1
|
Vespa E, Barchi A, Passaretti S, Danese S, Savarino EV. Pneumatic dilation for achalasia in the "POEM era": Still a valuable ally. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:778-785. [PMID: 37932169 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic treatments such as peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and pneumatic dilation (PD) are commonly used to treat achalasia. Although POEM has gained popularity due to its high efficacy, the technique is more complex and may be associated with a higher risk of long-term complications compared to PD. This narrative review will focus on efficacy and safety of PD and POEM, and their suitability for different patient populations. While evidence suggests that POEM may be preferred for type III achalasia, PD remains a valuable alternative for patients with a straight, non-dilated esophagus, who prioritize the preservation of anatomical integrity and a lower risk of post-procedural gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While PD carries a non negligibile risk of perforation, it has an excellent safety profile in terms of GERD and is minimally likely to cause permanent esophageal deformation. PD can be repeated with minimal risks to maintain symptom relief, whereas reversing permanent anatomical modifications related to POEM is difficult. The choice of treatment for achalasia should be patient-tailored, considering benefits and drawbacks of each intervention. The importance of personalized approach in the "POEM era" is highlighted, emphasizing the reasons why PD should still be considered a valuable option in the therapeutic armamentarium for achalasia. Areas requiring further research will be also outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Vespa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Barchi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Passaretti
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chuah KH, Ramasami N, Mahendran HA, Shanmuganathan G, Koleth GG, Voon K, Gew LT, Jahit MS, Lau PC, Muthukaruppan R, Said RHM, Mahadeva S, Ho SH, Lim SY, Tee SC, Siow SL, Ooi WK, Lee YY. Malaysian joint societies' consensus recommendations on diagnosis and management of disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:431-445. [PMID: 38087846 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Disorders of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow, including achalasia and EGJ outflow obstruction, are motility disorders characterized by inadequate relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter with or without impaired esophageal peristalsis. Current guidelines are technical and less practical in the Asia-Pacific region, and there are still massive challenges in timely diagnosis and managing these disorders effectively. Therefore, a Malaysian joint societies' task force has developed a consensus on disorders of EGJ outflow based on the latest evidence, while taking into consideration the practical relevance of local and regional context and resources. Twenty-one statements were established after a series of meetings and extensive review of literatures. The Delphi method was used in the consensus voting process. This consensus focuses on the definition, diagnostic investigations, the aims of treatment outcome, non-surgical or surgical treatment options, management of treatment failure or relapse, and the management of complications. This consensus advocates the use of high-resolution esophageal manometry for diagnosis of disorders of EGJ outflow. Myotomy, via either endoscopy or laparoscopy, is the preferred treatment option, while pneumatic dilatation can serve as a secondary option. Evaluation and management of complications including post-procedural reflux and cancer surveillance are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kee Huat Chuah
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Naveen Ramasami
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Sultanah Bahiyah Hospital, Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Glenn George Koleth
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Sultan Ismail Hospital, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Kelvin Voon
- Department of General Surgery, Penang General Hospital, George Town, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Lai Teck Gew
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur General Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Peng Choong Lau
- Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Raman Muthukaruppan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Rosaida Hj Md Said
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Serdang Hospital, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Sanjiv Mahadeva
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Shiaw-Hooi Ho
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Shyang Yee Lim
- Department of General Surgery, Penang General Hospital, George Town, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Sze Chee Tee
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Sze Li Siow
- Department of General Surgery, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
| | - Wei Keat Ooi
