaces, and (c) suggestions for change. We then analyzed these data through the lens of racial trauma while also noting the effects of gendered racism. Findings: We identified four key themes from the 46 first-person accounts of racial trauma of Black faculty members in higher education: pressures arising from being "the only" or "one of few"; elimination of value through the "cloak of invisibility" and "unconscious assumptions"; the psychological burden of "walking a tightrope"; and communal responsibility, asking "if not us, then who?" Insights: Black women's narratives are necessary to unearth their specific truths as individuals who experience intersectional oppression because of their marginalized racial and gender identities. This may also assist with better understanding opportunities to dismantle the oppressive structures and practices hindering more diverse, equitable, and inclusive institutional environments where their representation, voice, and experience gives space for them to thrive and not simply survive within the academy, including and not limited to medicine.

Navigating identity dissonance: subjectification to balance socialization

One of the main goals of medical education is to facilitate the development of a professional identity. As part of this effort, trainees are exposed to the values and cultures of the profession in a process known as socialization. Learners must then negotiate incongruent aspects between their preexisting identities and nascent professional identities. Individuals from historically underrepresented ethnic groups often undergo more significant changes due to their values and culture not being as prevalent within the dominant ideology of medicine. This transformative process can lead to identity dissonance and manifest as an internal discomfort resulting from perceived contradictions between one's existing identity and the required professional identity. Identity dissonance may be traumatic and pose a threat to the academic performance and professional integration of trainees. These detrimental effects harm the medical workforce by depriving it of a group crucial in addressing health inequities. Educators tasked with facilitating the professional development of learners must consider their implicit expectations about professionalism, explore the distinct challenges experienced by individuals from underrepresented backgrounds in their professional development, and work to develop strategies to help trainees navigate identity dissonance. Subjectification, an education philosophy that focuses on compelling individuals to explore the new possibilities and responsibilities imparted to them by their education, provides a theoretical framework to help educators guide learners through identity dissonance.

Sense of Belonging Among Medical Students, Residents, and Fellows: Associations With Burnout, Recruitment Retention, and Learning Environment

PURPOSE

This study examines sense of belonging (belongingness) in a large population of medical students, residents, and fellows and associations with learner burnout, organizational recruitment retention indicators, and potentially modifiable learning environment factors.

METHOD

All medical students, residents, and fellows at Mayo Clinic sites were surveyed between October and November 2020 with items measuring sense of belonging in 3 contexts (school or program, organization, surrounding community), burnout (2 Maslach Burnout Inventory items), recruitment retention indicators (likelihood of recommending the organization and accepting a job offer), potentially modifiable learning environment factors, and demographics (age, gender, race and ethnicity, LGBTQ+ identification, disability, socioeconomic background).

RESULTS

Of 2,257 learners surveyed, 1,261 (56%) responded. The percentage of learners reporting a somewhat or very strong sense of belonging was highest in the school or program (994 of 1,227 [81%]) followed by the organization (957 of 1,222 [78%]) and surrounding community (728 of 1,203 [61%]). In adjusted analyses, learners with very strong organization belongingness had lower odds of burnout (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02-0.12) and higher odds of being likely to recommend the organization (OR, 505.23; 95% CI, 121.54-2,100.18) and accept a job offer (OR, 38.68; 95% CI, 15.72-95.15; all P < .001). School or program and community belongingness also correlated strongly with these outcomes. In multivariable analyses, social support remained associated with higher odds of belongingness in all 3 contexts; favorable ratings of faculty relationships and leadership representation remained associated with higher odds of belongingness in 2 contexts (school or program and organization); and favorable ratings of diversity, equity, and inclusion learning climate remained associated with belongingness in 1 context (community).

CONCLUSIONS

Sense of belonging among medical students, residents, and fellows varies across contexts, correlates strongly with burnout and organizational recruitment retention indicators, and is associated with multiple potentially modifiable learning environment factors.

Academic Leadership Academy Summer Program: Clerkship Transition Preparation for Underrepresented in Medicine Medical Students

PROBLEM

Enhancing workforce diversity by increasing the recruitment of students who have been historically excluded/underrepresented in medicine (UIM) is critical to addressing healthcare inequities. However, these efforts are inadequate when undertaken without also supporting students' success. The transition to clerkships is an important and often difficult to navigate inflection point in medical training where attention to the specific needs of UIM students is critical.

INTERVENTION

We describe the design, delivery, and three-year evaluation outcomes of a strengths-based program for UIM second year medical students. The program emphasizes three content areas: clinical presentations/clinical reasoning, community building, and surfacing the hidden curriculum. Students are taught and mentored by faculty, residents, and senior students from UIM backgrounds, creating a supportive space for learning.

