1
|
Aloysius MM, Korsten MA, Radulovic M, Singh K, Lyons BL, Cummings T, Hobson J, Kahal S, Spungen AM, Bauman WA. Lack of improvement in anorectal manometry parameters after implementation of a pelvic floor/anal sphincter biofeedback in persons with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14667. [PMID: 37743783 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effect of biofeedback on improving anorectal manometric parameters in incomplete spinal cord injury is unknown. A short-term biofeedback program investigated any effect on anorectal manometric parameters without correlation to bowel symptoms. METHODS This prospective uncontrolled interventional study comprised three study subject groups, Group 1: sensory/motor-complete American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A SCI (n = 13); Group 2 (biofeedback group): sensory incomplete AIS B SCI (n = 17) (n = 3), and motor-incomplete AIS C SCI (n = 8), and AIS D SCI (n = 6); and Group 3: able-bodied (AB) controls (n = 12). High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) was applied to establish baseline characteristics in all subjects for anorectal pressure, volume, length of pressure zones, and duration of sphincter squeeze pressure. SCI participants with motor-incomplete SCI were enrolled in pelvic floor/anal sphincter bowel biofeedback training (2 × 6-week training periods comprised of two training sessions per week for 30-45 min per session). HR-ARM was also performed after each of the 6-week periods of biofeedback training. RESULTS Compared to motor-complete or motor-incomplete SCI participants, AB subjects had higher mean intra-rectal pressure, maximal sphincteric pressure, residual anal pressure, recto-anal pressure gradient, and duration of squeeze (p < 0.05 for each of the endpoints). No significant difference was evident at baseline between the motor-complete and motor-incomplete SCI groups. In motor-incomplete SCI subjects, the pelvic floor/anal sphincter biofeedback protocol failed to improve HR-ARM parameters. CONCLUSION Biofeedback training program did not improve anal manometric parameters in subjects with motor-incomplete or sensory-incomplete SCI. Biofeedback did not change physiology, and its effects on symptoms are unknown. INFERENCES Utility of biofeedback is limited in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury in terms of improving HR-ARM parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark M Aloysius
- Department of Medicine, The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Medicine, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark A Korsten
- National Center for Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
- Medical Service, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miroslav Radulovic
- National Center for Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
- Medical Service, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kamaldeep Singh
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Brian L Lyons
- National Center for Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | - Joshua Hobson
- National Center for Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Sandeep Kahal
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ann M Spungen
- National Center for Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - William A Bauman
- National Center for Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
- Medical Service, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Latey PJ, Eisenhuth J, McKay MJ, Hiller CE, Sureshkumar P, Nightingale EJ, Burns J. Feasibility of the Archercise biofeedback device to strengthen foot musculature. J Foot Ankle Res 2020; 13:43. [PMID: 32660591 PMCID: PMC7359285 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-020-00394-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Foot muscle weakness can produce foot deformity, pain and disability. Toe flexor and foot arch exercises focused on intrinsic foot muscle strength and functional control may mitigate the progression of foot deformity and disability. Ensuring correct exercise technique is challenging due to the specificity of muscle activation required to complete some foot exercises. Biofeedback has been used to improve adherence, muscle activity and movement patterns. We investigated the feasibility of using a novel medical device, known as “Archercise”, to provide real-time biofeedback of correct arch movement via pressure change in an inflatable bladder, and foot location adherence via sensors embedded in a footplate during four-foot exercises. Methods Thirty adults (63% female, aged 23–68 years) performed four-foot exercises twice on the Archercise sensor footplate alone and then with biofeedback. One-way repeated measures ANOVA with pairwise comparisons were computed to assess the consistency of the exercise protocol between trial 1 and trial 2 (prior to biofeedback), and the effectiveness of the Archercise biofeedback device between trial 2 and trial 3 (with biofeedback). Outcome measures were: Arch movement exercises of arch elevation and lowering speed, controlled arch elevation, controlled arch lowering, endurance of arch elevation; Foot location adherence was determined by percentage of time the great toe, fifth toe and heel contacted footplate sensors during testing and were analysed with paired sample t-tests. Participant survey comments on the use of Archercise with biofeedback were reported thematically. Results Seventeen (89%) arch movement and foot location variables were collected consistently with Archercise during the foot exercises. Archercise with biofeedback improved foot location adherence for all exercises (p = 0.003–0.008), coefficient of determination for controlled arch elevation (p < 0.0001) and endurance area ratio (p = 0.001). Twenty-nine (97%) participants reported Archercise with biofeedback, helped correct exercise performance. Conclusions Archercise is a feasible biofeedback device to assist healthy participants without foot pathologies perform foot doming exercises. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): 12616001559404. Registered 11 November 2016, http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12616001559404p.aspx
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope J Latey
- The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.