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- GI Function and Motility Unit, Universiti Sains Malaysia Hospital, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Basha J, Inavolu P, Kotla R, Goud R, Darisetty S, Reddy DN. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy in cases with prior Heller's myotomy: Outcomes at a median follow-up of 5 years. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:2035-2039. [PMID: 37571986 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment for achalasia cardia. However, data on the long-term efficacy of POEM in patients with failed Heller's myotomy (HM) are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of POEM in patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms following HM. METHODS Data of patients with recurrence of symptoms after HM who underwent POEM (September 2013 to December 2022) were analyzed, retrospectively. Primary outcome was clinical success [Eckardt score (ES) ≤ 3]. Secondary outcomes included improvement of manometry parameters, barium emptying at 5 min and gastroesophageal reflux (esophagitis and increased esophageal acid exposure) after POEM. RESULTS Seventy-two cases (45.9 ± 13.4 years, 43 men) with history of HM were included in the study. The subtypes of achalasia were type 1 (40.3%), type 2 (37.5%), and unknown (19.4%). Prior treatment included HM in 48 (66.7%), HM plus pneumatic dilatation in 20 (27.8%), and HM plus pneumatic dilatation and Botox in 4 (5.5%). Technical success was achieved in all cases. Mean length of myotomy was 10.7 ± 3.3 cm, and mean procedure duration was 59.2 ± 25.9 min. There was significant improvement in ES (pre-POEM 6.5 ± 1.8 vs post-POEM 0.7 ± 0.7), lower esophageal sphincter pressure pressures (31.7 ± 12.5 vs 13.3 ± 5.7 mmHg) and barium emptying (14.2 ± 4.2 vs 2.4 ± 3.1 cm) after POEM. At a median follow-up of 63 months (IQR 40-95), clinical success (ES ≤ 3) was documented in 58 (80.6%) patients. Reflux esophagitis and increased esophageal acid exposure were recorded in 28 of 49 (57.1%) and 11 of 20 (55%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION POEM is a durable treatment modality in cases with relapse of symptoms after HM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaheer Nabi
- Interventional Endoscopy Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | | | | | | | - Rama Kotla
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Rajesh Goud
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patti MG, Schlottmann F, Herbella FAM. Once an achalasia patient always an achalasia patient: evaluation and treatment of recurrent symptoms. Dysphagia 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-99865-9.00009-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
|
5
|
Cubisino A, Schlottmann F, Dreifuss NH, Baz C, Mangano A, Masrur MA, Bianco FM, Giulianotti PC. Robotic redo Heller myotomy: how I do it? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1721-1726. [PMID: 35583834 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02553-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the high success rate associated with Heller myotomy in the treatment of primary achalasia, symptom persistence or relapse occurs in approximately 10-20% of patients. Unfortunately, the ideal treatment after failed myotomy is not well established yet. We present a didactical video with a stepwise technique to perform a robotic revisional procedure after failed Heller myotomy. METHODS In this report, each surgical step is thoroughly described and visually represented with useful technical tips that might help in improving surgical results of revisional Heller myotomy. RESULTS In patients with previous surgical myotomy, the robotic platform with its high-definition magnified view and EndoWrist instruments allow for a safe and precise redo surgical myotomy. CONCLUSIONS Despite its improved surgical capabilities, the role of robotic redo Heller myotomy in the treatment algorithm of patients with recurrent symptoms after failed surgical myotomy should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Cubisino
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Clinical Sciences Building, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Clinical Sciences Building, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Nicolas H Dreifuss
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Clinical Sciences Building, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Carolina Baz
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Clinical Sciences Building, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Alberto Mangano
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Clinical Sciences Building, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Mario A Masrur
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Clinical Sciences Building, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Francesco M Bianco
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Clinical Sciences Building, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood Street, Suite 435 E, Clinical Sciences Building, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Esophageal Achalasia: Pros and Cons of the Treatment Options. World J Surg 2022; 46:1554-1560. [PMID: 35238987 PMCID: PMC9174302 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06495-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder of unknown origin. The goal of treatment is to reduce the resistance caused by a lower esophageal sphincter that fails to relax and is frequently hypertensive. Many treatment options are available to achieve this goal. In this review, we discuss the pros and cons of each therapeutic approach.
