Prevention, diagnosis, and management of atrioesophageal fistula

Posterior wall isolation via a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon catheter: feasibility, technical considerations, endoscopic findings and comparison with cryoballoon technologies

BACKGROUND

Posterior wall (PW) isolation is an important adjunctive ablation target in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Traditionally performed with point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) ablation, PW isolation has also been performed with different cryoballoon technologies. We aimed at assessing the feasibility of PW isolation with the novel RF balloon catheter Heliostar™ (Biosense Webster, CA, USA).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 32 consecutive patients with persistent AF scheduled for first-time ablation with the Heliostar™ device. Procedural data were compared with those from 96 consecutive persistent AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) plus PW isolation with a cryoballoon device. The ratio RF balloon/cryoballoon was 1:3 for each operator involved in the study, aiming at avoiding any imbalance related to different experience.

RESULTS

Single-shot PV isolation was documented in a significantly higher number of cases with the RF balloon technology compared to cryoballoon ablation (89.8% vs. 81.0%; p = 0.02, respectively). PW isolation was achieved with a similar number of balloon applications between the two groups (11 ± 4 with the RF balloon versus 11 ± 2 with the cryoballoon; p = 0.16), but in a significantly shorter time among RF balloon patients (228 ± 72 s versus 1274 ± 277 s with cryoballoon; p < 0.001). Primary safety endpoint occurred in none of the RF balloon patients versus 5 (5.2%) patients in the cryoballoon group (p = 0.33). Primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in all (100%) RF balloon patients versus 93 (96.9%) cryoballoon ones (p = 0.57). Oesophageal endoscopy did not show any signs of thermal lesions in RF balloon patients with luminal temperature rise.

CONCLUSIONS

RF balloon-based PW isolation was safe and promoted shorter procedure times compared to similar cryoballoon-based ablation procedures.

Posterior wall thickness of the confluent inferior pulmonary veins measured by left atrial intracardiac echocardiography: implications for catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Confluent inferior pulmonary veins (CIPV) is a rare anatomical variant. There is few evidence in the literature regarding anatomic landmarks consideration to guide radiofrequency application in avoiding complications in the esophagus in CIPV cases.

METHODS

Of 986 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation from July 2020 to June 2022, seven (0.7%) had CIPV with a common trunk connecting to the LA diagnosed by 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) performed from the left atrium (LA), we measured the posterior wall thickness (PWT) of the CIPV adjacent to the esophagus and compared the measurement with the LA posterior wall thickness (LAPWT) at the left inferior PV level of 25 controls without CIPV. For ablation in CIPV patients, each superior PV was individually isolated, and box isolation of CIPV without ablating the CIPV posterior wall was added (tri-circle ablation technique).

RESULTS

The CIPV PWT was 0.7 ± 0.1 mm, while non-CIPV LAPWT was 2.0 ± 0.4 mm (P < 0.001). In the CIPV group, upper and lower portions of the CIPV were both apart from the esophagus (mean distances, 6.7 ± 3.4 mm and 7.9 ± 2.7 mm, respectively). Individual superior PV isolation and box CIPV isolation resulted in complete isolation of all PVs, with no complications. All CIPV patients except one remained AF recurrence-free for 376 ± 52 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CIPV frequency is low, CIPV PWT is very thin and special care is needed during ablation. A "tri-circle" ablation strategy avoids ablating in the thinnest portion of the posterior wall. Further studies are warranted to assess the safety.

Acquired atrioesophageal fistula: Need it be lethal? Sizing up the problem, diagnostic modalities, and best management

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

An atrioesophageal fistula is a devastating complication of ablation for atrial fibrillation. For the surgeon facing this dreaded complication, it may be a 'once in a lifetime' case. This review aims to describe the clinical problem and evaluate the outcome of different surgical techniques to start guiding cardiothoracic surgeons toward those which offer the best chance of survival.

METHODS

An electronic search retrieved 125 articles containing 195 cases of atrioesophageal fistula secondary to atrial fibrillation ablation. Reports of pericardio-esophageal or mediastino-esophageal fistula were excluded.

RESULTS

The median age was 61 and 143 (73%) cases occurred in males. Fever (n = 147; 75%) and neurological dysfunction (n = 151; 77%) were the most common symptoms. The median time from ablation to symptom onset was 21 days (interquartile range: 12-28). The most sensitive thoracic imaging modality was computed tomography (n = 135/153; 90%). Immediate deterioration occurred during 11/58 (19%) oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopies. Mortality was lower in patients who had surgery (39%) compared with endoscopic intervention (94%) or conservative management (97%). Patients who had atrial repair combined with esophageal repair or oesophagectomy were more likely to survive than those who had atrial repair alone (OR 6.97; p < .001). Isolation of the esophageal aspect of the fistula conferred an additional survival benefit (OR 5.85; p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Fever, neurological symptoms, and chest pain in the context of recent ablation should prompt immediate evaluation. Urgent CT thorax should be arranged and repeated if initially unremarkable. Esophageal instrumentation should be avoided due to the risk of catastrophic air embolism or massive hemorrhage. The best way forward is emergency surgical repair; the combination which offers the best survival benefit is atrial repair combined with esophageal surgery and isolation of the esophageal aspect of the fistula.

Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of atrioesophageal fistula resulting from atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a worrisome complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Its clinical manifestations and time course are unpredictable and may contribute to diagnostic and treatment delays. We conducted a systematic review of all available cases of AEF, aiming at characterizing clinical presentation, time course, diagnostic pitfalls, and outcomes.

METHODS

The digital search retrieved 150 studies containing 257 cases, 238 (92.6%) of which with a confirmed diagnosis of AEF and 19 (7.4%) of pericardioesophageal fistula.

RESULTS

The median time from ablation to symptom onset was 21 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 11-28). Neurological abnormalities were documented in 75% of patients. Compared to patients seen by a specialist, those evaluated at a walk-in clinic or community hospital had a significantly greater delay between symptom onset and hospital admission (median: 2.5 day [IQR: 1-8] vs. 1 day [IQR: 1-5); p = .03). Overall, 198 patients underwent a chest scan (computed tomography [CT]: 192 patients and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]: 6 patients), 48 (24.2%; 46 CT and 2 MRI) of whom had normal/unremarkable findings. Time from hospital admission to diagnostic confirmation was significantly longer in patients with a first normal/unremarkable chest scan (p < .001). Overall mortality rate was 59.3% and 26.0% survivors had residual neurological deficits at the time of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Since healthcare professionals of any specialty might be involved in treating AEF patients, awareness of the clinical manifestations, diagnostic pitfalls, and time course, as well as an early contact with the treating electrophysiologist for a coordinated interdisciplinary medical effort, are pivotal to prevent diagnostic delays and reduce mortality.

Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a valuable tool and should be standard of care in any modern electrophysiology laboratory. Through real-time imaging of cardiac anatomy, ICE is used to guide electrophysiology procedures and monitor for complications. This article is a short overview of the application of real-time ICE imaging during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures.