Tumor-to-background ratio to predict response to chemotherapy of osteosarcoma better than standard uptake values

Harmonization of standard uptake values across different positron emission tomography/computed tomography systems and different reconstruction algorithms: validation in oncology patients

BACKGROUND

EQ.PET is a software package that overcomes the reconstruction-dependent variation of standard uptake values (SUV). In this study, we validated the use of EQ.PET for harmonizing SUVs between different positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) systems and reconstruction algorithms.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 49 patients with various cancers were scanned on a Biograph mCT (mCT) or Gemini TF 16 (Gemini) after [¹⁸F]FDG injections. Three groups of patient data were collected: Group 1, patients scanned on mCT or Gemini with data reconstructed using two parameters; Group 2, patients scanned twice on different PET scanners (interval between two scans, 68.9 ± 41.4 days); and Group 3, patients scanned twice using mCT with data reconstructed using different algorithms (interval between two scans, 109.5 ± 60.6 days). The SUVs of the lesions and background were measured, and the tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) were calculated. In addition, the consistency between the two reconstruction algorithms and confounding factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

In Group 1, the consistency of SUV and TBR between different reconstruction algorithms improved when the EQ.PET filter was applied. In Group 2, by comparing ΔSUV, ΔSUV%, ΔTBR, and ΔTBR% with and without the EQ.PET, the results showed significant differences (P < 0.05). In Group 3, Bland-Altman analysis of ΔSUV with EQ.PET showed an improved consistency relative to that without EQ.PET.

CONCLUSIONS

EQ.PET is an efficient tool to harmonize SUVs and TBRs across different reconstruction algorithms. Patients could benefit from the harmonized SUV, ΔSUV, and ΔSUV% for therapy responses and follow-up evaluations.

Evaluation of OTL38-Generated Tumor-to-Background Ratio in Intraoperative Molecular Imaging-Guided Lung Cancer Resections

INTRODUCTION

Cancer surgery has multiple challenges including localizing small lesions, ensuring negative margins, and identifying synchronous cancers. One of the tools proposed to address these issues is intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI). An important consideration in IMI is the quantification of the tumor fluorescence during the procedure and using that data to add clinical value. Currently, the most commonly cited measure of quantification is the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR). Our goal was to evaluate the clinical value of TBR measured with OTL38 NIR tracer during a lung cancer resection.

METHODS

Intraoperative data was retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected 5-year database. Between 2015 and 2020, 279 patients were included in the study. For standardization, all patients underwent infusion of the same targeted molecular optical contrast agent (OTL38) for lung cancer resections; then, the mean fluorescence intensity of the tumors and background tissues were calculated. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the TBR calculation, the results were correlated with patient, biologic, tumor, and technological factors.

RESULTS

For pulmonary surgery, patient factors such as gender, age, smoking history, and time from infusion of OTL38 to surgery did not have any statistical significance in predicting the TBR during surgery. In addition, TBR measurements did not correlate with location of the tumor in the lung (p = 0.123). There was no statistical correlation of preoperative positron emission tomography measurements (standardized uptake value) with intraoperative TBR. However, there was statistically significant negative correlation of in situ TBR measurement and the distance of the lesion from the surface of the organ (p < 0.001). Adenocarcinoma spectrum lesions overall had statistically significant correlation with in situ fluorescence compared to other NSCLC malignancies (p < 0.01) but TBR measurements could not identify histopathologic subtype on univariate analysis (p = 0.089). There was a tendency for in situ fluorescence for moderately and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma spectrum lesions, but this was not statistically significant. When comparing the in situ TBR of benign to malignant nodules in the lung, there was no statistically significant association (p = 0.145). In subset analysis, adenocarcinoma spectrum lesions tend to fluoresce at brighter with OTL38 compared to other histologic subtypes.

CONCLUSION

In our various iterations, the results of our retrospective analysis did not show that TBR measurements during OTL38-guided surgery provide clinically useful information about the nature of the nodule or cancer. The true value of IMI is in the ability for the surgeon to use the fluorescence to guide the surgeon to the tumor and margins, but that sophisticated quantification of the amount of fluorescence may not have clinical utility.

Unsupervised Clustering Reveals Sarcoidosis Phenotypes Marked by a Reduction in Lymphocytes Relate to Increased Inflammatory Activity on 18FDG-PET/CT

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a T-helper cell mediated disease characterized by granulomatous inflammation. We posited that unsupervised clustering of various features in sarcoidosis would establish phenotypes associated with inflammatory activity measured by 18FDG-PET/CT. Our goal was to identify unique features capable of distinguishing clusters and subsequently examine the relationship with FDG avidity to substantiate their potential use as markers for sarcoidosis inflammation.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of a diverse, but primarily African American, cohort of 58 subjects with biopsy proven sarcoidosis followed at the University of Illinois Bernie Mac Sarcoidosis Center and Center for Lung Health who underwent 18FDG-PET/CT scan. Demographic, therapeutic, radiographic, and laboratory data were utilized in unsupervised cluster analysis to identify sarcoidosis phenotypes. The association between clusters, their defining features, and quantitative measurements on 18FDG-PET/CT was determined. The relevance of these features as markers of 18FDG-PET/CT inflammatory activity was also investigated.

