Non-Anatomical Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear to Posterior Cruciate Ligament for Patients with Normal Lower Limb Alignment

Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies of Meniscus Root Tears: A Scoping Review

Background

Meniscus root tears comprise 10% to 21% of all meniscal tears. These tears alter knee biomechanics, elevating contact pressure, akin to a meniscectomy. Consequently, they are linked to advanced joint degeneration and cartilage damage in the affected compartment.

Purpose

To systematically evaluate and relate the current literature describing the diagnosis and treatment strategies for meniscus root tears.

Study Design

Scoping review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

This review was conducted following the guidelines of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for scoping reviews. Inclusion criteria encompassed English-language clinical and preclinical research, technical notes, and narrative reviews on meniscus root tears. Exclusion criteria were studies on patellar tendon rupture, studies on medial patellofemoral ligament rupture with additional knee joint ligament injuries, studies of patients <16 years old, and studies involving open fractures. The data were summarized using a descriptive analysis and a thematic analysis.

Results

After 1425 articles were identified, 461 studies were included; 17% (n = 78) were case reports or case series, 15% (n = 71) were technical notes, 9% (n = 41) addressed aspects of diagnosis, 7% (n = 32 ) were narrative reviews, and 5% (n = 21) were systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Studies presenting original data comprised 57% (n = 262) of all included studies, and 97% of the studies were of evidence levels 3 to 5. Contributions were mainly from the United States (n = 123; 27%), Republic of Korea (n = 102; 22%), and Japan (n = 99; 21%). Many studies (n = 216; 47%) focused on the treatment and outcomes of meniscus root tears. A significant chronological surge in the quantity of studies addressing the diagnosis and treatment of meniscus root tears was evident, particularly over the past 3 years. Consensus was found regarding the definition of meniscus root tears, the advantages of early repair, and postoperative rehabilitation protocols. The variations in surgical techniques and operative strategies created the greatest amount of contention, along with clinical assessment and imaging modalities.

Conclusion

High-level evidence studies for diagnosing and managing meniscus root tears were scarce. A consensus has yet to be reached regarding the role of concomitant osteotomy, comparison of repair techniques, the use of a centralization stitch, patient factors affecting outcomes, and long-term outcomes of nonoperative management.

Mid-term patient-reported outcomes are inferior in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy patients with untreated medial meniscus posterior root tear

Purpose

The impact of untreated medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tear (MMPRT) during opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains poorly understood. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between the presence of MMPRT and post-operative PROs in patients who underwent OWHTO.

Methods

A total of 83 knees that underwent OWHTO that were followed up for 6.6 years were included. Post-operative PROs were assessed using the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) subscales. Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MMPRT was diagnosed based on preoperative MRI and intraoperative arthroscopy findings. The participants were categorized into the MMPRT and MMPR intact (MMPRI) groups, and their KOOS subscales were compared. Additionally, logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the correlation between KOOS and MMPRT presence.

Results

In total, 29 out of 80 (36.3%) knees were classified into the MMPRT group, while three knees underwent total knee arthroplasty. Preoperative MME was 3.5 ± 1.9 (range 0-8.9) mm, showing correlation with the presence of MMPRT (p = 0.004) by regression analysis. The post-operative KOOS subscales of the MMPRT group were lower than the MMPRI group for pain (p = 0.017), activities of daily living (ADLs) (p = 0.001), sports (p < 0.001) and quality of life (QOL) (p < 0.001). Additionally, regression analysis showed the presence of MMPRT was correlated with lower KOOS subscale scores for pain (p = 0.041), ADLs (p = 0.011), sports (p < 0.001) and QOL (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Preoperative MMPRT correlated with a reduction in mid-term post-operative PROs, as assessed using the KOOS, among patients who underwent OWHTO. Surgeons should consider addressing an MMPRT at the time of OWHTO.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Arthroscopic Linear Chain Fixation for the Treatment of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: A Case Study