Collapse
|
7
|
Esophageal Achalasia: Evaluation and Treatment of Recurrent Symptoms. World J Surg 2022; 46:1561-1566. [PMID: 35166877 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06466-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophageal achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder of unknown origin. Treatment is palliative and its goal is to decrease the resistance posed by a non-relaxing and often hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter. This goal can be accomplished by different treatment modalities such as pneumatic dilatation, laparoscopic myotomy or peroral endoscopic myotomy. In some patients, however, symptoms tend to recur overtime. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed focused on the management of recurrent achalasia. RESULTS The available treatment modalities can be used, alone or in combination. The goal of treatment is to resolve/improve symptoms, avoiding an esophagectomy, an operation linked to significant morbidity. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of these patients is often very challenging, and the best results are obtained in centers where a multidisciplinary team-radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons-is present.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mohammed A, Garg R, Paranji N, Samineni AV, Thota PN, Sanaka MR. Pneumatic dilation for esophageal achalasia: patient selection and perspectives. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022:1-10. [PMID: 35114867 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2034940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Treatment is palliative, aimed at decreasing the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Pneumatic dilation (PD) is a safe and effective treatment for achalasia. Several other invasive and minimally invasive treatment modalities, such as Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), also have a comparable safety and efficacy profile to PD. The current review focuses on the indications, contraindications, techniques, and outcomes of PD in various patient populations and its comparison to LHM and POEM. This review also provides relevant information to help endoscopists identify those patients who will benefit the most from PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Mohammed
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rajat Garg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Neethi Paranji
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aneesh V Samineni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Prashanthi N Thota
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Madhusudhan R Sanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Milito P, Siboni S, Lovece A, Andreatta E, Asti E, Bonavina L. Revisional Therapy for Recurrent Symptoms After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:64-69. [PMID: 34341888 PMCID: PMC8760227 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05098-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Symptom recurrence after initial surgical management of esophageal achalasia occurs in 10-25% of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze safety and efficacy of revisional therapy after failed Heller myotomy (HM). METHODS A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed searching for patients with recurrent symptoms after primary surgical therapy for achalasia. Patients with previously failed HM were considered for the final analysis. The Foregut questionnaire, and the Atkinson and Eckardt scales were used to assess severity of symptoms. Objective investigations routinely included upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium swallow study. Redo treatments consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic HM, hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, or stapled cardioplasty. A yearly clinical and endoscopic follow-up was scheduled in all patients. RESULTS Over a 20-year period, 26 patients with a median age of 66 years (IQR 19.5) underwent revisional therapy after failed HM for achalasia at a tertiary-care university hospital. The median time after index procedure was 10 years (IQR 21). Revisional therapy consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (n=13), laparoscopic HM and fundoplication (n=10), esophagectomy (n=2), and stapled cardioplasty and fundoplication (n=1). Nine (34.6%) of these patients required further endoscopic or surgical treatments. There was no mortality, and the overall complication rate was 7.7%. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range 10-149), a significant decrease of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, respiratory symptoms, and median Eckardt score (p<0.05) was noted. CONCLUSION In specialized and multidisciplinary centers, revisional therapy for achalasia is feasible, safe, and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Milito
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Stefano Siboni
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Lovece
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Erika Andreatta
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Emanuele Asti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milano, Italy ,Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Malan 1, 20097 San Donato Milanese (Milano), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Long-term outcomes of treatments for achalasia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2021; 37:408-413. [PMID: 33859101 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Idiopathic achalasia is a primary motility disorder of the esophagus that results in dysphagia, weight loss, and impaired quality of life. Several treatment options are available to gastroenterologists, and insights on the long-term outcome of these modalities are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) represents a novel endoscopic technique in the treatment of achalasia. Studies on long-term outcomes and comparison to other well-known treatment modalities such as laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and pneumodilation have recently been published. POEM and LHM both have excellent 2-year success rates for relieving achalasia symptoms, but reflux disease and erosive esophagitis are more prevalent following POEM. SUMMARY Several treatment modalities with excellent long-term outcomes are available for the treatment of achalasia. The different options should be discussed with patients and treatments should be tailored to their individual needs.
