An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty through SuperPATH versus Conventional Approaches

Do Meta-Analyses of Total Hip Arthroplasty Produce Reliable Results? A Systematic Review and Meta-Epidemiological Study of Statistical Methods

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly successful orthopedic procedure, with numerous meta-analyses published to optimize its outcomes. However, the reliability of their results and conclusions depends heavily on the use of appropriate statistical methods. Therefore, the aim was to test the reliability of statistical methods in meta-analyses of THA by examining the degree of heterogeneity, the effect of different between-study variance estimators, and the equality of sample size of pooled primary studies.

METHODS

The literature was systematically searched in PubMed from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, for meta-analyses on THA. The quality of the meta-analyses was assessed using the revised Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2). All meta-analyses were recalculated using eight different heterogeneity estimators. The following indicators were considered: inequality of patient numbers, proportion of random-effects and fixed-effects models, heterogeneity with I2 value, ratio of effect sizes (RES), ratio of confidence interval width (RCIW), and the number of significant results. Mixed linear regression was then used to analyze whether the effect sizes and CIW were significantly different using different heterogeneity estimators. Finally, all examined meta-analyses were recalculated using the eight heterogeneity estimators and the Hartung-Knapp (HK) adjustment.

RESULTS

Of the 24 meta-analyses examined, 15 reported an outcome using a mean difference and 20 reported an outcome using an odds ratio. The quality assessment identified 10 meta-analyses of high quality, 7 of moderate quality, 4 of low quality, and 3 of critically low quality. The significance of the examined meta-analyses varied considerably depending on the heterogeneity estimators used. In particular, the DerSimonian and Laird and Hunter-Schmidt heterogeneity estimators tended to produce false-positive results. The meta-analyses examined generally did not use HK adjustment. This effect is amplified when combined with the weak DerSimonian and Laird heterogeneity estimator, which were used in almost all examined meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

Without HK adjustment, the results depend strongly on the heterogeneity estimator chosen and there is a risk of false positives, especially for the widely used DerSimonian and Laird heterogeneity estimator. For HK adjustment, the choice of heterogeneity estimator seems to play a less important role. We recommend the use of more reliable heterogeneity estimators as well as the HK adjustment as a measure to improve the statistical methodology of meta-analyses. This study highlights the critical need for improved statistical rigor in meta-analyses of THA, ensuring more reliable evidence for clinical decision-making and guideline development.

SuperPATH versus traditional hip replacement in efficacy and safety: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip replacement is a popular orthopedic surgery. The methods include SuperPATH and traditional hip replacement. The efficacy and safety of SuperPATH vs. traditional hip replacement might be an intriguing topic.

METHODS

The SuperPATH vs. traditional hip replacement comparison for the operation characteristics, hospitalization duration, postoperative pain and hip scores were set for the current systematic review and meta-analysis, which can help us determine the differences in the operation characteristics, hospitalization duration, postoperative pain severity and postoperative hip function between the 2 groups. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) were eligible and 9 RCTs (299 patients with the superPATH, and 379 patients with traditional hip replacement) were enrolled. We focused on the operation characteristics, hospitalization duration, pain, and hip function after orthopedic surgery.

RESULTS

The meta-analytic results showed that SuperPATH might be associated with a significantly shorter incision length and hospitalization duration. In addition, the postoperative pain severity was lower and the postoperative hip function was better in the SuperPATH group when compared to traditional hip replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

The SuperPATH might be beneficial for patients with hip replacement surgery when compared to the traditional hip replacement from the perspective of incision length, hospitalization, pain severity, and hip function. Further RCT studies with a more homogeneous study design and a greater sample size might be warranted in the future.