| | - John Eisenhuth
- The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia
| | - Marnee J McKay
- The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia
| | - Claire E Hiller
- The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia
| | - Premala Sureshkumar
- The University of Sydney, Concord Clinical School, Concord, New South Wales, 2139, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Nightingale
- The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia
| | - Joshua Burns
- The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.,Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vasant DH, Whorwell PJ. Gut-focused hypnotherapy for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Evidence-base, practical aspects, and the Manchester Protocol. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31:e13573. [PMID: 30815936 PMCID: PMC6850508 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite their high prevalence and advances in the field of neurogastroenterology, there remain few effective treatment options for functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). It is recognized that approximately 25% of sufferers will have symptoms refractory to existing therapies, causing significant adverse effects on quality of life and increased healthcare utilization and morbidity. Gut-focused hypnotherapy, when delivered by trained therapists, has been shown to be highly effective in severe refractory FGIDs. However, hypnotherapy continues to be surrounded by much misunderstanding and skepticism. PURPOSE The purpose of this review is to provide a contemporary overview of the principles of gut-focused hypnotherapy, its effects on gut-brain interactions, and the evidence-base for its efficacy in severe FGIDs. As supplementary material, we have included a hypnotherapy protocol, providing the reader with an insight into the practical aspects of delivery, and as a guide, an example of a script of a gut-focused hypnotherapy session.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dipesh H. Vasant
- Neurogastroenterology Unit, Gastroenterology, Wythenshawe HospitalManchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Gastroenterology, Manchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Peter J. Whorwell
- Neurogastroenterology Unit, Gastroenterology, Wythenshawe HospitalManchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Gastroenterology, Manchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is effective for managing pelvic floor disorders (i.e., defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence). However, even in controlled clinical trials, only approximately 60% of patients with defecatory disorders experienced long-term improvement. The review serves to update practitioners on recent advances and to identify practical obstacles to providing biofeedback therapy. RECENT FINDINGS The efficacy and safety of biofeedback therapy have been evaluated in defecatory disorders, fecal incontinence, and levator ani syndrome. Recent studies looked at outcomes in specific patient sub-populations and predictors of a response to biofeedback therapy. Biofeedback therapy is effective for managing defecatory disorders, fecal incontinence, and levator ani syndrome. Patients who have a lower bowel satisfaction score and use digital maneuvers fare better. Biofeedback therapy is recommended for patients with fecal incontinence who do not respond to conservative management. A subset of patients with levator ani syndrome who have dyssynergic defecation are more likely to respond to biofeedback therapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bocchini R, Chiarioni G, Corazziari E, Pucciani F, Torresan F, Alduini P, Bassotti G, Battaglia E, Ferrarini F, Galeazzi F, Londoni C, Rossitti P, Usai Satta P, Iona L, Marchi S, Milazzo G, Altomare DF, Barbera R, Bove A, Calcara C, D'Alba L, De Bona M, Goffredo F, Manfredi G, Naldini G, Neri MC, Turco L, La Torre F, D'Urso AP, Berni I, Balestri MA, Busin N, Boemo C, Bellini M. Pelvic floor rehabilitation for defecation disorders. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 23:101-115. [PMID: 30631977 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1921-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Pelvic floor rehabilitation is frequently recommended for defecation disorders, in both constipation and fecal incontinence. However, the lack of patient selection, together with the variety of rehabilitation methods and protocols, often jeopardize the results of this approach, causing difficulty in evaluating outcomes and addressing proper management, and above all, in obtaining scientific evidence for the efficacy of these methods for specific indications. The authors represent different gastroenterological and surgical scientific societies in Italy, and their aim was to identify the indications and agree on treatment protocols for pelvic floor rehabilitation of patients with defecation disorders. This was achieved by means of a modified Delphi method, utilizing a working team (10 members) which developed the statements and a consensus group (15 members, different from the previous ones) which voted twice also suggesting modifications of the statements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bocchini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Malatesta Novello Private Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