Collapse
|
11
|
Oude Nijhuis RAB, Zaninotto G, Roman S, Boeckxstaens GE, Fockens P, Langendam MW, Plumb AA, Smout A, Targarona EM, Trukhmanov AS, Weusten B, Bredenoord AJ. European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 8:13-33. [PMID: 32213062 PMCID: PMC7005998 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620903213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Achalasia is a primary motor disorder of the oesophagus characterised by absence of peristalsis and insufficient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation. With new advances and developments in achalasia management, there is an increasing demand for comprehensive evidence-based guidelines to assist clinicians in achalasia patient care. METHODS Guidelines were established by a working group of representatives from United European Gastroenterology, European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology and the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery in accordance with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Recommendations were voted upon using a nominal group technique. RESULTS These guidelines focus on the definition of achalasia, treatment aims, diagnostic tests, medical, endoscopic and surgical therapy, management of treatment failure, follow-up and oesophageal cancer risk. CONCLUSION These multidisciplinary guidelines provide a comprehensive evidence-based framework with recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of adult achalasia patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A B Oude Nijhuis
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Zaninotto
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - S Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - G E Boeckxstaens
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Centre for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A A Plumb
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ajpm Smout
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M Targarona
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A S Trukhmanov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Blam Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Santes O, Coss-Adame E, Valdovinos MA, Furuzawa-Carballeda J, Rodríguez-Garcés A, Peralta-Figueroa J, Narvaez-Chavez S, Olvera-Prado H, Clemente-Gutiérrez U, Torres-Villalobos G. Does laparoscopic reoperation yield symptomatic improvements similar to those of primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia patients? Surg Endosc 2020; 35:4991-5000. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07978-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
13
|
Abstract
Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by aberrant peristalsis and insufficient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Patients most commonly present with dysphagia to solids and liquids, regurgitation, and occasional chest pain with or without weight loss. High-resolution manometry has identified 3 subtypes of achalasia distinguished by pressurization and contraction patterns. Endoscopic findings of retained saliva with puckering of the gastroesophageal junction or esophagram findings of a dilated esophagus with bird beaking are important diagnostic clues. In this American College of Gastroenterology guideline, we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation process to provide clinical guidance on how best to diagnose and treat patients with achalasia.
Collapse
|
14
|
Felix VN, Murayama KM, Bonavina L, Park MI. Achalasia: what to do in the face of failures of Heller myotomy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2020; 1481:236-246. [PMID: 32713020 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Achalasia is a primary motility disorder of the esophagus, and while there are several treatment options, there is no consensus regarding them. When therapeutic intervention for achalasia fails, a careful evaluation of the cause of the persistent or recurrent symptoms using upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and contrast radiologic studies is required to understand the cause of therapy failure and guide plans for subsequent treatment. Options for reintervention are the same as for primary intervention and include pneumatic dilation, botulinum toxin injection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, or redo esophageal myotomy. When reintervention fails or if the esophagus is not amenable to intervention and the disease is considered end-stage, esophagectomy is the last option to manage recurrent achalasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valter N Felix
- Nucleus of General and Specialized Surgery - São Paulo and Department of Gastroenterology - Surgical Division - São Paulo University, FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Kenric M Murayama
- Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, the University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, The University of Milan, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Moo In Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Smith KE, Saad AR, Hanna JP, Tran T, Jacobs J, Richter JE, Velanovich V. Revisional Surgery in Patients with Recurrent Dysphagia after Heller Myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:991-999. [PMID: 31147973 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04264-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrent/persistent symptoms of achalasia occur in 10-20% of individuals after Heller myotomy. The causes and treatment outcomes are ambiguous. Our aim is to assess the causes and outcomes of a multidisciplinary approach to this patient population. METHODS All patients undergoing revisional operations after a Heller myotomy were reviewed retrospectively. DATA COLLECTED demographics, date of initial Heller myotomy, preoperative evaluation, etiology of recurrent symptoms, date of revisional operation, and surgical outcomes. RESULTS A total of 34 patients underwent 37 revisional operations. Operations were tailored based on preoperative