Nutrition in Renal Supportive Care: Patient-driven and flexible

Oral Nutritional Supplement Prescription and Patient-Reported Symptom Burden Among Patients With Late-Stage Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

Background

Malnutrition and protein-energy wasting (PEW) are nutritional complications of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) that contribute to morbidity, mortality, and decreased quality of life. No previous studies have assessed the effect of oral nutritional supplements (ONSs) on patient-reported symptom burden among patients with non-dialysis CKD (CKD-ND) who have or are at risk of malnutrition/PEW.

Objective

The objective of this study was (1) to quantify the associations between baseline nutritional parameters and patient-reported symptom scores for wellbeing, tiredness, nausea, and appetite and (2) to compare the change in symptom scores among patients prescribed ONS with patients who did not receive ONS in a propensity-score-matched analysis.

Design

This study conducted observational cohort analysis using provincial registry data.

Setting

This study was done in multidisciplinary CKD clinics in British Columbia.

Patients

Adult patients >18 years of age with CKD-ND entering multidisciplinary CKD clinics between January 1, 2010-July 31, 2019 who had at least 2 Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised: Renal (ESASr:Renal) assessments.

Measurements

The measurements include nutrition-related parameters such as body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, serum phosphate, serum bicarbonate, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and ESASr:Renal scores (overall and subscores for wellbeing, tiredness, nausea, and appetite).

Methods

Multivariable linear regression was applied to assess associations between nutritional parameters and ESASr:Renal scores. Propensity-score matching using the greedy method was used to match patients prescribed ONS with those not prescribed ONS using multiple demographic, comorbidity, health care utilization, and temporal factors. Linear regression was used to assess the association between first ONS prescription and change in ESASr:Renal overall score and subscores for wellbeing, tiredness, nausea, and appetite.

Results

Of total, 2076 patients were included. Higher baseline serum albumin was associated with lower overall ESASr:Renal score (-0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.40 to -0.01 per 1 g/L increase in albumin), lower subscores for tiredness (-0.04, 95% CI = -0.07 to -0.01), nausea (-0.03, 95% CI = -0.04 to -0.01), and appetite (-0.03, 95% CI = -0.06 to -0.01). Higher BMI was associated with higher overall ESASr:Renal score (0.32, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.48 per 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI), higher symptom subscores for wellbeing (0.02, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.04) and tiredness (0.05, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.07). Higher baseline NLR was associated with higher overall score (0.21, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.39 per 1 unit increase in NLR), higher symptom subscores for wellbeing (0.03, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.05) and nausea (0.03, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.05). In the propensity-score-matched analysis, there were no statistically significant associations between ONS prescription and change in overall ESASr:Renal (beta coefficient for change in ESASr:Renal = 0.17, 95% CI = -2.64 to 2.99) or for subscores for appetite, tiredness, nausea, and wellbeing.

Limitations

Possible residual confounding. The ESASr:Renal assessments were obtained routinely only in patients with G5 CKD-ND and/or experiencing significant CKD-related symptoms.

Conclusions

This exploratory observational analysis of patients with advanced non-dialysis CKD demonstrated BMI, serum albumin, and NLR were modestly associated with patient-reported symptoms, but we did not observe an association between ONS use and change in ESASr:Renal scores.

Personalized Low-Protein Diet Prescription in CKD Population: Merging Evidence From Randomized Trials With Observational Data

Nutritional therapy is a cornerstone of the clinical management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nevertheless, randomized controlled trials often have failed to show a relevant benefit of low-protein diets in nonselected CKD populations in terms of slowing the progression of kidney disease and need for dialysis. The more the target population is selected, the less the results can be generalizable to implement in clinical practice. On the contrary, observational studies, especially if performed with patient-centered, flexible approaches, point toward an extensive implementation of dietary protein restriction in different and unselected CKD populations. The observational evidence cannot be disregarded anymore. The most recent guidelines advise implementing low-protein diets or even very-low-protein diets in all CKD patients as early as stage 3. However, the lack of data from large randomized controlled trials on unselected CKD populations as well as on specific subpopulations, such as diabetic or obese patients, which nowadays comprise the majority of CKD subjects, reduces the generalizability of the recommendations. For some patient populations, such as those encompassing very old, nephrotic, or pregnant patients, the literature is even more limited because of the lower prevalence of these conditions and diffused prejudices against reducing protein intake. This pragmatic review discusses the need for integrating information derived from randomized trials with evidence derived from observational studies to guide feasible strategies for more successful implementation of low-protein diets in the treatment of all segments of the CKD population.

Nutrition in Conservative Kidney Management: From Evidence to Practice

Conservative kidney management (CKM) is a treatment option for kidney failure, particularly for the elderly and those with co-morbidities. Dietitians can play an important role in the provision of CKM by enhancing patients' quality of life through the management of nutrition impact symptoms (symptoms that result in decreased eating, including anorexia, nausea, dry mouth, and taste changes), as well as symptoms that result from malnutrition, including fatigue, weakness, activity intolerance, slow wound healing, and low mood. There are many gaps in the literature regarding optimal nutritional recommendations for patients on CKM. More research is needed on symptom management and interventions to delay or slow the progression of malnutrition and frailty. This article provides an overview of important nutritional considerations, a synthesis of the current literature, and recommendations for application of evidence into the practice of CKM.