| | - G Chiarioni
- RFF Division of Gastroenterology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - E Corazziari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy
| | - F Pucciani
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - F Torresan
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - P Alduini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | - G Bassotti
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia Medical School, Perugia, Italy
| | - E Battaglia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Italy
| | - F Ferrarini
- Endoscopy Unit, San Clemente Private Hospital, Mantua, Italy
| | - F Galeazzi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - C Londoni
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST "Maggiore", Crema, Cremona, Italy
| | - P Rossitti
- Gastroenterology Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - P Usai Satta
- Gastroenterology Unit, G. Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - L Iona
- Early Rehabilitation Department, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - S Marchi
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Departmentt. of General Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Milazzo
- U.O.Lungodegenza e Medicina, Ospedale Vittorio Emanuele III, Salemi, Tp, Italy
| | - D F Altomare
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO) and Interdepart mental Research Center for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (CIRPAP), University Aldo Moro, Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - R Barbera
- San Giuseppe Multimedica Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Bove
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - C Calcara
- Gastroenterology Unit, SSVD Gastroenterologia, Ospedale SS Trinità, Borgomanero, No, Italy
| | - L D'Alba
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - M De Bona
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Feltre Hospital, Feltre, Bl, Italy
| | - F Goffredo
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - G Manfredi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Crema Hospital, ASST CREMA, Crema, Italy
| | - G Naldini
- Proctological and Perineal Surgery Unit, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - M C Neri
- Gastroenterology Unit, Geriatric Institute "Pio Albergo Trivulzio", Milan, Italy
| | - L Turco
- Department of Digestive Physiopathology, Healte Center "Cittadella della Salute", Lecce, Italy
| | - F La Torre
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University "La Sapienza", Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | - I Berni
- Rehabilitation Department, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | - M A Balestri
- Proctological and Perineal Surgery Unit, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - N Busin
- Rehabilitation Department, Villa Igea Private Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - C Boemo
- Early Rehabilitation Department, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - M Bellini
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of General Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nigam GB, Limdi JK, Vasant DH. Current perspectives on the diagnosis and management of functional anorectal disorders in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2018; 11:1756284818816956. [PMID: 30574193 PMCID: PMC6295686 DOI: 10.1177/1756284818816956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies, a significant proportion of patients with quiescent disease experience persistent, debilitating symptoms of faecal incontinence (FI), urgency and defaecatory disorders due to anorectal dysfunction. Such symptoms are often underreported or misdiagnosed and can lead to potentially premature treatment 'escalation' and under-utilisation of pelvic floor investigations. In this review article, we consider putative pathophysiological post-inflammatory changes resulting in altered anorectal sensitivity, motility and neuromuscular coordination and how this may drive symptoms in quiescent IBD. Finally, we discuss a pragmatic approach to investigating and managing anorectal dysfunction and highlight areas for future research for this often-neglected group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jimmy K. Limdi
- Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Greater Manchester, UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dipesh H. Vasant
- Honorary Senior Lecturer, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Neurogastroenterology Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
|