DdcA antagonizes a bacterial DNA damage checkpoint

Bacterial DNA excision repair pathways

Bacteria are continuously exposed to numerous endogenous and exogenous DNA-damaging agents. To maintain genome integrity and ensure cell survival, bacteria have evolved several DNA repair pathways to correct different types of DNA damage and non-canonical bases, including strand breaks, nucleotide modifications, cross-links, mismatches and ribonucleotide incorporations. Recent advances in genome-wide screens, the availability of thousands of whole-genome sequences and advances in structural biology have enabled the rapid discovery and characterization of novel bacterial DNA repair pathways and new enzymatic activities. In this Review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair, and we discuss several new repair processes including the EndoMS mismatch correction pathway and the MrfAB excision repair system.

The ins and outs of Bacillus proteases: activities, functions and commercial significance

Because the majority of bacterial species divide by binary fission, and do not have distinguishable somatic and germline cells, they could be considered to be immortal. However, bacteria ‘age’ due to damage to vital cell components such as DNA and proteins. DNA damage can often be repaired using efficient DNA repair mechanisms. However, many proteins have a functional ‘shelf life’; some are short lived, while others are relatively stable. Specific degradation processes are built into the life span of proteins whose activities are required to fulfil a specific function during a prescribed period of time (e.g. cell cycle, differentiation process, stress response). In addition, proteins that are irreparably damaged or that have come to the end of their functional life span need to be removed by quality control proteases. Other proteases are involved in performing a variety of specific functions that can be broadly divided into three categories: processing, regulation and feeding. This review presents a systematic account of the proteases of Bacillus subtilis and their activities. It reviews the proteases found in, or associated with, the cytoplasm, the cell membrane, the cell wall and the external milieu. Where known, the impacts of the deletion of particular proteases are discussed, particularly in relation to industrial applications.

RecA is required for the assembly of RecN into DNA repair complexes on the nucleoid

Homologous recombination requires the coordinated effort of several proteins to complete break resection, homologous pairing and resolution of DNA crossover structures. RecN is a conserved bacterial protein important of double strand break repair and a member of the Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) protein family. Current models in Bacillus subtilis propose that RecN responds to double stranded breaks prior to RecA and end processing suggesting that RecN is among the very first proteins responsible for break detection. Here, we investigate the contribution of RecA and end processing by AddAB to RecN recruitment into repair foci in vivo. Using this approach, we found that recA is required for RecN-GFP focus formation on the nucleoid during normal growth and in response to DNA damage. In the absence of recA function, RecN foci form in a low percentage of cells, RecN localizes away from the nucleoid, and RecN fails to assemble in response to DNA damage. In contrast, we show that the response of RecA-GFP foci to DNA damage is unchanged in the presence or absence of recN. In further support of RecA activity preceding RecN we show that ablation of the double-strand break end processing enzyme addAB results in a failure of RecN to form foci in response to DNA damage. With these results, we conclude that RecA and end processing function prior to RecN establishing a critical step for the recruitment and participation of RecN during DNA break repair in Bacillus subtilis. IMPORTANCE Homologous recombination is important for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. RecN is a highly conserved protein that has been shown to be important for sister chromatid cohesion and for survival to break-inducing clastogens. Here, we show that the assembly of RecN into repair foci on the bacterial nucleoid requires the end processing enzyme AddAB and the recombinase RecA. In the absence of either recA or end processing RecN-GFP foci are no longer DNA damage inducible and foci form in a subset of cells as large complexes in regions away from the nucleoid. Our results establish the stepwise order of action, where double-strand break end processing and RecA association precede the participation of RecN during break repair in Bacillus subtilis.

Hydroxyurea Induces a Stress Response That Alters DNA Replication and Nucleotide Metabolism in Bacillus subtilis

Hydroxyurea (HU) is classified as a ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) inhibitor and has been widely used to stall DNA replication by depleting deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) pools. Recent evidence in Escherichia coli shows that HU readily forms breakdown products that damage DNA directly, indicating that toxicity is a result of secondary effects. Because HU is so widely used in the laboratory and as a clinical therapeutic, it is important to understand its biological effects. To determine how Bacillus subtilis responds to HU-induced stress, we performed saturating transposon insertion mutagenesis followed by deep sequencing (Tn-seq), transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis, and measurement of replication fork progression. Our data show that B. subtilis cells elongate, and replication fork progression is slowed, following HU challenge. The transcriptomic data show that B. subtilis cells initially mount a metabolic response likely caused by dNTP pool depletion before inducing the DNA damage response (SOS) after prolonged exposure. To compensate for reduced nucleotide pools, B. subtilis upregulates the purine and pyrimidine biosynthetic machinery and downregulates the enzymes producing ribose 5-phosphate. We show that overexpression of the RNR genes nrdEF suppresses the growth interference caused by HU, suggesting that RNR is an important target of HU in B. subtilis. Although genes involved in nucleotide and carbon metabolism showed considerable differential expression, we also find that genes of unknown function (y-genes) represent the largest class of differentially expressed genes. Deletion of individual y-genes caused moderate growth interference in the presence of HU, suggesting that cells have several ways of coping with HU-induced metabolic stress. IMPORTANCE Hydroxyurea (HU) has been widely used as a clinical therapeutic and an inhibitor of DNA replication. Some evidence suggests that HU inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, depleting dNTP pools, while other evidence shows that toxic HU breakdown products are responsible for growth inhibition and genotoxic stress. Here, we use multiple, complementary approaches to characterize the response of Bacillus subtilis to HU. B. subtilis responds by upregulating the expression of purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis. We show that HU challenge reduced DNA replication and that overexpression of the ribonucleotide reductase operon suppressed growth interference by HU. Our results demonstrate that HU targets RNR and several other metabolic enzymes contributing to toxicity in bacteria.

DNA damage checkpoint activation affects peptidoglycan synthesis and late divisome components in Bacillus subtilis

During normal DNA replication, all cells encounter damage to their genetic material. As a result, organisms have developed response pathways that provide time for the cell to complete DNA repair before cell division occurs. In Bacillus subtilis, it is well established that the SOS-induced cell division inhibitor YneA blocks cell division after genotoxic stress; however, it remains unclear how YneA enforces the checkpoint. Here, we identify mutations that disrupt YneA activity and mutations that are refractory to the YneA-induced checkpoint. We find that YneA C-terminal truncation mutants and point mutants in or near the LysM peptidoglycan binding domain render YneA incapable of checkpoint enforcement. In addition, we develop a genetic method which isolated mutations in the ftsW gene that completely bypassed checkpoint enforcement while also finding that YneA interacts with late divisome components FtsL, Pbp2b, and Pbp1. Characterization of an FtsW variant resulted in considerably shorter cells during the DNA damage response indicative of hyperactive initiation of cell division and bypass of the YneA-enforced DNA damage checkpoint. With our results, we present a model where YneA inhibits septal cell wall synthesis by binding peptidoglycan and interfering with interaction between late arriving divisome components causing DNA damage checkpoint activation.

All living cells are cognitive

All living cells sense and respond to changes in external or internal conditions. Without that cognitive capacity, they could not obtain nutrition essential for growth, survive inevitable ecological changes, or correct accidents in the complex processes of reproduction. Wherever examined, even the smallest living cells (prokaryotes) display sophisticated regulatory networks establishing appropriate adaptations to stress conditions that maximize the probability of survival. Supposedly "simple" prokaryotic organisms also display remarkable capabilities for intercellular signalling and multicellular coordination. These observations indicate that all living cells are cognitive.

Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.