Efficacy of ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Sex differences in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: A difference-in-difference propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether male and female patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) differ in their risk of recurrence after catheter ablation remains controversial. Large differences in baseline characteristics between males and females often affect study results.

METHODS

Patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF who received their first catheter ablation procedure between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for age, body mass index, and AF duration. Our main concerns were sex differences in comorbidities, procedures, arrhythmia recurrences, and procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

For this study, 352 patients (176 pairs) were matched, and baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Intraprocedural sex differences were apparent as more male patients received cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (55.00% vs. 31.43%, p = .005). Full follow-up, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year AF recurrence rates were comparable between male and female groups. Multivariable Cox regression showed that the recurrence risk of paroxysmal AF was similar between male and female patients. AF duration was the only potential risk factor and occurred for only male patients. There were no significant differences in the subgroup analyses. Procedure-related complications were comparable between the male and female groups.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe differences in baseline characteristics, arrhythmia recurrences, or procedure-related complications between male and female patients. Sex differences were reflected mainly in the finding that male patients received more cavotricuspid isthmus ablations, and atrial fibrillation duration was the only potential risk factor for recurrence and only for male patients.