Improving Tibial Component Coronal Alignment During Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Double-Check Technique

The main cause of tibial prosthesis malalignment after total knee arthroplasty in Southern Chinese population

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the occurrence rate of malalignment of tibial prosthesis and explore the influencing factors.

Methods

296 patients from Southern China who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were selected as the research objects. Their general demographic data were recorded. The tibial bowing angle (TBA), tibial length, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), tibial plateau shift angle (TPSA), tibial bone loss, lateral distal tibial angle, and overall width of tibial plateau and widths of medial and lateral tibial plateau were measured before TKA. The tibial component coronal alignment angle (TCCA) was measured after the operation. Malalignment of the tibial prosthesis was defined as TCCA <87° or TCCA >93°. Tibial bowing was indicated by TBA >2°, and lateral bowing was recorded as +. The correlations of TCCA with demographic data and pre-operation imaging measurement parameters were statistically analyzed.

Results

Bivariate correlation analysis revealed negative correlations between TCCA and TBA (r = -0.602, P < 0.001) and TPSA (r = -0.304, P < 0.001), and a positive correlation with MPTA (r = -0.318, P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant negative correlation between TCCA and TBA (P < 0.001). The occurrence rate of malalignment of tibial prosthesis was 12.37 %. The occurrence rates of malalignment were 22.54 % in the tibial bowing group and 6.87 % in the non-tibial bowing group, showing statistical differences (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The malalignment rate of tibial prosthesis among Southern Chinese patients is relatively high, possibly attributed to the tibial anatomy anomalies, particularly the tibial bowing. The entry point should be determined based on tibial morphology.

Functional Outcome of Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery: A Short-Term Cohort Study at an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital

Background

In severe arthritis cases, goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) management is to attain pain-free joint and restore the overall limb alignment. There are limited short-term studies published from Indian hospitals that investigated the importance of neutral mechanical component alignment in TKA patients.

Methods

Retrospective and prospective study was conducted at the Department of orthopaedics, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune from June 2020 to September 2022. Enrolled patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using clinical examination, radiological assessment and functional outcomes through the Oxford knee score, Knee society score and VAS score.

Results

204 patients enrolled, and 267 knees were evaluated for the study. Osteoarthritis was the commonest diagnosis (254 knees, 95.13%). Pre-operatively, 92.13% knees were varus, 4.87% valgus and 3% neutral while post-operatively, 51.69% were varus, 16.1% were valgus, and 32.32% were with neutral axis. Majority of patients with a pre-operative neutral axis converted to varus axis (62.5%), while most valgus axis cases preoperatively converted to a neutral axis (53.84%). For pre-operative varus subgroup, the majority patients with < 10° pre-operative axis converted to neutral (41.28%). Majority patients with 10°-20° pre-operative axis remained varus (60.53%) and with > 20° pre-operative axis remained varus (78.26%). Functional outcome parameters were significantly improved at follow-up (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Short-term postoperative functional scores were significantly improved in postoperative cases, with the postoperative alignment of 0° ± 3° relative to the mechanical axis was achieved. Thus, postoperative neutral mechanical alignment of 0° ± 3° can be the standard of care for patients undergoing TKA.

Graphical abstract

The Early Clinical Outcomes Following Unrestricted Caliper Verified Kinematic Alignment Using a Medial Stabilized Design Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Cruciate Retaining Insert

Background

Although various total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant designs are widely used, the ideal TKA design is yet to be agreed upon. Although the benefits of cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA and medial stabilized (MS) TKA have been reported in literature, the early clinical outcomes of an MS TKA with CR inserts have not been reported. This study aims to report on the patient-reported clinical and radiological outcomes of MS-TKA combined with a CR insert.

Methods

A prospective single-surgeon series evaluated the clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of 115 patients implanted with GMK Sphere CR. Patient outcomes were assessed with the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), Forgotten Joint Score, and Visual Analogue Scale for Satisfaction. Radiological assessment for alignment along with active flexion and extension were also assessed.

Results

Improvement in all scores was observed between the preoperative and 1-year follow-up timepoints, with statistical significance seen for Oxford Knee Score as well as KOOS Symptoms, Pain, Sport, quality of life, and activities of daily living subscales. The mean active flexion between the preoperative and both postoperative timepoints at 6 months and 1 year was also statistically significant (P = .021 and P = .001).

Conclusions

MS-TKA with a CR insert can facilitate symptom relief and improve overall function of the knee after surgery. Both the patient and clinical outcomes were comparable to 1-year outcomes utilizing other MS-TKA designs and were superior to those at 1-year follow-up following implantation of CR-TKA. Most notability, the KOOS symptoms and sports score were higher for the MS-TKA with a CR insert than for an MS-TKA design.

A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens

PURPOSE

Robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen a rapid increase in utilization with recent literature suggesting that implant accuracy and resection are better optimized than in conventional TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of robotic-assisted versus conventional TKA in minimizing biplanar femoral and tibial resection error in cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching through PubMed, Cochrane library, and Embase to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of robotic assisted and conventional TKA, according to standard PRISMA guidelines. Evaluated outcomes included femoral coronal resection error (deg), femoral sagittal resection error (deg), tibial coronal resection error (deg), and tibial sagittal resection error (deg).