CONTEXT

The program is offered to all UIM medical students; the centerpiece of the program is an intensive four-day curriculum just before the start of students' second year. Program evaluation with participant focus groups utilized an anti-deficit approach by looking to students as experts in their own learning. During focus groups mid-way through clerkships, students reflected on the program and identified which elements were most helpful to their clerkship transition as well as areas for programmatic improvement.

IMPACT

Students valued key clinical skills learning prior to clerkships, anticipatory guidance on the professional landscape, solidarity and learning with other UIM students and faculty, and the creation of a community of peers. Students noted increased confidence, self-efficacy and comfort when starting clerkships.

LESSONS LEARNED

There is power in learning in a community connected by shared identities and grounded in the strengths of UIM learners, particularly when discussing aspects of the hidden curriculum in clerkships and sharing specific challenges and strategies for success relevant to UIM learners. We learned that while students found unique benefits to preparing for clerkships in a community of UIM students, near peers, and faculty, future programs could be enhanced by pairing this formal intensive curriculum with more longitudinal opportunities for community building, mentoring, and career guidance.

Midwifery Students' Experiences of Bias in the Clinical Setting: Prevalence, Types, and Impact

INTRODUCTION

Exposure to bias in clinical learning environments may undermine students' confidence, cause emotional harm, impede learning, and potentially delay graduation. However, little is known about the prevalence of bias experienced by midwifery students in the United States. This cross-sectional, descriptive study aimed to quantify clinical midwifery students' experiences of bias based on 7 self-identified characteristics (gender identity, race or ethnicity, body size, age, sexual orientation, religion, and occupational background). Additionally, this research explored the impact of bias on student well-being, learning, and professional commitment.

METHODS

The survey consisted of 39 items addressing (1) prevalence and types of bias, (2) emotional impact and influence on clinical learning, (3) ways students coped, (4) whether anyone spoke up at the time bias occurred, (5) whether students reported bias to faculty, and (6) impact of bias on commitment to midwifery. The survey was distributed to midwifery students and recent graduates in 2022 via American College of Nurse-Midwives email discussion lists and social media. Participants were eligible if they were in a clinical rotation in an Accreditation Commission for Midwifery Education-accredited midwifery program between 2019 and 2022.

RESULTS

Surveys were returned by 383 participants, with 301 meeting inclusion criteria. Most participants (66.5%) reported personally experiencing or witnessing bias against at least 1 of 7 personal characteristics. The most commonly reported biases were related to gender, occupational background, age, and race or ethnicity. Only half of the participants reported these occurrences to someone with academic authority, and nearly a third considered withdrawing from their educational programs.

DISCUSSION

In this study bias was common and significantly impacted students. These results underscore the need for creative and bold interventions at personal, educational, and institutional levels to prevent and mitigate bias. Safeguarding clinical learning environments will enable students to thrive, graduate with confidence and competence, and thereby contribute to the diversification and strengthening of the midwifery profession.

Reasoning on Rounds Volume 2: a Framework for Teaching Management Reasoning in the Inpatient Setting

Management reasoning (MR) is a key domain of clinical reasoning that is distinct from the more heavily studied and taught diagnostic reasoning (DR). Despite MR's importance to patient care, there are few published strategies for incorporating MR education into the clinical learning environment. In this perspective, the authors review key theories and clinical principles relevant to MR and integrate these concepts with previously described tools for teaching MR to provide frontline clinical teachers with practical, theory-informed framework for teaching MR during inpatient rounds.

Navigating the paradox: Exploring resident experiences of vulnerability

INTRODUCTION

Learning and growth in postgraduate medical education (PGME) often require vulnerability, defined as a state of openness to uncertainty, risk, and emotional exposure. However, vulnerability can threaten a resident's credibility and professional identity. Despite this tension, studies examining vulnerability in PGME are limited. As such, this study aims to explore residents' experiences of vulnerability, including the factors that influence vulnerability in PGME.

METHODS

Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 residents from 10 different specialities. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed iteratively. Themes were identified and relationships among themes were examined to develop a theory describing vulnerability in PGME.

RESULTS

Residents characterised vulnerability as a paradox represented by two overarching themes. 'Experiencing the tensions of vulnerability' explores the polarities between being a fallible, authentic learner and an infallible, competent professional. 'Navigating the vulnerability paradox' outlines the factors influencing the experience of vulnerability and its associated outcomes at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and systems levels. Residents described needing to have the bandwidth to face the risks and emotional labour of vulnerability. Opportunities to build connections with social agents, including clinical teachers and peers, facilitated vulnerability. The sociocultural context shaped both the experience and outcomes of vulnerability as residents faced the symbolic mask of professionalism.

CONCLUSION

Residents experience vulnerability as a paradox shaped by intrapersonal, interpersonal, and systems level factors. These findings capture the nuance and complexity of vulnerability in PGME and offer insight into creating supportive learning environments that leverage the benefits of vulnerability while acknowledging its risks. There is a need to translate this understanding into systems-based change to create supportive PGME environments, which value and celebrate vulnerability.

