1
|
Zheng Z, Shang Y, Wang N, Liu X, Xin C, Yan X, Zhai Y, Yin J, Zhang J, Zhang Z. Current Advancement on the Dynamic Mechanism of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Int J Biol Sci 2021; 17:4154-4164. [PMID: 34803489 PMCID: PMC8579455 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.65066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common clinical disease associated with upper gastrointestinal motility disorders. Recently, with improvements in living standards and changes in lifestyle and dietary habits, the incidence of GERD has been increasing yearly. However, the mechanism of GERD has not been fully elucidated due to its complex pathogenesis, and this had led to unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes. Currently, the occurrence and development of GERD involve multiple factors. Its pathogenesis is mainly thought to be related to factors, such as lower esophageal sphincter pressure, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, crural diaphragmatic dysfunction, hiatus hernia, and impaired esophageal clearance. Therefore, explaining the pathogenesis of GERD more clearly and systematically, exploring potential and effective therapeutic targets, and choosing the best treatment methods have gradually become the focus of scholars' attention. Herein, we reviewed current advancements in the dynamic mechanism of GERD to better counsel patients on possible treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxi Shang
- Department of Hematology, Fuxing Hospital, Eighth Clinical Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoye Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Chenglin Xin
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaosheng Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuhao Zhai
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Yin
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bredenoord AJ, Babaei A, Carlson D, Omari T, Akiyama J, Yadlapati R, Pandolfino JE, Richter J, Fass R. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14193. [PMID: 34120375 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In the Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is manometrically defined as an elevated median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and elevated intrabolus pressure (IBP) during supine wet swallows, and persistently elevated median IRP in the upright position. A clinically relevant conclusive diagnosis of EGJOO requires a manometric diagnosis of EGJOO and associated symptoms such as dysphagia and/or chest pain with at least one of the following supportive investigations (pharmacologic provocation, timed barium esophagogram, and/or endoflip). The Chicago Classification is intended for diagnosis of primary esophageal motor disorders, and thus history and endoscopic evaluation are important to exclude conditions (eg, previous surgery, strictures, or masses) that can secondarily generate the EGJOO pattern on HRM. While a manometric finding of EGJOO is often made and can be an early sign of achalasia, more often it is a manometric finding without clinical implications. The proposed changes in CC4.0 have attempted to make the diagnosis more specific, in order to reduce the number of clinically irrelevant diagnoses and avoid confusion by patients and physicians alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arash Babaei
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Dustin Carlson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Taher Omari
- College or Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jun Akiyama
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Center for Esophageal Diseases, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - John E Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joel Richter
- Joy McCann Culverhouse Center for Esophageal Diseases, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ronnie Fass
- Esophageal and Swallowing Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Metrohealth Medical System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hernandez PV, Valdovinos LR, Horsley-Silva JL, Valdovinos MA, Crowell MD, Vela MF. Response to multiple rapid swallows shows impaired inhibitory pathways in distal esophageal spasm patients with and without concomitant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33:5860592. [PMID: 32566945 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Distal esophageal spasm (DES) is a motility disorder characterized by premature contraction of the esophageal body during single swallows. It is thought to be due to impairment of esophageal inhibitory pathways, but studies to support this are limited. The normal response to multiple rapid swallows (MRS) is deglutitive inhibition of the esophageal body during the MRS sequence. Our aim was to compare the response to MRS in DES patients and healthy control subjects. Response to MRS during HRM was evaluated in 19 DES patients (8 with and 11 without concomitant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction [EGJOO]) and 24 asymptomatic healthy controls. Patients with prior gastroesophageal surgery, peroral endoscopic myotomy, pneumatic dilation, esophageal botulinum toxin injection within 6 months of HRM, opioid medication use, and esophageal stricture were excluded. Response to MRS was evaluated for complete versus impaired inhibition (esophageal body contractility with distal contractile integral [DCI] > 100 mmHg-sec-cm during MRS), presence of post-MRS contraction augmentation (DCI post MRS greater than single swallow mean DCI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Impaired deglutitive inhibition during MRS was significantly more frequent in DES compared to controls (89% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), and