Assessing Global Kidney Nutrition Care

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Nutrition intervention is an essential component of kidney disease management. This study aimed to understand current global availability and capacity of kidney nutrition care services, interdisciplinary communication, and availability of oral nutrition supplements.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM), working in partnership with the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) Global Kidney Health Atlas Committee, developed this Global Kidney Nutrition Care Atlas. An electronic survey was administered among key kidney care stakeholders through 182 ISN-affiliated countries between July and September 2018.

RESULTS

Overall, 160 of 182 countries (88%) responded, of which 155 countries (97%) answered the survey items related to kidney nutrition care. Only 48% of the 155 countries have dietitians/renal dietitians to provide this specialized service. Dietary counseling, provided by a person trained in nutrition, was generally not available in 65% of low-/lower middle-income countries and "never" available in 23% of low-income countries. Forty-one percent of the countries did not provide formal assessment of nutrition status for kidney nutrition care. The availability of oral nutrition supplements varied globally and, mostly, were not freely available in low-/lower middle-income countries for both inpatient and outpatient settings. Dietitians and nephrologists only communicated "sometimes" on kidney nutrition care in ≥60% of countries globally.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey reveals significant gaps in global kidney nutrition care service capacity, availability, cost coverage, and deficiencies in interdisciplinary communication on kidney nutrition care delivery, especially in lower-income countries.

[Treatment of geriatric patients with end-stage renal failure : Dialysis or conservative procedure?]

Compared to younger patients, an acceptable state of health in older patients with various comorbidities is rarely achieved by the initiation of dialysis. Despite dialysis treatment, further functional and cognitive impairments often rapidly occur in geriatric patients. Thus, newer studies are concerned with the quality of life of this patient group after initiation of dialysis as well as with palliative treatment strategies as alternatives. A structured clarification for the patients on all possibilities with mediation of all necessary information is a prerequisite for a shared decision-making. To assess life expectancy after dialysis initiation, various scores have been developed but the sensitivity could not fulfil the expectations. In the case of renal replacement, chronic intermittent hemodialysis is the treatment form most frequently performed in geriatric patients. The main concern of conservative palliative treatment is the quality of life and the management of uremic symptoms, which have to be addressed by a multidisciplinary team.

Impact of Renal Supportive Care on Symptom Burden in Dialysis Patients: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

CONTEXT

Symptom burden is a strong predictor of reduced health-related quality of life and survival in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Renal supportive care (RSC) is a comprehensive approach shown to benefit symptoms in nondialysis conservatively managed patients, although its role in dialysis patients has not been reported.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the impacts of RSC intervention on symptoms in dialysis patients.

METHODS

Dialysis patients who were referred to an RSC clinic for symptom control between April 2010 and December 2017 were followed prospectively. Symptoms were scored using the Integrated Palliative care Outcomes Scale-Renal Inventory. Change in symptoms was analyzed at three visits and at final RSC visit within the study period. Correlation and linear regression were used to assess for effect modifiers.

RESULTS

A total of 127 dialysis patients attended the RSC clinic for symptom management. Median age was 74 years, 62% males, median dialysis vintage was 2.2 years, and median-modified Charlson Comorbidity Index was 7. Mean combined physical and emotional symptom score at baseline was 17.5 (SD 9.6), the most overwhelming/severe symptoms being difficulty sleeping (35%), pain (31%), lack of energy (31%), poor mobility (24%), and itch (22%). Eighty patients had follow-up to at least three RSC visits (median 3.1 months). There was significant improvement in combined physical and emotional symptom score during three clinic visits (18.1 vs. 14.2; mean change -3.8; 95% CI -5.7 to -1.9; P < 0.001), with greatest improvement in symptom scores for the five most severe symptoms (each P < 0.001). Follow-up of these 80 patients to final RSC visit (median 13.0 months) showed sustained reduction in mean combined physical and emotional symptom score (18.1 vs. 14.4; mean change -3.7; 95% CI -5.6 to -1.7; P < 0.001). These changes occurred without change in dialysis delivery.

CONCLUSION

RSC intervention that focuses on symptom control and patient-centered care is associated with improved total and individual symptom burden in dialysis patients. This supports a role for RSC as a management adjunct in these patients.

Supporting and maintaining the frail patient on long-term renal replacement therapy

The number of frail patients reaching end-stage kidney disease is increasing. They have a high level of comorbidity and symptom burden which need to be considered when making management plans. For those who choose renal replacement therapy, it is important to establish goals and ceilings of care and to provide holistic care focusing on optimising quality of life. Advance care planning is the process of documenting the patient's preferences for their treatment in the event they lose capacity to make decisions about their treatment.