1
|
Wielgosz J, Kral TRA, Perlman DM, Mumford JA, Wager TD, Lutz A, Davidson RJ. Neural Signatures of Pain Modulation in Short-Term and Long-Term Mindfulness Training: A Randomized Active-Control Trial. Am J Psychiatry 2022; 179:758-767. [PMID: 35899379 PMCID: PMC9529779 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21020145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mindfulness-based interventions are widely used to target pain, yet their neural mechanisms of action are insufficiently understood. The authors studied neural and subjective pain response in a randomized active-control trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) alongside long-term meditation practitioners. METHODS Healthy participants (N=115) underwent functional neuroimaging during a thermal acute pain task before and after random assignment to MBSR (N=28), an active control condition (health enhancement program [HEP]) (N=32), or a waiting list control condition (N=31). Long-term meditators (N=30) completed the same neuroimaging paradigm. Pain response was measured via self-reported intensity and unpleasantness, and neurally via two multivoxel machine-learning-derived signatures: the neurologic pain signature (NPS), emphasizing nociceptive pain processing, and the stimulus intensity independent pain signature-1 (SIIPS1), emphasizing stimulus-independent neuromodulatory processes. RESULTS The MBSR group showed a significant decrease in NPS response relative to the HEP group (Cohen's d=-0.43) and from pre- to postintervention assessment (d=-0.47). The MBSR group showed small, marginal decreases in NPS relative to the waiting list group (d=-0.36), and in SIIPS1 relative to both groups (HEP group, d=-0.37; waiting list group, d=-0.37). In subjective unpleasantness, the MBSR and HEP groups also showed modest significant reductions compared with the waiting list group (d=-0.45 and d=-0.55). Long-term meditators reported significantly lower pain than nonmeditators but did not differ in neural response. Within the long-term meditator group, cumulative practice during intensive retreat was significantly associated with reduced SIIPS1 (r=-0.65), whereas daily practice was not. CONCLUSIONS Mindfulness training showed associations with pain reduction that implicate differing neural pathways depending on extent and context of practice. Use of neural pain signatures in randomized trials offers promise for guiding the application of mindfulness interventions to pain treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Wielgosz
- Center for Healthy Minds (Wielgosz, Kral, Perlman, Mumford, Davidson), Department of Psychology (Kral, Davidson), Department of Psychiatry (Kral, Davidson), and Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior (Kral, Davidson), University of Wisconsin-Madison; Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Wielgosz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Wielgosz) and Department of Psychology (Mumford), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. (Wager); EDUWELL team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France (Lutz)
| | - Tammi R A Kral
- Center for Healthy Minds (Wielgosz, Kral, Perlman, Mumford, Davidson), Department of Psychology (Kral, Davidson), Department of Psychiatry (Kral, Davidson), and Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior (Kral, Davidson), University of Wisconsin-Madison; Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Wielgosz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Wielgosz) and Department of Psychology (Mumford), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. (Wager); EDUWELL team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France (Lutz)
| | - David M Perlman
- Center for Healthy Minds (Wielgosz, Kral, Perlman, Mumford, Davidson), Department of Psychology (Kral, Davidson), Department of Psychiatry (Kral, Davidson), and Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior (Kral, Davidson), University of Wisconsin-Madison; Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Wielgosz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Wielgosz) and Department of Psychology (Mumford), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. (Wager); EDUWELL team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France (Lutz)
| | - Jeanette A Mumford
- Center for Healthy Minds (Wielgosz, Kral, Perlman, Mumford, Davidson), Department of Psychology (Kral, Davidson), Department of Psychiatry (Kral, Davidson), and Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior (Kral, Davidson), University of Wisconsin-Madison; Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Wielgosz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Wielgosz) and Department of Psychology (Mumford), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. (Wager); EDUWELL team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France (Lutz)
| | - Tor D Wager
- Center for Healthy Minds (Wielgosz, Kral, Perlman, Mumford, Davidson), Department of Psychology (Kral, Davidson), Department of Psychiatry (Kral, Davidson), and Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior (Kral, Davidson), University of Wisconsin-Madison; Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Wielgosz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Wielgosz) and Department of Psychology (Mumford), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. (Wager); EDUWELL team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France (Lutz)
| | - Antoine Lutz
- Center for Healthy Minds (Wielgosz, Kral, Perlman, Mumford, Davidson), Department of Psychology (Kral, Davidson), Department of Psychiatry (Kral, Davidson), and Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior (Kral, Davidson), University of Wisconsin-Madison; Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Wielgosz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Wielgosz) and Department of Psychology (Mumford), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. (Wager); EDUWELL team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France (Lutz)
| | - Richard J Davidson
- Center for Healthy Minds (Wielgosz, Kral, Perlman, Mumford, Davidson), Department of Psychology (Kral, Davidson), Department of Psychiatry (Kral, Davidson), and Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior (Kral, Davidson), University of Wisconsin-Madison; Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Wielgosz); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Wielgosz) and Department of Psychology (Mumford), Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. (Wager); EDUWELL team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France (Lutz)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Williams RM, Day MA, Ehde DM, Turner AP, Ciol MA, Gertz KJ, Patterson D, Hakimian S, Suri P, Jensen MP. Effects of hypnosis vs mindfulness meditation vs education on chronic pain intensity and secondary outcomes in veterans: a randomized clinical trial. Pain 2022; 163:1905-1918. [PMID: 35082248 PMCID: PMC11089905 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Effective, rigorously evaluated nonpharmacological treatments for chronic pain are needed. This study compared the effectiveness of training in hypnosis (HYP) and mindfulness meditation (MM) with an active education control (ED). Veterans (N = 328) were randomly assigned to 8 manualized, group-based, in-person sessions of HYP (n = 110), MM (n = 108), or ED (n = 110). Primary (average pain intensity [API]) and secondary outcomes were assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3 and 6 months posttreatment. Treatment effects were evaluated using linear regression, a generalized estimating equation approach, or a Fisher exact test, depending on the variable. There were no significant omnibus between-group differences in pretreatment to posttreatment change in API; however, pretreatment to posttreatment improvements in API and several secondary variables were seen for participants in all 3 conditions. Participation in MM resulted in greater decreases in API and pain interference at 6 months posttreatment relative to ED. Participation in HYP resulted in greater decreases in API, pain interference, and depressive symptoms at 3 and 6 months posttreatment compared with ED. No significant differences on outcomes between HYP and MM were detected at any time point. This study suggests that all 3 interventions provide posttreatment benefits on a range of outcomes, but the benefits of HYP and MM continue beyond the end of treatment, while the improvements associated with ED dissipate over time. Future research is needed to determine whether the between-group differences that emerged posttreatment are reliable, whether there are benefits of combining treatments, and to explore moderating and mediating factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda M. Williams
