Utility of screening echocardiogram after endomyocardial biopsy for identification of cardiac perforation or tricuspid valve injury

Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in pediatric heart transplant

BACKGROUND

In pediatric heart transplant (PHT), cardiac catheterization with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is standard for diagnosing acute rejection (AR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) but is costly and invasive.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to noninvasively identify differences in PHT patients with AR and CAV.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled at three children's hospitals. Data were collected from surveillance EMB or EMB for-cause AR. Patients were excluded if they had concurrent diagnoses of AR and CAV, CMR obtained >7days from AR diagnosis, they had EMB negative AR, or could not undergo contrasted, unsedated CMR. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups: (1) No AR or CAV (Healthy), (2) AR, (3) CAV. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for pairwise comparisons.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (median age 17years [IQR 15-19]) 10 (17%) with AR, and 11 (19%) with CAV. AR subjects had worse left ventricular ejection fraction compared to Healthy patients (p = 0.001). Global circumferential strain (GCS) was worse in AR (p = 0.054) and CAV (p = 0.019), compared to Healthy patients. ECV, native T1, and T2 z-scores were elevated in patients with AR.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR was able to identify differences between CAV and AR. CAV subjects had normal global function but abnormal GCS which may suggest subclinical dysfunction. AR patients have abnormal function and tissue characteristics consistent with edema (elevated ECV, native T1 and T2 z-scores). Characterization of CMR patterns is critical for the development of noninvasive biomarkers for PHT and may decrease dependence on EMB.

Does the induction immunotherapy (basiliximab) influence the early acute cellular rejection index after orthotopic heart transplantation?- Preliminary assessment report

The study aimed to determine the influence of induction therapy on the acute cellular rejection (ACR) index in adult heart transplant recipients during the one-year observation. The study population consisted of 256 consecutive adult patients (pts), aged 51.5 (±11.9) years, 199 (77%) men treated with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in the period between 2015 and 2020 in a single high-volume heart transplant center. The endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) were performed according to the protocol consisting of 7 protocolary EMBs for up to 3 months and 10 EMBs for up to one year after OHT. The rejection index (ACRI) was calculated as the number of scheduled EMBs with the ACR ≥ 2 divided by the total number of protocolary EMBs. The study population was divided into two groups according to the application of basiliximab. The total number of pts. who received basiliximab was 10 (3.9%). The main indications for the usage of the induction therapy were heart retransplantation, mechanical circulatory support (MCS), severe renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and a panel of reactive antibody (PRA) > 10%. In the group with induction, the mean age was 49 (±14) years; 3 (30%) patients had the MCS prior to OHT, and 3 (30%) patients had heart retransplantation. Four (40%) patients had diabetes mellitus, and 4 (40%) patients had severe renal insufficiency. As maintenance therapy during the observation period, tacrolimus was given to 10 (100%) patients, everolimus to 2 (20%) patients, and MPA to 9 (90%) patients. In the group with no induction, the mean age was 51.8 (±12) years, MCS was used in 56 (23%) patients, 2 (0.8%) patients were retransplanted; 10 (4%) patients had eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 58 (24%) patients had diabetes. Tacrolimus was administered to 243 (99%) patients, cyclosporine to 3 (1%), everolimus to 40 (16%), and mycophenolate to 245 (99.6%) heart recipients. The median one-year ACRI was 0.0, IQR:0.0-0.08 in the group with induction vs. 0.077, IQR: 0.0-0.154 with no induction; p = 0.11. ACRI up to three months was significantly higher in the entire cohort in comparison to up to one year (P < 0.01). The multivariate analysis showed that only everolimus implementation and younger age at the time of transplant influenced patients' mortality rate (P < 0.01). Significant graft rejections (≥ 2R ISHLT) are most common in the first three months after OHT. Patients who are initially at high risk of significant cellular rejection may benefit from induction therapy.

