Maintaining Accurate Long-Term Sensing Ability Despite Significant Size Reduction of Implantable Cardiac Monitors

Programming Optimization in Implantable Cardiac Monitors to Reduce False-Positive Arrhythmia Alerts: A Call for Research

No studies have investigated whether optimizing implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) programming can reduce false-positive (FP) alerts. We identified patients implanted with an ICM (BIOMONITOR III) who had more than 10 FP alerts in a 1-month retrospective period. Uniform adjustments of settings were performed based on the mechanism of FP triggers and assessed at 1 month. Eight patients (mean age 57.5 ± 23.2 years; 37% female) were enrolled. In 4 patients, FPs were caused by undersensing of low-amplitude premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). No further false bradycardia was observed with a more aggressive decay of the dynamic sensing threshold. Furthermore, false atrial fibrillation (AF) alerts decreased in 2 of 3 patients. Two patients had undersensing of R waves after high-amplitude PVCs; false bradycardia episodes disappeared or were significantly reduced by limiting the initial value of the sensing threshold. Finally, the presence of atrial ectopic activity or irregular sinus rhythm generated false alerts of AF in 2 patients that were reduced by increasing the R-R variability limit and the confirmation time. In conclusion, adjustments to nominal settings can reduce the number of FP episodes in ICM patients. More research is needed to provide practical recommendations and assess the value of extended ICM programmability.

The BIOMONITOR III Injectable Cardiac Monitor: Clinical Experience with a Novel Injectable Cardiac Monitor

Background: Injectable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are leadless subcutaneous devices for long-term monitoring of arrhythmias. The BIOTRONIK BIOMONITOR III is a novel ICM with a miniaturized profile, long sensing vector, and simplified implantation technique. Methods: R-wave amplitude was recorded immediately after implantation, the day after implantation, and after 3 months. Follow-up was scheduled after 3 months or after an event. All data from the ICM were retrieved. The anatomical position of the ICM was determined post-implantation and after 3 months. A patient questionnaire was conducted after 3 months. Results: In 36 patients (mean age 67 ± 13 years; 40% male) an ICM was inserted. Six patients were not included in the final analysis. The median time from skin cut to wound closure was 6 [IQR 5–7] minutes. Mean R-wave amplitude increased over time (0.73 ± 32 mV vs. 0.78 ± 0.38 mV vs. 0.81 ± 0.39 mV; p = ns). Three months after implantation, the ICM was in an anatomically stable position. In 14 (47%) patients, true episodes were detected. False arrhythmia alerts were detected in 13 (43%) patients. The total number of false detections was low, and the patient satisfaction rate was high. Conclusion: Implantation of the novel BIOMONITOR III is fast and uncomplicated; its sensing characteristics are excellent and improve over time, and patient satisfaction is high.

Factors affecting signal quality in implantable cardiac monitors with long sensing vector

PURPOSE

Electrical artefacts are frequent in implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs). We analyzed the subcutaneous electrogram (sECG) provided by an ICM with a long sensing vector and factors potentially affecting its quality.

METHODS

Consecutive ICM recipients underwent a follow-up where demographics, body mass index (BMI), implant location, and surface ECG were collected. The sECG was then analyzed in terms of R-wave amplitude and P-wave visibility.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients (43% female, median age 68 [58-76] years) were enrolled at 3 sites. ICMs were positioned with intermediate inclination (n = 44, 52%), parallel (n = 35, 43%), or perpendicular (n = 5, 6%) to the sternum. The median R-wave amplitude was 1.10 (0.72-1.48) mV with P waves readily visible in 69.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 57.8%-79.2%), partially visible in 23.1% [95% CI: 14.3%-34.0%], and never visible in 7.7% [95% CI: 2.9%-16.0%] of patients. Men had higher R-wave amplitudes compared to women (1.40 [0.96-1.80] mV vs 1.00 [0.60-1.20] mV, P = .001), while obese people tended to have lower values (0.80 [0.62-1.28] mV vs 1.10 [0.90-1.50] mV, P = .074). The P-wave visibility reached 86.2% [95% CI: 68.3%-96.1%] in patients with high-voltage P waves (≥0.2 mV) at surface ECG. The sECG quality was not affected by implant site.

