Circumferential pulmonary vein antrum ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled trial

Representation of Women in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Sex inequality in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to cardiovascular disease has been observed. This study examined the proportion of women enrolled in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation RCTs and the potential risks of underrepresentation of women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for AF ablation RCTs published from 2015 to 2022. Participant characteristics were compared among trials with higher and lower proportions of women. Of 147 AF ablation RCTs (30,055 participants), only 10 trials had enrolled women ≥50% of the total participants. Additionally, 42 trials (28.57%) excluded pregnant/breastfeeding women; 6 (4.1%) excluded reproductive-age women without reliable birth control. The proportion of women in AF RCTs ranged from 9% to 71% (median 31.5%), whereas the median proportion of men was 67.7%. The rate of women included in the trials was stable from 2015 to 2022 (P=0.49). Study characteristics, including funding source, showed no correlation with the rate of inclusion of women. RCTs with a higher proportion of female participants enrolled older patients with AF, had a higher prevalence of hypertension but less persistent AF, and smaller left atrium size (P<0.05 for all). Biological sex was evaluated as a risk factor or in a subgroup analysis in 28 RCTs; 10.7% of these trials observed the implication of sex on their results.

CONCLUSION

Women were underrepresented in contemporary AF ablation RCTs. Additionally, women enrolled in AF RCTs were likely to have more comorbidities but less advanced AF, limiting the applicability of the results to women with AF.

General anesthesia enhances lesion quality and ablation efficiency of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. General anesthesia (GA) resolves the problem of pain intolerability and provides regular respiratory mode which might improve the catheter maneuverability of AF ablation. This study aims to compare the procedural performance of PVI under GA versus conscious sedation (CS) from multiple perspectives.

Methods

A total of 36 consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablation under GA were enrolled in GA group. Another 109 patients receiving AF ablation under CS in the same period were selected as the control group. After propensity score matching, 29 matched pairs with similar baseline characteristics were available for further analysis. The AIFV (using AI to analyze the raw data from CARTO3 system) system was used to evaluate six procedural parameters in each PVI procedure.

Results

Compared with CS, PVI under GA had a significantly shorter total PVI time (51.4 min vs. 67.8 min; p = .003) and higher radiofrequency ratio (62.6% vs. 55.8%; p = .032). The number of gaps (1.0 vs. 3.0; p < .001) and the rate of break point were significantly lower in the GA group. GA was also associated with a higher effective ablation-index ratio (87.5% vs. 74.1%; p < .001) and effective force-over-time ratio (85.3% vs. 69.2%; p = .001). After a medium follow-up time of 24 months, 12/29 (41.4%) patients in the CS group and 6/29 (20.7%) patients in the GA group suffered from AF recurrence (p = .156).

Conclusions

GA improves the lesion quality and procedural efficiency of PVI from multiple perspectives evaluated by the AIFV system.

Intraprocedural arrhythmia termination as an end point for hybrid ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a 2-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVES

Hybrid catheter and surgical ablation has emerged as an effective therapy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The aims of this study were to evaluate the relationship between intraprocedural arrhythmia termination and the long-term outcomes of hybrid ablation in patients with long-standing persistent AF.

METHODS

From May 2015 through April 2019, 50 patients with persistent AF with a mean duration of 73.3 ± 62.1 (median 54) months underwent single-step hybrid ablation. Pulmonary vein isolation, left atrial posterior wall isolation and left atrial appendage excision or closure were performed through a left-sided thoracoscopic approach. Subsequently, all patients underwent high-density endocardial mapping and electrogram-based ablation with the end point of AF termination.

RESULTS

We achieved intraprocedural AF termination in 84% (42/50) patients; this end point was reached in 16 patients during surgical ablation and in 26 patients during catheter ablation. Seven patients underwent repeat catheter ablation. After a mean follow-up period of 29 ± 13 months, the freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia of a single procedure without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs was 70% (35/50). In the Cox regression model, intraprocedural termination of AF (hazard ratio 0.205, 95% confidence interval 0.058-0.730; P = 0.014) was the sole predictor of success.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-year outcomes of a one-stop hybrid ablation with an end point of AF termination are promising in patients with long-standing persistent AF.