Enhancing recovery: surgical techniques and rehabilitation strategies after direct anterior hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common surgical procedure for hip joint pathologies, with the direct anterior approach (DAA) gaining popularity due to potential benefits in postoperative recovery. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of rehabilitation strategies following DAA THA, focusing on surgical techniques, postoperative care, and outcomes. The evolution of the DAA to THA is discussed, highlighting historical advancements and comparisons with other surgical approaches. Surgical techniques and considerations specific to the DAA are detailed, including outcomes and complications compared to alternative approaches. The role of the surgical technique in influencing postoperative rehabilitation is explored, emphasizing the importance of optimizing surgical procedures for enhanced recovery. Postoperative care and rehabilitation models following DAA THA are examined, with a focus on the impacts of different rehabilitation protocols on patient outcomes. The review underscores the significance of tailored rehabilitation programs in promoting optimal recovery and patient satisfaction. Current evidence from recent studies, meta-analyses, and clinical trials is critically analyzed to provide insights into the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation strategies. The review identifies gaps in the existing literature and proposes recommendations for future research to improve rehabilitation protocols and enhance outcomes. In conclusion, this review highlights the importance of postoperative rehabilitation in the context of DAA THA. By synthesizing historical perspectives, current evidence, and future directions, the review offers a comprehensive understanding of rehabilitation strategies following DAA THA. The findings underscore the need for personalized rehabilitation programs and ongoing research to optimize postoperative recovery and improve outcomes in the field of THA.

No Decrease in Early Survivorship of Dual Mobility Implants in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Dual mobility (DM) implants in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) have gained recent popularity; however, safety concerns persist. The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) assess trends in DM implant adoption; and 2) evaluate the impact of modular DM implants on dislocation and all-cause revision rates at short-term follow-up.

Methods

This retrospective study identified patients in our institutional arthroplasty database who underwent primary posterior approach THA for degenerative conditions from November 2013 to December 2020. Patients undergoing primary THA for fracture were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts: modular DM and non-DM implants. Annual DM utilization and dislocation rates were recorded. Patient records were reviewed to determine implant selection and identify indications for dislocations and reoperations.

Results

Institutional adoption was rapid, increasing from 3.4% in 2013 to 47.1% in 2020. Of the 4548 primary THA cases from 2013 to 2020, 2859 (62.9%) had minimum one-year follow-up data for inclusion. There were 724 (25.3%) with DM implants and 2135 (74.7%) with non-DM implants. The DM group had a significantly lower dislocation rate (0.14% vs 0.84%, P = .04), with similar all-cause revision rates (2.49% vs 2.72%, P = .74) at one-year follow-up. No cases of DM-specific complications (metallosis or intraprosthetic dislocations) were noted.

Conclusions

From 2013 to 2020, DM implant utilization in primary THA steadily increased. Use of modular DM implants is associated with a decreased dislocation rate without compromised survivorship at one-year follow-up when compared to non-DM implants. No instances of modular DM-specific complications were identified; however, longer-term surveillance is necessary to verify these findings.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level III.

Indirect comparison in network meta-analysis between SuperPATH, direct anterior and conventional approach hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the short-term outcome of SuperPATH, direct anterior (DAA) and conventional approach (CA) hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients with femoral neck fractures using a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Epistemonikos, and Embase were searched until May 31, 2024. In a network meta-analysis, mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method and a fixed/random effects model for continuous outcomes, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and a fixed/random effects model for dichotomous outcomes.

RESULTS

The literature search identified a total of 9 randomized controlled trials on SuperPATH with 762 patients and 8 randomized controlled trials on DAA with 641 patients. In the overall ranking, SuperPATH was placed first, DAA second and CA third. SuperPATH HA was best in 7, second best in 2 and third best in 1 of the 10 outcome parameters. DAA HA was best in 2 and second best in 8 of the 10 outcome parameters. CA HA was best in 1 and third best in 9 of the 10 outcome parameters. In the indirect comparison between SuperPATH HA and DAA HA, SuperPATH HA had a 1.36 point lower visual analog scale at 2 to 7 days postoperatively and a 0.17 lower overall complication rate compared to DAA.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of patients with femoral neck fractures, SuperPATH HA ranked first, DAA HA ranked second and CA HA ranked third. Based on the results, we recommend that trauma surgeons increase their use of minimally invasive hip HA techniques. It should be noted that SuperPATH HA had a significantly lower overall complication rate compared to DAA HA when the minimally invasive technique was chosen.

Which approach of total hip arthroplasty is the best efficacy and least complication?