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Seattle, Washington
| | - Melissa A. Day
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Seattle, Washington
- University of Queensland, School of Psychology, Australia
| | - Dawn M. Ehde
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Seattle, Washington
| | - Aaron P. Turner
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Seattle, Washington
| | - Marcia A. Ciol
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Seattle, Washington
| | - Kevin J. Gertz
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Seattle, Washington
| | - David Patterson
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Seattle, Washington
| | - Shahin Hakimian
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Pradeep Suri
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington Clinical Learning, Evidence and Research (CLEAR) Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mark P. Jensen
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Y, Liao L, Lin X, Sun Y, Wang N, Wang J, Luo F. A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Mindfulness and Meditation Research from 1900 to 2021. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:13150. [PMID: 34948760 PMCID: PMC8701075 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182413150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This study comprehensively summarizes research in the field of meditation, especially mindfulness meditation from 1900 to 2021, by analyzing the knowledge map through CiteSpace and VOSviewer software. Using "mindfulness *" or "meditation *" as the topic, articles included in the Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index were searched in the web of science core database, resulting in the selection of 19,752 articles. Over half a century ago, Deikman published the field's first article in the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease in 1963, and publications have soared in subsequent decades. The USA is in the core position in terms of global collaboration, total publication numbers, and total citations. The Mindfulness journal ranked first for the most published articles and citations. "The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being," written by Brown and Ryan, was the most cited article. Mindfulness, meditation, depression, intervention, stress reduction, stress, and anxiety are the top co-occurrence keywords. The timeline of cluster analysis discloses that before 2010, hypertension, cancer, mindfulness, generalized anxiety disorder, and other topics received great attention. In the decade since 2010, scholars have shown interest in meta-analysis, attention, and self-assessment, and keen attention to mindfulness-based interventions. These findings provide an important foundation to direct future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzheng Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; (Y.W.); (L.L.); (X.L.); (Y.S.); (N.W.); (J.W.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
| | - Lingqiu Liao
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; (Y.W.); (L.L.); (X.L.); (Y.S.); (N.W.); (J.W.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Lin
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; (Y.W.); (L.L.); (X.L.); (Y.S.); (N.W.); (J.W.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Yabin Sun
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; (Y.W.); (L.L.); (X.L.); (Y.S.); (N.W.); (J.W.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Ning Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; (Y.W.); (L.L.); (X.L.); (Y.S.); (N.W.); (J.W.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Jinyan Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; (Y.W.); (L.L.); (X.L.); (Y.S.); (N.W.); (J.W.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Fei Luo
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; (Y.W.); (L.L.); (X.L.); (Y.S.); (N.W.); (J.W.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang F, Chen WT, Shiu CS, Lin SH, Tun MS, Nwe TW, Nu Oo YT, Oo HN. Adaptation and Validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) in People Living with HIV in Myanmar. Mindfulness (N Y) 2021; 13:188-197. [PMID: 34777622 PMCID: PMC8576082 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-021-01784-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Valid and reliable instruments for the measurement of mindfulness are crucial for people living with HIV. However, there was no Myanmar version of such an instrument. Methods We adapted the English version of the 12-item Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) based on standard cross-cultural procedures. By randomly sampling methods, a sample of 248 eligible people living with HIV was contacted from a closed Myanmar Facebook group; 159 PLHIV completed the initial 12-item version of the adapted survey. Results Three items were removed due to low item-to-total correlations of the corrected item-total correlation as well as having infit and outfit mean squares outside the range of 0.6 to 1.4. After deleting the 3 items, the three-factor structure was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis, which indicated good model fit. The resultant 9-item CAMS-R in Myanmar (CAMS-R-M-2) achieved good internal reliability (Cronbach's α of 0.75 to 0.87, and the corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.44 to 0.81). Construct validity of the scale was demonstrated by significant association with self-reported HIV stigma and social support levels (r = 0.63, and - 0.53). In Rasch analysis, the infit and outfit mean squares for each item ranged from 0.49 to 1.24, and the person reliability was 2.17 and the separation index was 0.83. Conclusions The 9-item CAMS-R-M-2 with a three-factor structure has good reliability and validity. Higher total scores and subscale score reflected greater mindfulness qualities in people living with HIV in Myanmar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feifei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Wei-Ti Chen
- School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
| | - Cheng-Shi Shiu
- Department of Social Work, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sai Htun Lin
- Advocacy, Human Right & Technical Services Department, Secretariat Office, Myanmar Positive Group (MPG), Yangon, Myanmar
| | - Min San Tun
- Advocacy, Human Right & Technical Services Department, Secretariat Office, Myanmar Positive Group (MPG), Yangon, Myanmar
| | - Thet Wai Nwe
- National AIDS Program, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, Naypyitaw, 15011 Myanmar
| | - Yin Thet Nu Oo
- Department of Medical Research, Deputy Director, Health System Research Division, Yangon, Myanmar
| | - Htun Nyunt Oo
- National AIDS Program, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, Naypyitaw, 15011 Myanmar
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Benedittis G. Neural Mechanisms of Hypnosis and Meditation-Induced Analgesia: A Narrative Review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 2021; 69:363-382. [PMID: 33960912 DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2021.1917294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Meditation and hypnosis have both been found to attenuate pain; however, little is known about similarities and differences in the cognitive modulation of pain. Hypnotic and meditative states (e.g., mindfulness) reduce pain by sharing and overlapping multiple neuro-cognitive mechanisms, but they differ in many respects. While there are overlapping brain networks involved, the nature of these effects seems different. Both phenomena involve frontal modulation of pain-related areas. The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex appears to depend, in hypnosis, on the type of suggestion given and, in meditation, on the level of practice. Whereas the anterior cingulate cortex seems to be a key node in both hypnosis and meditation, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex appears to engage in hypnosis as a function of suggestion and, in meditation, as a function of proficiency.
