Synchronized functional anal sphincter assessment: maximizing the potential of anal vector manometry and 3-D anal endosonography

Preoperative predictors of success after transvaginal rectocoele repair

PURPOSE

Determine predictors of success for transvaginal rectocoele repair (TVRR). Primary aim is to establish predictors of successful treatment analysing patients' characteristics, baseline symptoms, pelvic floor test results and pre-operative conservative treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective single institution study in a tertiary referral centre for pelvic floor disorders. 207 patients underwent TVRR for symptomatic rectocoele. Information about symptoms related to obstructive defaecation, anal incontinence and vaginal prolapse, results of pelvic floor investigations, multimodality conservative management and variation in surgical technique have been recorded. Symptom related information have been collected at surgical follow-up.

RESULTS

115 patients had residual symptoms after surgical repair of rectocoele, while 97 were symptoms free. Factors associated with residual symptoms after surgical repair are previous proctological procedures, urge AI symptoms, absence of vaginal bulge symptoms, use of transanal irrigation and having a concomitant enterocoele repair during procedure.

CONCLUSION

Factors able to predict a less favourable outcome after TVRR in patients with concomitant ODS are previous proctological procedures, presence of urge AI, short anal canal length on anorectal physiology, seepage on defaecating proctography, use of transanal irrigation, absence of vaginal bulge symptoms and enterocoele repair during surgery. These information are important for a tailored decision making process and to manage patients' expectations before surgical repair.

Patient pathway in a tertiary referral pelvic floor unit: Telephone triage assessment clinic

BACKGROUND

To meet the increasing demands for colorectal pelvic floor services, a dedicated telephone triage assessment clinic (TTAC) was set up to establish a more efficient pathway, and reduce waiting times and patient's visits to the hospital. The primary aim of this study was to review TTAC in patients suffering from pelvic floor dysfunction and assess its feasibility. Secondary aims include measurement of waiting times for TTAC, main presenting complaints, and main treatment outcomes, including the need for review by a consultant surgeon.

METHODS

Review of data collected retrospectively in a single tertiary referral center collected from an institutional database.

KEY RESULTS

Between January 2016 and October 2017, 1192 patients referred to our pelvic floor unit were suitable for TTAC. Of these, 694 patients had complete records. There were 66 without follow-up after the initial TTAC, leaving 628 patients for analysis. In all, 86% were females and 14% were males, with a mean age of 52 years (range: 18-89). The median waiting time for TTAC was 31 days (range: 0-184). The main presenting complaint during the TTAC was obstructive defecation in 69.4%, fecal incontinence in 28.5%, and rectal prolapse in 2.1%. In our study, 611 patients had conservative management (97.3%), with a median of three sessions per patient (range: 1-16), while 82 patients (13.1%) needed a surgical intervention. Only 223 patients (35.5%) were reviewed by a consultant at some stage during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

To optimize resources, an adequate triage system allowed us to streamline the pathway for each individual patient with pelvic floor dysfunction according to their symptoms and/or test results with the aim of reducing waiting times and expediting treatment.

Transvaginal rectocoele repair for the surgical treatment of a "symptomatic" rectocoele when conservative measures fail: A 12 year experience of 215 patients

BACKGROUND

Conservative measures are first-line treatment for a "symptomatic" rectocoele, while surgery to correct the anatomical defect may be considered in selected cases. The standard repair offered in our trust is a native tissue transvaginal rectocoele repair (TVRR) combined with levatorplasty. The primary aim of the study was to conduct a retrospective study to assess the outcome of this procedure, while secondary aims were to assess whether specific characteristics and symptoms were associated with response to surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 215 patients who underwent TVRR in a single tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2018. In total, 97% of patients had symptoms of obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) and 81% had a feeling of vaginal prolapse/bulge. We recorded in-hospital and 30 days post-operative complications and pre- and post-operative symptoms.

KEY RESULTS

The majority of patients selected for surgery had rectocoele above 4 cm or medium size with contrast trapping. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.2 days. The in-hospital complication rate was 11.2% with the most common complications being urinary retention (8.4%). Mean length of follow-up was 12.7 months (SD 13.9, range 1.4-71.5) with global improvement of symptoms reported in 87.9% cases. Feeling of vaginal bulge improved in 80% of patients while ODS-related symptoms improved in 58% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The data suggest that TVRR might be a valid option in patients with rectocoele when conservative treatment has failed. Overall patient satisfaction is good, with improvement of ODS symptoms.

Tradução para a língua portuguesa do artigo original em inglês “ The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction”

Introdução

No desenvolvimento da terminologia do trato urinário inferior, devido à sua crescente complexidade, a terminologia para os sintomas e a disfunção do trato urinário inferior masculino e assoalho pélvico precisa ser atualizada, utilizando abordagem específica masculina e por meio de um relatório de consenso clinicamente embasado.

Métodos

Este relatório combina a contribuição de membros do Standardisation Committee da International Continence Society em um Grupo de Trabalho com especialistas reconhecidos no campo, assistido por muitos julgadores externos. Categorias clínicas centrais apropriadas e uma subclassificação foram desenvolvidas para fornecer uma codificação numérica para cada definição. Um extenso processo de 22 rodadas de revisão interna e externa foi desenvolvido para examinar exaustivamente cada definição, com tomada de decisão por opinião coletiva (consenso).

Resultados

Um relatório de terminologia para os sintomas e a disfunção do trato urinário inferior e do assoalho pélvico foi desenvolvido, abrangendo cerca de 390 definições/descritores separados. É clinicamente embasado nos diagnósticos mais comuns definidos. A clareza e a facilidade de uso foram os principais objetivos para torná-lo interpretável por profissionais e estagiários em todos os diferentes grupos de especialidades envolvidos na disfunção do trato urinário inferior e do assoalho pélvico masculino. Imagens específicas para homens (ultrassonografia, radiologia, tomografia computadorizada e ressonância magnética) foram um adicional importante, enquanto figuras apropriadas foram incluídas para complementar e ajudar a esclarecer o texto.

Conclusões

Um relatório de terminologia com base em consenso para sintomas e disfunção do trato urinário inferior e do assoalho pélvico masculino foi produzido visando ser um auxílio significativo para a prática clínica e um estímulo para a pesquisa.

The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

In the development of terminology of the lower urinary tract, due to its increasing complexity, the terminology for male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction needs to be updated using a male-specific approach and via a clinically-based consensus report.

METHODS

This report combines the input of members of the Standardisation Committee of the International Continence Society (ICS) in a Working Group with recognized experts in the field, assisted by many external referees. Appropriate core clinical categories and a subclassification were developed to give a numeric coding to each definition. An extensive process of 22 rounds of internal and external review was developed to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by collective opinion (consensus).

RESULTS

A Terminology Report for male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction, encompassing around 390 separate definitions/descriptors, has been developed. It is clinically-based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor dysfunction. Male-specific imaging (ultrasound, radiology, CT, and MRI) has been a major addition whilst appropriate figures have been included to supplement and help clarify the text.

CONCLUSIONS

A consensus-based Terminology Report for male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction has been produced aimed at being a significant aid to clinical practice and a stimulus for research.