RESULTS

Seven studies met inclusion criteria, including a total of 140 cadaveric specimens (robotic: 70, conventional: 70), for resection accuracy between robotic and conventional TKA. Pooled analysis from seven studies revealed a significant difference in femoral coronal and sagittal resection error in favor of robotic systems compared to conventional systems (p < 0.001 & p < 0.001, respectively). The pooled analysis from seven studies revealed a significant difference in tibial sagittal resection error in favor of robotic systems compared to conventional systems following TKA (p = 0.012). Posthoc power analysis revealed a power of 87.2%.

CONCLUSION

The use of robotic TKA is associated with lower femoral coronal, lower femoral sagittal and tibial sagittal resection error compared to conventional TKA. It should be noted that these findings are purely biomechanical - surgeons should interpret these findings along with clinical differences between conventional and robotic systems to determine which system is best for each patient.

Improved angle accuracy of tibial plateau osteotomy for total knee arthroplasty using tibial mechanical axis skin-mapping

Background

The tibial crest is often used as an anatomic landmark for tibial plateau osteotomy (TPO) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but it is not very accurate. This study aimed to investigate errors in using the tibial crest as a marker and present a simple approach to improve the angle accuracy of TPO by mapping the tibial mechanical axis (TMA), determined preoperatively, according to the tibial crest on the skin overlying the tibia.

Methods

We evaluated 50 healthy young volunteers and 100 pre-TKA osteoarthritic knees. The middle tibial crest lines (MTCLs) were marked on the shank tibial skin and covered with Kirschner wires. All participants underwent two sets of anteroposterior (AP) standing radiographs of the lower extremity, with the feet in neutral and external rotation positions. The MTCL-TMA angles were measured and compared. The TMA was mapped onto the tibial skin according to the MTCL-TMA angle prior to TKA and used for TPO. Postoperative outcomes were determined by the angle between the vertical tibial component axis (TCA) and the TMA.

Results

The MTCL had no evident relationship with the TMA. A few MTCLs were parallel to the TMA. External rotation of the foot significantly changed the MTCL-TMA relationship. The angle accuracy of the TPO as guided by TMA skin-mapping was 0.83 ± 0.76°. No postoperative errors exceeded 3°.

Conclusion

The MTCL was not equivalent to the TMA. The TPO error can be reduced by preoperatively marking the TMA on the tibial skin according to the MTCL.

Prevalence of proximal tibia vara in Indonesian population with knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Proximal tibia vara has drawn interest since the concept of constitutional varus was introduced. Proximal tibia vara is a condition where the knee varus tilt the tibia condyle medially and shift the tibial articular surface medially. This condition affects medial proximal tibial angle measurements and the placement of the tibial implant in knee replacement surgery. Thus, it challenged the neutral knee arthroplasty alignment target because some people may present a proximal tibia vara. This study assesses the prevalence of the proximal tibia vara and the correlation to knee osteoarthritis grade.

METHODS

This retrospective study was carried out from January 2021 to June 2021. Eighty-five limbs were included with the following inclusion criteria: knee osteoarthritis patients who received a long view lower extremity radiograph. The exclusions criteria were (1) patients who had undergone arthroplasty and lower extremity surgery before and (2) valgus knee deformity. The outcomes in this study were HKAA, MAD, TAD, MPTA, PTRP, LDFA, and PTS. Intraclass correlation (ICC) using two-way mixed was used to assess the reproducibility of the radiographic parameters. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the correlation between knee osteoarthritis grade and radiographs parameters (MAD and TAD).

RESULT

A total 85 limbs from 52 patients were assessed in this study. Proximal tibia vara was found in 18 knees (21%.). The logistic regression was performed to assess the correlation between the severity of the knee osteoarthritis and radiographic parameters (MAD, TAD, LDFA, and PTS) with an overall p-value < 0.001 and pseudo-R² = 0.29.

CONCLUSION

A significant portion of patients with knee osteoarthritis have proximal tibia vara, and it is a pre-existing condition. Since the pre-existing proximal tibia vara affects preoperative measurements, a long-standing lower extremity x-ray is recommended to be obtained as part of knee replacement preparation.

Comparison of Kinematic Alignment and Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

The aim of this study was to estimate whether kinematic alignment (KA) improves knee function or clinical outcomes compared with mechanical alignment (MA) in the short term after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials published before January 2020 from PubMed, EMBASE, Google, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and other databases. The observation markers included "The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index," "Knee Society Score (KSS)," "Oxford Knee Score (OKS)," "combined Knee Society Score (KSS)," "Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)," "European Quality of Life Measure-5 Domain-5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)," range of motion (ROM), lower limb alignment, ligament release, and complications. A total of 11 randomized controlled trial studies were included in the study. During the follow-up of 6-24 months, the KA-TKA group was superior to the MA-TKA group in terms of WOMAC scores, combined KSS, KSS, knee function scores, and knee range of flexion, but there was no significant difference in EQ-5D-5L, KOOS, KOOS (symptoms, pain, ADL, sports, and quality of life), complications, knee range of extension, hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, tibial component slope angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) or medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) angle between the MA-TKA group and the MA-TKA group (P > 0.05). Our meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of ligament release in the MA-TKA group was higher than that in the KA-TKA group. This meta-analysis shows that the KA-TKA group had better clinical outcomes and knee range of flexion than the MA-TKA group at short-term follow-up.