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty is as an effective intervention to relieve pain and improve hip function. Approaches of the hip have been exhaustively explored about pros and cons. The efficacy and the complications of hip approaches remains inconclusive. This study conducted an umbrella review to systematically appraise previous meta-analysis (MAs) including conventional posterior approach (PA), and minimally invasive surgeries as the lateral approach (LA), direct anterior approach (DAA), 2-incisions method, mini-lateral approach and the newest technique direct superior approach (DSA) or supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath).

AIM

To compare the efficacy and complications of hip approaches that have been published in all MAs and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

MAs were identified from MEDLINE and Scopus from inception until 2023. RCTs were then updated from the latest MA to September 2023. This study included studies which compared hip approaches and reported at least one outcome such as Harris Hip Score (HHS), dislocation, intra-operative fracture, wound complication, nerve injury, operative time, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, incision length and VAS pain. Data were independently selected, extracted and assessed by two reviewers. Network MA and cluster rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were estimated for treatment efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

Finally, twenty-eight MAs (40 RCTs), and 13 RCTs were retrieved. In total 47 RCTs were included for reanalysis. The results of corrected covered area showed high degree (13.80%). Among 47 RCTs, most of the studies were low risk of bias in part of random process and outcome reporting, while other domains were medium to high risk of bias. DAA significantly provided higher HHS at three months than PA [pooled unstandardized mean difference (USMD): 3.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98, 6.00 with SUCRA: 85.9], followed by DSA/SuperPath (USMD: 1.57, 95%CI: -1.55, 4.69 with SUCRA: 57.6). All approaches had indifferent dislocation and intraoperative fracture rates. SUCRA comparing early functional outcome and composite complications (dislocation, intra-operative fracture, wound complication, and nerve injury) found DAA was the best approach followed by DSA/SuperPath.

CONCLUSION

DSA/SuperPath had better earlier functional outcome than PA, but still could not overcome the result of DAA. This technique might be the other preferred option with acceptable complications.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of supercapsular percutaneously-assisted approach total hip arthroplasty versus conventional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was aimed to compare the postoperative clinical outcomes between the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPATH, SP) and conventional posterior/posterolateral approach (PA) for total hip arthroplasty in patients who have failed conservative treatment for hip-related disorders.

METHODS

PRISMAP guidelines were followed in this systematic review. CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science databases and the reference list grey literature were searched for studies according to the search strategy. Endnote (version 20) was used to screen the searched studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criterias and extract the data from the eligible studied. RR and 95% CI were used for dichotomous variables and MD and 95% CI were used for continuous variables. All analyses and heterogeneity of outcomes were analysed by Review Manage (version 5.4). Publication bias of included studies was analysed by Stata (version 16.0).

RESULTS

Thirty-six randomized control studies were included. Compared to PA group, SP group had a shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter length of hospital stay and do activities earlier. Hip function (HHS) was significantly improved within three months postoperatively. Pain of hip (VAS) was significantly reduced within one month postoperatively. The state of daily living (BI) was significantly improved within three months. Patients' overall health status (SF-36) improved significantly postoperatively. There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two approaches. PA had a shorter operative time and a higher accuracy of prosthesis placement.

CONCLUSION

The advantages of SuperPATH include accelerated functional recovery and less trauma associated with surgery. However, it required a longer operative time and implantation of the prosthesis was less accurate than that of PA.