Elective and non-elective endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant patients and procedural outcomes: An IMPACT registry analysis

BACKGROUND

Endomyocardial biopsies are standard of care for transplant surveillance, however the procedural risks are not well established, especially in children. The purpose of the study was therefore to assess procedural risks and outcomes associated with elective (surveillance) biopsies and non-elective (clinically indicated) biopsies.

METHODS

We used the NCDR IMPACT registry database for this retrospective analysis. Patients undergoing an endomyocardial biopsy were identified using the procedural code, with a diagnosis of heart transplantation required. Data regarding indication, hemodynamics, adverse events and outcomes was gathered and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 32 547 endomyocardial biopsies were performed between 2012-2020; 31 298 (96.5%) elective and 1133 (3.5%) were non-elective biopsies. Non-elective biopsy was more commonly performed in infants and in those above 18 years of age, in female and in Black race patients and in those with non-private insurance (all p < .05) and showed hemodynamic derangements. Overall rate of complications was low. Combined major adverse events were more common in non-elective patients, with sicker patient profile, use of general anesthesia and femoral access with overall decline in these events over time.

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale analysis shows safety of surveillance biopsies and that non-elective biopsies carry a small but significant risk of major adverse event. Patient profile impacts the safety of the procedure. These data may serve as important comparison point for newer non-invasive tests and for bench marking, especially in children.

Predictors and clinical significance of pericardial effusions after pediatric heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of pericardial effusions within 6 months after pediatric heart transplantation (HT).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed on all pediatric HT recipients from 2004 to 2018. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with pericardial effusions post-HT, and survival was compared using log-rank test.

RESULTS

During the study period, 97 HTs were performed in 93 patients. Fifty patients (52%) had a ≥small pericardial effusion within 6 months, 16 of which were, or became, ≥moderate in size. Pericardial drain was placed in 8 patients. In univariate analysis, larger recipient body surface area (p = .01) and non-congenital heart disease (p = .002) were associated with pericardial effusion development. Donor/recipient size ratios, post-HT hemodynamics, and rejection did not correlate with pericardial effusion development. In multivariable analysis, non-congenital heart disease (adjusted odds ratio 3.3, p = .01) remained independently associated with development of pericardial effusion. There were no significant differences in post-HT survival between patients with and without ≥small (p = .68) or ≥moderate pericardial effusions (p = .40).

CONCLUSIONS

Pericardial effusions are common after pediatric HT. Patients with cardiomyopathy, or non-congenital heart disease, were at higher risk for post-HT pericardial effusions. Pericardial effusions increased morbidity but had no effect on mortality in our cohort. The risk factors identified may be used for anticipatory guidance in pediatric HT.

Diagnostic value of myocardial strain using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in acute cardiac allograft rejection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D STE) has been demonstrated to have certain diagnostic utility in heart transplantation (HTX) patients with acute cardiac allograft rejection (ACAR). The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value of common strain parameters for ACAR in HTX patients.

METHODS

After conducting a database search, we selected studies evaluating left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), circumferential strain (CS), radial strain (RS), and free wall right ventricular longitudinal strain (RV FW) in rejection group vs rejection-free group.

RESULTS

After reviewing 886 publications, seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis, representing the data of 1173 pairs of endomyocardial biopsy and echocardiographic examination. Heart transplantation patients with rejection had significantly lower GLS than rejection-free subjects (weighted mean difference -2.32 (95% CI, -3.41 to -1.23; P < .001). Heart transplantation patients with rejection had significantly lower CS than rejection-free subjects (weighted mean difference -2.49 (95% CI, -4.05 to -0.91; P = .0019). In addition, HTX patients with rejection also had significantly lower RV FW (weighted mean difference -4.90 (95% CI, -6.15 to -3.65; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis and systematic review demonstrate that myocardial strain parameters derived from 2D STE may be useful in detecting ACAR in HTX patients. The present results provide encouraging evidence to consider the routine use of GLS, CS, and RV FW as markers of graft function involvement during ACAR.