Is there an association between caregiver antipathy and psychosis? A systematic review

What Do Four Decades of Research Tell Us About the Association Between Childhood Adversity and Psychosis: An Updated and Extended Multi-Level Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Estimating the current association between childhood adversity and the risk of psychosis is crucial for prevention and intervention. We provided an updated synthesis of evidence from the past four decades, expanded the available data by investigating a broad array of adversity subtypes, and explored sex differences and the age of psychosis onset as relevant factors.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, WANFANG, and CNKI, for case-control, cross-sectional and cohort studies on the association between adversity and psychotic symptoms/illness. Multi-level meta-analysis, prediction intervals calculation, and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The main analysis included 183 study samples (N=349,265), with 119 case-control studies (15,186 cases; 14,879 controls), 51 cross-sectional studies (N=299,659), and 13 cohort studies (N=19,541). Significant associations between adversity and psychosis were observed across all study designs, yielding an overall odds ratio of 2.80 (95% CI=2.18, 3.60). Secondary analyses revealed that exposure to each adversity subtype increased the odds of psychosis, with the highest odds ratio (3.54 [95% CI=3.04, 4.13]) for emotional abuse, and the lowest odds ratio of (1.58 [95% CI=1.48, 1.68]) for parental antipathy. No statistically significant sex differences were observed, although the odds ratio for sexual abuse was higher for women. Onset of psychosis was earlier in adversity-exposed individuals (mean difference=-0.79 years, 95% CI=-1.47 to -0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest meta-analysis to date on the association between childhood adversity and psychosis. The results have broad clinical implications, as they highlight the need for selective prevention of exposure to early adversities and the implementation of trauma-informed therapies in the treatment of psychosis.

Childhood family environment predicting psychotic disorders over a 37-year follow-up - A general population cohort study

BACKGROUND

Childhood adverse effects and traumatic experiences increase the risk for several psychiatric disorders. We now investigated whether prospectively assessed childhood family environment per se contributes to increased risk for psychotic disorders in adulthood, and whether these family patterns are also relevant in the development of affective disorders.

METHODS

We used the Young Finns Data (n = 3502). Childhood family environment was assessed in 1980/1983 with previously constructed risk scores: (1) disadvantageous emotional family atmosphere (parenting practices, parents' life satisfaction, parents' mental disorder, parents' alcohol intoxication), (2) adverse socioeconomic environment (overcrowded apartment, home income, parent's employment, occupational status, educational level), and (3) stress-prone life events (home movement, school change, parental divorce, death, or hospitalization, and child's hospitalization). Psychiatric diagnoses (ICD-10 classification) over the lifespan were collected up to 2017 from the national registry of hospital care. Non-affective psychotic disorder and affective disorder groups were formed.

RESULTS

Frequent stress-prone life events predicted higher likelihood of non-affective psychotic disorders (OR = 2.401, p = 0.001). Adverse socioeconomic environment or emotional family atmosphere did not predict psychotic disorders. Only disadvantageous emotional family atmosphere predicted modestly higher likelihood of affective disorders (OR = 1.583, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that childhood family environment and atmosphere patterns as such contribute to the risk for developing adulthood mental disorders with relative disorder specificity. The results emphasize the importance of both individual and public health preventive initiatives, including family support interventions.

The Structure of Temperament in Caregivers of Patients with Schizophrenia

The onset of schizophrenia symptoms usually occurs in early youth. As a result, the parents of these patients usually become their caregivers. The role of a caregiver for a person with schizophrenia is a considerable mental and physical burden. Therefore, an interesting issue is what motivates these people to take up this challenge. It is probable that, apart from the moral imperative or kinship, the factor determining this decision is the personality structure of the caregiver. The aim of our study was to compare the structure of temperament (according to the model of temperament as formal characteristics of behavior developed by Jan Strelau) in caregivers of young adults (age 18-25 years) with schizophrenia with the structure of temperament of parents of healthy young adults still living in the family home under their care. The study group consisted of 64 people (51 women), who were taking care of young adults (aged 18-25 years) with schizophrenia, while the control group (53 people, 42 women) consisted of parents of healthy adults still living in the family home. Both groups were asked to complete a questionnaire of the authors' own design on their demographic data as well as The Formal Characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory to assess the temperament traits. The results were given in the number of points obtained on average in each dimension. Both groups did not differ in terms of size and age, with women predominating. Caregivers of young adults with schizophrenia had higher values of briskness (43.22 ± 4.45 vs. 42.90 ± 3.98, p = 0.032), emotional reactivity (46.02 ± 4.39 vs. 41.01 ± 3.12, p = 0.012) and activity level (44.01.89 ± 4.15 vs. 37.59 ± 4.77, p = 0.022) compared to the control group. The remaining dimensions of temperament: perseverance, sensory sensitivity, rhythmicity, and endurance did not differentiate between the two groups. The temperament structure of caregivers of young people with schizophrenia differs from the temperament structure of caregivers of healthy adults. Caregivers of sick people have higher values of briskness, emotional reactivity, and activity level compared to the control group.