Hemiarthroplasty through SuperPATH versus hemiarthroplasty through conventional approaches in patients with femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The aim was to conduct a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short-term outcomes of bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) through SuperPATH and bipolar HA through conventional approaches (CAs) in patients with femoral neck fractures. The following PICO question was formulated: In human participants with femoral neck fractures, are the short-term outcomes of SuperPATH HA better than the short-term outcomes of CAs HA? The following databases were searched until 25 August 2023: PubMed, CNKI, CENTRAL of The Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, and Google Scholar. Quality assessment of the RCTs was performed, according to the Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool and the recommendations of the GRADE system. Furthermore, we evaluated publication bias with funnel plots. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous variables using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method and a random effects model. Nine RCTs with overall 762 patients were included in this meta-analysis. All 9 RCTs were rated with a moderate risk of bias. The quality of evidence of the outcome parameters was rated moderate to very low. The funnel plots were overall broadly symmetrical, possibly indicating low to moderate publication bias. SuperPATH had a longer operation time compared to CAs (MD = 21.79, 95% CI 12.57 to 31.02). SuperPATH decreased incision length (MD = - 4.50; 95% CI - 5.80 to - 3.20), intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 103.96, 95% CI - 150.27 to - 55.66), postoperative drainage volume (MD = - 137.30, 95% CI - 178.74 to - 95.86), time to mobilization (MD = - 3.86; 95% CI - 5.96 to - 1.76), pain VAS ≤ 1 week postoperatively (MD = - 1.81; 95% CI - 2.17 to - 1.45), and hospitalization time (MD = - 4.05; 95% CI - 4.96 to - 3.15). SuperPATH improved HHS ≤ 1 week postoperatively (MD = 11.10; 95% CI 1.65 to 20.54) and HHS 3 months postoperatively (MD = 6.33; 95% CI 3.97 to 8.69). There was no difference in pain VAS 1-3 months postoperatively (MD = - 0.08; 95% CI - 0.22 to 0.05) and HHS 6 months postoperatively (MD = 0.44; 95% CI - 0.11 to 1.00). This is the first meta-analysis comparing SuperPATH HA with CAs HA in patients with femoral neck fractures. SuperPATH HA was superior in the early short-term functional outcome (HHS) compared to CAs HA, reaching minimal clinically important differences. Furthermore, SuperPATH HA showed significantly better results in incision length, blood loss, time to mobilization, pain intensity (VAS), and hospitalization time than CAs HA.

Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Update on Navigation, Robotics, and Contemporary Advancements

While total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains effective for improvement of pain and function in patients with osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis, there remain areas of continued pursuit of excellence, including decreasing rates of dislocation, leg length discrepancy, implant loosening, and infection. This review article covers several bearing surfaces and articulations, computer-assisted navigation and robotic technology, and minimally invasive surgical approaches that have sought to improve such outcomes. Perhaps the most significant improvement to THA implant longevity has been the broad adoption of highly cross-linked polyethylene, with low wear rates. Similarly, navigation and robotic technology has proven to more reproducibly achieve intraoperative component positioning, which has demonstrated clinical benefit with decreased risk of dislocation in a number of studies. Given the projected increase in THA over the coming decades, continued investigation of effective incorporation of technology, soft tissue-sparing approaches, and durable implants is imperative to continued pursuit of improved outcomes in THA.

Risk Factors and Predictors for Functional Outcome and Complication Rate in Total Hip Arthroplasty through Minimally Invasive and Conventional Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 41 Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and identify risk factors and predictors for the difference in functional outcome and complications between total hip arthroplasty (THA) through minimally invasive and conventional approaches, using a meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature up to 31 July 2022 was performed. A meta-regression was conducted based on a random effects meta-analysis using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method.

RESULTS

A total of 41 RCTs with 3607 patients were found. The following predictors of HHS ≥ 6 months postoperatively were identified: patient age (predictor estimate = 0.14; p < 0.01), avascular necrosis of the femoral head (predictor estimate = -0.03; p = 0.04); incision length (predictor estimate = -0.82; p < 0.01). The following predictors of complication rate were identified: osteoarthritis (predictor estimate = 0.02; p = 0.02); femoral neck fracture (predictor estimate = -0.02; p = 0.02); SuperPATH (predictor estimate = -1.72; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and incision length were identified as predictors of the effect size of the HHS ≥ 6 months postoperatively; and osteoarthritis, femoral neck fracture, and SuperPATH as predictors of the effect size of the complication rate. Based on these findings, we recommend that more frequent use of minimally invasive THA in elderly patients should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

a systematic review of all relevant randomized controlled trials. Registered in PROSPERO on 10 August 2022 (CRD42022350287).

SuperPATH-Current Status of Evidence and Further Investigations: A Scoping Review and Quality Assessment

BACKGROUND

SuperPATH is a novel minimally invasive technique for hip replacement that is gaining increasing attention. The aim of this review was to determine the nature, extent, and quality of current research evidence on SuperPATH and to identify areas for further investigations.

