Gender differences in symptoms and functional status in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation

Gender, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences in access to catheter ablation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation

Introduction

Female patients, patients from racial minorities, and patient with low socioeconomic status have been noted to have less access to catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study using a large population database (Explorys) to evaluate the gender, racial and socioeconomic differences in access of catheter ablation therapy in patient with atrial fibrillation.

Results

A total of 2.2 million patients were identified as having atrial fibrillation and 62,760 underwent ablation. Females had ablation in 2.1% of cases while males received ablation in 3.4% of cases. Caucasians had ablation in 3.3% of cases, African Americans in 1.5% of cases and other minorities in 1.2% of cases. Individuals on medicaid underwent ablation in 1.6% of cases, individuals on medicare and private insurance had higher rates (2.8 and 2.9%, respectively). Logistic regression showed that female patients (OR 0.608, CI 0.597-0.618, p < 0.0001), patients who are African American (OR 0.483, CI 0.465-0.502, p < 0.0001), or from other racial minorities (OR 0.343, CI 0.332-0.355, p < 0.0001) were less likely to undergo ablation. Patient with medicare (OR 1.444, CI 1.37-1.522, p < 0.0001) and private insurance (OR 1.572, CI 1.491-1.658, p < 0.0001) were more likely to undergo ablation.

Conclusion

Female gender, racial minorities, low socioeconomic status are all associated with lower rates of catheter ablation in management of atrial fibrillation.

Sex Differences in the Outcomes of Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Background

The literature data on the outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in women are contradictory.

Aim

To determine and compare the outcomes and complications of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (cryo-PVI) in men vs. women, and to identify predictors of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence.

Methods

We included all consecutive patients having undergone cryo-PVI for the treatment of symptomatic AF in our center since 2012. Peri-operative complications were documented. All patients were prospectively monitored for the recurrence of ATa, and predictors were assessed.

Results

A total of 733 patients were included (550 men (75%) and 183 (25%) women). Paroxysmal AF was recorded in 112 (61%) female patients and 252 male patients (46%; p < 0.001). Female patients were older (p < 0.001) and had a greater symptom burden (p = 0.04). Female patients were more likely to experience complications (p = 0.02). After cryo-PVI for paroxysmal AF, 66% of the female patients and 79% of the male patients were free of ATa at 24 months (p = 0.001). Female sex was the only independent predictive factor for ATa recurrence (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.87 [1.28; 2.73]; p = 0.001). After cryo-PVI for non-paroxysmal AF, 37% of the male patients and 39% of the female patients were free of ATa at 36 months (p = 0.73). Female patients were less likely than male patients to undergo repeat ablation after an index cryo-PVI for non-paroxysmal AF (p = 0.019).

Conclusion

A single cryo-PVI procedure for paroxysmal AF was significantly less successful in female patients than in male patients. Overall, the complication rate was higher in women than in men.

Symptoms and health-related quality of life 5 years after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of catheter ablation (CA) on symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after 5 years, and analyze predictors of recurrence of symptoms.

BACKGROUND

The primary indication for CA of atrial fibrillation (AF) is to reduce symptoms and improve HRQoL where long-term follow-up are sparse.

METHODS

In this observational, long-term, single-center study, patients were recruited from Linköping University Hospital, Sweden. They were aged ≥18 years and had been referred for CA from November 2011 until June 2019. Arrhythmia-specific symptoms and HRQoL were assessed by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with the Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA).

RESULTS

In the study were 1521 patients, 69% men, mean age 62 years. At baseline, 87% of the patients and at the 5-year follow-up 80% of those eligible filled out the ASTA questionnaire. At follow-up, 50% reported freedom from symptoms, 18% had >50% symptom reduction, 14% had a minor reduction, while 18% reported no effect or a worsening of symptoms. Factors predicting symptoms were female gender (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.8; 1.2-2.8), body mass index ≥ 35 (HR: 3.9; 1.6-9.8), and ischemic heart disease (IHD) (HR: 2.6; 1.2-5.9). After 5 years, breathlessness during activity, weakness/fatigue, and tiredness were still the most common symptoms; regarding HRQoL they were impaired physical ability and deteriorated life situation.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This clinical cohort of patients with AF evaluated through PROMs showed that CA had long-lasting effects on symptoms and HRQoL and that the use of PROMs in clinical routines was feasible. Factors predicting symptoms after CA were female gender, IHD, and obesity, an important reminder to encourage lifestyle management.

