1
|
Aggarwal AK, Ottestad E, Pfaff KE, Huai-Yu Li A, Xu L, Derby R, Hecht D, Hah J, Pritzlaff S, Prabhakar N, Krane E, D’Souza G, Hoydonckx Y. Review of Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in the Management of Chronic Pain. Anesthesiol Clin 2023; 41:395-470. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
|
2
|
Tomasian A, Filippiadis DK, Tutton S, Deschamps F, Cazzato RL, Prologo JD, Kelekis A, Levy J, Gangi A, Garnon J, Jennings JW. Comprehensive Palliative Musculoskeletal Interventional Radiology Care for Patients with Cancer. Radiographics 2022; 42:1654-1669. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.220009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
3
|
Hao D, Fiore M, Di Capua C, Gulati A. Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Practical Review for Acute Cancer-Related Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:813-820. [PMID: 36168092 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01089-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ultrasound-guided regional techniques, including catheter-based approaches, are a subset of interventional therapies that have gained interest as an option for managing acute cancer-related pain. The authors sought to review the available published evidence and to discuss practical recommendations for expanding access to such therapies. RECENT FINDINGS In a MEDLINE/Pubmed search of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks and peripheral nerve catheters for specific anatomic targets, a total of 28 case reports and case series were identified. Included studies described improved analgesia and reduced opioid requirements with highly variable duration of effect. Current level of evidence remains limited. Pain is a symptom that markedly impacts the quality of life of cancer patients and ultrasound-guided regional techniques are a promising therapeutic option albeit with a limited evidence base. Practical recommendations offered for coordinating access to such therapies in the inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient settings may expand interest and facilitate higher quality research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Michael Fiore
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Di Capua
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang A, Nadav D, Legler A, Chen GH, Hingula L, Puttanniah V, Gulati A. An Interventional Pain Algorithm for the Treatment of Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Review. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:677-686. [PMID: 33155049 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy worldwide. Breast surgery and adjuvant oncological therapies are often required to increase survival. Treatment-related pain may persist and evolve into postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) in a significant subset of breast cancer survivors. In this retrospective investigation, we will present our experience in applying an interventional algorithmic approach to treat PMPS. DESIGN A retrospective study. SETTING An academic cancer hospital. SUBJECTS Adult females with PMPS diagnosis. METHODS We reviewed 169 records with the diagnosis of PMPS from 2015 to 2019 within our health system. Pre- and post-injection pain scores, relief duration, and medication usage changes were collected. The decision to perform each procedure was based on the anatomic location of the painful area with the corresponding peripheral sensory innervation. Decision-making flow diagrams were created to present our experience in managing PMPS beyond peripheral nerve blocks. RESULTS Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block results (n=350) were analyzed. The mean baseline pain score was 7, compared with the post-treatment mean score of 3 (95% confidence interval: 3.58 to 3.98, P = 0.0001). Among the responders, the mean pain relief duration was 45 days, with a median of 84 days. Opioid medication consumption was reduced by 11% (t = 0.72, P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks of this area could be performed safely and effectively after breast surgeries. We also present our proposed algorithm to provide a stepwise application for selecting the appropriate therapies in the management of more complex PMPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajax Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.,The Spine and Pain Institute of New York, New York, USA
| | - Danielle Nadav
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aron Legler
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Grant H Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lee Hingula
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vinay Puttanniah
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oh DCS, Rispoli L, Ghosh P, Gulati A. Epidural Steroid Injections for the Management of Spinal Malignancy-Related Pain: A Pragmatic Review and Retrospective Study. Pain Pract 2020; 21:285-298. [PMID: 33025670 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal malignancy-related pain results from tumor, fracture, instability, inflammation, and/or nerve root/spinal cord compression. Systemic corticosteroids are commonly used but have many undesirable adverse effects that impact quality of life and continuation of cancer treatments. Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) may be a viable alternative pain treatment. OBJECTIVES This study starts with a pragmatic review on the efficacy of ESIs to treat spinal malignancy-related pain. Given the limited evidence, we supplement the study with a single-center, retrospective review. METHODS A pragmatic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Review. Then, a retrospective chart review was performed. RESULTS A pragmatic review yielded 10 patients who underwent ESI for spinal malignancy-related pain. Three patients had "excellent" relief (≥ 50% relief), who all received thoracic injections. This amounted to level IV evidence and an inconclusive recommendation (Grade C) as per Wright's criteria. In our retrospective review, all thoracic cases achieved at least "moderate" pain improvement (30% to 49% relief). 