Cryoablation of atrial fibrillation with the fourth‐generation balloon: The first reported case

Second versus fourth generation of cryoballoon catheters: The 1STOP real-world multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

It has been observed that the fourth-generation cryoballoon (CB4) ablation catheter increased the rate of acute real-time recordings of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) during the ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this analysis was to compare the long-term outcome results between patients treated with the CB4 and second-generation cryoballoon (CB2).

METHODS

In total, 492 patients suffering from AF, underwent PVI ablation with either the CB2 or CB4 catheter within this examination of the 1STOP real-world Italian project and were included in the analysis. Specifically, 246 consecutive patients treated by CB4 were compared to 246 propensity-matched control patients who underwent PVI using CB2.

RESULTS

When comparing the patient cohorts treated with CB2 versus CB4, acute success rate (99.6 ± 4.7% vs. 99.7 ± 3.6%, p = .949) and peri-procedural complications (3.7% vs.1.2%, p = .080) were similar in both groups, respectively. However, procedure time (100 vs.75 min, p < .001) and fluoroscopy duration (21 vs.17 min, p < .001) were all significantly lower in the CB4 treated patient cohort. At the 12-month follow-up, the freedom from AF recurrence after a 90-day blanking period was significant higher in the CB4 as compared with the CB2 group (93.3% vs.81.3%, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, usage of the CB4 ablation catheter increased the rate of acute PVI recording capability and resulted in a higher rate of long-term PVI success, as demonstrated by the reduced rate of AF recurrence in comparison to the CB2 cohort at the 12-month follow-up period.

Relationship between time-to-isolation and freeze duration: Computational modeling of dosing for Arctic Front Advance and Arctic Front Advance Pro cryoballoons

BACKGROUND

Preclinical and clinical studies have utilized periprocedural parameters to optimize cryoballoon ablation dosing, including acute time-to-isolation (TTI) of the pulmonary vein, balloon rate of freezing, balloon nadir temperature, and balloon-thawing time. This study sought to predict the Arctic Front Advance (AFA) vs Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA Pro) ablation durations required for transmural pulmonary vein isolation at varied tissue depths.

METHODS

A cardiac-specific, three-dimensional computational model that incorporates structural characteristics, temperature-dependent cellular responses, and thermal-conductive properties was designed to predict the propagation of cold isotherms through tissue. The model assumed complete cryoballoon-to-pulmonary vein (PV) circumferential contact. Using known temperature thresholds of cardiac cellular electrical dormancy (at 23°C) and cellular nonviability (at -20°C), transmural time-to-isolation electrical dormancy (TTI_ED ) and cellular nonviability (TTI_NV ) were simulated.

RESULTS

For cardiac thickness of 0.5, 1.25, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 mm, the 23°C isotherm passed transmurally in 33, 38, 46, 62, 80, and 95 seconds during cryoablation utilizing AFA and 33, 38, 46, 63, 80, and 95 seconds with AFA Pro. Using the same cardiac thicknesses, the -20°C isotherm passed transmurally in 40, 55, 78, 161, 354, and 696 seconds during cryoablation with AFA and 40, 54, 78, 160, 352, and 722 seconds with AFA Pro.

CONCLUSION

This model predicted a minimum duration of cryoballoon ablation (TTI_NV ) to obtain a transmural lesion when acute TTI of the PV was observed (TTI_ED ). Consequently, the model is a useful tool for characterizing CBA dosing, which may guide future cryoablation dosing strategies.