frequency was similar for DES with versus without concomitant EGJOO (100% vs. 82%, P = 0.48). The proportion of subjects with augmentation post MRS was similar for both groups (37% vs. 38%, P = 1.00), but mean DCI post MRS was higher in DES than controls (3360.0 vs. 1238.9, P = 0.009). IRP was lower during MRS compared to single swallows in all patients, and IRP during MRS was normal in 5 of 8 patients with DES and EGJOO. Our study suggests that impaired deglutitive inhibition during MRS is present in the majority of patients with DES regardless of whether they have concomitant EGJOO, and future studies should explore the usefulness of incorporating response to MRS in the diagnosis of DES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luis R Valdovinos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona.,Department of Gastroenterology, Laboratorio de Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, 14080, C.D.M.X., Mexico
| | | | - Miguel A Valdovinos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Laboratorio de Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, 14080, C.D.M.X., Mexico
| | | | - Marcelo F Vela
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for assessment of esophageal motor disorders, but motor responses to the standard 5 mL water swallow protocol may not provide precision in defining minor motor disorders. Provocative maneuvers, particularly multiple rapid swallows (MRS), have been used to assess deglutitive inhibition during the repetitive swallows, and the contractile response following the final swallow of the sequence. The augmentation of esophageal smooth muscle contraction following MRS is termed contraction reserve. This is determined as the ratio between esophageal body contraction vigor (distal contractile integral, DCI) following MRS to the mean DCI after single swallows, which is ≥1 in the presence of contraction reserve. Reliable assessment of contraction reserve requires the performance of 3 MRS maneuvers during HRM. Absence of contraction reserve is associated with a higher likelihood of late postfundoplication dysphagia and may correlate with higher esophageal reflux burden on ambulatory reflux monitoring. Esophageal motor responses to abdominal compression, functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) balloon distension, and pharmacologic testing (using edrophonium and cisapride) may correlate with contraction reserve. Other provocative tests useful during HRM include rapid drink challenge, solid and viscous swallows, and standardized test meals, which are more useful in evaluation of esophageal outflow obstruction and dysphagia syndromes than in identification of contraction reserve. Provocative maneuvers have been recommended as part of routine HRM protocols, and while useful clinical information can be gleaned from these maneuvers, further research is necessary to determine the precise role of provocative testing in clinical esophagology.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mauro A, Savarino E, De Bortoli N, Tolone S, Pugliese D, Franchina M, Gyawali CP, Penagini R. Optimal number of multiple rapid swallows needed during high-resolution esophageal manometry for accurate prediction of contraction reserve. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018; 30:e13253. [PMID: 29159898 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) is a provocative test for assessment of contraction reserve, however reproducibility on repetitive MRS is incompletely understood. Our aim was to determine the optimal number of MRS sequences for consistent assessment of contraction reserve. METHODS One hundred and fifty-nine consecutive patients (79 IEM and 80 normal motility) who underwent high-resolution manometers were enrolled. Ten single swallows (SS) and 10 MRS were performed. Gold standard for evaluation of the contraction reserve was the ratio between the mean DCI of 10 MRS and the mean DCI of 10 SS (MRS/SS DCI ratio). Rates of false negatives and false positives were calculated for increasing numbers of MRS sequences, using either mean DCI or the MRS with the highest DCI. KEY RESULTS According to the gold standard, 50 IEM and 50 normal motility patients had contraction reserve. With progressively increasing numbers of MRS sequences, contraction reserve was detected using mean MRS DCI within three and four MRS sequences in IEM and normal motility respectively, whereas two and three MRS sequences were needed using the MRS sequence with the highest DCI. False positives were much higher with highest DCI method compared with mean DCI, (22% vs 9% respectively in IEM; 24% vs 9% in normal motility) when three MRS sequences were considered. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES At least three MRS are needed to reliably assess contraction reserve. The mean DCI of the three MRS sequences is the best variable to utilize as evidence of contraction reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mauro
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano - Italy, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - E Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - N De Bortoli
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Cisanello Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - S Tolone
- Division of General and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - D Pugliese
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano - Italy, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - M Franchina
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano - Italy, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - C P Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - R Penagini
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano - Italy, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|