Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With H-Coil Coupled With Cycling for Improving Lower Limb Motor Function After Stroke: An Exploratory Study

Management Approaches to Spastic Gait Disorders

Spastic gait presents clinically as the net mechanical consequence of neurological impairments of spasticity, weakness, and abnormal synergies and their interactions with the ground reaction force in patients with upper motor neuron syndromes and with some neuromuscular diseases. It is critical to differentiate whether the primary problem is weakness or spasticity, thus better understanding different phenotypes of spastic gait disorders. Pelvic girdle abnormality plays a pivotal role in determining the clinical presentation of gait disorders, since it determines the body vector and compensatory kinetic chain reactions in the knee and ankle joints. Knee joint abnormality can be a mechanical compensation for hip and/or ankle and foot abnormality. Diagnostic nerve blocks and instrumented gait analysis may be needed for diagnosing the underlying problems and developing an individualized plan of care. A wide spectrum of treatment options has been used to manage spastic gait disorders. Some are in early and investigational stages, such as neuromodulation modalities, while others are well-developed, such as therapeutic exercise, ankle-foot orthoses, botulinum toxin treatment, and surgical interventions. Physicians and other healthcare providers who manage spastic gait disorders should be familiar with these treatment options and should employ appropriate interventions concurrently rather than serially. The most effective treatments can be selected based on careful evaluation, inputs from patients, family, and therapists, along with appropriate goal setting. Treatment plans need to be re-evaluated for effectiveness, relevance, and in concordance with disease progress. This is particularly important for patients with progressive neuromuscular diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Therapeutic efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on gait and limb balance function in patients with lower limb dysfunction post-cerebral infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This investigation is designed to evaluate the effects of rTMS and its varying stimulation parameters and target sites on the therapeutic outcomes for post-stroke lower limb motor impairment and balance, with the objective of pinpointing stimulation locations and parameters that are both reasonable and applicable in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An exhaustive search was carried out across the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases to identify RCTs that assessed the effectiveness of rTMS in the treatment of lower limb motor impairment following a stroke. Meta-analysis was performed usingR statistical environment (V.4.2.2, www.r-project.org ). The review period encompassed the interval from the databases' origination through to February 18, 2024.

RESULTS

Research reveals that applying rTMS to the unaffected motor cortex markedly enhances gait speed in stroke patients,exhibiting a significant effect (SMD: 1.117, 95% CI:0.40, 1.82, I2 = 0.0%). rTMS sessions comprising 1000-1500 pulses (SMD: 0.92, 95% CrI:0.63, 1.21, I2 = 42%, six studies), with a total session count ≥ 10 (SMD: 0.85, 95% CrI:0.53, 1.18, I2 = 54.1%, six studies), and high-frequency rTMS (SMD: 0.83, 95% CrI:0.34, 1.09, I2 = 46.3%, three studies) exhibit significant efficacyin improving lower limb balance and gait post-stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

The research indicates that rTMS has been instrumental in enhancing the post-stroke prognosis for gait and limb balance. Nevertheless, the therapeutic efficacy of rTMS is subject to the diversity in stimulation locations and parameter settings.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor function in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the safety and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating motor dysfunction in stroke patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in five online databases, namely, Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus, from their inception to July 29, 2024. Studies meeting the predetermined inclusion criteria were included. The data were analyzed using RevMan 5.4.1 software and Stata 15.0. The subgroup analysis was conducted based on various disease stages and intervention frequencies. The overall effects were estimated using either the fixed effects model or the random effects model, with standardized mean differences (SMDs). The level of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies encompassing 2951 stroke survivors were included. The results of the quantitative analysis revealed that the application of 1 Hz rTMS over the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) significantly improved motor function during both the early stage (< 1 month) with moderate effect size (n = 443, SMD = 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.63, P < 0.00001, I2 = 47%, fixed-effect model) and recovery period (1-6 months) with moderate effect size (n = 233, SMD = 0.61, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.87, P < 0.0001, I2 = 33%, fixed-effect model). In the context of activities of daily living (ADLs), the application of 1 Hz rTMS over the contralesional M1 can lead to improvements in ADLs among individuals in the early stages of stroke with moderate effect size (n = 343, SMD = 0.67, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.89, I2 = 79%, P < 0.00001, fixed-effect model). However, evidence to support that 1 Hz rTMS over contralesional M1 can improve motor dysfunction in the chronic phase of stroke (> 6 months) is insufficient.