Collapse
|
6
|
Current Understanding of the Involvement of the Insular Cortex in Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22052648. [PMID: 33808020 PMCID: PMC7961886 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuropathic pain is difficult to cure and is often accompanied by emotional and psychological changes. Exploring the mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain will help to identify a better treatment for this condition. The insular cortex is an important information integration center. Numerous imaging studies have documented increased activity of the insular cortex in the presence of neuropathic pain; however, the specific role of this region remains controversial. Early studies suggested that the insular lobe is mainly involved in the processing of the emotional motivation dimension of pain. However, increasing evidence suggests that the role of the insular cortex is more complex and may even be related to the neural plasticity, cognitive evaluation, and psychosocial aspects of neuropathic pain. These effects contribute not only to the development of neuropathic pain, but also to its comorbidity with neuropsychiatric diseases. In this review, we summarize the changes that occur in the insular cortex in the presence of neuropathic pain and analgesia, as well as the molecular mechanisms that may underlie these conditions. We also discuss potential sex-based differences in these processes. Further exploration of the involvement of the insular lobe will contribute to the development of new pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy treatments for neuropathic pain.
Collapse
|
7
|
Efficacy and Feasibility of Behavioral Treatments for Migraine, Headache, and Pain in the Acute Care Setting. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2020; 24:66. [PMID: 32979092 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-00899-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review examines the use of behavioral interventions for acute treatment of headache and pain in the emergency department (ED)/urgent care (UC) and inpatient settings. RECENT FINDINGS Behavioral interventions demonstrate reductions of pain and associated disability in headache, migraine, and other conditions in the outpatient setting. Behavioral treatments may be a useful addition for patients presenting with acute pain to hospitals and emergency departments. We review challenges and limitations and offer suggestions for implementation of behavioral interventions in the acute setting. Some evidence exists for relaxation-based treatments, mindfulness-based treatments, hypnosis/self-hypnosis, and immersive virtual reality for acute pain, migraine, and headache. There are few high-quality studies on behavioral treatments in the inpatient and emergency department settings. Further research is warranted to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Given the general safety and cost-effectiveness of behavioral interventions, healthcare professionals may want to include these therapies in treatment plans.
Collapse
|
8
|
Zorn J, Abdoun O, Bouet R, Lutz A. Mindfulness meditation is related to sensory-affective uncoupling of pain in trained novice and expert practitioners. Eur J Pain 2020; 24:1301-1313. [PMID: 32311185 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mindfulness meditation can alleviate acute and chronic pain. It has been proposed that mindfulness meditation reduces pain by uncoupling sensory and affective pain dimensions. However, studies to date have reported mixed results, possibly due to a diversity of styles of and expertise in mindfulness meditation. Furthermore, the interrelations between mindfulness meditation and pain catastrophizing during acute pain remain little known. METHODS This cross-sectional study investigated the effect of a style of mindfulness meditation called Open Monitoring (OM) on sensory and affective pain experience by comparing novice (2-day formal training; average ~20 hr practice) to expert practitioners (>10.000 hr practice). We implemented a paradigm that was designed to amplify the cognitive-affective aspects of pain experience by the manipulation of pain anticipation and uncertainty of stimulus length (8 or 16 s thermal pain stimuli). We collected pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings and assessed trait pain catastrophizing with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). RESULTS Across groups, mindfulness meditation reduced unpleasantness, but not intensity ratings compared to attentional distraction. Experts reported a lower score on PCS, reduced amplification of unpleasantness by long painful stimuli, and larger sensory-affective uncoupling than novices particularly during long painful stimuli. In experts, meditation-induced uncoupling spilled over the control condition. Across groups and task conditions, a higher score on PCS predicted lower sensory-affective uncoupling during long painful stimuli and higher ratings of pain intensity during short painful stimuli. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that mindfulness meditation specifically down-regulates pain affect as opposed to pain intensity, and that pain catastrophizing undermines sensory-affective uncoupling of pain. SIGNIFICANCE In this study, we found that a style of mindfulness meditation referred to as OM reduced unpleasantness but not intensity ratings compared to attentional distraction in trained novice (state effect) and expert meditators (state and trait effects). We also observed that trait pain catastrophizing scores predicted this sensory-affective uncoupling. These findings advance our understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underlying mindfulness meditation and can inform treatment strategies for chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelle Zorn
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Bron Cedex, Lyon, France
| | - Oussama Abdoun
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Bron Cedex, Lyon, France
| | - Romain Bouet
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Bron Cedex, Lyon, France
| | - Antoine Lutz