CONCLUSION

In ordinary clinical practice, ICMs with long sensing vector provided median R-wave amplitude above 1 mV and reliable P-wave visibility of nearly 70%, regardless of the position of the device. Women and obese patients showed lower but still very good signal quality.

Are implantable cardiac monitors reliable tools for cardiac arrhythmias detection? An intra-patient comparison with permanent pacemakers

INTRODUCTION

Implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) is an established tool for the management of unexplained syncope and atrial fibrillation (AF) even if its accuracy of arrhythmia detection may be suboptimal. The aim of this study was to perform an intra-patient comparison of the diagnostic capability of ICM with a dual-chamber PM as a gold standard.

METHODS

We included 19 patients with a previously implanted ICM (BioMonitor 2 Biotronik, Berlin, Germany), who received a dual-chamber PM for standard indications. ICM-detected arrhythmic events in a 6-month follow-up were compared with those detected by the PM and classified by visual inspection of intracardiac electrograms.

RESULTS

During follow up, ICMs generated 15 false asystole and 39 false bradycardia detections in 5 patients (26.3%) due to recurrent premature ventricular contractions. A total of 34 true high ventricular rate (HVR) episodes were detected by the PM. Of them, 30 (88%) events were also recorded by the ICM, which further detected 14 false HVR snapshots, leading to a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 88% and 68%, respectively. In addition, PM identified 234 true AF episodes. Of them, 225 (96%) events were also detected by the ICM, while 8 (42%) ICMs stored 50 AF episodes classified as false positives. The ICM sensitivity for AF was 96% with a positive predictive value of 82%.

CONCLUSION

Our intra-patient comparison with permanent PM confirmed that ICM is an effective tool for cardiac arrhythmias detection. ICM algorithms for AF and HVR detection were highly sensitive with an acceptable rate of false positive episodes.

The BioMonitor 2 insertable cardiac monitor: Clinical experience with a novel implantable cardiac monitor

INTRODUCTION

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are leadless subcutaneous devices that allow cardiac monitoring for up to 3 years and are a valuable tool in the diagnosis of arrhythmias, cryptogenic stroke and unexplained syncope. The Biotronik BioMonitor 2 is a novel, insertable ILR allowing long-term continuous monitoring with wireless telemetry options.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, observational study investigating the reliability of sensing quality and detection performance in the BioMonitor 2 ILR, as well as post-implantation patient satisfaction. R-wave amplitude was recorded immediately post implantation and 1 day post implantation, followed by extensive patient instruction. Follow-up was scheduled after 3 months, or after an event. Data from the ILR were retrieved, with documentation of all episodes, R-wave amplitude and noise burden. The anatomical position of the ILR was determined 1 day post implantation and after 3 months. A patient questionnaire was conducted after 3 months.

RESULTS

30 consecutive patients (mean age 71 ± 12 years, 56% male) were analyzed. Indications for ILR implantation were: unexplained syncope (n = 24, 80%), suspected atrial fibrillation (n = 4, 13%), cryptogenic stroke (n = 1, 3%) and palpitations (n = 1, 3%). Median time from skin cut to suture was 8 min. No complications occurred. Mean R-wave amplitude at implantation was 0.84 ± 0.32 mV, at day 1 post implantation 0.96 ± 0.31 mV, and after a mean follow-up of 85 ± 24 days 1.02 ± 0.47 mV (p = 0.01). The mean noise burden was 1.4 ± 2%.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of the novel BioMonitor 2 ILR is fast and uncomplicated. Initial sensing values are good and improve over time.