CONCLUSION

Moderate- to high-quality evidence suggests that 1 Hz rTMS over the contralesional M1 may enhance motor function and independence in ADL during the early stages of stroke and the recovery period (within 6 months) with moderate effect. Nonetheless, as for the efficacy of 3, 5, 10, and 20 Hz rTMS in the treatment of motor dysfunction after stroke, it needs to be further determined. It is important to interpret these findings with caution in clinical practice due to the small sample sizes and low quality of the studies reviewed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

INPLASY, Registration number is INPLASY202360042. DOI number is https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2023.6.0042 .

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coupled With Visual-Feedback Cycling Exercise Improves Walking Ability and Walking Stability After Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Study

Background: Stroke survivors exhibit persistent abnormal gait patterns, particularly in diminished walking ability and stability, limiting mobility and increasing the risk of falling. The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) coupled with cycling exercise on walking ability and stability in patients with stroke and explore the potential mechanisms underlying motor cortex recovery. Methods: In this double-blinded randomized pilot trial, 32 stroke patients were randomly separated into the real-rTMS group (RG, receiving rTMS during active cycling exercise) and the sham-rTMS group (SG, receiving sham rTMS during active cycling exercise). Participants completed 10 exercise sessions (5 times per week). Lower extremity function was measured using the Fugl-Meyer assessment of lower extremity (FMA-LE), and functional balance ability was measured by the Berg balance scale (BBS). The 2-min walk test (2MWT) and standing balance test were employed to evaluate walking and balance ability. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured to evaluate cortical excitability. The above assessments were administered at baseline and after the intervention. Additionally, the cycling exercise performance was recorded after the initial and final exercise sessions to evaluate the motor control during exercise. Results: The RG showed significant improvements in lower extremity function (FMA-LE) and functional balance ability (BBS) compared to the SG at postintervention. The walking and balance abilities, as well as the motor asymmetry of cycling exercise, significantly improved in RG. Additionally, participants in RG exhibited a higher elicitation rate of ipsilesional MEPs than that in SG. The improvements in motor asymmetry of cycling exercise in RG were significantly associated with increases in FMA-LE scores and walking ability. Conclusion: The combination of rTMS and cycling exercise effectively improves walking ability and walking stability in patients with stroke, which may be related to the excitability modulation of the motor cortex induced by rTMS. Trial Registration: Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2400079360.

Noninvasive Neuromodulation Combined With Rehabilitation Therapy Improves Balance and Gait Speed in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulation affect functional balance, gait speed, and walking cadence in stroke patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus (June 22, 2022) for randomized controlled trials. Three reviewers independently performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. Network and pairwise meta-analyses were performed to assess indirect and direct comparisons.

RESULTS

We included 34 studies ( N = 915 patients). Sixty percent had moderate-to-high methodological quality. The meta-analyses showed positive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with rehabilitation therapy compared with sham on gait speed, walking cadence, and balance function with weighted mean differences and 95% confidence interval of 0.08 (0.03 to 0.13), 7.16 (3.217 to 11.103), and 3.05 (0.52 to 5.57), respectively. Transcranial direct current stimulation showed improvement on the time up and go test (-0.88 [-1.68 to -0.08]). From the surface under the cumulative ranking analyses, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is the best ranked treatment for gait speed and functional balance improvement compared with transcranial direct current stimulation and sham interventions. There were not enough studies to include cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulation in the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Walking cadence and speed, functional balance significantly improved after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with short-term effects, which were superior to that of transcranial direct current stimulation and sham treatments. Transcranial direct current stimulation showed short-term beneficial effects on the Time Up and Go test.

Effects of the intermittent theta burst stimulation on gait, balance and lower limbs motor function in stroke: study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial with multimodal neuroimaging assessments

INTRODUCTION

Approximately, 50% of stroke survivors experience impaired walking ability 6 months after conventional rehabilitation and standard care. However, compared with upper limb motor function, research on lower limbs rehabilitation through non-invasive neuromodulation like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has received less attention. Limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), an optimised rTMS modality, on lower limbs rehabilitation after stroke. This study aims to evaluate the effects of iTBS on gait, balance and lower limbs motor function in stroke recovery while also exploring the underlying neural mechanisms using longitudinal analysis of multimodal neuroimaging data.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this double-blinded randomised controlled trial, a total of 46 patients who had a stroke will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 15 sessions of leg motor area iTBS consisting of 600 pulses or sham stimulation over the course of 3 weeks. Additionally, conventional rehabilitation therapy will be administered following the (sham) iTBS intervention. The primary outcome measure will be the 10 m walking test. Secondary outcomes include the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the lower extremity, Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Ambulation Category Scale, Berg Balance Scale, modified Barthel Index, Mini-Mental State Examination, montreal cognitive assessment, tecnobody balance assessment encompassing both static and dynamic stability evaluations, surface electromyography recording muscle activation of the lower limbs, three-dimensional gait analysis focusing on temporal and spatial parameters as well as ground reaction force measurements, corticomotor excitability tests including resting motor threshold, motor evoked potential and recruitment curves and multimodal functional MRI scanning. Outcome measures will be collected prior to and after the intervention period with follow-up at 3 weeks.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has received approval from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Wuxi Mental Health Center/Wuxi Central Rehabilitation Hospital (no. WXMHCCIRB2023LLky078). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2300077431.

