Prophylactic Closed Suction Drainage Is Irrelevant to Accelerated Rehabilitation after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Closed Distal Femur Fractures

Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between closed suction drainage and postoperative infection in patients with tibial plateau or pilon fractures. Secondarily, this study assessed whether intrawound vancomycin powder modified the association of closed surgical drains with infection.

METHODS

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the Effect of Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Operatively Treated High-risk Tibia Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial (VANCO).

SETTING

Thirty-six academic trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

All patients with high-risk tibia fractures Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (OTA/AO classification 41B/C or 43B/C) from the VANCO trial were considered. Closed suction drains were placed based on the treating surgeon's discretion. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1-gram intrawound vancomycin powder in the surgical wound at definitive fixation or the standard infection prevention protocol at each center.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Deep surgical site infection (SSI) within 6 months. Comparisons were made between patients treated with and without drains. Subgroup analysis also examined the effect of drains in patients with and without intrawound vancomycin powder.

RESULTS

Of the 978 study patients, 197 (20%) were treated with drains. Deep infection rates did not significantly differ between patients with or without surgical drains (8% vs. 8%, P = 0.88). However, intrawound vancomycin powder significantly modified the association of surgical drains on deep SSI (interaction P = 0.048). Specifically, patients with drains but no vancomycin powder had the highest deep infection rate (13%; 95% confidence interval, 6%-19%). When vancomycin powder was used in addition to a drain, deep SSI rates were reduced by 10% (95% confidence interval, 2%-17%, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that closed suction drains after operative fixation of high-risk tibia fractures may not be associated with deep infection in general. However, a secondary analysis raises the possibility that drains are associated with reduced deep infection rates if topical vancomycin powder is used but associated with increased infection rates if vancomycin powder is not used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Drain versus no-drain at the donor sites of iliac crest bone graft: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Closed suction drainage is typically used in orthopaedic surgery to reduce the occurrence of incision complications. However, whether drainage tubes should be routinely placed in iliac crest bone graft surgeries is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of closed suction drainage at iliac crest bone donor site on clinical prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

G.Power was used for a prior analysis to estimate the required sample size. 91 patients with tibial plateau fractures who underwent iliac crest harvesting and grafting between January 2019 and January 2022 were enrolled in the study. All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon team. Patients were divided into close suction drainage (CSD) group and no-CSD group according to the use of drainage tube. The demographic and perioperative data of the patients were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups except that the CSD group had more people with diabetes. The use of closed suction drainage in patients undergoing iliac crest harvest can significantly reduce the incidence of incision complications without increasing pain level and extending hospital stay. However, the closed suction drainage obviously caused the increase of blood loss. More drainage tubes would cause more drainage fluid to flow out. And drainage tube placement may impose a higher financial burden on patients.

CONCLUSION

The closed suction drainage should not be recommended routinely for iliac crest bone graft patients. Only when the patient is at high risk for infection and without severe blood loss, placing a single drainage tube is recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at (NCT04807062) and approved by the Ethics Committee of the participating institution (Theoretical No. 2015-003-1).

Utility of prophylactic closed suction drainage in open reduction and internal fixation for tibial plateau fracture

PURPOSE

The usefulness of closed suction drains (CSD) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of tibial plateau fractures is a contested topic. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of CSD in postoperative outcomes after tibial plateau fracture.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent primary repair of closed tibial plateau fractures via an anterolateral approach between June 2021 to May 2022 at a single academic center. Fifty-six patients were included and 28 received CSDs at time of surgery. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included. There was no significant difference in demographics, pre- and post-op hemoglobin, estimated blood loss during surgery, length of stay, postoperative MMEs and pain at 3 month follow-up, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), compartment syndrome, flexion contracture, use of incisional vac, infection rate, wound drainage, hematoma, neurologic pain, dehiscence, additional surgery, or range of motion at 3 months follow-up. We noted a significant difference in Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) on POD1, demonstrating greater pain in those in the CSD group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the use of CSD in ORIF of tibial plateau fractures may not be of significant prophylactic benefit. CSDs in ORIF patients were associated with increased early postoperative pain and had no identifiable benefits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Drain vs. no-drain for acetabular fractures after treatment via a modified stoppa approach: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of close suction drainage (CSD) and no-CSD after a modified Stoppa approach for the surgical fixation of acetabular fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 49 consecutive acetabular fracture patients, who presented to a single level I trauma center for surgical fixation, using a modified Stoppa approach from January 2018 to January 2021. All surgeries were performed by a senior surgeon using the same approach, and the patients were divided into two groups based on whether CSD was used after the operation. Details of the patient demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative indicators, reduction quality, intra and postoperative blood transfusion, clinical outcomes, and incision-related complications were collected.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in the demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative indicators, reduction quality, clinical outcomes, and incision-related complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The use of CSD was associated with a significantly higher postoperative blood transfusion volume (P = 0.034) and postoperative blood transfusion rate (P = 0.027). In addition, there was a significant difference in postoperative temperatures, especially on postoperative Day 2 (no-CSD 36.97 ± 0.51°C vs. CSD 37.34 ± 0.69°C, P = 0.035), and higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, especially on postoperative Day 1 (no-CSD 3.00 ± 0.93 vs. CSD 4.14 ± 1.43, P = 0.002) and 3 (no-CSD 1.73 ± 0.94 vs. CSD 2.48 ± 1.08, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that routine use of CSD should not be recommended for patients with acetabular fractures after surgical fixation using a modified Stoppa approach.

Characteristics of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Isolated Lower Extremity Fractures and Unsolved Problems in Guidelines: A Review of Recent Literature

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) has been characterized by a disorder of venous return caused by abnormal blood clotting in deep veins. It often occurs in the lower limbs and is a common complication in orthopaedics. Therefore, relevant professional organizations domestic and overseas had formulated and constantly updated relevant guidelines to prevent the occurrence of DVT. According to the management strategy of the guidelines, the incidence of DVT can be significantly reduced. However, due to the variety of fractures types, the guidelines cannot expound precautions and characteristics of DVT for all fracture types at present, and there are other related unresolved problems. For example, there is still a lack of consistent optimal strategies for the management of DVT following isolated lower extremity fractures with a higher incidence. The best anticoagulant strategies for patients with upper limb fractures, pediatric fractures, and those combined with other injuries are rarely described in orthopaedic guidelines, but such fractures are common in clinical orthopaedics. The long‐term complications after DVT, such as post‐thrombotic syndrome, are not well‐understood. In the absence of clear guidance, orthopaedic surgeons often resort to empiric anticoagulation or conservative treatment, so the prevention effects of DVT are inconsistent. The purpose of this review is to summarize the characteristics of DVT events after isolated lower extremity fractures and to discuss the unsolved issues in the guidelines by reviewing the previous literature and tracing the history of DVT discovery, to provide more scientific and comprehensive recommendations for the prediction and prevention of DVT.