Therapeutic Effect of Acetabular Fractures Using the Pararectus Approach Combined with 3D Printing Technique

Developing a core outcome set for acetabular fractures: a systematic review (part I)

BACKGROUND

There are indications that clinical studies investigating the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures assess different outcomes. This heterogeneity reduces the comparability of study results and, thus, limits the knowledge generated from research. Core outcome sets (COS) contain a minimum set of outcomes that should be measured in studies investigating a specific disease or injury. A COS for surgically treated acetabular fractures does not yet exist. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify the reported outcomes in studies investigating the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures.

METHODS

Studies including skeletally mature individuals (≥ 16 years) with isolated acetabular fractures treated surgically were included. Studies with polytrauma patients, pathological fractures, additional pelvic fractures, exclusively non-surgical treatment, or juvenile individuals were excluded. Three databases and two clinical trial registries were searched on 15 November 2022. The identified outcomes were grouped and subsequently categorized according to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 193 studies were included, which reported a cumulative total of 2581 outcomes. After grouping, 266 unique outcomes were identified. No outcome was examined in all studies. Pain, ability to walk independently, range of motion, quality of reduction, and heterotopic ossification were the most reported unique outcomes and assessed in at least 60% of included studies. A total of 105 outcomes were only assessed in one of the included studies. Outcomes of all five core areas and 25 outcome domains of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy were examined. Furthermore, outcomes were named and defined differently, measured at different time points, and assessed using a variety of measurement instruments.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this systematic review shows that a wide range of outcomes are measured in studies examining surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. The results of this systematic review will be used in a subsequent study to develop the COS for surgically treated acetabular fractures by using the Delphi method.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42022357644; COMET: 2123.

[Experiences with the infra-acetabular screw placement technique in acetabular fracture surgery]

Objective

To investigate the application experiences and effectiveness of the infra-acetabular screw (IAS) placement technique in acetabular fracture surgery.

Methods

A clinical data of 34 patients with complex acetabular fractures with anterior and posterior columns separation, who were admitted between January 2019 and October 2023 and treated with IAS fixation, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 23 males and 11 females with an average age of 55.3 years (range, 18-78 years). The acetabular fractures caused by traffic accident in 20 cases, falling from height in 12 cases, crushing injury in 1 case, and bruising with a heavy object in 1 case. According to the Letournel-Judet classification, there were 7 cases of anterior column fracture, 8 cases of anterior wall/column plus posterior hemi-transverse fracture, 2 cases of T-shaped fracture, and 17 cases of both-column fracture. The time from injury to surgery was 4-21 days (mean, 8.6 days). The time of IAS placement and the intraoperative blood loss were recorded. After surgery, the X-ray film and CT scan were re-examined, and the modified Matta score was used to assess the quality of fracture reduction. The trajectory of IAS in the channel was analyzed based on CT scan, and the screw length was measured. During follow-up, the fracture healing was observed and the hip function was assessed according to the modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scoring system at last follow-up.

Results

The IAS was successfully implanted in all 34 patients. The length of IAS ranged from 70 to 100 mm (mean, 86.2 mm). The time of IAS placement ranged from 10 to 40 minutes (mean, 20.7 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss ranged from 520 to 820 mL (mean, 716.8 mL). All patients were followed up 8-62 months (mean, 21.8 months). After surgery, 4 patients developed lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, 2 developed popliteal vein thrombosis of the lower extremity, 3 developed incision infection, and no surgical complication such as arteriovenous injury or obturator nerve palsy occurred. At last follow-up, the hip function was rated as excellent in 14 cases, good in 13 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 3 cases according to the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scoring system, with an excellent and good rate of 79.41%. Imaging re-examined showed that the quality of fracture reduction was rated as excellent in 9 cases, good in 19 cases, and poor in 6 cases according to the modified Matta score, with an excellent and good rate of 82.35%; and 25 (73.53%) IAS trajectories were located in the channel. All fractures obtained bony union, and the healing time was 12-24 weeks (mean, 18 weeks). During follow-up, there was no loosening or fracture of the plate and screws.

Conclusion

IAS placement technique can effectively strengthen internal fixation and prevent fracture re-displacement, making it a useful adjunct for treating complex acetabular fractures with anterior and posterior columns separation.

Minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs: Ex vivo feasibility study and case report

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate minimally invasive repair of acetabular fractures in dogs using plates contoured to 3D-printed hemipelvic models.

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo feasibility study and case report.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Adult canine cadavers (n = 5); 8 year old male neutered Chihuahua.

METHODS

Bone plates were contoured to 3D printed hemipelvic models derived from computed tomographic scans of each dog. In cadavers, acetabular, ischial, and pubic osteotomies were performed. A small craniolateral approach to the ilial body and a caudal approach to the ischium were made and connected through epiperiosteal tunnels. Under fluoroscopic guidance, fractures were reduced, and precontoured bone plates were applied with locking screws. Postoperative computed tomographic images were used to assess fracture gaps, step defects, and pelvic angulation. Cadavers were dissected for subjective assessment of sciatic nerve injury. Radiographic and clinical follow up was acquired for the clinical case.

RESULTS

Small fracture gaps (<2 mm) and step defects (<1 mm), low pelvic angulation (<5°), and minimal (none n = 4 and mild n = 1) sciatic nerve injuries were observed in cadaver testing. There was slight (~1 mm) medial displacement of the pubic segment and good functional outcome for the clinical case, with radiographic healing documented at 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive acetabular fracture repair in dogs with the aid of 3D printing was feasible and accurate.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Minimally invasive repair techniques assisted by 3D printing may be applicable for acetabular fractures in dogs. The technique should be evaluated further before routine use can be recommended.

Does 3D Printing-Assisted Acetabular or Pelvic Fracture Surgery Shorten Hospitalization Durations among Older Adults?

Acetabular or anterior pelvic ring fractures are rare but extremely complicated and challenging injuries for orthopedic trauma surgeons. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is widely used in the management of these two fracture types for surgical benefits. Our study aimed to explore whether 3D printing-assisted acetabular or pelvic surgery is beneficial in terms of shortening the length of hospital stay (LHS) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (ICU LS) for older patients. This retrospective study included two groups of 76 participants over 60 years old who underwent operations with (n = 41) or without (n = 35) guidance by 3D printing. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous variables. Chi-square analysis was applied for categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models were used to analyze the factors associated with LHS. The median LHS in the group without 3D printing assistance was 16 (12–21) days, and the median ICU LS was 0 (0–2) days. The median LHS in the group with 3D printing assistance was 17 (12.5–22.5) days, and the median ICU LS was 0 (0–3) days. There was no significant difference in LHS associated with 3D printing assistance vs. that without 3D printing among patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic or acetabular fractures. The LHS positively correlated with the ICU LS whether the operation was 3D printing assisted or not. For fracture surgery in older patients, in addition to the advancement of surgical treatment and techniques, medical teams require more detailed preoperative evaluations, and more personalized medical plans regarding postoperative care to achieve the goals of shortening LHS, reducing healthcare costs, and reducing complication rates.

Does 3D-Assisted Acetabular Fracture Surgery Improve Surgical Outcome and Physical Functioning?-A Systematic Review

Three-dimensional technology is increasingly being used in acetabular fracture treatment. No systematic reviews are available about the added clinical value of 3D-assisted acetabular fracture surgery compared to conventional surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether 3D-assisted acetabular fracture surgery compared to conventional surgery improves surgical outcomes in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy usage, complications, and postoperative fracture reduction, and whether it improves physical functioning. Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for articles on 3D technologies in acetabular fracture surgery, published between 2010 and February 2021. The McMaster critical review form was used to assess the methodological quality. Differences between 3D-assisted and conventional surgery were evaluated using the weighted mean and odds ratios. Nineteen studies were included. Three-dimensional-assisted surgery resulted in significantly shorter operation times (162.5 ± 79.0 versus 296.4 ± 56.0 min), less blood loss (697.9 ± 235.7 mL versus 1097.2 ± 415.5 mL), and less fluoroscopy usage (9.3 ± 5.9 versus 22.5 ± 20.4 times). The odds ratios of complications and fracture reduction were 0.5 and 0.4 for functional outcome in favour of 3D-assisted surgery, respectively. Three-dimensional-assisted surgery reduces operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy usage, and complications. Evidence for the improvement of fracture reduction and functional outcomes is limited.