BACKGROUND

The repair and reconstruction of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) is an important issue in the field of orthopedic sports medicine. This study reports the first application of arthroscopic linear chain fixation for the treatment of MMPRTs.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 78-year-old female patient presented with a 1.5-month history of right knee pain accompanied by a locked facet joint. The patient underwent surgery with the new linear chain fixation method. In this method, the suture and the loop part of the buckle-strap titanium plate were combined into a linear chain mechanical complex, and the tension of the posterior root stump was gradually increased by pulling on the two attachment lines at the external mouth of the tibial tunnel. The postoperative Lysholm score was 89, and the visual analogue scale score was 0.9, indicating a significant improvement in knee joint function. At the 7-month and 1-year post-surgery follow-up, physical and MRI examinations confirmed satisfactory healing of the MMPRTs.

CONCLUSION

This surgical approach offers several benefits, including a simplified instrumentation setup, preservation of natural anatomical structures, and reliable residual stump fixation. It has the potential for clinical implementation.

A Systematic Review of Adverse Events and Complications After Isolated Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repairs

BACKGROUND

Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears are recognized as a substantial cause of disability and morbidity. However, meniscus root repair, regardless of technique, is not without potential complications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reported incidence of complications and adverse events after isolated MMPR repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases with the following search terms combined with Boolean operators: "meniscus,""root," and "repair." Inclusion criteria consisted of level 1 to 4 human clinical studies in English or English-language translation reporting complications and adverse events after isolated posterior medial meniscus root repairs. The overall incidence of specific complications was estimated from the pooled sample of the included studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with a total pooled sample of 442 patients were identified. The mean patient age was 58.1 years, while the mean final follow-up time was 37.2 months (range, 12-84.8 months). The overall incidence of complications was 9.7% (n = 43/442), with the most commonly reported complication being progressive degenerative changes within the knee (10.4%; n = 25/240; n = 5 studies). A total of 1.25% (n = 3/240) of patients who experienced degenerative changes required conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Repair failures were reported in 3.1% (n = 10/327; n = 8 studies) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Repairing MMPR tears is critical in preventing accelerated progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients without significant knee osteoarthritis preoperatively. While this repair is still recommended and necessary in appropriate patients, this review found that the incidence of complications after isolated posterior medial meniscus root repair was 9.7%, primarily involving the presence of progressive degeneration, while repair failure was reported in 3% of patients.

The clinical and radiographic outcomes of type 2 medial meniscus posterior root tears following transtibial pullout repair

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of different subtypes of type 2 medial meniscus posterior root tears following transtibial pullout repair.

METHODS

In total, 147 patients (mean age: 66.2 ± 8.3 years) who were diagnosed with type 2 medial meniscus posterior root tears and underwent transtibial pullout repair were included. Patients were divided into 2A (n = 31), 2B (n = 90), and 2C (n = 26) groups according to tear type. Clinical outcomes were assessed pre-operatively and at second-look arthroscopy using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The meniscal healing status was evaluated at second-look arthroscopy. Medial meniscus extrusion was calculated using magnetic resonance imaging pre-operatively and at second-look arthroscopy.

RESULTS

No significant differences in pre-operative or post-operative clinical scores were observed between each subtype, although clinical scores improved post-operatively for each subtype. Significant differences were noted in the anteroposterior width of the bridging tissues at second-look arthroscopy (2A, 7.1 ± 1.2; 2B, 6.2 ± 1.7; and 2C, 6.2 ± 1.7 mm; p = 0.045); type 2A tears were the widest. There was a significant difference in post-operative medial meniscus extrusion (2A, 3.2 ± 0.9; 2B, 4.0 ± 1.2; and 2C, 4.0 ± 1.4 mm; p = 0.004) and its progression (2A, 0.7 ± 0.6; 2B, 1.2 ± 0.8; and 2C, 1.2 ± 0.8 mm; p = 0.008), and type 2A tears were the shortest.

CONCLUSION

Although there was no significant difference in the post-operative clinical scores among different type 2 tears in the short term, type 2A tears showed better healing and medial meniscus extrusion progression prevention, thus indicating the usefulness of classifying tear type in estimating post-operative outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.