Breathing circuit compliance and accuracy of displayed tidal volume during pressure-controlled ventilation of infants: A quality improvement project

Practical Review of Mechanical Ventilation in Adults and Children in The Operating Room and Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

During general anesthesia, mechanical ventilation can cause pulmonary damage through mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury which is a major cause of postoperative pulmonary complications, which varies between 5 and 33% and increases significantly the 30-day mortality of the surgical patient.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to analyze different variables which played key role in safe application of mechanical ventilation in the operating room and emergency setting.

METHOD

Also, we wanted to analyze different types of population that underwent intraoperative mechanical ventilation like obese patients, pediatric and adult population and different strategies such as one lung ventilation and ventilation in trendelemburg position. The peer-reviewed articles analyzed were selected according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) from Pubmed/Medline, Ovid/Wiley and Cochrane Library, combining key terms such as: "pulmonary post-operative complications", "protective ventilation", "alveolar recruitment maneuvers", "respiratory compliance", "intraoperative paediatric ventilation", "best peep", "types of ventilation". Among the 230 papers identified, 150 articles were selected, after title - abstract examination and removing the duplicates, resulting in 94 articles related to mechanical ventilation in operating room and emergency setting that were analyzed.

RESULTS

Careful preoperative patient's evaluation and protective ventilation (i.e. use of low tidal volumes, adequate PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuvers) has been shown to be effective not only in limiting alveolar de-recruitment, alveolar overdistension and lung damage, but also in reducing the onset of pulmonary post-operative complications (PPCs).

CONCLUSION

Mechanical ventilation is like "Janus Bi-front" because it is essential for surgical procedures, for the care of critical care patients and in life-threatening conditions but it can be harmful to the patient if continued for a long time and where an excessive dose of oxygen is administered into the lungs. Low tidal volume is associated with minor rate of PPCs and other complications and every complication can increase length of Stay, adding cost to NHS between 1580 € and 1650 € per day in Europe and currently the prevention of PPCS is only weapon that we possess.

The Difference Between Set and Delivered Tidal Volume: A Lung Simulation Study

Background

Precise control of tidal volume is one of the keys in limiting ventilator-induced lung injury and ensuring adequate ventilation in mechanically ventilated neonates. The aim of the study was to compare the tidal volume (mVT) measured from the expiratory limb of the ventilator with the actual tidal volume (aVT) that would be delivered to the patient using a lung model to simulate a neonate.

Methods

This study was conducted using the ASL5000 lung simulator. Three combinations of parameters were set: resistance (cmH₂O/L/sec) and compliance (mL/cmH₂O) of 50 and 2 (Group 1), 100 and 1 (Group 2), and 150 and 0.5 (Group 3), respectively. The ASL5000 was connected to each of the ventilators including one anesthesia machine ventilator (Drager Fabius GS) and two ICU ventilators (Servo-i Universal and Evita Infinity V500). Each ventilator was evaluated with a set tidal volume of 30 mL (sVT) and a respiratory rate of 25 breathes/minute in both the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and dual-controlled ventilation (DCV) modes.

Results

The discrepancies between sVT, mVT and aVT were highest with the Fabius anesthesia machine ventilator and increased in the simulated lung injury groups. When comparing the ICU ventilators, the difference was greater the Servo-i and increased when using the DCV mode and with simulated lung injury.

Conclusion

Accurate tidal volumes were achieved only with the Infinity ICU ventilator. This was true regardless of mode of ventilation and even during simulated lung injury.

Effect of an endoscopic bite block on one-handed mask ventilation

PURPOSE

An endoscopic bite block is a device to ensure that the patient's mouth remains wide open during endoscopic procedures. Wide opening of the mouth may facilitate the efficiency of one-handed mask ventilation. We evaluated the effect of an endoscopic bite block on mask ventilation among three ventilation techniques: one-handed ventilation, one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block, and two-handed ventilation.

METHODS

Fifty-nine anesthetized and paralyzed patients were included. After induction of anesthesia, one-handed ventilation, one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block and two-handed ventilation were performed in a cross-over, randomized order. The primary outcome was the expiratory tidal volume (mL/kg of predicted body weight). Secondary outcomes included minute ventilation (L/min) and the incidence of inadequate mask ventilation or dead space ventilation.