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, INSERM U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon 1 University, Bron Cedex, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Talbot K, Madden VJ, Jones SL, Moseley GL. The sensory and affective components of pain: are they differentially modifiable dimensions or inseparable aspects of a unitary experience? A systematic review. Br J Anaesth 2019; 123:e263-e272. [PMID: 31053232 PMCID: PMC6676053 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain is recognised to have both a sensory dimension (intensity) and an affective dimension (unpleasantness). Pain feels like a single unpleasant bodily experience, but investigations of human pain have long considered these two dimensions of pain to be separable and differentially modifiable. The evidence underpinning this separability and differential modifiability is seldom presented. We aimed to fill this gap by evaluating the current evidence base for whether or not the sensory and affective dimensions of pain can be selectively modulated using cognitive manipulations. METHODS A rigorous systematic search, based on a priori search terms and consultation with field experts, yielded 4270 articles. A detailed screening process was based on the following recommendations: (i) evaluation of effectiveness; (ii) examination of methodological rigour, including each study having an a priori intention to cognitively modulate one of the two dimensions of pain; and (iii) sound theoretical reasoning. These were used to ensure that included studies definitively answered the research question. RESULTS After in-depth critique of all 12 articles that met the inclusion criteria, we found that there is no compelling evidence that the sensory and affective dimensions of pain can be selectively and intentionally modulated using cognitive manipulations in humans. CONCLUSIONS We offer potential explanations for this discrepancy between assumptions and evidence and contend that this finding highlights several important questions for the field, from both the research and clinical perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Talbot
- School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Queensland, Australia
| | - V J Madden
- School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - S L Jones
- School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - G L Moseley
- School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Y, Qi Z, Hofmann SG, Si M, Liu X, Xu W. Effect of Acceptance versus Attention on Pain Tolerance: Dissecting Two Components of Mindfulness. Mindfulness (N Y) 2019; 10:1352-1359. [PMID: 31537989 PMCID: PMC6752222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previous studies have shown that brief mindfulness trainings can have significant analgesic effects. However, the effects of the various components of mindfulness on pain analgesia are not well understood. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of two components of mindfulness interventions - attention and acceptance on pain analgesia. METHODS One hundred and nineteen healthy college students without prior mindfulness experience underwent a cold pressor test to measure pain tolerance before and after the training. Pain intensity, tolerance, distress, threshold and endurance time were also tested. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) acceptance of pain, (2) attention to pain, (3) acceptance of and attention to pain, or (4) control. RESULTS The results showed that both the acceptance strategy and the combined acceptance and attention group increased pain endurance and tolerance after training. Furthermore, acceptance group had longer pain endurance time and tolerance time than attention group and control group. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that acceptance of pain is more important than attention to pain. Study limitations and future research directions are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzheng Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
- CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenzhen Qi
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Stefan G. Hofmann
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mei Si
- Department of Cognitive Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, NY, USA
| | - Xinghua Liu
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
- School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Xu
- School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kopel J, Habermas GR. Neural Buddhism and Christian mindfulness in medicine. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2019; 32:308-310. [PMID: 31191165 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1581525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, interest in mindfulness practices has swept through the medical community as mounting regulations increase burnout and challenge physicians' roles, responsibilities, and work-life balance. Despite its modern resurgence, several mindfulness practices have their roots in Buddhist tradition and manuscripts dating hundreds of years after Buddha's death. In the West, another variant of mindfulness proceeds from the Christian tradition emphasizing spiritual reflection on biblical teachings and God's interactions. With scientific advancements unearthing the neurological mechanisms involved in meditation and mindfulness, the medical profession has attempted to bridge the intersection between science and religion. Within this overlap, faith and spiritual practices may become an essential component for the physician-patient relationship and treatment plan. Overall, the crossing lanes between science and religion may represent a paradigm shift that merges empirical studies in medical practice with faith along with patient experience with illness towards a new understanding of the relationship between spirituality and medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kopel
- Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences CenterLubbockTexas
| | - Gary R Habermas
- Department of Philosophy, Liberty UniversityLynchburgVirginia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Employing pain and mindfulness to understand consciousness: a symbiotic relationship. Curr Opin Psychol 2019; 28:192-197. [PMID: 30776682 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Consciousness, defined here as the quality of awareness of self and the corresponding sensory environment, is considered to be one of most enigmatic and contentious areas of scholarly dissection and investigation. The subjective experience of pain is constructed and modulated by a myriad of sensory, cognitive and affective dimensions. Thus, the study of pain can provide many inroads to a concept like consciousness that the traditional sense modalities do not. Mindfulness defined here as non-reactive awareness of the present moment, can uniquely control and/or modulate particular substrates of conscious experience. Thus, in combination with brain imaging methodologies, we propose that the interactions between pain and mindfulness could serve as a more comprehensive platform to disentangle the biological and psychological substrates of conscious experience. The present review provides a brief synopsis on how combining the study of pain and mindfulness can inform the study of consciousness, delineates the multiple, unique brain mechanisms supporting mindfulness-based pain relief, and describes how mindfulness uniquely improves the affective dimension of pain, an important consideration for the treatment of chronic pain.
