The role of pyloric manometry in gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM): response to Jacques et al

Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for decompensated gastroparesis: comprehensive motility analysis in relation to treatment outcomes

Background and study aims  There are no reliable data to predict which patients with gastroparesis (GP) would benefit the most from gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM). The aim of the present study was to assess whether antro-duodenal motility patterns and pyloric distensibility can predict the outcome of G-POEM in patients with decompensated GP. Patients and methods  In an open-label study, patients with GP and refractory symptoms were eligible for treatment with G-POEM if treatment attempts according to a standardized stepwise protocol had failed. Baseline assessment included Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), C13-octanoic gastric emptying breath test and high-resolution antro-duodenal manometry. Pyloric distensibility using EndoFlip measurements was assessed at baseline and 3 months after the procedure. Explorative analyses were performed on potential predictors of response using logistic regression analyses. Results  Twenty-four patients with decompensated GP underwent G-POEM. At baseline, 78.3 % and 61.9 % of patients showed antral hypomotility and neuropathic motor patterns, respectively. The technical success rate was 100 % (24/24). Mean GCSI improved significantly at 3, 6, and 12 months after G-POEM ( P  = 0.01). Median distensibility index (DI) improved significantly as compared with baseline (7.5 [6.9;11.7] vs. 5.3[3.1;8.1], P  = 0.004). A significant correlation was found between clinical response at 6 months and pyloric DI improvement ( P  = 0.003). No potential predictors of clinical response after G-POEM could be identified in an explorative analysis. Conclusions  G-POEM improved pyloric distensibility patterns in patients with decompensated GP. Clinical response at 6 months after G-POEM was associated with pyloric distensibility improvement. However, no potential predictors of response could be identified from either antro-duodenal motility patterns or pyloric distensibility.

Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review of early outcomes with pooled analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastroparesis (GP) is a chronic debilitating condition. Prior pyloric-targeted procedures are either invasive or have questionable efficacy. Gastric peroral pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) has been proposed as a minimally invasive approach. We performed a pooled analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of G-POEM for GP.

METHODS

Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE) were searched up to January 2019. Studies including patients who underwent G-POEM for GP were eligible. Procedural, clinical, and safety outcomes were assessed by pooling data with a random- or fixed-effect model according to the degree of heterogeneity to obtain a proportion with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Ten studies were eligible for inclusion (292 patients), and 2 of the 10 studies were prospective. Seven studies were performed in the United States, 2 in France, and 1 in China. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy was feasible in all patients. Significant symptomatic improvement was achieved after 83.9% of procedures (mean follow-up, 7.8 ± 5.5 months). When comparing the mean values of pre- and postprocedural scintigraphic evolution, there was a significant decrease of the residual percentage at 2 and 4 hours. The overall adverse events rate was 6.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

G-POEM appears to be a promising approach for GP in terms of safety and efficacy outcomes in the short term.

Association between duration or etiology of gastroparesis and clinical response after gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (GPOEM) is a novel procedure with promising potential for the treatment of gastroparesis but with limited data regarding predictors of clinical response. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the procedure and explore the impact of duration and etiology (diabetic vs nondiabetic) of gastroparesis on clinical outcome as measured by the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective longitudinal study at a tertiary care hospital was performed over an 18-month period. Forty patients with refractory gastroparesis (25 nondiabetic and 15 diabetic patients) were included.

RESULTS

GCSI significantly improved throughout the study period (F[2.176, 17.405] = 10.152, P = .001). The nausea/vomiting subscale showed sustained improvement through 18 months (F[2.213, 17.704] = 15.863, P < .00001). There was no significant improvement in bloating (F[2.099, 16.791] = 1.576, P = .236). Gastric scintigraphy retention was significantly reduced by 41.7% (t = -7.90; P < .00001). Multivariate linear regression modeling revealed a significant correlation between the duration of disease and a GCSI improvement at 12 months (P = .02), with a longer duration of disease associated with a poorer long-term response. The etiology of gastroparesis was not associated with clinical improvement (P = .16). Adverse events (7.5%) included 1 capnoperitoneum, 1 periprocedure chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation, and 1 mucosotomy closure site disruption.

CONCLUSIONS

GPOEM appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive therapy for refractory gastroparesis, especially for patients with predominant nausea/vomiting and shorter duration of disease, regardless of the etiology. We propose the clinical criteria for undergoing GPOEM should be a GCSI of at least 2.0 and a gastric retention of greater than 20%.

Outcomes of per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy in gastroparesis worldwide

Per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP), also known as gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM), is a novel procedure with promising potential for the treatment of gastroparesis. As more data emerge and the procedure is becoming more recognized in clinical practice, its safety and efficacy need to be carefully evaluated. Appropriate patient selection for favorable clinical success prediction after GPOEM also needs additional research. This review aims to systemically summarize the existing data on clinical outcomes of POP. Symptomatologic responses to the procedure, its adverse effects, procedural techniques, and predictive factors of clinical success are also discussed.

Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy Reduces Symptoms, Increases Quality of Life, and Reduces Health Care Use For Patients With Gastroparesis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (GPOEM) is becoming a promising treatment option for patients with refractory gastroparesis. We aimed to systematically assess the efficacy of GPOEM and its effects on health care use.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on 30 patients with refractory gastroparesis who underwent GPOEM from June 2015 through July 2017 at a tertiary center. We compared outcomes with those of 7 patients with refractory gastroparesis who did not undergo the procedure (controls). The primary outcomes were patient-reported reductions in symptoms, based on the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI), and increases in 8 aspects of quality of life, based on Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores. Data were collected on the day of the procedure (baseline) and at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months afterward. Secondary outcomes included visits to the emergency department or hospitalization for gastroparesis-related symptoms.

RESULTS

GPOEM was technically successful in all patients and significantly reduced GCSI scores in repeated-measure analysis of variance (F_{2.044, 38.838} = 22.319; P < .0005). The mean score at baseline was 3.5 ± 0.6, at 1 month after GPOEM was 1.8 ± 1.0 (P < .0005), at 6 months after was 1.9 ± 1.2 (P < .0005), at 12 months after was 2.6 ± 1.5 (P < .026), and at 18 months after was 2.1 ± 1.3 (P < .016). GPOEM was associated with improved quality of life: 77.8%, 76.5%, and 70% of patients had significant increases in SF-36 scores, compared with baseline, at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after GPOEM, respectively (F_1.71,18.83 = 14.16; P < .0005). Compared with controls, patients who underwent GPOEM had significant reductions in GCSI, after we controlled for baseline score and duration of the disease (F_1,31 = 9.001; P = .005). Patients who received GPOEM had significant reductions in number of emergency department visits (from 2.2 ± 3.1 times/mo at baseline to 0.3 ± 0.8 times/mo; P = .003) and hospitalizations (from 1.7 ± 2 times/mo at baseline to 0.2 ± 0.4 times/mo; P = .0002).

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective study of patients who underwent GPOEM for refractory gastroparesis, we found the procedure significantly improved symptoms, increased quality of life, and reduced health care use related to gastroparesis.

Outcomes of Per Oral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy in the United States

Per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) has emerged as an endoscopic intervention for refractory gastroparesis. Early experience in the United States showed exciting clinical response rate, reduced gastroparesis symptoms, improved quality of life, and decreased gastric-emptying time during midterm follow-up up to 18 months. One recent study also showed that the number of patient emergency room visits and hospitalizations decreased significantly after POP. The procedure is technically feasible and safe. As more data become available, it is important to identify patients who would benefit most from this novel procedure.

Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: a detailed description of the procedure, our experience, and review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) was introduced four years ago as an investigational procedure for refractory gastroparesis. The safety and efficacy were currently evaluated. With our recent studies on G-POEM, we share our experience and knowledge through the discussion of a detailed description of the procedure and review of the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first systemic review on this new therapeutic endoscopic procedure.

METHODS

The indications and contraindications, various aspects of the procedure, and efficacy assessment are discussed based on our experience and current available data.

RESULTS

Preoperative preparation, detailed description of the procedure, post-procedural care, and results in the literature are presented. The procedure is safe and effective. 70-80% of patients have significant improvement in overall symptoms and quality of life in short-term (6 months) follow-up, as assessed by Gastric Cardinal Symptom Index and Short Form 36.

CONCLUSIONS

G-POEM is a feasible and effective procedure for refractory gastroparesis based on early and limited data. Well-designed prospective studies are expected to advance and evaluate this new procedure in the future.

Fluoroscopy-guided gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM): a more reliable and efficient method for treatment of refractory gastroparesis

INTRODUCTION

Prior studies show promising results of the gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) procedure for treatment of refractory gastroparesis. One major technical challenge involved in this procedure is identifying the pyloric muscular ring (PMR). The aim of this study is to establish a reliable method for identification of the PMR during G-POEM.

METHODS

Fluoroscopy-guided G-POEM was performed by placing an endoclip at the 9 to 11'o clock position at the pylorus for identification of PMR. Conventional G-POEM was performed by observation of blue colored mucosa at the pylorus area as an indirect marker for PMR. The degree of the PMR identification was graded into well identified, identified, and not identified based on the appearance of the PMR. Procedure times were accurately documented. Gastroparesis cardinal symptoms index and gastric emptying scintigraphy were evaluated before and after the procedure.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were studied, seven underwent fluoroscopy-guided G-POEM, and seven patients underwent conventional G-POEM. All procedures achieved technical success and no adverse events occurred. In the seven patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided G-POEM, the PMR was well identified in four patients and identified in three patients. In the seven patients who underwent conventional G-POEM, the PMR was identified in four patients and not identified in three patients. The average time to complete the fluoroscopy-guided G-POEM was significantly shorter than that of the conventional G-POEM.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroscopy-guided G-POEM by placement of an endoclip at the pylorus was a reliable and safe method to direct the orientation of the submucosal tunnel, to facilitate the location of the PMR, and to shorten the procedure time.