Fear of Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation: Translating a Cancer Fear Model to the Atrial Fibrillation Patient Experience

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation occurs when rapid and disorganized electrical signals cause the atria in the heart to beat irregularly and is associated with an increased risk for stroke. Despite medical advancements, first and second line atrial fibrillation treatments exhibit significant recurrence rates. Because of this, atrial fibrillation patients often experience disease-specific fears that are not routinely assessed and targeted in clinical management. Fear of recurrence models in cancer research and other cardiac-specific fears have paved the way for a patient-centric approach to disease intervention.

PURPOSE

Clinical assessment focused solely on the taxonomy of anxiety disorders may miss key components unique to the atrial fibrillation patient experience. An anxiety disorder diagnosis in the presence of an arrhythmia could be misleading and ultimately fail to address patient needs. Modeled from the cancer literature, providers may benefit from a broader disease specific conceptualization for AF patients that differs from a general DSM-5 diagnosis.

AIMS

The objectives of this paper are: (1) to review the medical aspects of atrial fibrillation, (2) to examine the comparability of fear of recurrence concept from cancer literature to the atrial fibrillation patient, and (3) to suggest considerations of these novel concepts in patient care.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Increased understanding of fear of recurrence among atrial fibrillation patients aims to define and assess fear of recurrence components, determine treatment targets, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Catheter ablation superiority over the pharmacological treatments in atrial fibrillation: a dedicated review

Atrial fibrillation globally affects roughly 33.5 million people, making it the most common heart rhythm disorder. It is a crucial arrhythmia, as it is linked with a variety of negative outcomes such as strokes, heart failure and cardiovascular mortality. Atrial fibrillation can reduce quality of life because of the potential symptoms, for instance exercise intolerance, fatigue, and palpitation. There are different types of treatments aiming to prevent atrial fibrillation and improve quality of life. Currently, the primary treatment for atrial fibrillation is pharmacology therapy, however, these still show limited effectiveness, which has led to research on other alternative strategies. Catheter ablation is considered the second line treatment for atrial fibrillation when the standard treatment has failed. Moreover, catheter ablation continues to show significant results when compared to standard therapy. Hence, this review will argue that catheter ablation can show superiority over current pharmacological treatments in different aspects. It will discuss the most influential aspects of the treatment of atrial fibrillation, which are recurrence and burden of atrial fibrillation, quality of life, atrial fibrillation in the setting of heart failure and mortality and whether catheter ablation can be the first line treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Patient-reported outcomes and subsequent management in atrial fibrillation clinical practice: Results from the Utah mEVAL AF program

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly reduces health-related quality of life (HRQoL), previously measured in clinical trials using patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We examined AF PROs in clinical practice and their association with subsequent clinical management.

METHODS

The Utah My Evaluation (mEVAL) program collects the Toronto AF Symptom Severity Scale (AFSS) in AF outpatients at the University of Utah. Baseline factors associated with worse AF symptom score (range 0-35, higher is worse) were identified in univariate and multivariable analyses. Secondary outcomes included AF burden and AF healthcare utilization. We also compared subsequent clinical management at 6 months between patients with better versus worse AF HRQoL.