Results: Clustering determined three distinct phenotypes: (1) a predominantly African American cluster with chronic, quiescent disease, (2) a predominantly African American cluster with elevated conventional inflammatory markers, advanced pulmonary disease and extrathoracic involvement, and (3) a predominantly Caucasian cluster characterized by reduced lymphocyte counts and acute disease. In contrast to the chronic quiescent cluster, Clusters 2 and 3 were defined by significantly greater FDG avidity on 18FDG-PET/CT. Despite similarly increased inflammatory activity on 18FDG-PET/CT, Clusters 2, and 3 differed with regards to extrathoracic FDG avidity and circulating lymphocyte profiles, specifically CD4+ T-cells. Notably, absolute lymphocyte counts and CD4+ T-cell counts were found to predict 18FDG-PET/CT inflammatory activity by receiver operating curve analysis with a 69.2 and 73.42% area under the curve, respectively.

Conclusions: Utilizing cluster analysis, three distinct phenotypes of sarcoidosis were identified with significant variation in race, disease chronicity, and serologic markers of inflammation. These phenotypes displayed varying levels of circulating inflammatory cells. Additionally, reduction in lymphocytes, specifically CD4+ T-cells, was significantly related to activity on 18FDG-PET/CT. Though future studies are warranted, these findings suggest that peripheral lymphocyte counts may be considered a determinant of sarcoidosis phenotypes and an indicator of active inflammation on 18FDG-PET/CT.

[Postoperative and posttherapeutic changes after primary bone tumors : What's important for radiologists?]

Posttreatment imaging of primary bone tumours represents a diagnostic challenge for radiologists. Depending on the primary bone tumour common radiological procedures, such as radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are employed. Radiography and CT are particularly useful in benign bone tumours and in matrix-forming bone tumours. MRI comes into consideration with malignant tumour recurrence and tumoral soft tissue infiltration. Bone scintigraphy is of superior importance if a primarily multifocal manifestation of bone tumour or metastasizing tumour disease is suspected. Molecular imaging (FDG-PET and hybrid imaging, using CT) are gaining increasing importance in light of monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy and detecting recurrent tumour appearance. The current literature shows sensitivity and specificity values for recurrent detection of up to 92% and 93%. Diagnostic accuracy is as high as 95%, thus, exceeding accuracy values for CT (67%) and MRI (86%) by far. Likewise, this is also applicable for the assessment of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, PET-based modalities are able to establish prognostic statements using SUV-threshold values at baseline (especially for Ewing sarcomas). Advanced imaging techniques have made a great diagnostic step forward and have proven to be relevant and reproducible with respect to both relapse detection and treatment assessment. Furthermore, it is not clear whether a higher detection rate of early tumour recurrence will inevitably lead to better outcome and survival.

Preliminary Application of Precision Genomic Medicine Detecting Gene Variation in Patients with Multifocal Osteosarcoma

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to present our clinical experience of treating multifocal osteosarcoma (MFOS) in our center and gain more insight into the biology of this rare condition; in particular, to address with the help of precision genomic medicine the issue of whether the multiple osteosarcoma (OS) lesions in such patients are multi-centric or originate from one primary lesion and metastasize to other sites. Finally, we aimed to identify particular gene phenotypes and mutations that differentiate MFOS from OS with only one tumor.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with MFOS treated at our center between June 2007 and October 2014 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. High throughput sequencing of the whole exome of normal tissue and multiple lesions had been performed on samples from two patients (HJF and JZ) diagnosed in 2014. To explore the particular gene phenotype and clinical significance of MFOS, these sequencing results were analyzed and compared with those from patients with osteosarcoma in a single site. Seven patients with MFOS (three male and four female; average age 19.71 ± 3.35 years were enrolled in this study. Two of these patients declined treatment and died after 4 and 6 months, respectively. The remaining patients received standard treatment comprising neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen was lobaplatin (45 mg/m(2) ), doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2) ) and ifosfamide (12 g/m(2) ). Patients were followed up every 3 months after completing treatment and evaluated by the Enneking and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors scoring systems.

RESULTS

Up to the last follow-up on 1 December 2015, three patients were still alive. The event-free survival ranged from 4 to 144 weeks (median, 50.14 weeks), the mean (±SD) being 55.45 ± 45.47 weeks. Overall survival ranged from 16 to 388 weeks (median, 89 weeks; mean ± SD, 118.7 ± 147.7 weeks). The rates of mutation of the targeted drug-related genes were 133.5% ± 3.0% in the proximal tibia lesion and 113.1% ± 1.9% in the distal femur of patient HJF (P < 0.01) and 136.1% ± 10.8% in the proximal tibial lesion and 122.3% ± 5.5% in the proximal humerus of patient JZ (P = 0.0335). Furthermore, there were several anti-oncogenes in the somatic copy number variation lists analyzed from the two patients, especially TP53. However, no kataegis was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Early and radical surgery accompanied by appropriate chemotherapy is the optimal means of treating MFOS. These patients may benefit from precision genomic medicine.

UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas

This document is an update of the British Sarcoma Group guidelines published in 2010. The aim is to provide a reference standard for the clinical care of patients in the UK with bone sarcomas. Recent recommendations by the European Society of Medical Oncology, The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have been incorporated, and the literature since 2010 reviewed. The standards represent a consensus amongst British Sarcoma Group members in 2015. It is acknowledged that these guidelines will need further updates as care evolves. The key recommendations are that bone pain or a palpable mass should always lead to further investigation and that patients with clinico-radiological findings suggestive of a primary bone tumour at any site in the skeleton should be referred to a specialist centre and managed by a fully accredited bone sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Treatment recommendations are provided for the major tumour types and for localised, metastatic and recurrent disease. Follow up schedules are suggested.