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy F Donaldson
- School of Life Sciences and Arthritis Research UK Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Bridget M Lumb
- School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Innes KE, Selfe TK, Kandati S, Wen S, Huysmans Z. Effects of Mantra Meditation versus Music Listening on Knee Pain, Function, and Related Outcomes in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: An Exploratory Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT). EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE : ECAM 2018; 2018:7683897. [PMID: 30245732 PMCID: PMC6136530 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7683897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Disease-modifying treatments for OA remain elusive, and commonly used medications can have serious side effects. Although meditation and music listening (ML) have been shown to improve outcomes in certain chronic pain populations, research in OA is sparse. In this pilot RCT, we explore the effects of two mind-body practices, mantra meditation (MM) and ML, on knee pain, function, and related outcomes in adults with knee OA. METHODS Twenty-two older ambulatory adults diagnosed with knee OA were randomized to a MM (N=11) or ML program (N=11) and asked to practice 15-20 minutes, twice daily for 8 weeks. Core outcomes included knee pain (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] and Numeric Rating Scale), knee function (KOOS), and perceived OA severity (Patient Global Assessment). Additional outcomes included perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), mood (Profile of Mood States), sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), and health-related quality of life (QOL, SF-36). Participants were assessed at baseline and following completion of the program. RESULTS Twenty participants (91%) completed the study (9 MM, 11 ML). Compliance was excellent; participants completed an average of 12.1±0.83 sessions/week. Relative to baseline, participants in both groups demonstrated improvement post-intervention in all core outcomes, including knee pain, function, and perceived OA severity, as well as improvement in mood, perceived stress, and QOL (Physical Health) (p's≤0.05). Relative to ML, the MM group showed greater improvements in overall mood and sleep (p's≤0.04), QOL-Mental Health (p<0.07), kinesiophobia (p=0.09), and two domains of the KOOS (p's<0.09). CONCLUSIONS Findings of this exploratory RCT suggest that a simple MM and, possibly, ML program may be effective in reducing knee pain and dysfunction, decreasing stress, and improving mood, sleep, and QOL in adults with knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim E. Innes
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Terry Kit Selfe
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Services, Health Science Center Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Sahiti Kandati
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
- School of Dentistry, SUNY-Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Sijin Wen
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Zenzi Huysmans
- College of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jurisic P, Salm DC, Vieira C, Cidral-Filho FJ, Mazzardo-Martins L, Martins DF. Pain-related encephalic regions influenced by yoga meditation: An integrative review. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2018; 31:320-324. [PMID: 29705476 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2017] [Revised: 03/31/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The mechanisms underlying the use of yoga in pain relief are still unclear. This study reviewed literature reports on encephalic activity related to analgesia induced by yoga meditation practice. METHODS This integrative review examined studies published in the Pubmed, LILACS and MEDLINE databases without restriction of the year of publication. The research involved 16 descriptors related to the words: yoga, pain and neuroimaging methods. Inclusion criteria involved only the publications available online, with free access and written in English. RESULTS 2 case studies and 1 pilot study met the criteria. Yoga meditation practice induces analgesia primarily through attenuation of the medial pain perception system including the Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Insula regions, as well as the lateral system including the Secondary Sensory Cortex and Thalamus. CONCLUSION Yoga induced analgesia is a potentially important adjunct to current pain management. This integrative review revealed that there is a need for further research that analyzes the encephalic regions related to analgesia induced by yoga practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Jurisic
- Experimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Daiana Cristina Salm
- Experimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Cintia Vieira
- Experimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Francisco José Cidral-Filho
- Experimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Leidiane Mazzardo-Martins
- Experimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Neuroscience, Center of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Daniel Fernandes Martins
- Experimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, at Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Senders A, Borgatti A, Hanes D, Shinto L. Association Between Pain and Mindfulness in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional Survey. Int J MS Care 2018; 20:28-34. [PMID: 29507540 PMCID: PMC5825983 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2016-076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is a common symptom in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and often requires a multimodal approach to care. The practice of mindfulness has been shown to decrease the experience of pain in other conditions, yet little is known about the relationship between mindfulness and pain in people with MS. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between pain interference and trait mindfulness in people with MS. METHODS In this cross-sectional survey, 132 people with any type of MS completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference scale and the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Linear regression was used to test the association between pain and mindfulness while adjusting for demographic and MS-related characteristics. RESULTS The relationship between pain and mindfulness was clinically meaningful and highly significant (t = -5.52, P < .0001). For every 18-point increase in mindfulness scores, pain interference scores are expected to decrease by 3.96 (95% CI, -2.52 to -5.40) points (β = -0.22, P < .0001). The adjusted model, including age, type of MS, the interaction between mindfulness and age, and the interaction between mindfulness and MS type, explains 26% of the variability in pain interference scores (R2 = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest a clinically significant association between mindfulness and pain interference in MS and support further exploration of mindfulness-based interventions in the management of MS-related pain.
Collapse
|
17
|
Broadway JM. A Very Short Tour of the Mind-Wandering Brain. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2017. [DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.3.0389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James M. Broadway
- Department of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico, 1101 Yale Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tassorelli C, Tramontano M, Berlangieri M, Schweiger V, D'Ippolito M, Palmerini V, Bonazza S, Rosa R, Cerbo R, Buzzi MG. Assessing and treating primary headaches and cranio-facial pain in patients undergoing rehabilitation for neurological diseases. J Headache Pain 2017; 18:99. [PMID: 28963668 PMCID: PMC5622014 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-017-0809-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain is a very common condition in patient undergoing rehabilitation for neurological disease; however the presence of primary headaches and other cranio-facial pains, particularly when they are actually or apparently independent from the disability for which patient is undergoing rehabilitation, is often neglected. Diagnostic and therapeutic international and national guidelines, as well as tools for the subjective measure of head pain are available and should also be applied in the neurorehabilitation setting. This calls for searching the presence of head pain, independently from the rehabilitation needs, since pain, either episodic or chronic, interferes with patient performance by affecting physical and emotional status. Pain may also interfere with sleep and therefore hamper recovery. METHODS In our role of task force of the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation (ICCPN), we have elaborated specific recommendations for diagnosing and treating head pains in patients undergoing rehabilitation for neurological diseases. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION In this narrative review, we describe the available literature that has been evaluated in order to define the recommendations and outline the needs of epidemiological studies concerning headache and other cranio-facial pain in neurorehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Tassorelli