RESULTS

Overall, 1338 patients completed the AFSS symptom score, which varied by sex (mean 7.26 for males vs. 10.27 for females; p < .001), age (<65, 9.73; 65-74, 7.66; ≥75, 7.58; p < .001), heart failure (9.39 with HF vs. 7.67 without; p < .001), and prior ablation (7.28 with prior ablation vs. 8.84; p < .001). In multivariable analysis, younger age (mean difference 2.92 for <65 vs. ≥75; p < .001), female sex (mean difference 2.57; p < .001), pulmonary disease (mean difference 1.88; p < .001), and depression (mean difference 2.46; p < .001) were associated with higher scores. At 6-months, worse baseline symptom score was associated with the use of rhythm control (37.1% vs. 24.5%; p < .001). Similar cofactors and results were associated with increased AF burden and health care utilization scores.

CONCLUSIONS

AF PROs in clinical practice identify highly-symptomatic patients, corroborating findings in more controlled, clinical trials. Increased AFSS score correlates with more aggressive clinical management, supporting the utility of disease-specific PROs guiding clinical practice.

Psychological aspects of atrial fibrillation: A systematic narrative review : Impact on incidence, cognition, prognosis, and symptom perception

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmia in the general population. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the psychological aspects of AF, compiling evidence from epidemiological, clinical, and basic research sources.

RECENT FINDINGS

Findings from large-scale population-based and clinical longitudinal studies reveal an association between negative affectivity (e.g. depression) and the incidence and clinical prognosis of AF. Studies investigating the impact of work stress parameters on AF onset show conflicting results. Researchers have reported the impact of AF on cognitive decline and on health-related quality of life, and have highlighted the role of interoceptive cues in the development of AF symptom burden and gender differences in psychological covariates of AF. Among biological pathways linking psychosocial factors to AF, research on autonomic regulation has yielded the most evidence so far, showing that the onset of AF is associated with simultaneous sympatho-vagal activation rather than an increase in vagal or sympathetic drive alone. Thus, modulation of the autonomic nervous system is likely to be a promising strategy for protecting the myocardium from pro-arrhythmic autonomic influences. In total, the findings show that AF is embedded as a disease condition in a psycho-societal context and is not an isolated medical problem per se. A broader perspective than a focus on the electrophysiology alone is urgently needed.

Gender Differences in Arrhythmias: Focused on Atrial Fibrillation

There are significant differences in clinical presentation and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) between women and men. The primary goal of AF management is to restore sinus rhythm and to prevent various complications, including stroke and heart failure. In many areas of AF, such as prevalence, clinical manifestations, morbidity, risk factors, pathophysiology, treatment strategies, and complications, gender-specific variability is observed and needs to be further addressed by large-scale population researches or randomized clinical trials, which help to promote the customization of AF treatment programs, hence to maximize the success rate of AF therapy in both sexes. This review highlights our current understanding of these gender differences in AF and how these differences affect treatment decisions on AF.

Gender and age differences in symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation referred for catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Primary indication for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is to reduce symptoms and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There are data showing differences between the genders and between younger and older patients. To evaluate this, we studied a large Scandinavian cohort of patients referred for catheter ablation of AF.

METHODS

Consecutive patients filled out the ASTA questionnaire, assessing symptoms, HRQoL, and perception of arrhythmia, prior to ablation. Patients were recruited from four Swedish and one Danish tertiary center.

RESULTS

A total of 2493 patients (72% men) filled out the ASTA questionnaire. Women experienced eight of the nine ASTA scale symptoms more often than men. Patients <65 years reported four symptoms more often, only tiredness was more frequent in those ≥65 years (P = .007). Women and patients <65 years experienced more often palpitations and regarding close to fainting and this was more common among women, no age differences were seen. Women and men scored differently in 10 of the 13 HRQoL items. Only negative impact on sexual life was more common in men (P < .001). Older patients reported more negative influence in four of the HRQoL items and the younger in one; ability to concentrate.

CONCLUSIONS

Women experienced a more pronounced symptom burden and were more negatively affected in all HRQoL concerns, except for the negative impact on sexual life, where men reported more influence of AF. Differences between age groups were less pronounced. Disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) add important information where gender differences should be considered in the care.