Three-dimensional comparison of the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances: A CBCT study

A 3-dimensional comparative assessment of the dentoskeletal effects of clear aligners vs temporary skeletal anchorage device-assisted posterior intrusion in adolescents with anterior open bite: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The dentoskeletal effects of clear aligner treatment (CAT) with Invisalign vs temporary skeletal anchorage device-anchored Sydney intrusion spring (SIS) were compared in consecutively treated growing patients with anterior open bite using cone-beam computed tomography scans.

METHODS

Fifteen adolescents treated exclusively with Invisalign, and 14 with SIS (first-phase treatment) were assessed retrospectively. Rigid-wise, voxel-based registration of pretreatment and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans were performed using the anterior cranial base, maxillary plane, and mandibular body as reference regions. Treatment outcomes were compared between groups using median regression modeling.

RESULTS

Molar intrusion and incisor extrusion (millimeters), as well as buccolingual inclination changes (°), were not expressed as prescribed in the ClinChecks for Invisalign. Both treatment modalities resulted in similar improvement of anterior open bite; however, via different mechanics. Compared with CAT, SIS demonstrated significantly greater intrusion of the maxillary first molars when measured from the mesiobuccal (16: 2.09 mm [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.05-3.12]; 26: 2.98 mm [95% CI, 2.00-3.96]) and palatal cusps (16: 2.08 mm [95% CI, 1.15-3.01], 26: 2.83 mm [95% CI, 1.92-3.74]) and less extrusion of the maxillary incisors (12: -1.30 mm [95% CI, -2.13 to -0.47], 11: -1.30 mm [95% CI, -2.40 to -0.20], 21: -0.92 mm [95% CI, -1.73 to -0.12], 22: -0.85 mm [95% CI, -1.71 to -0.00]). There was weak evidence of association with less extrusion of the mandibular incisors using SIS. Maxillary and mandibular incisors tipped lingually in both groups with no statistical difference across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SIS demonstrated greater maxillary molar intrusion, whereas CAT was associated with incisor extrusion.

Molar Distalization by Clear Aligners with Sequential Distalization Protocol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

With the popularity of clear aligners, the sequential distalization protocol has been more commonly used for molar distalization. However, the amount of molar distalization that can be achieved, as well as the accompanying side effects on the sagittal dimension, are unclear.

METHODS

Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023447211), relevant original studies were screened from seven databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Elsevier [SCOPUS], Cochrane, LILACS [Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature], and Google Scholar) supplemented by a manual search of the references of the full-reading manuscripts by two investigators independently. A risk of bias assessment was conducted, relevant data were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed using RStudio.

RESULTS

After the screening, 13 articles (11 involving maxillary distalization, two involving mandibular distalization) met the inclusion criteria. All studies had a high or medium risk of bias. The meta-analysis revealed that the maxillary first molar (U6) mesiobuccal cusp was distalized 2.07 mm [1.38 mm, 2.77 mm] based on the post-distalization dental model superimposition, and the U6 crown was distalized 2.00 mm [0.77 mm, 3.24 mm] based on the post-treatment lateral cephalometric evaluation. However, the U6 mesiobuccal root showed less distalization of 1.13 mm [-1.34 mm, 3.60 mm], indicating crown distal tipping, which was validated by meta-analysis (U6-PP angle: 2.19° [1.06°, 3.33°]). In addition, intra-arch anchorage loss was observed at the post-distalization time point (U1 protrusion: 0.39 mm [0.27 mm, 0.51 mm]), which was corrected at the post-treatment time point (incisal edge-PTV distance: -1.50 mm [-2.61 mm, -0.39 mm]).

CONCLUSION

About 2 mm maxillary molar distalization can be achieved with the sequential distalization protocol, accompanied by slight molar crown distal tipping. Additional studies on this topic are needed due to the high risk of bias in currently available studies.

A Simple Technique Using a Modified Nance Appliance as Anchorage for Maxillary Molar Distalization—Two Case Reports

Maxillary molar distalization to correct a dental Class II molar relationship and to create space to relieve crowding has been a long-lasting subject of debate in orthodontics. Generally, to distalize maxillary molars, an intra-arch distalization appliance is favored over an inter-arch appliance since it does not utilize mandibular dentition as an anchorage, so some unwanted side effects on mandibular incisors can be avoided. A variety of intra-arch appliances have been developed to distalize maxillary molars, such as the pendulum, Jones jig, first class appliance, distal jet, and modified C-palatal plate. Although they could achieve efficient molar distalization, the learning curve of proper appliance insertion and activation is relatively long. In addition, the appliances are not comfortable for the patients due to the bulky activation units, especially when the activation units are designed in the palatal area. The current manuscript describes a novel and effective maxillary intra-arch molar distalization appliance—a modified Nance appliance technique, which consists of: (1) palatally, a big acrylic button against the palatal rugae and connected to the premolars with wide mesh pads; (2) buccally, regular brackets on maxillary premolars and first molars with sectional round stainless steel archwires and open coil springs between the second premolar and first molar. Either bilateral or unilateral maxillary molar distalization can be achieved with this appliance, and the Class II elastics are not needed. It is simple to be fabricated, delivered, and activated, and it is comfortable for patients.