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino", Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Tramontano
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina, 306 00179, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Berlangieri
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino", Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Mariagrazia D'Ippolito
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina, 306 00179, Rome, Italy
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sara Bonazza
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rosa
- Clinical Medicine - Headache Center, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosanna Cerbo
- Pain Therapy Hub, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lindahl JR, Fisher NE, Cooper DJ, Rosen RK, Britton WB. The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176239. [PMID: 28542181 PMCID: PMC5443484 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 04/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Buddhist-derived meditation practices are currently being employed as a popular form of health promotion. While meditation programs draw inspiration from Buddhist textual sources for the benefits of meditation, these sources also acknowledge a wide range of other effects beyond health-related outcomes. The Varieties of Contemplative Experience study investigates meditation-related experiences that are typically underreported, particularly experiences that are described as challenging, difficult, distressing, functionally impairing, and/or requiring additional support. A mixed-methods approach featured qualitative interviews with Western Buddhist meditation practitioners and experts in Theravāda, Zen, and Tibetan traditions. Interview questions probed meditation experiences and influencing factors, including interpretations and management strategies. A follow-up survey provided quantitative assessments of causality, impairment and other demographic and practice-related variables. The content-driven thematic analysis of interviews yielded a taxonomy of 59 meditation-related experiences across 7 domains: cognitive, perceptual, affective, somatic, conative, sense of self, and social. Even in cases where the phenomenology was similar across participants, interpretations of and responses to the experiences differed considerably. The associated valence ranged from very positive to very negative, and the associated level of distress and functional impairment ranged from minimal and transient to severe and enduring. In order to determine what factors may influence the valence, impact, and response to any given experience, the study also identified 26 categories of influencing factors across 4 domains: practitioner-level factors, practice-level factors, relationships, and health behaviors. By identifying a broader range of experiences associated with meditation, along with the factors that contribute to the presence and management of experiences reported as challenging, difficult, distressing or functionally impairing, this study aims to increase our understanding of the effects of contemplative practices and to provide resources for mediators, clinicians, meditation researchers, and meditation teachers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared R. Lindahl
- Cogut Center for the Humanities, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - Nathan E. Fisher
- Department of Religious Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America
| | - David J. Cooper
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - Rochelle K. Rosen
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - Willoughby B. Britton
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Panta P. The Possible Role of Meditation in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A New Hypothesis. Indian J Palliat Care 2017; 23:180-187. [PMID: 28503039 PMCID: PMC5412127 DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.204239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND OF HYPOTHESIS Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is the most common musculoskeletal pain disorder of the head and neck area. In the past, several theories were put forth to explain its origin and nature, but none proved complete. Myofascial pain responds to changing psychological states and stress, anxiety, lack of sleep, anger, depression and chronic pain are direct contributional factors. Myofascial pain syndrome may be considered as a psychosomatic disorder. There are numerous accepted palliative approaches, but of all, relaxation techniques stand out and initiate healing at the base level. In this article, the connection between mental factors, MPS and meditation are highlighted. Recent literature has shed light on the fundamental role of free radicals in the emergence of myofascial pain. The accumulating free radicals disrupt mitochondrial integrity and function, leading to sustenance and progression of MPS. Meditation on the other hand was shown to reduce free radical load and can result in clinical improvement. 'Mindfulness' is the working principle behind the effect of all meditations, and I emphasize that it can serve as a potential tool to reverse the neuro-architectural, neurobiological and cellular changes that occur in MPS. CONCLUSIONS The findings described in this paper were drawn from studies on myofascial pain, fibromyalgia, similar chronic pain models and most importantly from self experience (experimentation). Till date, no hypothesis is available connecting MPS and meditation. Mechanisms linking MPS and meditation were identified, and this paper can ignite novel research in this direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashanth Panta
- Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Sangareddy, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nonpharmacological Interventions in Targeting Pain-Related Brain Plasticity. Neural Plast 2017; 2017:2038573. [PMID: 28299206 PMCID: PMC5337367 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2038573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is a highly prevalent and debilitating condition that is frequently associated with multiple comorbid psychiatric conditions and functional, biochemical, and anatomical alterations in various brain centers. Due to its widespread and diverse manifestations, chronic pain is often resistant to classical pharmacological treatment paradigms, prompting the search for alternative treatment approaches that are safe and efficacious. The current review will focus on the following themes: attentional and cognitive interventions, the role of global environmental factors, and the effects of exercise and physical rehabilitation in both chronic pain patients and preclinical pain models. The manuscript will discuss not only the analgesic efficacy of these therapies, but also their ability to reverse pain-related brain neuroplasticity. Finally, we will discuss the potential mechanisms of action for each of the interventions.
Collapse
|
22
|
