Radiofrequency versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in the setting of left common pulmonary veins

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Comparison of atrial fibrillation ablation using cryoballoon versus radiofrequency in patients with left common pulmonary veins: mid-term follow-up results

PURPOSE

Cryoballoon (CB) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation techniques have similar outcomes for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is limited data about the impact of different ablation strategies in patients with left common pulmonary vein (LCPV). Our aim was to compare the safety and efficacy of RF and CB ablation in AF patients with LCPV.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-seven (n = 80 CB and n = 47 RF) AF patients with LCPV detected by preprocedural computerized tomography (CT) were included in the study. Ostial dimensions and trunk distance were measured in all patients. Atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence was defined as detection of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia (≥ 30 s) after a 3-month blanking period.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in acute procedural success rates for PVI (97.5% in CB and 97.9% in RF, respectively, P = 0.953) and complication rates were similar between the groups (6 (7.5%) in CB and 4 (8.5%) in RF, respectively, P = 1.000). During a median follow-up of 20.7 (4.8-50.2) months for CB and 20.5 (6.2-36.0) months for RF, ATa recurrence was 35.0% and 38.2%, respectively (P = 0.777). Multivariate analysis did not reveal any of the morphologic parameters of LCPV as a significant predictor of ATa recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated that both CB and RF ablation techniques have similar efficacy and safety in AF patients with LCPV during the mid-term follow-up.

Novel noncontact charge density map in the setting of post-atrial fibrillation atrial tachycardias: first experience with the Acutus SuperMap Algorithm

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new high-resolution mapping algorithm SuperMap (Acutus Medical, CA, USA) in identifying and guiding ablation in the setting of regular atrial tachycardias following index atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

METHODS

Seven consecutive patients who underwent a radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by the novel noncontact charge density (CD) SuperMap for atrial tachycardia were prospectively enrolled in our study.

RESULTS

Arrhythmogenic substrate was identified in all seven patients. Mean number of EGM per map was 5859.7 ± 4348.5 points. Three patients (43%) exhibited focal tachycardia mechanisms in the left atrium, alternating from anteroseptal right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV), posterior in proximity of left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV), and interarial septum in proximity of fossa ovalis, respectively. Four patients exhibited macroreentrant mechanism. In 3 of these patients, SuperMap detected mitral isthmus-dependent flutters with tachycardia cycle lengths of 240, 270 and 420 ms, respectively. In one patient, the mechanism was a macroreentrant tachycardia with the critical isthmus located between the crista terminalis and atriotomy. The mean ablation time (min) was 18.2 ± 12.5 and the mean procedural duration time was 56.4 ± 12.1 min. No minor or major complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

The novel high-resolution mapping algorithm SuperMap proved to be safe, fast, and feasible in identifying and guiding ablation in the setting of regular atrial tachycardias following index AF ablation.

The impact of left common pulmonary vein on cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. A meta-analysis

Introduction

Conflicting results regarding the impact of left common pulmonary vein (LCPV) on clinical outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with cryoballoon technology have been reported.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed and Cochrane library for articles that compared the arrhythmia recurrence rate after cryoballoon ablation between patients with normal pattern PVs and patients with LCPV. Studies of first ablation for persistent and paroxysmal AF using the 28 mm Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic cryoballoon (CB-A) reporting clinical success rates at a mean follow-up of ≥12 months were included. Data were analyzed by applying a random effects model.

Results

A total of 5 studies with a total of 1178 patients met our predefined inclusion criteria. After a mean follow-up of 18.4 months, the overall success rate of CB-A ablation among patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF was 57%; in the LCPV group the success rate was 46% and in the normal anatomical pattern group it was 61%. No significant heterogeneity was noted among the studies (I² = 35.8%; Q (df = 3) = 6.23 p-value = 0.18). Arrhythmia recurrence after CB-A ablation was not statistically significant between the two groups (LogOR 0.24; 95% CI [-0.16-0.63]; p-value = 0.23). No significant difference in PNI was observed between the two groups (p-value = 0.693).

Conclusion

The presence of LCPV does not affect the long-term outcome of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation ablation with 28 mm CB-A compared to normal left PVs pattern.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing second-generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the preferred modalities for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Technological advances have improved procedural outcomes, warranting an updated comparison. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBA-2nd generation (CBA-2G) in comparison to RFA-contact force (RFA-CF) in patients with AF.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched until 03/01/2020 for relevant studies comparing CBA-2G versus RFA-CF in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for AF.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies, involving 11 793 patients were included. There was no difference between the two groups in the outcomes of freedom from atrial arrhythmia (p = .67) and total procedural complications (p = .65). There was a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy in CBA-2G (odds ratio: 10.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.85 to 19.55; p < .001). Procedure duration was shorter (mean difference: -31.32 min; 95% CI: -40.73 to -21.92; p < .001) and fluoroscopy duration was longer (+3.21 min; 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.33; p = .003) in CBA-2G compared to RFA-CF. In the subgroup analyses of patients with persistent AF and >1 freeze lesion delivered per vein, there was no difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia.

CONCLUSIONS

In AF patients undergoing initial ablation, CBA-2G and RFA-CF were equally efficacious. The procedure duration was shorter, but with a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy in CBA-2G. In patients with persistent AF, there was no difference in the efficacy between CBA-2G or RFA-CF techniques.

Impact of Left Common Pulmonary Veins in the Contact-Force vs. Cryoballoon Atrial Fibrillation Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) Study

BACKGROUND

Concerns remain regarding the effectiveness of PVI using the fixed diameter non-compliant cryoballoon in the presence of a left common pulmonary vein (LCPV). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of PVI performed by contact-force guided radiofrequency (CF-RF) versus second-generation cryoballoon-based ablation in patients with LCPV.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 346 patients with paroxysmal AF and randomized them to CF-RF or cryoballoon ablation. PV anatomy was not assessed prior to enrolment, and there were no exclusions based on PV anatomy. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor. LCPV was observed in 13.6% of patients (47/346). Left atrial time and fluoroscopy time did not differ between those with and without LCPV (P=0.58 and P=0.06, respectively). Freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia at one year was observed in 46.8% with LCPV and 54.5% without LCPV (P=0.06). In those with LCPV the freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia did not differ between those randomized to CF-RF or cryoballoon ablation (HR for recurrence 1.19, 95% CI 0.53-2.65, P=0.69). In those with LCPV the AF burden was reduced to a similar extent with CF-RF and cryoballoon ablation (99.7% vs. 99.5%, respectively; P=0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized clinical trial, the presence of a LCPV was associated with a trend towards higher rates of arrhythmia recurrence following PVI. No significant difference in arrhythmia recurrence was observed between patients with LCPV randomized to cryoballoon ablation or contact-force guided RF ablation, suggesting that either ablation modality is suitable in this population. (Cryoballoon vs. Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation [CIRCA-DOSE], NCT01913522) This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.