A retrospective validation of different scores of guideline adherence and infectious diseases consultation on candidaemia: The higher, the better

The Impact of Epidemiological Trends and Guideline Adherence on Candidemia-Associated Mortality: A 14-Year Study in Northeastern Italy

Invasive candidiasis represents a major global health concern, with incidence and mortality rates expected to rise due to medical advancements and unavoidable risk factors. This retrospective, multicentric study was conducted in eight hospitals in a northeastern Italian region, enrolling adult patients diagnosed with candidemia from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. Epidemiological trends and clinical characteristics were analyzed and compared to those from a prior regional study (2009-2011), allowing a fourteen-year comparative evaluation. A shift in species distribution was observed, with a decline in Candida albicans (from 65.7% to 57.8%) and a rise in non-albicans species, particularly the Candida parapsilosis complex (from 16.1% to 18.2%). Guideline adherence was assessed applying the EQUAL Candida score; scores ≥ than 11.5 were independently associated with improved in-hospital survival (HR 3.51, p < 0.001). Among individual score components, empiric echinocandin therapy and central venous catheter removal correlated with better outcomes. Centers with routine infectious disease (ID) consultations showed higher survival and adherence, reinforcing the value of specialist involvement. These findings support local epidemiological and management practice surveillance program adoption to address context-specific gaps, promote the adoption of best practices in Candida BSI management-as expanded ID specialist consultations and education programs-and, ultimately, reduce candidemia-related mortality rates.

Factors influencing outcomes in candidemia: A retrospective study of patients in a Swedish county

BACKGROUND

Candidemia is a diverse condition and associated with a broad spectrum of clinical presentation. As mortality is high, timely diagnosis of candidemia and start of correct therapeutic treatment are essential.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate characteristics and factors influencing outcomes for patients with candidemia in a Swedish setting.

METHOD

All positive blood cultures for any Candida species in Östergötland County from 2012 to 2016 were screened. Medical records of patients fulfilling all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed to obtain data on risk factors, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and at what wards candidemia was diagnosed. Univariate logistic regression and multivariable regression analysis were used to obtain odds ratio to determine risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality associated with candidemia. A p-value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of all analysed risk factors, increasing age, renal failure with haemodialysis, immunosuppressant treatment, and severity of the infection (i.e. if septic shock was present) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality in univariate analysis (p < .05). Removal of a central venous catheter or an infectious diseases consultant was associated with a significantly lower odds ratio for death at 30 days (p < .05). With multivariable analysis, age, time to start of treatment and infectious disease consultant remained significant (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study provides an update of the epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in a Swedish setting, highlighting that patients with candidemia are present at various departments and indicates the importance of an infectious disease consultant when candidemia is present.

Guideline Adherence and Outcomes of Patients with Candidemia in Brazil

Candidemia is a significant cause of mortality among hospitalized patients, both worldwide and in Brazil. Prompt and appropriate treatment are essential to mitigate mortality, and clinical practice guidelines aim to optimize patient care based on the best scientific evidence. This study aims to examine the management of candidemia, assessing adherence to the guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases in a single center located at São Paulo, Brazil. All adult patients hospitalized from 2016 to 2018 who presented one positive blood culture for Candida spp. were included. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed to collect information relevant to the treatment for candidemia, in order to assess the adherence to the Brazilian guideline for the management of candidemia in relation to nine defined outcomes, and we correlated those findings with 30-day mortality by using uni- and multivariate analyses. A total of 115 patients were included; 68 patients (59.1%) were male, with a mean age of 55 years. C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata were the most prevalent species. In total, 80 patients (69.5%) received antifungal treatment. The adherence to Brazilian guideline recommendations was determined as described in the following: initial treatment with echinocandin in 48 (60%); step-down to fluconazole in 21 (26.2%); collection of first control blood culture in 43 (58.9%); collection of second control blood culture, if the first one had been positive, in 14 (73.6%); treatment for 14 days after the first negative blood culture in 53 (65.4%); central venous catheter (CVC) removal in 66 (82.5%); CVC removal if the first control blood culture had been positive in 17 (89.4%); performance of a transthoracic echocardiogram in 51 (63.7%) and performance of a fundoscopy in 59 (73.7%). Univariate analysis showed that CVC removal and initial echinocandin therapy were more prevalent in the surviving group, but with no statistically significant difference. On the other hand, step-down to fluconazole demonstrated higher survival rate in the multivariate analysis OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.03-0.8); p = 0.02. The analysis of these nine recommendations demonstrates that it is necessary to improve adherence to specific recommendations and also disseminate strategies of the initial use of echinocandin as the drug of choice and addressing length of treatment and follow-up and complementary exams. Our study provides reassurance that the step-down to fluconazole is safe and may be recommended, if the preexisting conditions are present.

The interplay of infectious diseases consultation and antimicrobial stewardship in candidemia outcomes: A retrospective cohort study from 2016 to 2019

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the need for mandatory infectious diseases consultation (IDC) for candidemia in the setting of antimicrobial stewardship guidance.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study from January 2016 to December 2019.

SETTING

Academic quaternary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

All episodes of candidemia in adults (n = 92), excluding concurrent bacterial infection or death or hospice care within 48 hours.

METHODS

Primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included guideline-adherence and treatment choice. Guideline-adherence was assessed with the EQUAL Candida score.

RESULTS

Of 186 episodes of candidemia, 92 episodes in 88 patients were included. Central venous catheters (CVCs) were present in 66 episodes (71.7%) and were the most common infection source (N = 38, 41.3%). The most frequently isolated species was Candida glabrata (40 of 94, 42.6%). IDC was performed in 84 (91.3%) of 92 candidemia episodes. Mortality rates were 20.8% (16 of 77) in the IDC group versus 25% (2 of 8) in the no-IDC group (P = .67). Other comparisons were numerically different but not significant: repeat blood culture (98.8% vs 87.5%; P = .17), echocardiography (70.2% vs 50%; P = .26), CVC removal (91.7% vs 83.3%; P = .45), and initial echinocandin treatment (67.9% vs 50%; P = .44). IDC resulted in more ophthalmology examinations (67.9% vs 12.5%; P = .0035). All patients received antifungal therapy. Antimicrobial stewardship recommendations were performed in 19 episodes (20.7%). The median EQUAL Candida score with CVC was higher with IDC (16 vs 11; P = .001) but not in episodes without CVC (12 vs 11.5; P = .81).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of an active antimicrobial stewardship program and high consultation rates, mandatory IDC may not be warranted for candidemia.

The Utility of EQUAL Candida Score in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Candidemia

In an effort to standardize practice, the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) developed the European Confederation of Medical Mycology Quality of Clinical Candidaemia Management (EQUAL) Candida score. This study investigated the utility of the EQUAL Candida score in predicting mortality in patients with candidemia admitted between January 2004 and July 2019. A total of 142 cases were included in the study, and 43.6% died within 30 days of candidemia diagnosis. There were no significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in terms of comorbidities predisposing to candidemia, except for malignancy (p = 0.021). The overall mean EQUAL score was 11.5 in the total population and 11.8 ± 3.82 and 11.03 ± 4.59 in survivors and non-survivors, respectively. When patients with a central venous catheter (CVC) were considered alone, survivors were found to have significantly higher scores than non-survivors (13.1 ± 3.19 vs. 11.3 ± 4.77, p = 0.025). When assessing components of the EQUAL Score separately, only candida speciation (p = 0.013), susceptibility testing (p = 0.012) and echocardiography results (p = 0.012) were significantly associated with a lower case-fatality rate. A higher EQUAL Candida score was able to predict a lower case-fatality rate in patients with a CVC.