The effects of combined microwave ablation and open surgery for the treatment of lung cancer-derived thoracolumbar metastases

Safety and efficacy of combined acetabular reconstruction and microwave ablation in the treatment of periacetabular metastatic disease: a retrospective clinical evaluation

Introduction

The periacetabular bone defects caused by metastatic disease often necessitate acetabular reconstruction and various techniques have been employed with varying degrees of success. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acetabular reconstruction in conjunction with adjuvant microwave ablation as a surgical intervention for patients with periacetabular metastases.

Methods

Between January 2019 and September 2023, 17 consecutive patients with different tumor subtypes required surgical intervention for periacetabular metastases. The acetabular reconstruction was performed by utilizing an acetabular reconstructive cage and cement total hip arthroplasty with microwave ablation. A retrospective review was performed to assess pain relief, intraoperative details and postoperative complications. Functional status following procedures was determined by the 1993 Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and the overall survival of patients was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

In total, 8 males and 9 females were included with an average age of 48.6 years (range 34-66). Patients reported a significant improvement in the level of pain and the mean VAS score declined from 7.7 preoperatively to 2.2 postoperatively. Of the 17 patients, 16 could ambulate either independently (6 patients) or using a walking aid (10 patients) with a mean MSTS score of 18.9. The median follow-up was 9.0 months. Nine patients were alive at the most recent follow-up with overall survival of 40.9% at 12 months and 30.7% at 36 months, respectively.

Conclusion

In selected patients with periacetabular metastasis, the utilization of an acetabular cage and cement total hip arthroplasty presents a less invasive reconstruction technique. The incorporation of adjuvant microwave ablation has shown promise in providing long-lasting pain relief, reducing intraoperative bleeding, and improving local tumor control. However, further research and extended follow-up are necessary to establish the effectiveness of this procedure.

Clinical Analysis of Microwave Ablation Combined with Decompression and Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases

OBJECTIVES

There is still controversy over the choice of treatment for end-stage spinal metastases. With the continuous development of microwave technology in spinal tumors, related studies have reported that microwave combined with techniques such as pedicle screw fixation and percutaneous vertebroplasty can achieve the purpose of tumor ablation, relieving spinal cord compression, enhancing spinal stability, effectively relieving pain, and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of microwave ablation combined with decompression and pedicle screw fixation in the palliative management of spinal metastases with pathological fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with spinal metastases and pathological fractures treated between January 2016 and July 2020, with 44 patients undergoing pedicle screw fixation along with laminectomy (fixation group) and the remaining 38 receiving microwave ablation in addition to the treatment provided to group fixation (MWA group). Before surgery, all patients underwent pain assessment using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and evaluation of spinal cord injury using the Frankel classification. After surgery, the patients' prognoses were assessed using the Tomita score, modified Tokuhashi score system, and progression-free survival. Additionally, we compared operative time and blood loss between the two groups. Survival analysis utilized the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test for group comparisons. Paired t-tests and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied to metric and non-normally distributed data, respectively. Neurological function improvement across groups was evaluated using the χ2 test.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for a median duration of 18 and 20 months in the fixation and MWA groups, respectively, with follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 36 months. Statistically significant reductions in postoperative VAS scores were observed in all patients compared with their preoperative scores. The MWA group exhibited reduced blood loss (t = 2.74, p = 0.01), lower VAS scores at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups (t = 2.34, P = 0.02; t = 2.83, p = 0.006), and longer progression-free survival than the fixation group (p = 0.03). Although the operation times in the MWA group were longer than those in the fixation group, this difference was not statistically significant (t = 6.06, p = 0.12). No statistically significant differences were found regarding improvements in spinal cord function between the two groups (p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

Compared with decompression and pedicle screw fixation for treating spinal metastases with pathological fractures, microwave ablation combined with decompression and pedicle screw fixation showed better outcomes in terms of pain control, longer progression-free survival, and lower blood loss without increasing operative time, which has favorable implications for clinical practice.