Long Term outcomes of percutaneous atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with continuous monitoring

Long-term safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in atrial fibrillation: 3-year results of the AFFORD study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia which has been associated with increased sympathetic nervous system activity and hypertension. Recent evidence indicated that renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) could safely contribute to an improvement in AF burden.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of radiofrequency RDN in hypertensive patients with symptomatic AF.

METHODS

This pilot study included patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF (European Hearth Rhythm Association class ≥ II) despite optimal medical therapy, office systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140 mmHg and ≥ 2 antihypertensive drugs. AF burden was measured using an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), implanted 3 months prior to RDN. ICM interrogation and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring were performed at baseline and at 3/6/12/24/36 months post RDN. The primary efficacy outcome was daily AF burden. Statistical analyses were performed using Poisson and negative binomial models.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients with a median age [25th-75th percentiles] of 66.2 [61.2-70.8] years (55% female) were included. At baseline, office BP ± standard deviation (SD) was 153.8/87.5 ± 15.2/10.4 mmHg, while mean 24-h ambulatory BP was 129.5/77.3 ± 15.5/9.3 mmHg. Baseline daily AF burden was 1.4 [0.0-10.9] minutes/day and throughout a 3-year follow-up period, no significant change was observed (- 15.4%/year; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 50.2%, + 43.7%; p = 0.54). The number of defined daily doses of antiarrhythmic drugs and antihypertensive drugs remained stable over time, while mean 24-h ambulatory systolic BP decreased with - 2.2 (95% CI - 3.9, - 0.6; p = 0.01) mmHg/year.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with hypertension and symptomatic AF, stand-alone RDN reduced BP but did not significantly reduce AF burden up until 3 years of follow-up.

A retrospective analysis of frailty status on atrial fibrillation catheter ablation outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces symptoms and improves the quality of life compared with medical treatment. It is unclear if frailty impacts on the outcome of catheter ablation in patients with symptomatic AF. We sought to evaluate the association between frailty as measured by the validated NHS electronic Frailty Index (eFI) and outcomes post-AF ablation.

METHODS

Two hundred forty eight patients who had undergone AF ablation with a mean age of 72.9 ± 5.16 were included in the study retrospectively. The primary endpoint for success was defined as freedom from atrial arrhythmia lasting >30 s beyond the 3-month blanking periods. Frailty was based on the eFI, and the cohort split into four groups: fit (no frailty), mild, moderate and severe frailty.

RESULTS

Frailty was categorized as fit (118/248; 47.6%), mild (66/248; 26.6%), moderate (54/248; 21.8%), and severe (10/248; 4.0%). Freedom from arrhythmia occurred in 167 of 248 (67.3%) patients after a mean follow-up of 25.8 +/- 17.3 months. Fit patients had significantly greater freedom from arrhythmia (92/118; 78%) compared to mild frailty (40/66; 60.6%, p-value = .020), moderate frailty (31/54; 57.4%, p-value = .006), or severe frailty (4/10; 40.0%, p-value < .001). There was also a significant difference in arrhythmia occurrence between patients with mild frailty and severe frailty (p-value = .044).

CONCLUSION

Frailty is associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing AF ablation. The eFI may be used in the prognostic evaluation of AF ablation outcomes. Further studies are essential to confirm the findings of this study.

Rate or Rhythm Control in CRT (RHYTHMIC): Study rationale and protocol

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has several detrimental effects on heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). These include suboptimal biventricular pacing and the loss of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony. AV node ablation improves biventricular pacing and clinical outcomes in large observational studies. However, restoration of sinus rhythm with AF ablation may have additional benefits.

Objectives

To compare the effects of AV node ablation and AF ablation on echocardiographic and symptomatic outcomes in patients with CRT and suboptimal biventricular pacing.

Methods

RHYTHMIC is a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial. Seventy patients will be recruited and randomized to each ablation strategy in a 1:1 ratio. Key inclusion criteria include a previous CRT implant (with atrial lead) for dyssynchronous heart failure, and biventricular pacing <95% secondary to AF. Patients with permanent AF will be excluded.

Results

Patients will undergo baseline assessment including transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), device check, blood tests, electrocardiogram (ECG), 6-minute walk test, and symptom questionnaire. They will then undergo either AV node ablation or AF ablation according to their allocated group. Follow-up will occur at 1 week (TTE and ECG) and at 6 months (repeat of baseline investigations). The primary endpoint will be change in left ventricular ejection fraction on TTE.

Conclusion

This is the first randomized controlled trial comparing AV node ablation and AF ablation in patients with CRT. We anticipate it will provide valuable insight into the management of this frequently encountered clinical scenario in a challenging patient cohort.

Posterior wall isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation. Long-term outcomes of a repeat procedure strategy

BACKGROUND

Posterior wall isolation (PWI) added to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly used in ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) despite limited evidence of clinical benefit. We investigated the 5-year outcomes of a PVI + PWI ablation strategy with mandatory repeat procedures in PeAF.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with PeAF participated in this single-arm prospective study and underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with wide area circumferential ablation (WACA), roof, and inferior lines for PVI + PWI which was reinforced if required during mandated repeat procedures after 6 months. Then, patients were followed for 60 months using continuous heart rhythm monitoring by implanted cardiac monitors (ICM) and atrial fibrillation effect on quality-of-life scoring (AFEQT; range: 20-100 points) for the initial 30 months.

RESULTS

ICM-verified cumulated AF recurrence was 54% after 30 months but the ensuing AF burden was only median 0‰ [0 to 4.8‰] overall and 1‰ [0 to 8 ‰] among patients with any recurrence. AFEQT scores increased from baseline 60 points [48 to 72] to 93 points [84 to 96] at repeat procedures P < 0.0001 and further to 96 points [93 to 99] P = 0.03 after 30 months. After 60 months, at least one episode of AF had been documented in 63% and two patients (8%) were in permanent AF.

CONCLUSION

Reinforced PVI + PWI was associated with low long-term AF burden and corresponding improvements in quality-of-life. Reinforced (or durable) PVI + PWI appears to be a promising strategy to treat PeAF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05045131.

Reflections on the usefulness of today's atrial fibrillation ablation procedure endpoints and patient-reported outcomes

The improvement of Patient-reported outcomes, such as health-related quality of life, is the main indication for atrial fibrillation ablation. Despite this guideline derived indication for an AF ablation procedure the current standardized primary endpoint in AF ablation trials is still rhythm-related, and primarily a 30-second long AF episode. The review presents reflections on the non-rational arguments of using rhythm related endpoints rather than Patient-reported outcomes in AF ablation procedure trials despite the mismatch between many of the rhythm related variables and symptoms. Arguments for health-related quality of life as the most optimal primary endpoint in clinical trials are presented while atrial fibrillation burden is presented as the most optimal electrical complementary endpoint, apart from being the major variable in mechanistic trials.