multidisciplinary evaluation. Causes of symptoms: periesophageal/perihiatal fibrosis 11 (27%), obstructing fundoplication 11 (27%), incomplete myotomy 8 (20%), progression of disease 9 (22%), and epiphrenic diverticulum 1 (2%). Operations performed: reversal/no creation of fundoplication with or without re-do myotomy 22 (59%), revision/creation of fundoplication with or without myotomy 6 (16%), and esophagectomy 9 (24%). Ten patients in the 37 operations (27%) developed postoperative complications. Of 33 patients for 36 operations with follow-up, 25 patient-operations (69%) resulted in resolution or improved dysphagia. Although there was variation in symptomatic improvement by cause and operation type, none reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION There are several causes of dysphagia after Heller myotomy and a thoughtful evaluation is required. Complication rates are higher than first-time operations. Symptomatic improvement occurs in the majority of cases, but a significant minority will have persistent dysphagia. Although an individualized approach to dysphagia after Heller myotomy may improve symptoms and passage of food, the perception of dysphagia may persist in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaylee E Smith
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 5 Tampa General Circle, Suite 740, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA
| | - Adham R Saad
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 5 Tampa General Circle, Suite 740, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.,The Joy McCann Culverhouse Center for Swallowing Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John P Hanna
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Thanh Tran
- Division of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John Jacobs
- The Joy McCann Culverhouse Center for Swallowing Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joel E Richter
- The Joy McCann Culverhouse Center for Swallowing Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vic Velanovich
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, 5 Tampa General Circle, Suite 740, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA. .,The Joy McCann Culverhouse Center for Swallowing Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jung HK, Hong SJ, Lee OY, Pandolfino J, Park H, Miwa H, Ghoshal UC, Mahadeva S, Oshima T, Chen M, Chua ASB, Cho YK, Lee TH, Min YW, Park CH, Kwon JG, Park MI, Jung K, Park JK, Jung KW, Lim HC, Jung DH, Kim DH, Lim CH, Moon HS, Park JH, Choi SC, Suzuki H, Patcharatrakul T, Wu JCY, Lee KJ, Tanaka S, Siah KTH, Park KS, Kim SE. 2019 Seoul Consensus on Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 26:180-203. [PMID: 32235027 PMCID: PMC7176504 DOI: 10.5056/jnm20014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal achalasia is a primary motility disorder characterized by insufficient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and loss of esophageal peristalsis. Achalasia is a chronic disease that causes progressive irreversible loss of esophageal motor function. The recent development of high-resolution manometry has facilitated the diagnosis of achalasia, and determining the achalasia subtypes based on high-resolution manometry can be important when deciding on treatment methods. Peroral endoscopic myotomy is less invasive than surgery with comparable efficacy. The present guidelines (the "2019 Seoul Consensus on Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines") were developed based on evidence-based medicine; the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association and Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility served as the operating and development committees, respectively. The development of the guidelines began in June 2018, and a draft consensus based on the Delphi process was achieved in April 2019. The guidelines consist of 18 recommendations: 2 pertaining to the definition and epidemiology of achalasia, 6 pertaining to diagnoses, and 10 pertaining to treatments. The endoscopic treatment section is based on the latest evidence from meta-analyses. Clinicians (including gastroenterologists, upper gastrointestinal tract surgeons, general physicians, nurses, and other hospital workers) and patients could use these guidelines to make an informed decision on the management of achalasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye-Kyung Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Jin Hong
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Oh Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - John Pandolfino
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hyojin Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hiroto Miwa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Uday C Ghoshal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Sanjiv Mahadeva
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Tadayuki Oshima
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Minhu Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Yu Kyung Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Hee Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yang Won Min
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Hyuk Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | - Joong Goo Kwon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Moo In Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Kyoungwon Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jong Kyu Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Gangwon-do, Korea
| | - Kee Wook Jung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Chul Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Da Hyun Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Do Hoon Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul-Hyun Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Seok Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suck Chei Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Disease Research Institute, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Hidekazu Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tanisa Patcharatrakul
- Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Justin C Y Wu
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kwang Jae Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Shinwa Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kobe University Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kewin T H Siah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Kyung Sik Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Sung Eun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Esophagogastric Junction Distensibility on Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Topography Predicts Treatment Response in Achalasia-Anatomy Matters! Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114:1455-1463. [PMID: 30741739 PMCID: PMC6682473 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To compare the utility of the distensibility index (DI) on functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography to other esophagogastric junction (EGJ) metrics in assessing treatment response in achalasia in the context of esophageal anatomy. METHODS We prospectively evaluated 79 patients (at ages 17-81 years; 47% female patients) with achalasia during follow-up after pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy, or per-oral endoscopic myotomy with timed barium esophagram, high-resolution impedance manometry, and FLIP. Anatomic deformities were identified based on consensus expert opinion. Patients were classified based on anatomy and EGJ opening to determine the association with radiographic outcome and Eckardt score (ES). RESULTS Twenty-seven patients (34.1%) had an anatomic deformity-10 pseudodiverticula at myotomy, 7 epiphrenic diverticula, 5 sigmoid, and 5 sinktrap. A 5-minute column area of >5 cm was best associated with an ES of >3, with a sensitivity of 84% (P = 0.0013). Area under the curve for EGJ metrics in association with retention was as follows: DI, 0.90; maximal EGJ diameter, 0.76; integrated relaxation pressure, 0.64; and basal esophagogastric junction pressure, 0.53. Only FLIP metrics were associated with retention given normal anatomy (DI 2.4 vs 5.2 mm/mm Hg and maximal EGJ diameter 13.1 vs 16.6 mm in patients with and without retention, respectively; P values < 0.0001 and 0.002). Using a DI cutoff of <2.8 as abnormal, 40 of 45 patients with retention (P = 0.0001) and 23 of 25 patients with an ES of >3 (P = 0.02) had a low DI and/or anatomic deformity. With normal anatomy, 21 of 22 patients with retention had a low or borderline low DI. DISCUSSION The FLIP DI is most useful metric for assessing the effect of achalasia treatment on EGJ opening. However, abnormal anatomy is an important mediator of outcome and treatment success will be modulated by anatomic defects that impede bolus emptying.
Collapse
|
18
|
van Hoeij FB, Prins LI, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Efficacy and safety of pneumatic dilation in achalasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31:e13548. [PMID: 30697952 PMCID: PMC6849773 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS One of the most used treatments for achalasia is pneumatic dilation of the lower esophageal sphincter to improve esophageal emptying. Multiple treatment protocols have been described with a varying balloon size, number of dilations, inflation pressure, and duration. We aimed to identify the most efficient and safe treatment protocol. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on pneumatic dilation in patients with primary achalasia. Clinical remission was defined as an Eckardt score ≤3 or adequate symptom reduction measured with a similar validated questionnaire. We compared the clinical remission rates and occurrence of complications between different treatment protocols. RESULTS We included 10 studies with 643 patients. After 6 months, dilation with a 30-mm or 35-mm balloon gave comparable mean success rates (81% and 79%, respectively), whereas a series of dilations up to 40 mm had a higher success rate of 90%. Elective additional dilation in patients with insufficient symptom resolution was somewhat more effective than performing a predefined series of dilations: 86% versus 75% after 12 months. Perforations occurred most often during initial dilations, and significantly more often using a 35-mm balloon than a 30-mm balloon (3.2 vs 1.0%); P = 0.027. A subsequent 35-mm dilation was safer than an initial dilation with 35 mm (0.97% vs 9.3% perforations), P = 0.0017. CONCLUSIONS The most efficient and safe method of dilating achalasia patients is a graded approach starting with a 30-mm dilation, followed by an elective 35-mm dilation and 40 mm when there is insufficient symptom relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Froukje B. van Hoeij
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Leah I. Prins
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - André J. P. M. Smout
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Arjan J. Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G, Costantini M, Ferguson MK, Pandolfino JE, Patti MG, Ribeiro U, Richter J, Swanstrom L, Tack J, Triadafilopoulos G, Markar SR, Salvador R, Faccio L, Andreollo NA, Cecconello I, Costamagna G, da Rocha JRM, Hungness ES, Fisichella PM, Fuchs KH, Gockel I, Gurski R, Gyawali CP, Herbella FAM, Holloway RH, Hongo M, Jobe BA, Kahrilas PJ, Katzka DA, Dua KS, Liu D, Moonen A, Nasi A, Pasricha PJ, Penagini R, Perretta S, Sallum RAA, Sarnelli G, Savarino E, Schlottmann F, Sifrim D, Soper N, Tatum RP, Vaezi MF, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom M, Vanuytsel T, Vela MF, Watson DI, Zerbib F, Gittens S, Pontillo C, Vermigli S, Inama D, Low DE. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31:5087687. [PMID: 30169645 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Achalasia is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disorder, characterized by absence of relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter and of peristalsis along the esophageal body. As a result, patients typically present with dysphagia, regurgitation and occasionally chest pain, pulmonary complication and malnutrition. New diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic techniques have been recently added to the armamentarium for treating achalasia. With the aim to offer clinicians and patients an up-to-date framework for making informed decisions on the management of this disease, the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus Guidelines proposed and endorsed the Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines (I-GOAL). The guidelines were prepared according the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-REX) tool, accredited for guideline production by NICE UK. A systematic literature search was performed and the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Given the relative rarity of this disease and the paucity of high-level evidence in the literature, this process was integrated with a three-step process of anonymous voting on each statement (DELPHI). Only statements with an approval rate >80% were accepted in the guidelines. Fifty-one experts from 11 countries and 3 representatives from patient support associations participated to the preparations of the guidelines. These guidelines deal specifically with the following achalasia issues: Diagnostic workup, Definition of the disease, Severity of presentation, Medical treatment, Botulinum Toxin injection, Pneumatic dilatation, POEM, Other endoscopic treatments, Laparoscopic myotomy, Definition of recurrence, Follow up and risk of cancer, Management of end stage achalasia, Treatment options for failure, Achalasia in children, Achalasia secondary to Chagas' disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Zaninotto
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - C Bennett
- Office of Research and Innovation, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Ireland
| | - G Boeckxstaens
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (Chrometa), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Costantini
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterologica Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - M K Ferguson
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - J E Pandolfino
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - M G Patti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - U Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - J Richter
- Department of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - L Swanstrom
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France; Interventional Endoscopy and Foregut Surgery, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - J Tack
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (Chrometa), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Triadafilopoulos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford Esophageal Multidisciplinary Program in Innovative Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - S R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - R Salvador
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterologica Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - L Faccio
- Division of Surgery, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - N A Andreollo
- Faculty of Medical Science, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - I Cecconello
- Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - G Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, A. Gemelli Hospital, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - J R M da Rocha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - E S Hungness
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - P M Fisichella
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Boston VA Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - K H Fuchs
- Department of Surgery, AGAPLESION-Markus-Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - I Gockel
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - R Gurski
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - C P Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - F A M Herbella
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - R H Holloway
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - M Hongo
- Department of Medicine, Kurokawa Hospital, Taiwa, Kurokawa, Miyagi, Japan
| | - B A Jobe
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - P J Kahrilas
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - D A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - K S Dua
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - D Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - A Moonen
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (Chrometa), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Nasi
- Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - P J Pasricha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - R Penagini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation; Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - S Perretta
- Institute for Image Guided Surgery IHU-Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - R A A Sallum
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - G Sarnelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - E Savarino
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterologica Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - F Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - D Sifrim
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - N Soper
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - R P Tatum
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - M F Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - M van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T Vanuytsel
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (Chrometa), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M F Vela
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - D I Watson
- Department of Surgery, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - F Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Gittens
- ECD Solutions, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - C Pontillo
- ALMA (Association of patients with achalasia, ONLUS), Naples, Italy
| | - S Vermigli
- ALMA (Association of patients with achalasia, ONLUS), Naples, Italy
| | - D Inama
- ALMA (Association of patients with achalasia, ONLUS), Naples, Italy
| | - D E Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
S093: pneumatic balloon dilation for palliation of recurrent symptoms of achalasia after esophagomyotomy. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:4017-4021. [PMID: 29905893 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6271-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Achalasia is a chronic disease affecting the myenteric plexus of the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter. Treatment is aimed at palliating symptoms to improve quality of life. Treatment options for symptom relapse after esophagomyotomy include botox injection, repeat myotomy, per-oral endoscopic myotomy, or pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD). Data demonstrating the safety and efficacy of PBD for recurrence are scarce. With a lack of published data, guidelines have suggested avoiding PBD for recurrent achalasia because of concern for a high risk of perforation. METHODS A retrospective review of patients who underwent PBD for recurrent symptoms of achalasia after esophagomyotomy between 2007 and 2017 was conducted. PBD was performed at 30 mm and held for 60 s under fluoroscopic guidance. Patients with residual symptoms had subsequent dilations at increasing 5 mm increments to a maximum of 40 mm. Patient demographics, Eckardt scores, presence of hiatal hernia, time from myotomy to recurrence, and diagnostic modalities were reported. The primary outcome was need for further endoscopic or surgical intervention. Complications are reported as secondary outcomes. RESULTS One-hundred eight esophagomyotomies were done during the study period. Fourteen patients underwent PBD for recurrent symptoms. The median time to symptom recurrence after esophagomyotomy was 28 months. The median Eckardt score was 6. Ten of 14 patients had an intervention between the initial surgery and PBD (9 standard dilations and 1 botox injection). A total of 23 PBD were done. Seven patients required dilation at 35 mm and two patients required dilation at 40 mm. Eleven patients required no further intervention at a median follow-up of 27.7 months. There were three treatment failures: one required repeat esophagomyotomy and two had no further treatments. There were no periprocedural complications. CONCLUSION Serial PBD is safe and effective in treatment of recurrent symptoms of achalasia after esophagomyotomy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tyberg A, Sharaiha RZ, Familiari P, Costamagna G, Casas F, Kumta NA, Barret M, Desai AP, Schnoll-Sussman F, Saxena P, Martínez G, Zamarripa F, Gaidhane M, Bertani H, Draganov PV, Balassone V, Sharata A, Reavis K, Swanstrom L, Invernizzi M, Seewald S, Minami H, Inoue H, Kahaleh M. Peroral endoscopic myotomy as salvation technique post-Heller: International experience. Dig Endosc 2018; 30:52-56. [PMID: 28691186 DOI: 10.1111/den.12918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment for achalasia has traditionally been Heller myotomy (HM). Despite its excellent efficacy rate, a number of patients remain symptomatic post-procedure. Limited data exist as to the best management for recurrence of symptoms post-HM. We present an international, multicenter experience evaluating the efficacy and safety of post-HM peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). METHODS Patients who underwent POEM post-HM from 13 centers from January 2012 to January 2017 were included as part of a prospective registry. Technical success was defined as successful completion of the myotomy. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3 on 12-month follow up. Adverse events (AE) including anesthesia-related, operative, and postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS Fifty-one patients were included in the study (mean age 54.2, 47% male). Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients. Clinical success on long-term follow up was achieved in 48 patients (94%), with a mean change in Eckardt score of 6.25. Seven patients (13%) had AE: six experienced periprocedural mucosal defect treated endoscopically and two patients developed mediastinitis treated conservatively. CONCLUSION For patients with persistent symptoms after HM, POEM is a safe salvation technique with good short-term efficacy. As a result of the challenge associated with repeat HM, POEM might become the preferred technique in this patient population. Further studies with longer follow up are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Tyberg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Reem Z Sharaiha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Fernando Casas
- Gastroenterology, Bogota General Hospital, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | | | - Amit P Desai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Felice Schnoll-Sussman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Monica Gaidhane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Valerio Balassone
- Gastroenterology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kevin Reavis
- Gastroenterology, Portland Clinic, Portland, USA
| | | | | | - Stefan Seewald
- Gastroenterology, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hitomi Minami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Haruhiro Inoue
- Gastroenterology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Response. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86:928. [PMID: 29061265 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
23
|
Patel DA, Vaezi MF. Refractory Achalasia: Is POEM Changing the Paradigm? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15:1504-1506. [PMID: 28478302 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dhyanesh A Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Michael F Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|