Esch T, Winkler J, Auwärter V, Gnann H, Huber R, Schmidt S. Neurobiological Aspects of Mindfulness in Pain Autoregulation: Unexpected Results from a Randomized-Controlled Trial and Possible Implications for Meditation Research. Front Hum Neurosci 2017; 10:674. [PMID: 28184192 PMCID: PMC5266722 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Research has demonstrated that short meditation training may yield higher pain tolerance in acute experimental pain. Our study aimed at examining underlying mechanisms of this alleged effect. In addition, placebo research has shown that higher pain tolerance is mediated via endogenous neuromodulators: experimental inhibition of opioid receptors by naloxone antagonized this effect. We performed a trial to discern possible placebo from meditation-specific effects on pain tolerance and attention. Objectives: It was proposed that (i) meditation training will increase pain tolerance; (ii) naloxone will inhibit this effect; (iii) increased pain tolerance will correlate with improved attention performance and mindfulness. Methods: Randomized-controlled, partly blinded trial with 31 healthy meditation-naïve adults. Pain tolerance was assessed by the tourniquet test, attention performance was measured by Attention Network Test (ANT), self-perceived mindfulness by Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory. 16 participants received a 5-day meditation training, focusing on body/breath awareness; the control group (N = 15) received no intervention. Measures were taken before the intervention and on 3 consecutive days after the training, with all participants receiving either no infusion, naloxone infusion, or saline infusion (blinded). Blood samples were taken in order to determine serum morphine and morphine glucuronide levels by applying liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Results: The meditation group produced fewer errors in ANT. Paradoxically, increases in pain tolerance occurred in both groups (accentuated in control), and correlated with reported mindfulness. Naloxone showed a trend to decrease pain tolerance in both groups. Plasma analyses revealed sporadic morphine and/or morphine metabolite findings with no discernable pattern. Discussion: Main objectives could not be verified. Since underlying study goals had not been made explicit to participants, on purpose (framing effects toward a hypothesized mindfulness-pain tolerance correlation were thus avoided, trainees had not been instructed how to 'use' mindfulness, regarding pain), the question remains open whether lack of meditation effects on pain tolerance was due to these intended 'non-placebo' conditions, cultural effects, or other confounders, or on an unsuitable paradigm. Conclusion: Higher pain tolerance through meditation could not be confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Esch
- Division of Integrative Health Promotion, Coburg University of Applied SciencesCoburg, Germany; School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke UniversityWitten, Germany; Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-EssenEssen, Germany
| | - Jeremy Winkler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany
| | - Volker Auwärter
- Institute of Forensic Medicine, Forensic Toxicology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany
| | - Heike Gnann
- Institute of Forensic Medicine, Forensic Toxicology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany
| | - Roman Huber
- Center for Complementary Medicine, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Schmidt
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of FreiburgFreiburg, Germany; Institute for Transcultural Health Studies, European University ViadrinaFrankfurt (Oder), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alpha-range visual and auditory stimulation reduces the perception of pain. Eur J Pain 2016; 21:562-572. [DOI: 10.1002/ejp.960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
24
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED Mindfulness meditation, a cognitive practice premised on sustaining nonjudgmental awareness of arising sensory events, reliably attenuates pain. Mindfulness meditation activates multiple brain regions that contain a high expression of opioid receptors. However, it is unknown whether mindfulness-meditation-based analgesia is mediated by endogenous opioids. The present double-blind, randomized study examined behavioral pain responses in healthy human volunteers during mindfulness meditation and a nonmanipulation control condition in response to noxious heat and intravenous administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone (0.15 mg/kg bolus + 0.1 mg/kg/h infusion) or saline placebo. Meditation during saline infusion significantly reduced pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings when compared to the control + saline group. However, naloxone infusion failed to reverse meditation-induced analgesia. There were no significant differences in pain intensity or pain unpleasantness reductions between the meditation + naloxone and the meditation + saline groups. Furthermore, mindfulness meditation during naloxone produced significantly greater reductions in pain intensity and unpleasantness than the control groups. These findings demonstrate that mindfulness meditation does not rely on endogenous opioidergic mechanisms to reduce pain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Endogenous opioids have been repeatedly shown to be involved in the cognitive inhibition of pain. Mindfulness meditation, a practice premised on directing nonjudgmental attention to arising sensory events, reduces pain by engaging mechanisms supporting the cognitive control of pain. However, it remains unknown if mindfulness-meditation-based analgesia is mediated by opioids, an important consideration for using meditation to treat chronic pain. To address this question, the present study examined pain reports during meditation in response to noxious heat and administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone and placebo saline. The results demonstrate that meditation-based pain relief does not require endogenous opioids. Therefore, the treatment of chronic pain may be more effective with meditation due to a lack of cross-tolerance with opiate-based medications.
Collapse
|
25
|
Fox KCR, Dixon ML, Nijeboer S, Girn M, Floman JL, Lifshitz M, Ellamil M, Sedlmeier P, Christoff K. Functional neuroanatomy of meditation: A review and meta-analysis of 78 functional neuroimaging investigations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016; 65:208-28. [PMID: 27032724 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 264] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2015] [Revised: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Meditation is a family of mental practices that encompasses a wide array of techniques employing distinctive mental strategies. We systematically reviewed 78 functional neuroimaging (fMRI and PET) studies of meditation, and used activation likelihood estimation to meta-analyze 257 peak foci from 31 experiments involving 527 participants. We found reliably dissociable patterns of brain activation and deactivation for four common styles of meditation (focused attention, mantra recitation, open monitoring, and compassion/loving-kindness), and suggestive differences for three others (visualization, sense-withdrawal, and non-dual awareness practices). Overall, dissociable activation patterns are congruent with the psychological and behavioral aims of each practice. Some brain areas are recruited consistently across multiple techniques-including insula, pre/supplementary motor cortices, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and frontopolar cortex-but convergence is the exception rather than the rule. A preliminary effect-size meta-analysis found medium effects for both activations (d=0.59) and deactivations (d=-0.74), suggesting potential practical significance. Our meta-analysis supports the neurophysiological dissociability of meditation practices, but also raises many methodological concerns and suggests avenues for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran C R Fox
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| | - Matthew L Dixon
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Savannah Nijeboer
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Manesh Girn
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - James L Floman
- Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, and Special Education, University of British Columbia, 2125 Main Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Michael Lifshitz
- Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, 3775 University St., Montreal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Melissa Ellamil
- Neuroanatomy and Connectivity Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstrasse 1a, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
| | - Peter Sedlmeier
- Institut für Psychologie, Technische Universität Chemnitz, 43 Wilhelm-Raabe Street, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Kalina Christoff