The need for critical and intersectional approaches to equity efforts in postgraduate medical education: A critical narrative review

BACKGROUND

Racialised trainees in Canada and the USA continue to disproportionately experience discrimination and harassment in learning environments despite equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) reform efforts. Using critical approaches to understand what problems have been conceptualised and operationalised as EDI issues within postgraduate medical education (PGME) is important to inform ongoing learning environment reform in resident training.

METHODS

We conducted a critical narrative review of EDI literature from 2009-2022 using critical race theory (CRT) and the concept of intersectionality to analyse how issues of discrimination in PGME have been studied. Our search yielded 2244 articles that were narrowed down to 349 articles for relevance to Canadian and American PGME contexts. We attended to reflexivity and our positionality in analysing the database and identifying themes related to EDI reform.

RESULTS

Interest convergence was noted in how EDI reform was rationalised primarily by increased productivity. Problems of learner representation, gender inequities and curricular problems were conceptualised as EDI issues. The role that racism played in EDI-related problems was largely invisible, as were explicit conceptualisations of race and gender as social constructs. Overall, there was a lack of critical or intersectional approaches in the literature reviewed. Misalignment was noted where studies would frame a problem through a critical lens, but then study the problem without attention to power.

DISCUSSION

Interest convergence and epistemic injustice can account for the absence of critical approaches due to the alignment of existing EDI work with institutional interests and priorities. Interest convergence conceptually limits existing EDI reform efforts in PGME. CRT and intersectionality connect racialised learner experiences to systemic phenomena like racism and other forms of discrimination to challenge dominant assumptions. Because they attend to power, critical approaches are key to understanding why inequities have persisted to advance equity in learning environments for racialised and intersectionally marginalised learners.

"We Need a Seismic Shift": Disabled Student Perspectives on Disability Inclusion in U.S. Medical Education

PURPOSE

Students with disabilities have inequitable access to medical education, despite widespread attention to their inclusion. Although systemic barriers and their adverse effects on medical student performance are well documented, few studies include disabled students' first-person accounts. Existing first-person accounts are limited by their focus predominantly on students who used accommodations. This study bridged these gaps by analyzing a national dataset of medical students with disabilities to understand their perceptions of disability inclusion in U.S. medical education.

METHOD

The authors analyzed 674 open-text responses by students with disabilities from the 2019 and 2020 Association of American Medical Colleges Year Two Questionnaire responding to the prompt, "Use the space below if you would like to share anything about your experiences regarding disability and medical school." Following reflexive thematic analysis principles, the authors coded the data using an inductive semantic approach to develop and refine themes. The authors used the political-relational model of disability to interpret themes.

RESULTS

Student responses were wide-ranging in experience. The authors identified key dimensions of the medical education system that influenced student experiences: program structure, processes, people, and culture. These dimensions informed the changes students perceived as possible to support their access to education and whether pursuing such change would be acceptable. In turn, students took action to navigate the system, using administrative, social, and internal mechanisms to manage disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Key dimensions of medical school affect student experiences of and interactions with disability inclusion, demonstrating the political-relational production of disability. Findings confirm earlier studies on disability inclusion that suggest systemic change is necessary, while adding depth to understand how and why students do not pursue accommodations. On the basis of student accounts, the authors identify existing resources to help medical schools remedy deficits in their systems to improve their disability inclusion practice.

What Are We Made For? Mobilizing Medical Education Research for Impact

ABSTRACT

During the past several decades, medical education research has advanced in many ways. However, the field has struggled somewhat with translating knowledge into practice. The field has tremendous potential to generate insights that may improve educational outcomes, enhance teaching experiences, reduce costs, promote equity, and inform policy. However, the gap between research and practice requires attention and reflection. In this commentary, the authors reflect on ways that medical education researchers can balance relevance and rigor, while discussing a potential path forward. First, medical education research can learn from implementation science, which focuses on adopting and sustaining best practices in real-world settings. Second, gaining a deeper understanding of the complex and dynamic ways that medical education contexts may influence the uptake of research findings into practice would facilitate the translation and mobilization of knowledge into practical settings. Third, moving from unilateral knowledge translation to participatory knowledge mobilization and engaging diverse stakeholders as active participants in the research process can also enhance impact and influence research findings. Overall, for medical education research to effect meaningful change, it must transition from producing generalizable findings to generating context-specific insights and embracing participatory knowledge mobilization. This shift will involve rethinking traditional research approaches and fostering collaboration with knowledge users to cocreate and implement innovative solutions tailored to their unique settings.