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity motor function and optimal parameters in stroke patients with different stages of stroke: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

Background

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), as an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation technique, is now widely employed in rehabilitation therapy. The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively summarize existing evidence regarding rTMS intervention for lower limb motor function in patients at different stages of stroke.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of rTMS for treating lower limb motor dysfunction after stroke. Multiple databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Database, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched. The search period extended from the inception of the libraries to June 2024. Literature information was extracted, and methodological quality was evaluated using the risk of bias assessment tool in the Cochrane Handbook. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software.

Results

Overall, 49 appropriate studies (including 3,558 stroke subjects) were found. Meta-analysis results demonstrated that rTMS effectively improved lower limb motor function across all stages of stroke. The intervention was particularly more effective in patients in the subacute stage than in the acute or chronic stages. Subgroup analysis revealed that, for acute-stage patients, low-frequency stimulation targeting the M1 or DLPFC brain regions on the unaffected side with 20-40 sessions significantly improved FMA-LE scores. In subacute-phase patients, low-frequency stimulation targeting the M1 brain regions on the unaffected side with 18 sessions significantly improved FMA-LE scores. The results demonstrated that HF-rTMS was more effective than LF-rTMS in improving walking speed, with the greatest efficacy observed at 20 sessions. While for enhancing gait balance in stroke patients, LF-rTMS with the best therapeutic effect was observed at a frequency of 20-40 treatments.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the efficacy of rTMS in improving lower limb motor function, balance, and walking speed in stroke patients at various stages. The findings provide a valuable reference for the development of optimized rTMS treatment plans in clinical practice.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42023466094.

Neuropsychological and Anatomical-Functional Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Patients with Cognitive Impairment and Aphasia: A Systematic Review

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been found to be promising in the neurorehabilitation of post-stroke patients. Aphasia and cognitive impairment (CI) are prevalent post-stroke; however, there is still a lack of consensus about the characteristics of interventions based on TMS and its neuropsychological and anatomical-functional benefits. Therefore, studies that contribute to creating TMS protocols for these neurological conditions are necessary. To analyze the evidence of the neuropsychological and anatomical-functional TMS effects in post-stroke patients with CI and aphasia and determine the characteristics of the most used TMS in research practice. The present study followed the PRISMA guidelines and included articles from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and EMBASE databases, published between January 2010 and March 2023. In the 15 articles reviewed, it was found that attention, memory, executive function, language comprehension, naming, and verbal fluency (semantic and phonological) are the neuropsychological domains that improved post-TMS. Moreover, TMS in aphasia and post-stroke CI contribute to greater frontal activation (in the inferior frontal gyrus, pars triangularis, and opercularis). Temporoparietal effects were also found. The observed effects occur when TMS is implemented in repetitive modality, at a frequency of 1 Hz, in sessions of 30 min, and that last more than 2 weeks in duration. The use of TMS contributes to the neurorehabilitation process in post-stroke patients with CI and aphasia. However, it is still necessary to standardize future intervention protocols based on accurate TMS characteristics.

Neuroprotective effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Alzheimer's disease: Undetermined therapeutic protocols and mechanisms