METHODS

A bibliometric search was conducted in PubMed up to 1 August 2023 using the search term "SuperPATH". Data extraction and quality assessment were performed for relevant articles.

RESULTS

The bibliometric search yielded 51 articles on SuperPATH, 9 of which were meta-analyses, 11 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 4 were prospective non-RCTs, 12 were retrospective comparative studies, 11 were case series, and 4 were other article types. Most articles were published between 2015 and 2023, with a steady increase in publications per year. The articles originated from 13 countries, of which China was the most productive (35%). The quality assessment of the meta-analyses showed that 22.2% were of moderate quality, 66.7% were of low quality, and 11.1% were of critically low quality. The quality assessment of the RCTs showed that 36.4% had a low risk of bias (RoB), 27.2% revealed some concerns, and 36.4% had a high RoB. All studies were evaluated for content and taken into account in the formulation of recommendations and conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The SuperPATH evidence varies from low to high quality. There is a steady increase in SuperPATH publications in the English-language literature and an uneven distribution of the article origins, with most articles coming from China. Consistent terminology should be used in the future, referring to the surgical approach as the direct superior approach (DSA) and to the surgical technique as SuperPATH. This review provides further concrete suggestions for future investigations and recommendations to improve study quality.

Comparison of the early clinical efficacy of the SuperPath approach versus the modified Hardinge approach in total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical efficacy and advantages of the SuperPath approach for total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly population.

METHODS

From February 2018 to March 2019, 120 patients were randomly divided into two groups with 60 patients each: the SuperPath group and the conventional group. The results evaluated included the general operation situation, serum markers, blood loss, pain score, hip function and prosthesis location analysis.

RESULTS

There was no demographic difference between the two groups. Compared with the conventional group, the SuperPath group had a shorter operation time (78.4 vs. 93.0 min, p = 0.000), a smaller incision length (5.8 vs. 12.5 cm, p = 0.000), less intraoperative blood loss (121.5 vs. 178.8 ml, p = 0.000), a shorter hospitalization time (8.0 vs. 10.8 days, p = 0.000) and less drainage volume (77.8 vs. 141.2 ml, p = 0.000). The creatine kinase level in the SuperPath group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group, while there was no difference in the C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate level. The visual analog scale score was lower one month postoperatively, and the Harris hip score was higher three months postoperatively in the SuperPath group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the cup abduction angle or anteversion angle of the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We found better clinical efficacy after using the SuperPath approach with less muscle damage, less postoperative pain and better postoperative function than after using the modified Hardinge approach. Trial registration The randomized clinical trial was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 31/12/2020 (ChiCTR-2000041583, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=57008 ).

Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty

SuperPATH is a novel approach to the hip joint that needs to be compared to other known surgical approaches. To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short-term outcomes of SuperPATH, direct anterior (DAA), and posterior/ posterolateral approaches (PA) in total hip joint arthroplasty (THA). We performed a systematic review on PubMed, CNKI, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, and Google Scholar up to November 30th, 2021. We assessed treatment effects between SuperPATH, DAA, and PA by performing a frequentist NMA, including a total of 20 RCTs involving 1501 patients. SuperPATH showed a longer operation time (MD = 16.99, 95% CI 4.92 to 29.07), a shorter incision length (MD = −4.71, 95% CI −6.21 to −3.22), a lower intraoperative blood loss (MD = −81.75, 95% CI  −114.78 to −48.72), a higher HHS 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (MD = 2.59, 95% CI 0.59–4.6; MD = 2.14, 95% CI 0.5–3.77; MD = 0.6, 95% CI 0.03–1.17, respectively) than PA. DAA showed a higher intraoperative blood loss than PA and SuperPATH (MD = 91.87, 95% CI  27.99–155.74; MD = 173.62, 95% CI 101.71–245.53, respectively). No other relevant differences were found. In conclusion, the overall findings suggested that the short-term outcomes of THA through SuperPATH were statistically superior to PA. DAA and PA as well as SuperPATH and DAA showed indifferent results.