A dimensional analysis of inner strength in people ageing with serious illness

The Listening Guide: Illustrating an underused voice-centred methodology to foreground underrepresented research populations

AIM

To highlight the value of utilizing the Listening Guide methodology for nursing research and provide an exemplar applying this methodology to explore a novel concept in an underrepresented group-inner strength in persons newly diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment along with their care partners.

DESIGN

Methodology discussion paper.

METHODS

The exemplar study used the Listening Guide methods for data elicitation and analysis. Methods included adaptations for the study population and novice qualitative researchers.

RESULTS

The Listening Guide methodology with adaptations enabled the research team to centre the voices of persons living with mild cognitive impairment, highlight an abstract phenomenon and attend to the influences of the sociopolitical context. Further, this methodology helped address common challenges emerging qualitative researchers encounter, including understanding methods of application, engaging reflexively and immersing in the data.

CONCLUSION

The Listening Guide is a voice-centred qualitative methodology that is well suited to foreground the experiences of groups underrepresented in research and explore emerging phenomena.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses are central to striving for health equity. The Listening Guide methodology offers a valuable and accessible research tool to understand the experiences and needs of underrepresented groups and shape healthcare in response.

IMPACT

The Listening Guide methodology can be broadly applied to research with persons with mild cognitive impairment, and other underrepresented groups, to explore other phenomena beyond inner strength and move the science forward in representing the perspectives of groups underrepresented by research.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Persons living with cognitive impairment and their care partners participated in study conceptualization, interview guide development, methods development and dissemination plans.

Existential Care in Daily Nursing Practice

ABSTRACT

Relationship-centered palliative nursing during serious illness requires existential care. Yet, multilevel systemic barriers hinder nurses' ability to provide this care. The authors suggest ways to navigate these barriers, highlighting existential care priorities that nurses can attend to in their daily practice. These include 1) maintaining a strengths-based orientation, 2) taking a life course perspective, 3) grounding care firmly in relationships, and 4) responding moment to moment. They propose that by emphasizing existential care in palliative nursing, we can create a more compassionate and human-centered health system.

Clinician distress in seriously ill patient care: A dimensional analysis

BACKGROUND

Caring for patients with serious illness may severely strain clinicians causing distress and probable poor patient outcomes. Unfortunately, clinician distress and its impact historically has received little attention.

RESEARCH PURPOSE

The purpose of this article was to investigate the nature of clinician distress.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Qualitative inductive dimensional analysis.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

After review of 577 articles from health sciences databases, a total of 33 articles were eligible for analysis.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

This study did not require ethical review and the authors adhered to appropriate academic standards in their analysis.

FINDINGS

A narrative of clinician distress in the hospital clinician in the United States emerged from the analysis. This included clinicians' perceptions and sense of should or the feeling that something is awry in the clinical situation. The explanatory matrix consequence of clinician distress occurred under conditions including: the recognition of conflict, the recognition of emotion, or the recognition of a mismatch; followed by a process of an inability to feel and act according to one's values due to a precipitating event.

DISCUSSION

This study adds three unique contributions to the concept of clinician distress by (1) including the emotional aspects of caring for seriously ill patients, (2) providing a new framework for understanding clinician distress within the clinician's own perceptions, and (3) looking at action outside of a purely moral lens by dimensionalizing data, thereby pulling apart what has been socially constructed.

CONCLUSION

For clinicians, learning to recognize one's perceptions and emotional reactions is the first step in mitigating distress. There is a critical need to understand the full scope of clinician distress and its impact on the quality of patient-centered care in serious illness.