Mean of creatinine clearance and urea clearance examined over 1 h estimates glomerular filtration rate accurately and precisely in children

Assessing bias in GFR estimating equations: improper GFR stratification can yield misleading results

BACKGROUND

Assessing bias (estimated - measured) is key to evaluating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Stratification by subgroups can indicate where equations perform differently. However, there is a fallacy in the assessment of two instruments (e.g., eGFR and mGFR) when stratifying on the level of only one of those instruments. Here, we present statistical aspects of the problem and a solution for GFR stratification along with an empirical investigation using data from the CKiD study.

METHODS

Compared and contrasted biases (eGFR relative to mGFR) with 95% confidence intervals within strata of mGFR only, eGFR only, and the average of mGFR and eGFR using data from the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) study.

RESULTS

A total of 304 participants contributed 843 GFR studies with a mean mGFR of 48.46 (SD = 22.72) and mean eGFR of 48.67 (SD = 22.32) and correlation of 0.904. Despite strong agreement, eGFR significantly overestimated mGFR when mGFR < 30 (+ 6.2%; 95%CI + 2.9%, + 9.7%) and significantly underestimated when mGFR > 90 (-12.2%; 95%CI - 17.3%, - 7.0%). Significant biases in opposite direction were present when stratifying by eGFR only. In contrast, when stratifying by the average of eGFR and mGFR, biases were not significant (+ 1.3% and - 1.0%, respectively) congruent with strong agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Stratifying by either mGFR or eGFR only to assess eGFR biases is ubiquitous but can lead to inappropriate inference due to intrinsic statistical issues that we characterize and empirically illustrate using data from the CKiD study. Using the average of eGFR and mGFR is recommended for valid inferences in evaluations of eGFR biases.

Chapter 1: Evaluation of kidney function in patients undergoing anticancer drug therapy, from clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022

The prevalence of CKD may be higher in patients with cancer than in those without due to the addition of cancer-specific risk factors to those already present for CKD. In this review, we describe the evaluation of kidney function in patients undergoing anticancer drug therapy. When anticancer drug therapy is administered, kidney function is evaluated to (1) set the dose of renally excretable drugs, (2) detect kidney disease associated with the cancer and its treatment, and (3) obtain baseline values for long-term monitoring. Owing to some requirements for use in clinical practice, a GFR estimation method such as the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, CKD-EPI, and the Japanese Society of Nephrology's GFR estimation formula has been developed that is simple, inexpensive, and provides rapid results. However, an important clinical question is whether they can be used as a method of GFR evaluation in patients with cancer. When designing a drug dosing regimen in consideration of kidney function, it is important to make a comprehensive judgment, recognizing that there are limitations regardless of which estimation formula is used or if GFR is directly measured. Although CTCAEs are commonly used as criteria for evaluating kidney disease-related adverse events that occur during anticancer drug therapy, a specialized approach using KDIGO criteria or other criteria is required when nephrologists intervene in treatment. Each drug is associated with the different disorders related to the kidney. And various risk factors for kidney disease associated with each anticancer drug therapy.