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder characterized by gradual deterioration of cognitive functions, for which an effective treatment is currently unavailable. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a well‐established noninvasive brain stimulation method, is utilized in clinical settings to address various neuropsychiatric conditions, such as depression, neuropathic pain, and poststroke dysfunction. Increasing evidence suggests that rTMS may enhance cognitive abilities in individuals with AD. However, its optimal therapeutic protocols and precise mechanisms are currently unknown, impeding its clinical implementation. In the present review, we aimed to summarize and discuss the efficacy‐related parameters in rTMS treatment, encompassing stimulus frequency, stimulus pattern, stimulus intensity, and the configuration of the stimulus coil. Furthermore, we reviewed promising rTMS therapeutic protocols involving various combinations of these factors, that were examined in clinical studies. Based on our analysis, we propose that a multisite high‐frequency rTMS (HF‐rTMS) regimen has value in AD therapy, and that promising single‐site protocols, such as HF‐rTMS, applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus, or cerebellum are required to be validated in larger clinical studies. Lastly, we provide a comprehensive review of the potential mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective effects of rTMS on cognition in AD in terms of brain network modulation as well as cellular and molecular reactions. In conclusion, the interaction of diverse mechanisms may be responsible for the total therapeutic effect of rTMS on AD. This review provides theoretical and practical evidence for the future clinical application and scientific research of rTMS in AD.

Comparative efficacy of different repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols for lower extremity motor function in stroke patients: a network meta-analysis

Background

Lower extremity motor dysfunction is one of the most severe consequences after stroke, restricting functional mobility and impairing daily activities. Growing evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can improve stroke patients' lower extremity motor function. However, there is still controversy about the optimal rTMS protocol. Therefore, we compared and analyzed the effects of different rTMS protocols on lower extremity motor function in stroke patients using network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

We systematically searched CNKI, WanFang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases (from origin to 31 December 2023). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or crossover RCTs on rTMS improving lower extremity motor function in stroke patients were included. Two authors independently completed article screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. RevMan (version 5.4) and Stata (version 17.0) were used to analyze the data.

Results

A total of 38 studies with 2,022 patients were eligible for the NMA. The interventions included HFrTMS-M1, LFrTMS-M1, iTBS-Cerebellum, iTBS-M1, dTMS-M1, and Placebo. The results of NMA showed that LFrTMS-M1 ranked first in FMA-LE and speed, and HFrTMS-M1 ranked first in BBS, TUGT, and MEP amplitude. The subgroup analysis of FMA-LE showed that HFrTMS-M1 was the best stimulation protocol for post-stroke time > 1 month, and LFrTMS-M1 was the best stimulation protocol for post-stroke time ≤ 1 month.

Conclusion

Considering the impact of the stroke phase on the lower extremity motor function, the current research evidence shows that HFrTMS-M1 may be the preferred stimulation protocol to improve the lower extremity motor function of patients for post-stroke time > 1 month, and LFrTMS-M1 for post-stroke time ≤ 1 month. However, the above conclusion needs further analysis and validation by more high-quality RCTs.Systematic Review Registration:www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD42023474215).

Integrative Approaches in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Symptom Recognition to Future Innovations

Among the high prevalence of cerebrovascular diseases nowadays, acute ischemic stroke stands out, representing a significant worldwide health issue with important socio-economic implications. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are important milestones for the management of this multifaceted pathology, making understanding the various stroke-onset symptoms crucial. A key role in acute ischemic stroke management is emphasizing the essential role of a multi-disciplinary team, therefore, increasing the efficiency of recognition and treatment. Neuroimaging and neuroradiology have evolved dramatically over the years, with multiple approaches that provide a higher understanding of the morphological aspects as well as timely recognition of cerebral artery occlusions for effective therapy planning. Regarding the treatment matter, the pharmacological approach, particularly fibrinolytic therapy, has its merits and challenges. Endovascular thrombectomy, a game-changer in stroke management, has witnessed significant advances, with technologies like stent retrievers and aspiration catheters playing pivotal roles. For select patients, combining pharmacological and endovascular strategies offers evidence-backed benefits. The aim of our comprehensive study on acute ischemic stroke is to efficiently compare the current therapies, recognize novel possibilities from the literature, and describe the state of the art in the interdisciplinary approach to acute ischemic stroke. As we aspire for holistic patient management, the emphasis is not just on medical intervention but also on physical therapy, mental health, and community engagement. The future holds promising innovations, with artificial intelligence poised to reshape stroke diagnostics and treatments. Bridging the gap between groundbreaking research and clinical practice remains a challenge, urging continuous collaboration and research.