RESULTS

The expiratory tidal volume of one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block was significantly improved when compared with that of one-handed ventilation (8.2 [6.8-10.2] mL/kg vs. 7.1 [4.5-9.0] mL/kg, respectively, difference = 1.1 mL/kg; 95% CI 0.8-2.4; P < 0.001), and was comparable to that of two-handed ventilation (8.9 [6.3-11.5] mL/kg; difference = 0.7 mL/kg; 95% CI - 0.7 to 1.5; P = 0.432). Minute ventilation was also significantly improved in one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block compared with that in one-handed ventilation (7.4 [6.3-8.6] L/min vs. 6.7 [4.2-7.9] L/min, respectively, difference = 0.7 L/min; 95% CI 0.6-2.0; P < 0.001), and was comparable to that of two-handed ventilation (7.7 [6.5-9.5] L/min; difference = 0.3 L/min; 95% CI - 0.5 to 1.4; P = 0.390). The incidence of inadequate ventilation or dead space ventilation was not different among the ventilation techniques (P = 0.080).

CONCLUSION

The use of an endoscopic bite block improved one-handed mask ventilation, showing comparable efficacy with two-handed mask ventilation.

How to ventilate preterm infants with lung compliance close to circuit compliance: real-time simulations on an infant hybrid respiratory simulator

Circuit compliance close to lung compliance can create serious problems in effective and safe mechanical ventilation of preterm infants. We considered what ventilation technique is the most beneficial in this case. A hybrid (numerical-physical) simulator of infant respiratory system mechanics, the Bennett Ventilator and NICO apparatus were used to simulate pressure-controlled ventilation (PC) and volume-controlled ventilation with constant flow (VCV_CF) and descending flow (VCV_DF), under permissive hypercapnia (PHC) (6 ml kg^-1) and normocapnia (SV) (8 ml kg^-1) conditions. Respiratory rate (RR) was 36 or 48 min^-1 and PEEP was 0.3 or 0.6 kPa. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean airway pressure (MAP), and work of breathing by the ventilator (WOB) were lower (P < 0.01, 1 - β = 0.9) using the PHC strategy compared to the SV strategy. The WOB increased (P < 0.01; 1 - β = 0.9) when the RR increased. The PC, VCV_CF, and VCV_DF modes did not differ in minute ventilation produced by the ventilator (MV_V), but the PC mode delivered the highest minute ventilation to the patient (MV_T) (P < 0.01; 1 - β = 0.9) at the same PIP, MAP, and WOB. The most beneficial ventilation technique appeared to be PC ventilation with the PHC strategy, with lower RR (36 min^-1). Graphical abstract The effectiveness of an infant ventilation depending on circuit compliance to lung compliance ratio (C_v C_L ^-1) and inspiration time (T_i). V_V, V_T, tidal volume set on the ventilator and delivered to patient, respectively.

Accuracy of near-patient vs. inbuilt spirometry for monitoring tidal volumes in an in-vitro paediatric lung model

Spirometric monitoring provides precise measurement and delivery of tidal volumes within a narrow range, which is essential for lung-protective strategies that aim to reduce morbidity and mortality in mechanically-ventilated patients. Conventional anaesthesia ventilators include inbuilt spirometry to monitor inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes. The GE Aisys CS² anaesthesia ventilator allows additional near-patient spirometry via a sensor interposed between the proximal end of the tracheal tube and the respiratory tubing. Near-patient and inbuilt spirometry of two different GE Aisys CS² anaesthesia ventilators were compared in an in-vitro study. Assessments were made of accuracy and variability in inspiratory and expiratory tidal volume measurements during ventilation of six simulated paediatric lung models using the ASL 5000 test lung. A total of 9240 breaths were recorded and analysed. Differences between inspiratory tidal volumes measured with near-patient and inbuilt spirometry were most significant in the newborn setting (p < 0.001), and became less significant with increasing age and weight. During expiration, tidal volume measurements with near-patient spirometry were consistently more accurate than with inbuilt spirometry for all lung models (p < 0.001). Overall, the variability in measured tidal volumes decreased with increasing tidal volumes, and was smaller with near-patient than with inbuilt spirometry. The variability in measured tidal volumes was higher during expiration, especially with inbuilt spirometry. In conclusion, the present in-vitro study shows that measurements with near-patient spirometry are more accurate and less variable than with inbuilt spirometry. Differences between measurement methods were most significant in the smallest patients. We therefore recommend near-patient spirometry, especially for neonatal and paediatric patients.