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada; Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2B5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zgierska AE, Burzinski CA, Cox J, Kloke J, Stegner A, Cook DB, Singles J, Mirgain S, Coe CL, Bačkonja M. Mindfulness Meditation and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention Reduces Pain Severity and Sensitivity in Opioid-Treated Chronic Low Back Pain: Pilot Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial. PAIN MEDICINE 2016; 17:1865-1881. [PMID: 26968850 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnw006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess benefits of mindfulness meditation and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based intervention for opioid-treated chronic low back pain (CLBP). DESIGN 26-week parallel-arm pilot randomized controlled trial (Intervention and Usual Care versus Usual Care alone). SETTING Outpatient. SUBJECTS Adults with CLBP, prescribed ≥30 mg/day of morphine-equivalent dose (MED) for at least 3 months. METHODS The intervention comprised eight weekly group sessions (meditation and CLBP-specific CBT components) and 30 minutes/day, 6 days/week of at-home practice. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, 8, and 26 weeks: primary-pain severity (Brief Pain Inventory) and function/disability (Oswestry Disability Index); secondary-pain acceptance, opioid dose, pain sensitivity to thermal stimuli, and serum pain-sensitive biomarkers (Interferon-γ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-α; Interleukins 1ß and 6; C-reactive Protein). RESULTS Thirty-five (21 experimental, 14 control) participants were enrolled and completed the study. They were 51.8 ± 9.7 years old, 80% female, with severe CLBP-related disability (66.7 ± 11.4), moderate pain severity (5.8 ± 1.4), and taking 148.3 ± 129.2 mg/day of MED. Results of the intention-to-treat analysis showed that, compared with controls, the meditation-CBT group reduced pain severity ratings during the study (P = 0.045), with between-group difference in score change reaching 1 point at 26 weeks (95% Confidence Interval: 0.2,1.9; Cohen's d = 0.86), and decreased pain sensitivity to thermal stimuli (P < 0.05), without adverse events. Exploratory analyses suggested a relationship between the extent of meditation practice and the magnitude of intervention benefits. CONCLUSIONS Meditation-CBT intervention reduced pain severity and sensitivity to experimental thermal pain stimuli in patients with opioid-treated CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jennifer Cox
- Department of *Family Medicine and Community Health
| | - John Kloke
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics
| | - Aaron Stegner
- Department of Research Service, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin.,Department of Department of Kinesiology, School of Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Dane B Cook
- Department of Research Service, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin.,Department of Department of Kinesiology, School of Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | - Christopher L Coe
- Department of Harlow Center for Biological Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Miroslav Bačkonja
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison,Wisconsin.,Department of **PRAHS Clinical Research Company Lifetree, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kucyi A, Davis KD. The dynamic pain connectome. Trends Neurosci 2015; 38:86-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 271] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2014] [Revised: 11/24/2014] [Accepted: 11/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
28
|
Nakata H, Sakamoto K, Kakigi R. Meditation reduces pain-related neural activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, secondary somatosensory cortex, and thalamus. Front Psychol 2014; 5:1489. [PMID: 25566158 PMCID: PMC4267182 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that meditation inhibits or relieves pain perception. To clarify the underlying mechanisms for this phenomenon, neuroimaging methods, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, and neurophysiological methods, such as magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography, have been used. However, it has been difficult to interpret the results, because there is some paradoxical evidence. For example, some studies reported increased neural responses to pain stimulation during meditation in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and insula, whereas others showed a decrease in these regions. There have been inconsistent findings to date. Moreover, in general, since the activities of the ACC and insula are correlated with pain perception, the increase in neural activities during meditation would be related to the enhancement of pain perception rather than its reduction. These contradictions might directly contribute to the ‘mystery of meditation.’ In this review, we presented previous findings for brain regions during meditation and the anatomical changes that occurred in the brain with long-term meditation training. We then discussed the findings of previous studies that examined pain-related neural activity during meditation. We also described the brain mechanisms responsible for pain relief during meditation, and possible reasons for paradoxical evidence among previous studies. By thoroughly overviewing previous findings, we hypothesized that meditation reduces pain-related neural activity in the ACC, insula, secondary somatosensory cortex, and thalamus. We suggest that the characteristics of the modulation of this activity may depend on the kind of meditation and/or number of years of experience of meditation, which were associated with paradoxical findings among previous studies that investigated pain-related neural activities during meditation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Nakata
- Department of Integrative Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences Okazaki, Japan ; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Human Life and Environment, Nara Women's University Nara, Japan
| | - Kiwako Sakamoto
- Department of Integrative Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences Okazaki, Japan
| | - Ryusuke Kakigi
- Department of Integrative Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences Okazaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fabbro F, Crescentini C. Toward an integrative view of human pain and suffering. Reply to comments on "Facing the experience of pain: a neuropsychological perspective". Phys Life Rev 2014; 11:569-72. [PMID: 25107844 DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/10/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Fabbro
- Department of Human Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; Perceptual Robotics (PERCRO) Laboratory, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gard T. Different neural correlates of facing pain with mindfulness: contributions of strategy and skill. Comment on "Facing the experience of pain: a neuropsychological perspective" by Fabbro and Crescentini. Phys Life Rev 2014; 11:564-6. [PMID: 25022214 DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2014] [Accepted: 07/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Gard
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pagnoni G, Porro CA. Cognitive modulation of pain and predictive coding. Comment on "Facing the experience of pain: a neuropsychological perspective" by Fabbro and Crescentini. Phys Life Rev 2014; 11:555-7. [PMID: 24906616 DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2014] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Pagnoni
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | - Carlo A Porro
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Chronic pain is common, and the available treatments do not provide adequate relief for most patients. Neuromodulatory interventions that modify brain processes underlying the experience of pain have the potential to provide substantial relief for some of these patients. The purpose of this Review is to summarize the state of knowledge regarding the efficacy and mechanisms of noninvasive neuromodulatory treatments for chronic pain. The findings provide support for the efficacy and positive side-effect profile of hypnosis, and limited evidence for the potential efficacy of meditation training, noninvasive electrical stimulation procedures, and neurofeedback procedures. Mechanisms research indicates that hypnosis influences multiple neurophysiological processes involved in the experience of pain. Evidence also indicates that mindfulness meditation has both immediate and long-term effects on cortical structures and activity involved in attention, emotional responding and pain. Less is known about the mechanisms of other neuromodulatory treatments. On the basis of the data discussed in this Review, training in the use of self-hypnosis might be considered a viable 'first-line' approach to treat chronic pain. More-definitive research regarding the benefits and costs of meditation training, noninvasive brain stimulation and neurofeedback is needed before these treatments can be recommended for the treatment of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA
| | - Melissa A Day
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA
| | - Jordi Miró
- Department of Psychology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Carretera de Valls, s/n, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|