The imbroglio of the physiological Cra effector clarified at last

Cra-controlled antisense RNA-downregulation of isocitrate dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli

Catabolite repressor activator (Cra) protein (formerly called FruR) found in E. coli is known to regulate the expression of many genes positively and negatively in response to the intracellular levels of fructose-1-phosphate (F-1-P) and fructose-1,6-bisphopahate (F-1,6-bisP). In this paper, we report synthesis and characterization of a conditionally expressed antisense RNA corresponding to 101 bp of isocitrate dehydrogenase (icd) gene (as-icd) under Cra (FruR) responsive promoter fruB (PfruB as-icd construct denoted as pVS2K3) in E. coli K-12 derivative (DH5α) and E. coli B derivative (BL21) strains. Previous studies have shown that ICD mutants accumulated citrate intracellularly but failed to grow on glucose in absence of glutamate. Hence, a conditional downregulation of icd gene could be helpful in overcoming this lethality and also aid in understanding the flux towards citrate accumulation. Effect of pVS2K3 construct was monitored in E. coli DH5α and E. coli BL21 during growth on carbon sources wherein the fruB promoter is active (glucose) or repressed (glycerol). A 3-to 4-fold decrease in ICDH activity was observed in E. coli DH5α expressing pVS2K3 on glucose but no change in ICDH activity was observed in E. coli BL21 expressing pVS2K3 on glucose. This alteration could be attributed to the anomalous Cra regulation seen in E. coli B strain which could be a crucial factor while choosing PfruB promoter for expression studies.

Insights into the regulatory mechanisms and application prospects of the transcription factor Cra

Cra (catabolite repressor/activator) is a global transcription factor (TF) that plays a pleiotropic role in controlling the transcription of several genes involved in carbon utilization and energy metabolism. Multiple studies have investigated the regulatory mechanism of Cra and its rational use for metabolic regulation, but due to the complexity of its regulation, there remain challenges in the efficient use of Cra. Here, the structure, mechanism of action, and regulatory function of Cra in carbon and nitrogen flow are reviewed. In addition, this paper highlights the application of Cra in metabolic engineering, including the promotion of metabolite biosynthesis, the regulation of stress tolerance and virulence, the use of a Cra-based biosensor, and its coupling with other transcription factors. Finally, the prospects of Cra-related regulatory strategies are discussed. This review provides guidance for the rational design and construction of Cra-based metabolic regulation systems.

Molecular insights into FucR transcription factor to control the metabolism of L-fucose in Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis

Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis commonly colonizes the human gut and is capable of metabolizing L-fucose, which is abundant in the gut. Multiple studies have focused on the mechanisms of L-fucose utilization by B. longum subsp. infantis, but the regulatory pathways governing the expression of these catabolic processes are still unclear. In this study, we have conducted a structural and functional analysis of L-fucose metabolism transcription factor FucR derived from B. longum subsp. infantis Bi-26. Our results indicated that FucR is a L-fucose-sensitive repressor with more α-helices, fewer β-sheets, and β-turns. Transcriptional analysis revealed that FucR displays weak negative self-regulation, which is counteracted in the presence of L-fucose. Isothermal titration calorimetry indicated that FucR has a 2:1 stoichiometry with L-fucose. The key amino acid residues for FucR binding L-fucose are Asp280 and Arg331, with mutation of Asp280 to Ala resulting in a decrease in the affinity between FucR and L-fucose with the Kd value from 2.58 to 11.68 μM, and mutation of Arg331 to Ala abolishes the binding ability of FucR towards L-fucose. FucR specifically recognized and bound to a 20-bp incomplete palindrome sequence (5'-ACCCCAATTACGAAAATTTTT-3'), and the affinity of the L-fucose-loaded FucR for the DNA fragment was lower than apo-FucR. The results provided new insights into the regulating L-fucose metabolism by B. longum subsp. infantis.

What are the signals that control catabolite repression in Pseudomonas?

Metabolically versatile bacteria exhibit a global regulatory response known as carbon catabolite repression (CCR), which prioritizes some carbon sources over others when all are present in sufficient amounts. This optimizes growth by distributing metabolite fluxes, but can restrict yields in biotechnological applications. The molecular mechanisms and preferred substrates for CCR vary between bacterial groups. Escherichia coli prioritizes glucose whereas Pseudomonas sp. prefer certain organic acids or amino acids. A significant issue in understanding (and potentially bypassing) CCR is the lack of information about the signals that trigger this regulatory response. In E. coli, several key compounds act as flux sensors, governing the flow of metabolites through catabolic pathways and preventing imbalances. These flux sensors can also modulate the CCR response. It has been suggested that the order of substrate preference is determined by carbon uptake flux rather than substrate identity. For Pseudomonas, much less information is available, as the signals that induce CCR are poorly understood. This article briefly discusses the available evidence on the signals that trigger CCR and the questions that remain to be answered in Pseudomonas.

Escherichia coli segments its controls on carbon-dependent gene expression into global and specific regulations

How bacteria adjust gene expression to cope with variable environments remains open to question. Here, we investigated the way global gene expression changes in E. coli correlated with the metabolism of seven carbon substrates chosen to trigger a large panel of metabolic pathways. Coarse-grained analysis of gene co-expression identified a novel regulation pattern: we established that the gene expression trend following immediately the reduction of growth rate (GR) was correlated to its initial expression level. Subsequent fine-grained analysis of co-expression demonstrated that the Crp regulator, coupled with a change in GR, governed the response of most GR-dependent genes. By contrast, the Cra, Mlc and Fur regulators governed the expression of genes responding to non-glycolytic substrates, glycolytic substrates or phosphotransferase system transported sugars following an idiosyncratic way. This work allowed us to expand additional genes in the panel of gene complement regulated by each regulator and to elucidate the regulatory functions of each regulator comprehensively. Interestingly, the bulk of genes controlled by Cra and Mlc were, respectively, co-regulated by Crp- or GR-related effect and our quantitative analysis showed that each factor took turns to work as the primary one or contributed equally depending on the conditions.

Vibrio cholerae FruR facilitates binding of RNA polymerase to the fru promoter in the presence of fructose 1-phosphate

In most bacteria, efficient use of carbohydrates is primarily mediated by the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS), which concomitantly phosphorylates the substrates during import. Therefore, transcription of the PTS-encoding genes is precisely regulated by transcriptional regulators, depending on the availability of the substrate. Fructose is transported mainly through the fructose-specific PTS (PTS^Fru) and simultaneously converted into fructose 1-phosphate (F1P). In Gammaproteobacteria such as Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida, transcription of the fru operon encoding two PTS^Fru components, FruA and FruB, and the 1-phosphofructokinase FruK is repressed by FruR in the absence of the inducer F1P. Here, we show that, contrary to the case in other Gammaproteobacteria, FruR acts as a transcriptional activator of the fru operon and is indispensable for the growth of Vibrio cholerae on fructose. Several lines of evidence suggest that binding of the FruR-F1P complex to an operator which is located between the –35 and –10 promoter elements changes the DNA structure to facilitate RNA polymerase binding to the promoter. We discuss the mechanism by which the highly conserved FruR regulates the expression of its target operon encoding the highly conserved PTS^Fru and FruK in a completely opposite direction among closely related families of bacteria.