Applying transcranial magnetic stimulation to rehabilitation of poststroke lower extremity function and an improvement: Individual-target TMS

Stroke is the leading cause of disability globally in need of novel and effective methods of rehabilitation. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has been adopted as a Level B recommendation for lower limb spasticity in guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Nonetheless, the methodological differences and deficits of existing work bring about heterogenous results and therefore limit the universal clinical use of rTMS in lower extremity (LE) rehabilitation. The variation of stimulated targets across motor cortex contributes mainly to these heterogeneities. This narrative review includes studies of rTMS on LE motor function rehabilitation in patients after stroke until now. Some analyses of brain imaging and electromagnetic simulation and quantification through computational modeling were also performed. rTMS appears capable of fostering LE motor rehabilitation after stroke, but the actually stimulated targets are considerably bias making it difficult to confirm effectiveness. The main reason for this phenomenon is probably inaccurate targeting of motor cortical leg representation. An underlying updated method is proposed as Individual-Target TMS (IT-TMS) combined with brain imaging. rTMS is a promising validated method for LE function regaining. Future studies should systematically compare the effects of IT-TMS with traditional rTMS using large samples in random clinical trials. This article is categorized under: Neuroscience > Clinical Neuroscience.

Benefits from Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation

Stroke is an acute neurovascular central nervous system (CNS) injury and one of the main causes of long-term disability and mortality. Post-stroke rehabilitation as part of recovery is focused on relearning lost skills and regaining independence as much as possible. Many novel strategies in neurorehabilitation have been introduced. This review focuses on current evidence of the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), in post-stroke rehabilitation. Moreover, we present the effects of specific interventions, such as low-frequency or high-frequency rTMS therapy, on motor function, cognitive function, depression, and aphasia in post-stroke patients. Collected data suggest that high-frequency stimulation (5 Hz and beyond) produces an increase in cortical excitability, whereas low-frequency stimulation (≤1 Hz) decreases cortical excitability. Accumulated data suggest that rTMS is safe and can be used to modulate cortical excitability, which may improve overall performance. Side effects such as tingling sensation on the skin of the skull or headache are possible. Serious side effects such as epileptic seizures can be avoided by adhering to international safety guidelines. We reviewed clinical studies that present promising results in general recovery and stimulating neuroplasticity. This article is an overview of the current rTMS state of knowledge related to benefits in stroke, as well as its cellular and molecular mechanisms. In the stroke rehabilitation literature, there is a key methodological problem of creating double-blinding studies, which are very often impossible to conduct.

A Meta-Analysis: Whether Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Dysfunction Caused by Stroke with Lower Limb Spasticity

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in improving lower limb spasticity after stroke.

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine (CBM) disc, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched online from their inception to May 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for lower extremity spasticity after stroke. Valid data were extracted from the included literature, and the quality evaluation was conducted with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions along with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale (PE-Dro scale). The data that met the quality requirements were systematically analysed using Review Manager 5.4 software.

Results

A total of 554 patients from seven articles (nine studies) were quantitatively analysed. Outcomes included the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Timed Up and Go (TUG), measured as the effect of rTMS compared with controls conditions after treatment. The systematic review showed that rTMS reduced MAS and increased MBI scores, respectively (SMD = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.45, -0.03], P = 0.02; MD = 6.14, 95% CI [-3.93,8.35], P ＜ 0.00001), compared with control conditions. Low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS) significantly improved FMA-LE scores (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.13, 0.51], P = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in FMA-LE scores when using high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) (P > 0.1) and in TUG times (P > 0.1) between the treatment and control groups.

Conclusions

rTMS was effective in improving spasticity and activities of daily living. LF-rTMS has positive clinical effects on enhancing motor function in patients who experience lower extremity spasticity after stroke. To better validate the above conclusions, more multicentre, high-quality, and double-blind randomized controlled trials are needed.

Novel Advances to Post-Stroke Aphasia Pharmacology and Rehabilitation

Aphasia is one of the most common clinical features of functional impairment after a stroke. Approximately 21–40% of stroke patients sustain permanent aphasia, which progressively worsens one’s quality of life and rehabilitation outcomes. Post-stroke aphasia treatment strategies include speech language therapies, cognitive neurorehabilitation, telerehabilitation, computer-based management, experimental pharmacotherapy, and physical medicine. This review focuses on current evidence of the effectiveness of impairment-based aphasia therapies and communication-based therapies (as well as the timing and optimal treatment intensities for these interventions). Moreover, we present specific interventions, such as constraint-induced aphasia therapy (CIAT) and melodic intonation therapy (MIT). Accumulated data suggest that using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is safe and can be used to modulate cortical excitability. Therefore, we review clinical studies that present TMS and tDCS as (possible) promising therapies in speech and language recovery, stimulating neuroplasticity. Several drugs have been used in aphasia pharmacotherapy, but evidence from clinical studies suggest that only nootropic agents, donepezil and memantine, may improve the prognosis of aphasia. This article is an overview on the current state of knowledge related to post-stroke aphasia pharmacology, rehabilitation, and future trends.