Reasoning Report: Engineering Case Conferences to Maximize Clinical Reasoning Education for All Learners

Case conferences, specifically those in which an unknown case is presented and discussed, are widely utilized in the delivery of medical education. However, the format of case conferences is not always optimized to engage and challenge audience members' clinical reasoning (CR). Based on the current conception of CR and our experience, we provide recommendations on how to better engineer case conferences to maximize CR education for learners at all levels through case selection, conference format, and intentional case construction.

"I have established this support network": How Chosen Kin Support Women Medical Students During their First Two Years in Medical School

Women medical students experience unique stressors and challenges during medical school related to inherent structural androcentric norms. Through a longitudinal qualitative study of 17 women medical students in their first two years of medical school, we sought to investigate how they navigated their medical school experience. We used a critical lens and narrative inquiry to understand their experiences within the powerful and marginalizing culture of medical school. Our participants identified two essential support groups: those relationships made within, and those sustained outside, medical school. These findings invoked a kinship framework-one where women medical students have a network of chosen kin who provide essential support for them during their first 2 years. The participants' chosen kin within medical school provided support through recognition of one another, belonging by not belonging, being encouraged to reach out, and creating long-term relationships. The chosen kin outside medical school provided support by reminding the student who they are and creating stability. Integrating models of kinship into medical school as practiced by women medical students may have immense value in providing essential supports for medical students, preventing burnout, and changing the culture of care for future physicians that would align recognition and practice of self-care with patient care.

Transforming medical education: Implementing 'disruptors' to break the cycle of ableism

@meekslisa and @jbullockruns in @MedEd_Journal highlight the struggles of disabled students and call for strategic disruptions to dismantle ableism and foster inclusion in #HPE. #DocsWithDisabilities #MedTwitter #MedEd

Being, becoming, and belonging: reconceptualizing professional identity formation in medicine

Over the last decade, there has been a drive to emphasize professional identity formation in medical education. This shift has had important and positive implications for the education of physicians. However, the increasing recognition of longstanding structural inequalities within society and the profession has highlighted how conceptualizations of professional identity formation have also had unintended harmful consequences. These include experiences of identity threat and exclusion, and the promotion of norms and values that over-emphasize the preferences of culturally dominant groups. In this paper, the authors put forth a reconceptualization of the process of professional identity formation in medicine through the elaboration of 3 schematic representations. Evolutions in the understandings of professional identity formation, as described in this paper, include re-defining socialization as an active process involving critical engagement with professional norms, emphasizing the role of agency, and recognizing the importance of belonging or exclusion on one's sense of professional self. The authors have framed their analysis as an evidence-informed educational guide with the aim of supporting the development of identities which embrace diverse ways of being, becoming, and belonging within the profession, while simultaneously upholding the standards required for the profession to meet its obligations to patients and society.

'The program director's word … it's stronger than the word of God': Epistemic injustice revealed through narratives of remediated graduate medical education residents

BACKGROUND

Though graduate medical education (GME) residency training provides positive experiences for many trainees, it may also result in major stressors and negative experiences, particularly for those requiring remediation. Residents requiring remediation may experience feelings of dismay, shame and guilt that can negatively affect their training, self-efficacy and their medical careers. Power differentials between educators and residents may set the stage for epistemic injustice, which is injustice resulting from the silencing or dismissing a speaker based on identity prejudice. This can lead to decreased willingness of trainees to engage with learning. There is a paucity of literature that explores GME experiences of remediation from the resident perspective.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesise the narratives of physician experiences of remediation during residency through the lens of epistemic injustice.

METHODS

Between January and July 2022, we interviewed US physicians who self-identified as having experienced remediation during residency. They shared events that led to remediation, personal perspectives and emotions about the process and resulting outcomes. Interviews were analysed using narrative analysis with attention to instances of epistemic injustice.

RESULTS

We interviewed 10 participants from diverse backgrounds, specialties and institutions. All participants described contextual factors that likely contributed to their remediation: (1) previous academic difficulty/nontraditional path into medicine, (2) medical disability or (3) minoritised race, gender or sexual identity. Participants felt that these backgrounds made them more vulnerable in their programmes despite attempts to express their needs. Participants reported instances of deflated credibility and epistemic injustices with important effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Participant narratives highlighted that deep power and epistemic imbalances between learners and educators can imperil GME trainees' psychological safety, resulting in instances of professional and personal harm. Our study suggests applying an existing framework to help programme directors (PDs) approach remediation with epistemic humility.

Critically re-examining professional norms: Medicine's urgent need to look inwards

'Are physicians who they ought to be?' This commentary advocates for a critical re‐examination of what is at the core of being a physician via a process of inclusive co‐construction

Cheating is a professional identity formation problem

.@kmcowen outlines how medical education could better support students connect their behavior during medical school to their future identities as physicians.

What does 'belongingness' mean in relation to diverse medical student groups?

Kitchuk comments on ways in which identity threats and identity safety impact ‘belongingness’ for diverse students, highlighting that there remains need to further explore what is meant by belonging and the effects this has on students.