55.6% had "excellent" relief. Lumbosacral injections resulted in 86.0% with at least "moderate" relief and 69.8% with "excellent" relief. Caudal injections were less likely to benefit than lumbosacral injections (P = 0.02). The transforaminal approach resulted in the best relief. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS There is inconclusive evidence to use ESIs to treat spinal malignancy-related pain in the current literature. Our retrospective review provides level III evidence for our conclusion that ESIs are safe and efficacious to treat spinal malignancy-related pain. Thoracic/lumbosacral injections led to significantly better pain relief compared with caudal injections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Chun-Suk Oh
- Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital - University Hospital of Columbia and Cornell, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Leia Rispoli
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Priyanka Ghosh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Steinberger JM, Yuk F, Doshi AH, Green S, Germano IM. Multidisciplinary management of metastatic spine disease: initial symptom-directed management. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 7:i33-i44. [PMID: 33299572 PMCID: PMC7705525 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In the past 2 decades, a deeper understanding of the cancer molecular signature has resulted in longer longevity of cancer patients, hence a greater population, who potentially can develop metastatic disease. Spine metastases (SM) occur in up to 70% of cancer patients. Familiarizing ourselves with the key aspects of initial symptom-directed management is important to provide SM patients with the best patient-specific options. We will review key components of initial symptoms assessment such as pain, neurological symptoms, and spine stability. Radiographic evaluation of SM and its role in management will be reviewed. Nonsurgical treatment options are also presented and discussed, including percutaneous procedures, radiation, radiosurgery, and spine stereotactic body radiotherapy. The efforts of a multidisciplinary team will continue to ensure the best patient care as the landscape of cancer is constantly changing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy M Steinberger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Frank Yuk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Amish H Doshi
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sheryl Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Isabelle M Germano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oh DCS, First L, Rakesh N, Oh H, Gulati A. Inferior and Intra-/Peri-Articular Superior Sacroiliac Joint Injection Approaches Under Ultrasound Guidance to Treat Metastasis-Related Posterior Pelvic Bone Pain. Pain Pract 2020; 20:769-776. [PMID: 32270598 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous mechanical and pathologic variables contribute to sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. The oncologic population has additional considerations, including tumor burden causing fracture, nerve compression, joint instability, and periosteal inflammation. Post-treatment changes may also restrict joint mobility, causing transitional pain. Currently, fluoroscopically guided SIJ injections, aimed at the inferior one third of the SIJ, are the gold standard for treatment but have only been described in the nononcologic population. Ultrasound (US) guidance may confer several benefits, including positioning, ease of procedure, lower costs, and, importantly, guidance to avoid neovascularization, metastatic disease, and other soft tissue structures. OBJECTIVES We aim to describe the advantages of US-guided SIJ injections for refractory malignant SIJ pain from extra-articular tumors. We then describe our technique and decision framework for accessing the superior or inferior SIJ in patients with metastatic sacroiliac pain. METHODS A retrospective review was performed on 5 patients with refractory malignant SIJ pain who underwent US-guided superior or inferior approach SIJ injection. Using imaging and outcomes, we developed a decision framework. RESULTS Patients received either inferior or superior approach SIJ injections depending on location of tumor, extent of tumor invasion, and stability of the SIJ as per our framework. All patients reported improvement in pain and function without complications. CONCLUSIONS We propose a decision framework for inferior vs. superior approach US-guided SIJ injections in the oncologic population with SIJ pain from metastases to the pelvis or sacrum. Having multiple techniques to approach the SIJ is important in the oncologic population, in whom metastatic tumor burden poses a technical challenge to performing these injections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Chun-Suk Oh
- Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-University Hospital of Columbia and Cornell, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Lucas First
- Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-University Hospital of Columbia and Cornell, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Neal Rakesh
- Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-University Hospital of Columbia and Cornell, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Hanna Oh
- Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-University Hospital of Columbia and Cornell, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|