Comparison of efficacy and safety between rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and anti-T lymphocyte globulin in kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death: a retrospective cohort study

ATG-Fresenius increases the risk of red blood cell transfusion after kidney transplantation

Introduction

In sensitized deceased donor kidney allograft recipients, the most frequent induction therapy is anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG), including Thymoglobulin® (Thymo) and ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F).

Methods

We conducted a 3-year monocentric observational study to compare the impact of ATGs on hematological parameters. We included adult kidney transplant recipients treated with ATG induction therapy, either Thymo or ATG-F, on a one-in-two basis. The primary endpoint was red blood cell (RBC) transfusions within 14 days after transplantation.

Results

Among 309 kidney allograft recipients, 177 (57.2%) received ATG induction, 90 (50.8 %) ATG-F, and 87 (49.2%) Thymo. The ATG-F group received significantly more RBC transfusions (63.3% vs. 46% p = 0.02) and in bigger volumes (p = 0.01). Platelet transfusion was similar in both groups. Within 14 and 30 days after transplantation, older age, ATG-F induction, and early surgical complication were independently associated with RBC transfusion. Patient survival rate was 95%, and the death-censored kidney allograft survival rate was 91.5% at 12 months post-transplantation. There was no difference in the incidence of acute rejection and infections or in the prevalence of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies.

Discussion

In conclusion, after kidney transplantation, ATG-F is an independent risk factor for early RBC transfusion and early thrombocytopenia without clinical and biological consequences. These new data should be clinically considered, and alternatives to ATG should be further explored.

Anti-T-Lymphocyte Immunoglobulin (Grafalon) as an Induction Agent for Renal Transplantation: A Real-World, Retrospective, Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Polyclonal antithymocyte globulins are widely used in the induction regimens of solid-organ transplant recipients; however, their doses and outcomes remain to be standardized in Indian patients. We report our clinical experience from the real-world use of Grafalon (an anti-T-lymphocyte globulin; ATG-Fresenius) as an induction agentin renal transplant recipients from India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, single- center, observational study, we analyzed the medical records of 177 consecutive, kidney-only transplant recipients who received induction therapy with Grafalon from September 2016 to March 2018 at our center. Incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection and graft dysfunction, immunosuppression protocol, Grafalon dosage, 18-month post-transplant graft and patient survival, treatment-related adverse events, and infective complications were reported.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 41.46 years (range, 14-68 years), (85% were males). The average dose of Grafalon was 5.81 ± 1.95 mg/kg (range, 2.41 to 10.07 mg/kg). Graft dysfunction (ie, at least 20% increase in serum creatinine from baseline) was observed in 26 patients (14%): 11 patients (6.2%) had biopsy-proven acute rejections, 11 patients (6.2%) had acute tubular necrosis, and 4 patients (2.2%) had calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. Seven deaths were recorded: 2 each from fungal pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, and acute coronary syndrome and 1 with urinary tract infection with septicemia. Death-censored graft survival was 100% at 12 months and 98% at 18-month follow-up; overall patient survival was 96%. Infective complications occurred in 40 patients (22.5%), with the most common being urinary tract infection in 32 patients (18%). No malignancies were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a potent induction therapy like anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (Grafalon) is often restricted by the risk of side effects and lack of local clinical evidence supporting its role in long-term graft survival. Real-world evidence support the safe and effective use of anti-T-lymphocyte globulin as an induction agent in renal transplant recipients with an individualized dosing approach.

Grafalon® vs. Thymoglobulin® as an Induction Agent in Renal Transplantation - A Retrospective Study

Introduction

Antihuman thymocyte immunoglobulin, used as an induction agent in renal transplantation, is of two types - thymoglobulin and grafalon (formerly ATG-Fresenius). In this study, we compared outcomes with these two agents.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective study of patients transplanted from January 2017 to October 2019, who received either grafalon or thymoglobulin induction. Grafalon or thymoglobulin was given at 6 and 3 mg/kg, respectively, followed by standard triple immunosuppression of tacrolimus, MMF, and prednisolone.

Results

Median follow up was 22 (3-36) months. Thymoglobulin was given to 255 patients, whereas 78 patients received grafalon. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups although significantly more patients in the grafalon group received ABO incompatible transplant (15% vs. 4.3%; P = 0.002). Patient survival was similar between the two groups (99% in grafalon vs. 98.8% in thymoglobulin; P = 1.0). Death censored graft survival was also similar (99% in grafalon vs. 100% in thymoglobulin; P = 0.23). Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) was significantly higher in the grafalon group (12.8% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.04). The significance persisted after multivariable regression analysis (P = 0.02). Other outcomes such as infection rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate on last follow up were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions

Grafalon (6 mg/kg dose) when used as an induction agent was associated with significantly higher rate of BPARs as compared to thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg dose) although with comparable short-term patient and death censored graft survival, graft function, and infection rates.

Efficacy of anti-T-lymphocyte globulin-Fresenius as an induction agent in deceased-donor renal transplantation: A cohort study

Anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATG) is frequently used in the induction regimen of renal transplantation, but its dose has not been standardized. In the present study, the efficacy of different ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) doses was assessed in recipients of renal transplantation. A total of 131 adult recipients of renal transplantation who received ATG-F induction between August 2015 and July 2018 were included. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft function, as well as graft and patient survival within 12 months post-transplant, was assessed, and adverse events, including hematologic and infection-associated side effects, were compared between patients receiving a cumulative ATG-F dose of <7 or ≥7 mg/kg. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was similar between patients receiving cumulative doses of <7 and ≥7 mg/kg (7.5 vs. 4.7%, P=0.766). The incidence of infection within 12 months was lower in the ATG-F <7 mg/kg group compared with that in the ≥7 mg/kg group (26.9 vs. 50.0%, P=0.006), but the incidence of pneumonia did not differ between the ATG-F <7 and ≥7 mg/kg groups (10.4 vs. 20.3%, P=0.117). The incidence of urinary infection was higher in the ≥7 mg/kg group than in the <7 mg/kg group (20.4 vs. 7.46%, P=0.033), while the extent and duration of anemia and lymphopenia was similar between groups. There was no difference in graft function, delayed graft function, as well as overall and graft survival between the groups. In conclusion, a moderate reduction in the cumulative ATG-F dose was not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection, while the risk of infection was reduced. Optimization of the ATG-F dose for induction may facilitate the reduction of the risk of infection without compromising the induction efficacy in renal transplant recipients.

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Versus Antithymocyte Globulin-fresenius as Induction Therapy for Patients With Kidney Transplantation From Donation After Cardiac Death in China

PURPOSE

Induction immunosuppression therapy is used to support optimal outcomes in kidney transplantation. This study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) versus ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) in kidney transplantation in the Chinese setting from the perspective of the health care payer.

METHODS

A 2-part survival model was developed, consisting of a short-term part and a long-term part. The short-term part analyzed the first year, using the decision tree, and consisted of the functioning transplant, acute rejection (AR), delayed graft function (DGF), dialysis, and death health states. The long-term part analyzed 2 to 5 years, using Markov model, and consisted of the functioning transplant, chronic dysfunction, recurring primary disease, dialysis, and death health states, with capture of the association between DGF and graft loss. Costs, including drug acquisition and other direct medical costs, were derived from China IQVIA database (formerly known as IMS) hospitaldatabase, chart review, and physician interviews. Clinical outcomes and utility were retrieved from published literature. The model calculated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs per patient. Costs and QALYs were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Univariate sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to assess the impact of uncertainty of the variables on the results.

FINDINGS

Patients who received r-ATG had more clinical effectiveness than patients who received ATG-F mainly because of less AR, DGF, and dialysis. The incremental QALY was 0.01 over a 1-year time horizon and 0.0496 over a 5-year time horizon. R-ATG and ATG-F drug costs were ¥10,783 and ¥8409, respectively. However, the total treatment costs of the r-ATG arm were lower than the ATG-F arm because of lower costs related to DGF, AR, dialysis, and adverse events. In total, r-ATG saved ¥5423 over the 1-year and ¥7042 over the 5-year time horizon. R-ATG was dominant with lower total direct medical costs and higher QALYs compared with ATG-F. Both univariate sensitivity analysis and PSA found the robustness of the model results. PSA results indicated that r-ATG was cost-effective compared with ATG-F in 86.81% of the simulations, considering <3 times the gross domestic product per capita as the threshold.

IMPLICATIONS

From the perspective of the health care payer, r-ATG should be considered as the preferred treatment agent for induction therapy for Chinese patients undergoing kidney transplantation because of its lower overall medical costs and greater QALYs gained compared with ATG-F. The study was limited by lack of long-term efficacy data among the Chinese population and lack of comprehensive real-world higher quality costs data.

Hypertension: a new treatment for an old disease? Targeting the immune system

Arterial hypertension represents a serious public health problem, being a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The availability of many antihypertensive therapeutic strategies still fails to adequately treat around 20% of hypertensive patients, who are considered resistant to conventional treatment. In the pathogenesis of hypertension, immune system mechanisms are activated and both the innate and adaptive immune responses play a crucial role. However, what, when and how the immune system is triggered during hypertension development is still largely undefined. In this context, this review highlights scientific advances in the manipulation of the immune system in order to attenuate hypertension and end-organ damage. Here, we discuss the potential use of immunosuppressants and immunomodulators as pharmacological tools to control the activation of the immune system, by non-specific and specific mechanisms, to treat hypertension and improve end-organ damage. Nevertheless, more clinical trials should be performed with these drugs to establish their therapeutic efficacy, safety and risk-benefit ratio in hypertensive conditions. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Immune Targets in Hypertension. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.12/issuetoc.