Cephalometric analysis of dental and skeletal effects of Carriere Motion 3D appliance for Class II malocclusion

INTRODUCTION

The objective was to describe the dental and skeletal changes obtained using the Carriere Motion Appliance (CMA), lateral cephalogram, and the corresponding cephalometric tracings.

METHODS

A sample of 29 patients with Class II malocclusion (mean age, 12.6 ± 1.7 years) was retrospectively selected. All patients were treated at a single center using a CMA as the primary sagittal correction device. Cephalometric tracings at the beginning and end of treatment were compared. Each cephalometric tracing was performed 3 times by the same operator.

RESULTS

Using the CMA, the 29 patients studied reached dental Class I in 4.4 ± 0.98 months. All measurements were subjected to statistical analysis, paired t test, and all displayed differences between T0 and T1 (P <0.05) except for the SNA. At the end of treatment, the Wits and ANB values were reduced by 1.38 mm and 0.8°, respectively. Overbite and overjet were also reduced by 1.4 mm and 2 mm, respectively. The SNB, FMA, LAFH, and IMPA increased to a lesser extent (ie, 0.7°, 0.4°, 1.5 mm, and 1.5°, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The CMA is a rapid and efficient means of correcting Class II malocclusion. Its effects are predominantly dentoalveolar, with minimal skeletal alteration of little clinical significance.

Treatment and posttreatment effects of Herbst appliance therapy on trabecular structure of the mandible using fractal dimension analysis

OBJECTIVES

This controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of Herbst therapy on the trabecular structure of the condyle and angulus mandible using fractal dimension analysis (FD-A) accompanied by skeletal cephalometric changes.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The panoramic and cephalometric radiographs of 30 patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance (C II-H group, mean age: 15.23 ± 1.08), 30 patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion that received fixed orthodontic treatment (C II-C group, mean age: 15.73 ± 1.38), and 30 patients with skeletal Class I malocclusion (C I-C group, mean age: 15.90 ± 1.30) were selected. FD-A was performed on the superoposterior region (C-SP) and centre of the condyles (C-C) and the mandibular angulus (Ang) on the panoramic radiographs taken at the pretreatment (T0), intermediate stage of treatment (T1), and posttreatment (T2) timepoints just like cephalometric analysis.

RESULTS

Herbst therapy provided a statistically significant increase in SNB, ANS-Me, Na-Me, S-Go, Co-Gn and a decrease in ANB and overjet (P < 0.05). All skeletal changes remained stable during the fixed appliance treatment after Herbst. The FD values in C-C increased (P < 0.05), and C-SP values decreased (P < 0.05) during Herbst therapy, while after removal of the Herbst appliance, no significant change was observed despite an increase in C-SP. The Ang value did not change during Herbst treatment, but then increased significantly (P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the FD values of the C I-C and C II-C groups at any stage of treatment. The C-C and C-SP changes at T1-T0 period, C-SP and Ang changes at T2-T1 period, and C-C, C-SP, and Ang values at T2-T0 period were found higher in C II-H group compared with the C II-C group significantly (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Herbst therapy changed the trabecular structure of the condyles in different directions at the superoposterior and central regions of the condyles, while the structural complexity of the angulus mandible, which did not change during the Herbst treatment, increased during the fixed orthodontic treatment after Herbst.

Occlusal Plane Changes After Molar Distalization With a Pendulum Appliance in Growing Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Cephalometric Study

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes after distalization with a pendulum appliance in growing patients with Class II malocclusion, focusing on the occlusal plane (OP).

Methods

The sample included 24 patients with Class II malocclusion (10 boys, 14 girls); their mean age was 12.1 years. All patients underwent molar distalization and had 2 serial cephalograms traced at baseline (T1) and after distalization (T2). Angular and linear dental changes were calculated by taking the sella-nasion (SN), palatal plane (PP), and pterygoid vertical as reference. OP inclination was compared with SN, PP, and mandibular plane. The collected data were computed for all the tested variables, and one-way paired t-test was used to assess the significance of the differences between the time points. α was set at 0.05. Multiple linear regressions were used to predict the OP changes.

Results

The mean total treatment time was 8±2 months to obtain a super Class I molar relationship. In T1-T2 interval, statistically significant incisor buccal tipping of 5°±3.6° (p<0.05), first molar distal tipping of 8.9°±8.3° (p<0.001), and second molar tipping of 8.2°±8.1° (p<0.001) were observed. The maxillary first and second molars moved significantly backward by 2.8±3.2 mm (p<0.05) and 3.7±2.7 mm (p<0.001), respectively. Only the premolars showed a statistically significant anchorage loss of 2.7±3.3 mm (p<0.05); overjet increased significantly at 1.3±1.2 mm (p<0.05). Regarding the OP, none of the tested variables showed any statistically significant changes between T1-T2.

Conclusion

The pendulum appliance showed efficacy in distalizing the maxillary first and second molars at the expense of anterior anchorage loss. The OP did not show statistically significant changes after molar distalization.