Influence of rigid lens decentration and rotation on visual image quality in normal and keratoconic eyes

Evaluation of Higher-Order Aberrations After the Smooth Incision Lenticular Keratomileusis (SILKTM) Procedure Using the ELITATM Femtosecond Platform for Correction of Myopic and Astigmatic Refractive Errors

Purpose

To evaluate the changes of higher-order wavefront aberrations following the Smooth Incision Lenticular Keratomileusis (SILKTM) procedure for correction of myopic refractive errors with and without astigmatism, using the ELITATM Femtosecond Platform.

Methods

This prospective study included 24 eyes that underwent SILK procedure using one ELITA femtosecond laser system for the correction of myopic refractive errors with and without astigmatism. Preoperative and postoperative 1-day, 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 9-month eye exams were measured with a commercial wavefront aberrometer (iDESIGN ® Refractive Studio, Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc). Wavefront aberrations up to the 6th order Zernike coefficients, including coma Z(3, -1) and Z(3, 1), spherical aberration Z(4, 1), and the wavefront error of all higher-order aberrations (HOAs RMS), were evaluated across a 6 mm pupil.

Results

The mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent changed from the preoperative refractions -3.82 ± 1.26 D (range -6.00 to -2.25 D) to the postoperative refractions -0.20 ± 0.15 D (range -0.50 to 0.00 D) at the 9-month follow-up. Compared to baseline preoperative HOAs, the mean postoperative HOAs were significantly increased at the 1-day follow-up. On average, at the 9-month postoperative assessment the vertical coma Z(3, -1) was -0.054 ±0.186 µm, horizontal coma Z(3, 1) was 0.016 ± 0.124 µm, spherical aberration Z(4, 0) was 0.046 ± 0.163 µm, and HOAs RMS was 0.363 ± 0.115 µm across a 6 mm pupil. There is no significant difference in the mean HOAs starting at 1-week follow-up for the horizontal coma (P = 0.346) and spherical aberration (P = 0.095).

Conclusions

The visual outcomes demonstrated that the SILK procedure for refractive lenticule extraction using ELITA femtosecond laser system is effective and predictable for the correction of myopic refractive errors with and without astigmatism. The ELITA femtosecond laser system induced minimal HOAs in surgical eyes following the SILK procedures. These results demonstrate fast corneal recovery starting at 1-week follow-up, and spherical aberration was not induced.

Allowable movement of wavefront-guided contact lens corrections in normal and keratoconic eyes

PURPOSE

The goal was to use SyntEyes modelling to estimate the allowable alignment error of wavefront-guided rigid contact lens corrections for a range of normal and keratoconic eye aberration structures to keep objectively measured visual image quality at or above average levels of well-corrected normal eyes. Secondary purposes included determining the required radial order of correction, whether increased radial order of the corrections further constrained the allowable alignment error and how alignment constraints vary with keratoconus severity.

METHODS

Building on previous work, 20 normal SyntEyes and 20 keratoconic SyntEyes were fitted with optimised wavefront-guided rigid contact lens corrections targeting between three and eight radial orders that drove visual image quality, as measured objectively by the visual Strehl ratio, to near 1 (best possible) over a 5-mm pupil for the aligned position. The resulting wavefront-guided contact lens was then allowed to translate up to ±1 mm in the x- and y-directions and rotate up ±15°.

RESULTS

Allowable alignment error changed as a function of the magnitude of aberration structure to be corrected, which depends on keratoconus severity. This alignment error varied only slightly with the radial order of correction above the fourth radial order. To return the keratoconic SyntEyes to average levels of visual image quality depended on maximum anterior corneal curvature (Kmax). Acceptable tolerances for misalignment that returned keratoconic visual image quality to average normal levels varied between 0.29 and 0.63 mm for translation and approximately ±6.5° for rotation, depending on the magnitude of the aberration structure being corrected.

CONCLUSIONS

Allowable alignment errors vary as a function of the aberration structure being corrected, the desired goal for visual image quality and as a function of keratoconus severity.

Keratoconus: exploring fundamentals and future perspectives - a comprehensive systematic review

Background

New developments in artificial intelligence, particularly with promising results in early detection and management of keratoconus, have favorably altered the natural history of the disease over the last few decades. Features of artificial intelligence in different machine such as anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and femtosecond laser technique have improved safety, precision, effectiveness, and predictability of treatment modalities of keratoconus (from contact lenses to keratoplasty techniques). These options ingrained in artificial intelligence are already underway and allow ophthalmologist to approach disease in the most non-invasive way.

Objectives

This study comprehensively describes all of the treatment modalities of keratoconus considering machine learning strategies.

Design

A multidimensional comprehensive systematic narrative review.

Data sources and methods

A comprehensive search was done in the five main electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane), without language and time or type of study restrictions. Afterward, eligible articles were selected by screening the titles and abstracts based on main mesh keywords. For potentially eligible articles, the full text was also reviewed.

Results

Artificial intelligence demonstrates promise in keratoconus diagnosis and clinical management, spanning early detection (especially in subclinical cases), preoperative screening, postoperative ectasia prediction after keratorefractive surgery, and guiding surgical decisions. The majority of studies employed a solitary machine learning algorithm, whereas minor studies assessed multiple algorithms that evaluated the association of various keratoconus staging and management strategies. Last but not least, AI has proven effective in guiding the implantation of intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus corneas and predicting surgical outcomes.

Conclusion

The efficient and widespread clinical translation of machine learning models in keratoconus management is a crucial goal of potential future approaches to better visual performance in keratoconus patients.

Trial registration

The article has been registered through PROSPERO, an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews, with the ID: CRD42022319338.

Book Review: Efron, N. Contact Lens Practice; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; ISBN: 978-0-7020-8427-0

The book Contact Lens Practice (ISBN 978-0-7020-8427-0), fourth edition [...].

Computational analysis of retinal image quality with different contact lens designs in keratoconus

PURPOSE

To determine 1) the relative differences in optical quality of keratoconic eyes fitted with four routinely used CL designs and 2) the Zernike coefficients in the residual wavefront aberration map that may be responsible for differences in the optical quality of keratoconic eyes fitted with these CLs.

METHODS

Wavefront aberrations over a 3-mm pupil diameter were measured without and with Kerasoft IC®, Rose K2®, conventional spherical Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP), and Scleral CLs in 15 mild to moderate keratoconic eyes (20 - 28 years) and under unaided viewing in 10 age-similar non-contact lens wearing controls. The resultant through-focus curves constructed for the logarithm of Neural Sharpness (logNS) Image Quality (IQ) metric were quantified in terms of peak value, best focus, and depth of focus. Sensitivity analyses determined the impact of the residual Zernike coefficients of keratoconic eyes fitted with CLs on the IQ of controls at emmetropic refraction.

RESULTS

The peak IQ and depth of focus were similar with Rose K2®, conventional RGP, and Scleral CLs (p > 0.05, for all) but significantly better than Kerasoft IC® CLs (p < 0.01 for all). Best focus was similar across all four CLs (p > 0.2 for all). However, the IQ parameters of all the lenses remained significantly poorer than the controls (p < 0.01, for all). The IQ of the controls dropped to keratoconic levels with induced residual lower-order Zernike terms and 3rd-order coma across all lenses in the sensitivity analysis (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

IQ of keratoconic eyes remain suboptimal with routinely dispensed CL designs, largely due to residual lower-order aberrations and coma, all relative to the controls. The performance drop appears greater for the Kerasoft IC® CL relative to the other CL designs. These results may provide the optical basis for psychophysical spatial visual performance reported earlier across these four CL designs for keratoconus.